Summary:
There are a few field init values that are concrete but not complete/foldable (e.g. `?`). This allows for using those values as initializers without erroring out.
Example:
```
class A {
string value = ?;
}
class B<A impl> : A {
let value = impl.value; // This currently emits an error.
let value = ?; // This doesn't emit an error.
}
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74360
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
These allow you to get and set the operator of a dag node, without
affecting its list of arguments.
`!getop` is slightly fiddly because in many contexts you need its
return value to have a static type more specific than 'any record'. It
works to say `!cast<BaseClass>(!getop(...))`, but it's cumbersome, so
I made `!getop` take an optional type suffix itself, so that can be
written as the shorter `!getop<BaseClass>(...)`.
Reviewers: hfinkel, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71191
This is not a new semantic feature. The syntax `(? 1, 2, 3)` was
disallowed by the parser in a dag //expression//, but there were
already ways to sneak a `?` into the operator field of a dag
//value//, e.g. by initializing it from a class template parameter
which is then set to `?` by the instantiating `def`.
This patch makes `?` in the operator slot syntactically legal, so it's
now easy to construct dags with an unset operator. Also, the semantics
of `!con` are relaxed so that it will allow a combination of set and
unset operator fields in the dag nodes it's concatenating, with the
restriction that all the operators that are //not// unset still have
to agree with each other.
Reviewers: hfinkel, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: hfinkel, nhaehnle
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71195
Using `?` as an optional marker is very useful in Clang's AST-node
emitters because otherwise we need a separate class just to encode
the presence or absence of a base node reference.
Summary:
While working with DagInit's, it's often the case that you expect the
operator to be a reference to a def. This patch adds a wrapper for this
common case to reduce the amount of boilerplate callers need to duplicate
repeatedly.
getOperatorAsDef() returns the record if the DagInit has an operator that is
a DefInit. Otherwise, it prints a fatal error.
There's only a few pre-existing examples in LLVM at the moment and I've
left a few instances of the code this simplifies as they had more specific
error messages than the generic one this produces. I'm going to be using
this a fair bit in my subsequent patches.
Reviewers: bogner, volkan, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: nhaehnle, hiraditya, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68424
llvm-svn: 374101
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
Summary:
```
``!listsplat(a, size)``
A list value that contains the value ``a`` ``size`` times.
Example: ``!listsplat(0, 2)`` results in ``[0, 0]``.
```
I plan to use this in X86ScheduleBdVer2.td for LoadRes handling.
This is a little bit controversial because unlike every other binary operator
the types aren't identical.
Reviewers: stoklund, javed.absar, nhaehnle, craig.topper
Reviewed By: javed.absar
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60367
llvm-svn: 358117
These two values correspond to the 'Empty' and 'Tombstone' special
keys defined by DenseMapInfo<int64_t>, which means that neither one
can be used as a key in DenseMap<int64_t, anything>. Hence, if you try
to use either of those values as an int literal, IntInit::get() fails
an assertion when it tries to insert them into its static cache of
int-literal objects.
Fixed by replacing the DenseMap with a std::map, which doesn't intrude
on the space of legal values of the key type.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, hfinkel, javedabsar, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: fhahn, efriedma, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59016
llvm-svn: 355900
Currently one can concatenate strings using hash(#),
but not lists, although that would be a natural thing to do.
This patch allows one to write something like:
def : A<!listconcat([1,2], [3,4])>;
simply as :
def : A<[1,2] # [3,4]>;
This was missing feature was highlighted by Nicolai
at FOSDEM talk.
Reviewed by: nhaehnle, hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58895
llvm-svn: 355414
Summary:
Add an SMLoc to CodeInit that records the source line it originated from.
This allows tablegen to point precisely at portions of code when reporting
errors within the CodeInit. For example, in the upcoming GlobalISel
combiner, it can report undefined expansions and point at the instance of
the expansion. This is achieved using something like:
SMLoc::getFromPointer(SMLoc::getPointer() +
(StringRef - CodeInit::getValue()))
The location is lost when producing a CodeInit by string concatenation so
a fallback SMLoc is required (e.g. the Record::getLoc()) but that's pretty
rare for CodeInits.
There's a reasonable case for extending tracking of a couple other Init
objects, for example StringInit's are often parsed and it would be good to
point inside the string when reporting errors about that. However, location
tracking also harms de-duplication. This is fine for CodeInit where there's
only a few hundred of them (~160 for X86) and it may be worth it for
StringInit (~86k up to ~1.9M for roughly 15MB increase for X86).
However the origin tracking would be a _terrible_ idea for IntInit, BitInit,
and UnsetInit. I haven't measured either of those three but BitInit would
most likely be on the order of increasing the current 2 BitInit values up
to billions.
