This patch changes the way we initialize and terminate the plugins in
the system initializer. It uses an approach similar to LLVM's
TARGETS_TO_BUILD with a def file that enumerates the plugins.
The previously landed patch got reverted because it was lacking:
(1) A plugin definition for the Objective-C language runtime,
(2) The dependency between the Static and WASM dynamic loader,
(3) Explicit initialization of ScriptInterpreterNone for lldb-test.
All issues have been addressed in this patch.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73067
This patch changes the way we initialize and terminate the plugins in
the system initializer. It uses an approach similar to LLVM's
TARGETS_TO_BUILD with a def file that enumerates the plugins.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73067
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
"apple-latest" which llvm uses to indicate the newest supported ISA.
Add a unit test; I'm only testing an armv8.1 instruction in this
unit test which would already be disassembled correctly because we
set the disassembler to ARM v8.2 mode, but it ensures that nothing
has been broken by adding this cpu spec.
<rdar://problem/38714781>
llvm-svn: 355578
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
tests and don't mark this as a failure. This happens when we've
linked against an llvm without the ARM target built in. Davide
added some cmake conditionals to avoid building this test when the
target was absent from llvm's build, but we're still finding some
bots that manage to get in this situation.
<rdar://problem/44270082>
llvm-svn: 342072
The warning is
comparison of integers of different signs: 'const int' and 'const unsigned long'
and triggered by
EXPECT_EQ (num_of_instructions, inst_list.GetSize());
as num_of_instructions is an int in this comparison (and the RHS is size_t).
llvm-svn: 341931
code. This will enable disassembly of the optional subset of
neon that some Cortex cores support. Add a unit test to check
that a few of these instructions disassemble as expected.
<rdar://problem/26674303>
llvm-svn: 341623
Jonas Devlieghere