Summary:
We don't use MinLatency any more since r184032.
Reviewers: atrick, hfinkel, mcrosier
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19474
llvm-svn: 267502
TableGen checks at compiletime that for scheduling models with
"CompleteModel = 1" one of the following holds:
- Is marked with the hasNoSchedulingInfo flag
- The instruction is a subclass of Sched
- There are InstRW definitions in the scheduling model
Typical steps necessary to complete a model:
- Ensure all pseudo instructions that are expanded before machine
scheduling (usually everything handled with EmitYYY() functions in
XXXTargetLowering).
- If a CPU does not support some instructions mark the corresponding
resource unsupported: "WriteRes<WriteXXX, []> { let Unsupported = 1; }".
- Add missing scheduling information.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17747
llvm-svn: 262384
isel is actually a cracked instruction on the P7/P8, and must start a dispatch
group. The scheduling model should reflect this so that we don't bunch too many
of them together when possible.
Thanks to Bill Schmidt and Pat Haugen for helping to sort this out.
llvm-svn: 227758
In preparation for adding scheduling definitions for the POWER7, split some PPC
itinerary classes so that the P7's latencies and hazards can be better
described. For the most part, this means differentiating indexed from non-index
pre-increment loads and stores. Also, differentiate single from
double-precision sqrt.
No functionality change intended (except for a more-specific latency for
single-precision sqrt on the A2).
llvm-svn: 195980
The operand latencies for loads and stores in the PPC440 itinerary were wrong
(the store operands are all inputs, and the "with update" (pre-increment)
instructions need a latency for the additional output).
llvm-svn: 195948
The operand latencies for the PPC440 should be specified relative to dispatch,
not relative to the initial fetch-and-decode stages. Because most instructions
(ignoring bypass) wait in dispatch until their operands are ready, this is
modeled as reading input operands "at dispatch" (0 cycles after issue), and so
every input and output operand has 4 cycles subtracted from it.
This could alter scheduling slightly, but I don't expect a large effect.
llvm-svn: 195947
Modeling the fetch and decode units in the PPC440 itinerary does not add
anything to the hazard detection capability (and so modeling them just wastes
compile time).
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 195946
Instead of sharing functional unit names between the various PPC itineraries,
give each core its own unit names prefixed with the core name. This follows
the convention used by other backends (such as ARM), and removes a non-obvious
ordering dependency between the various PPCSchedule*.td files.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 195908
This adds the IIC_ prefix to the instruction itinerary class names, giving the
PPC backend a naming convention for itinerary classes that is more consistent
with that used by the X86 and ARM backends.
Instruction scheduling in the PPC backend needs a bunch of cleanup and
improvement (especially for the ooo cores). This is just a preliminary step.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 195890
Slight reorganisation of PPC instruction classes for scheduling. No
functionality change for existing subtargets.
- Clearly separate load/store-with-update instructions from regular loads and stores.
- Split IntRotateD -> IntRotateD and IntRotateDI
- Split out fsub and fadd from FPGeneral -> FPAddSub
- Update existing itineraries
Patch by Tobias von Koch.
llvm-svn: 162729
Loads and stores can have different pipeline behavior, especially on
embedded chips. This change allows those differences to be expressed.
Except for the 440 scheduler, there are no functionality changes.
On the 440, the latency adjustment is only by one cycle, and so this
probably does not affect much. Nevertheless, it will make a larger
difference in the future and this removes a FIXME from the 440 itin.
llvm-svn: 153821
Junmo Park