Reviewers: volkan, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, paquette, aemerson
Reviewed By: paquette
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, dexonsmith, llvm-commits, kristina
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58141
llvm-svn: 355245
This is a small addition to arithmetic operations that improves
expressiveness of the language.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58775
llvm-svn: 355187
This patch extends TableGen language with !cond operator.
Instead of embedding !if inside !if which can get cumbersome,
one can now use !cond.
Below is an example to convert an integer 'x' into a string:
!cond(!lt(x,0) : "Negative",
!eq(x,0) : "Zero",
!eq(x,1) : "One,
1 : "MoreThanOne")
Reviewed By: hfinkel, simon_tatham, greened
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55758
llvm-svn: 352185
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This code:
bits<96> X = 0;
was triggering undefined behaviour since it iterates over bits 0..95 and tests
them against the IntInit using 1LL << I.
This patch resolves the undefined behaviour by continuing to treat the IntInit
as a 64-bit value and simply causing all bit tests in excess of 64-bits to report
false. As a result,
bits<96> X = -1;
will be equivalent to:
bits<96> X;
let X{0-63} = -1;
let X{64-95} = 0;
llvm-svn: 342744
Summary:
This also allows inner foreach loops to have a list that depends on
the iteration variable of an outer foreach loop. The test cases show
some very simple examples of how this can be used.
This was perhaps the last remaining major non-orthogonality in the
TableGen frontend.
Change-Id: I79b92d41a5c0e7c03cc8af4000c5e1bda5ef464d
Reviewers: tra, simon_tatham, craig.topper, MartinO, arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47431
llvm-svn: 335221
Summary:
The new rules are straightforward. The main rules to keep in mind
are:
1. NAME is an implicit template argument of class and multiclass,
and will be substituted by the name of the instantiating def/defm.
2. The name of a def/defm in a multiclass must contain a reference
to NAME. If such a reference is not present, it is automatically
prepended.
And for some additional subtleties, consider these:
3. defm with no name generates a unique name but has no special
behavior otherwise.
4. def with no name generates an anonymous record, whose name is
unique but undefined. In particular, the name won't contain a
reference to NAME.
Keeping rules 1&2 in mind should allow a predictable behavior of
name resolution that is simple to follow.
The old "rules" were rather surprising: sometimes (but not always),
NAME would correspond to the name of the toplevel defm. They were
also plain bonkers when you pushed them to their limits, as the old
version of the TableGen test case shows.
Having NAME correspond to the name of the toplevel defm introduces
"spooky action at a distance" and breaks composability:
refactoring the upper layers of a hierarchy of nested multiclass
instantiations can cause unexpected breakage by changing the value
of NAME at a lower level of the hierarchy. The new rules don't
suffer from this problem.
Some existing .td files have to be adjusted because they ended up
depending on the details of the old implementation.
Change-Id: I694095231565b30f563e6fd0417b41ee01a12589
Reviewers: tra, simon_tatham, craig.topper, MartinO, arsenm, javed.absar
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47430
llvm-svn: 333900
An input !foreach expression such as !foreach(a, lst, !add(a, 1))
would be re-emitted by llvm-tblgen -print-records with the first
argument in quotes, giving !foreach("a", lst, !add(a, 1)), which isn't
valid TableGen input syntax.
Reviewers: nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46352
llvm-svn: 331351
See r331124 for how I made a list of files missing the include.
I then ran this Python script:
for f in open('filelist.txt'):
f = f.strip()
fl = open(f).readlines()
found = False
for i in xrange(len(fl)):
p = '#include "llvm/'
if not fl[i].startswith(p):
continue
if fl[i][len(p):] > 'Config':
fl.insert(i, '#include "llvm/Config/llvm-config.h"\n')
found = True
break
if not found:
print 'not found', f
else:
open(f, 'w').write(''.join(fl))
and then looked through everything with `svn diff | diffstat -l | xargs -n 1000 gvim -p`
and tried to fix include ordering and whatnot.
No intended behavior change.
llvm-svn: 331184
Summary:
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before sorting.
This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined sorting
order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of std::sort.
Note: This patch is one of a series of patches to replace *all* std::sort to llvm::sort.
Refer the comments section in D44363 for a list of all the required patches.
Reviewers: stoklund, kparzysz, dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45144
llvm-svn: 329451
Summary:
Recursive lookups are handled by the Resolver, so the loop was purely
a waste of runtime.
Change-Id: I2bd23a68b478aea0bbac1a86ca7635adffa28688
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44624
llvm-svn: 328118
Summary:
Instantiating def's and defm's needs to perform the following steps:
- for defm's, clone multiclass def prototypes and subsitute template args
- for def's and defm's, add subclass definitions, substituting template
args
- clone the record based on foreach loops and substitute loop iteration
variables
- override record variables based on the global 'let' stack
- resolve the record name (this should be simple, but unfortunately it's
not due to existing .td files relying on rather silly implementation
details)
- for def(m)s in multiclasses, add the unresolved record as a multiclass
prototype
- for top-level def(m)s, resolve all internal variable references and add
them to the record keeper and any active defsets
This change streamlines how we go through these steps, by having both
def's and defm's feed into a single addDef() method that handles foreach,
final resolve, and routing the record to the right place.
