Sema::ActOnIdExpression to use the new functionality.
Among other things, this allows recovery in several cases where it
wasn't possible before (e.g. correcting a mistyped static_cast<>).
llvm-svn: 222464
of a binary expression, continue on and parse the right-hand side of
the binary expression anyway, but don't call the semantic actions to
type-check. Previously, we would see the error and then, effectively,
skip tokens until the end of the statement.
The result should be more useful recovery, both in the normal case
(we'll actually see errors beyond the first one in a statement), but
it also helps code completion do a much better job, because we do
"real" code completion on the right-hand side of an invalid binary
expression rather than completing with the recovery completion. For
example, given
x = p->y
if there is no variable named "x", we can still complete after the p->
as a member expression. Along the recovery path, we would have
completed after the "->" as if we were in an expression context, which
is mostly useless.
llvm-svn: 114225
generally recover from typos in keywords (since we would effectively
have to mangle the token stream). However, there are still benefits to
typo-correcting with keywords:
- We don't make stupid suggestions when the user typed something
that is similar to a keyword.
- We can suggest the keyword in a diagnostic (did you mean
"static_cast"?), even if we can't recover and therefore don't have
a fix-it.
llvm-svn: 101274
Richard Smith