c17d9b4b12 added REQUIRES lines to a lot of Arm and AArch64
test, but added them to the very beginning, before the existing
update_cc_test_checks lines. This just moves them later so as to not
mess up the existing ordering when the checks are regenerated.
This splits out the generated headers and conditonalises them upon the
target being enabled.
The motivation here is that the RISCV header alone added 10MB to the
resource directory, which was previously at 10MB, increasing the build
size and time. This header is contributing ~50% of the size of the
resource headers (~10MB).
The ARM generated headers are contributing about ~10% or 1MB.
This could be extended further adding only the static resource headers
for the targets that the LLVM build supports.
The changes to the tests for ARM mirror what the RISCV target already
did and rnk identified as a possible issue.
Testing:
cmake -G Ninja -D LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86 -D LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="clang;lld" ../clang
ninja check-clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112890
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Post-commit feedback for d69c4372bf says the output
may vary between pass managers. This is hopefully a
quick fix, but we might want to investigate how to
better solve this type of problem.
The FileCheck lines in these files are auto-generated and complete,
so there's very little upside (less CHECK lines) from running
-instcombine on them and violating the expected test layering
(optimizer developers shouldn't have to be aware of clang tests).
Running opt passes like this makes it harder to make changes such as:
D93817
Currently, in order to extract an element from a bf16 vector, we cast
the vector to an i16 vector, perform the extraction, and cast the result to
bfloat. This behavior was copied from the old fp16 implementation.
The goal of this patch is to achieve optimal code generation for lane
copying intrinsics in a subsequent patch (LLVM fails to fold certain
combinations of bitcast, insertelement, extractelement and
shufflevector instructions leading to the generation of suboptimal code).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82206
David Green