This happens to make foreach inside of multiclasses work, as the new
test case demonstrates. Previously, foreach inside multiclasses was not
forbidden by the parser, but it was de facto broken.
Another side effect is that the order of "instantiated from" notes in error
messages is reversed, as the modified test case shows. This is arguably
clearer, since the initial error message ends up pointing directly to
whatever triggered the error, and subsequent notes will point to increasingly
outer layers of multiclasses. This is consistent with how C++ compilers
report nested #includes and nested template instantiations.
Change-Id: Ica146d0db2bc133dd7ed88054371becf24320447
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44478
llvm-svn: 328117
Summary:
Otherwise, patterns like in the test case produce cryptic error
messages about fields being resolved incompletely.
Change-Id: I713c0191f00fe140ad698675803ab1f8823dc5bd
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44476
llvm-svn: 327850
Summary:
The docs already claim that this happens, but so far it hasn't. As a
consequence, existing TableGen files get this wrong a lot, but luckily
the fixes are all reasonably straightforward.
To make this work with all the existing forms of self-references (since
the true type of a record is only built up over time), the lookup of
self-references in !cast is delayed until the final resolving step.
Change-Id: If5923a72a252ba2fbc81a889d59775df0ef31164
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44475
llvm-svn: 327849
Summary:
These are cases of self-references that exist today in practice. Let's
add tests for them to avoid regressions.
The self-references in PPCInstrInfo.td can be expressed in a simpler
way. Allowing this type of self-reference while at the same time
consistently doing late-resolve even for self-references is problematic
because there are references to fields that aren't in any class. Since
there's no need for this type of self-reference anyway, let's just
remove it.
Change-Id: I914e0b3e1ae7adae33855fac409b536879bc3f62
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: nemanjai, wdng, kbarton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44474
llvm-svn: 327848
Summary:
Make sure that we always fold immediately, so there's no point in
attempting to re-fold when nothing changes.
Change-Id: I069e1989455b6f2ca8606152f6adc1a5e817f1c8
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44198
llvm-svn: 327847
Summary:
Cast-from-string for records isn't going away, but cast-from-string for
variables is a pretty dodgy feature to have, especially when referencing
template arguments. It's doubtful that this ever worked in a reliable
way, and nobody seems to be using it, so let's get rid of it and get
some related cleanups.
Change-Id: I395ac8a43fef4cf98e611f2f552300d21e99b66a
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44195
llvm-svn: 327844
This allows constructing DAG nodes with programmatically determined
names, and can simplify constructing DAG nodes in other cases as
well.
Also, add documentation and some very simple tests for the already
existing !con.
Change-Id: Ida61cd82e99752548d7109ce8da34d29da56a5f7
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44110
llvm-svn: 327492
The changes to FieldInit are required to make field references (Def.field)
work inside a ForeachDeclaration: previously, Def.field wasn't resolved
immediately when Def was already a fully resolved DefInit.
Change-Id: I9875baec2fc5aac8c2b249e45b9cf18c65ae699b
llvm-svn: 327120
Summary:
Only instantiate anonymous records once all variable references in template
arguments have been resolved. This allows patterns like the new test case,
which in practice can appear in expressions like:
class IntrinsicTypeProfile<list<LLVMType> ty, int shift> {
list<LLVMType> types =
!listconcat(ty, [llvm_any_ty, LLVMMatchType<shift>]);
}
class FooIntrinsic<IntrinsicTypeProfile P, ...>
: Intrinsic<..., P.types, ...>;
Without this change, the anonymous LLVMMatchType instantiation would
never get resolved.
Another consequence of this change is that anonymous inline
instantiations are uniqued via the folding set of the newly introduced
VarDefInit.
Change-Id: I7a7041a20e297cf98c9109b28d85e64e176c932a
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43756
llvm-svn: 326788
Summary:
So that we will be able to generate new anonymous names more easily
outside the parser as well.
Change-Id: I28f396a7bdbc3ff0c665d466abbd3d31376e21b4
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43755
llvm-svn: 326787
Summary:
There are various places where resolving and constant folds can
get stuck, especially around casts. We don't always signal an
error for those, because in many cases they can legitimately
occur without being an error in the "untaken branch" of an !if.
Change-Id: I3befc0e4234c8e6cc61190504702918c9f29ce5c
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43754
llvm-svn: 326786
Summary:
Distinguish two relationships between types: is-a and convertible-to.
For example, a bit is not an int or vice versa, but they can be
converted into each other (with range checks that you can think of
as "dynamic": unlike other type checks, those range checks do not
happen during parsing, but only once the final values have been
established).
Actually converting initializers between types is subtle: even
when values of type A can be converted to type B (e.g. int into
string), it may not be possible to do so with a concrete initializer
(e.g., a VarInit that refers to a variable of type int cannot
be immediately converted to a string).
For this reason, distinguish between getCastTo and convertInitializerTo:
the latter implements the actual conversion when appropriate, while
the former will first try to do the actual conversion and fall back
to introducing a !cast operation so that the conversion will be
delayed until variable references have been resolved.
To make the approach of adding !cast operations to work, !cast needs
to fallback to convertInitializerTo when the special string <-> record
logic does not apply.
This enables casting records to a subclass, although that new
functionality is only truly useful together with !isa, which will be
added in a later change.
The test is removed because it uses !srl on a bit sequence,
which cannot really be supported consistently, but luckily
isn't used anywhere either.
Change-Id: I98168bf52649176654ed2ec61a29bdb29970cfe7
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43753
llvm-svn: 326785
Summary:
No functional change intended. The removed code has a loop for
recursive resolving, which is superseded by the recursive
resolving done by the Resolver implementations.
Add a test case which was broken by an earlier version of this
change.
Change-Id: Ib208d037b77a8bbb725977f1388601fc984723d8
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43655
llvm-svn: 326784
Summary:
Allow RecordRecTy to represent the type "subclass of N superclasses",
where N may be zero. Furthermore, generate RecordRecTy instances only
with actual classes in the list.
Keeping track of multiple superclasses is required to resolve the type
of a list correctly in some cases. The old code relied on the incorrect
behavior of typeIsConvertibleTo, and an earlier version of this change
relied on a modified ordering of superclasses (it was committed in
r325884 and then reverted because unfortunately some of clang-tblgen's
backends depend on the ordering).
Previously, the DefInit for each Record would have a RecordRecTy of
that Record as its type. Now, all defs with the same superclasses will
share the same type.
This allows us to be more consistent about type checks involving records:
- typeIsConvertibleTo actually requires the LHS to be a subtype of the
RHS
- resolveTypes will return the least supertype of given record types in
all cases
- different record types in the two branches of an !if are handled
correctly
Add a test that used to be accepted without flagging the obvious type
error.
Change-Id: Ib366db1a4e6a079f1a0851e469b402cddae76714
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43680
llvm-svn: 326783
Summary:
Use the new resolver interface more explicitly, and avoid traversing
all the initializers multiple times.
Add a test case for a pattern that was broken by an earlier version
of this change.
An additional change is that we now remove *all* template arguments
after resolving them.
Change-Id: I86c828c8cc84c18b052dfe0f64c0d5cbf3c4e13c
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43652
llvm-svn: 326706
Summary:
This changes the syntax of !foreach so that the first "parameter" is
a new syntactic variable: !foreach(x, lst, expr) will define the
variable x within the scope of expr, and evaluation of the !foreach
will substitute elements of the given list (or dag) for x in expr.
Aside from leading to a nicer syntax, this allows more complex
expressions where x is deeply nested, or even constant expressions
in which x does not occur at all.
!foreach is currently not actually used anywhere in trunk, but I
plan to use it in the AMDGPU backend. If out-of-tree targets are
using it, they can adjust to the new syntax very easily.
Change-Id: Ib966694d8ab6542279d6bc358b6f4d767945a805
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits, tpr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43651
llvm-svn: 326705
Summary:
The intention is to allow us to more easily restructure how resolving is
done, e.g. resolving multiple variables simultaneously, or using the
resolving mechanism to implement !foreach.
Change-Id: I4b976b54a32e240ad4f562f7eb86a4d663a20ea8
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43564
llvm-svn: 326704
It is redundant with the implementation in TypedInit.
Change-Id: I8ab1fb5c77e4923f7eb3ffae5889f0f8af6093b4
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43678
llvm-svn: 326061
Summary:
FieldInit will just rely on the standardized resolving mechanism to give
us DefInits for folding, thus simplifying the code.
Unlike the removal of resolveListElementReference, this shouldn't have
performance implications, because DefInits do not recurse inside their
record.
Change-Id: Id4544c774c9d9ee92f293615af6ecff706453f21
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43563
llvm-svn: 326060
Summary:
Resolving a VarListElementInit should just resolve the list and then
take its element. This eliminates a lot of duplicated logic and
simplifies the next steps of refactoring resolveReferences.
This does potentially cause sub-elements of the entire list to be
resolved resulting in more work, but I didn't notice a measurable
change in performance, and a later patch adds a caching mechanism that
covers at least the common case of `var[i]` in a more generic way.
Change-Id: I7b59185b855c7368585c329c31e5be38c5749dac
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43562
llvm-svn: 326059
River Riddle