When we simplify at least one operand in the Attributor simplification
we can use the InstSimplify to work on the simplified operands. This
allows us to avoid duplication of the logic.
Depends on D106189
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106190
We should use AAValueSimplify for all value simplification, however
there was some leftover logic that predates AAValueSimplify in
AAReturnedValues. This remove the AAReturnedValues part and provides a
replacement by making AAValueSimplifyReturned strong enough to handle
all previously covered cases. Further, this improve
AAValueSimplifyCallSiteReturned to handle returned arguments.
AAReturnedValues is now much easier and the collected returned
values/instructions are now from the associated function only, making it
much more sane. We also do not have the brittle logic anymore that looks
for unresolved calls. Instead, we use AAValueSimplify to handle
recursion.
Useful code has been split into helper functions, e.g., an Attributor
interface to get a simplified value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103860
Not all attributes are able to handle the interprocedural step and
follow the uses into a call site. Let them be able to combine call site
uses instead. This might result in some unused values/arguments being
leftover but it removes problems where we misused "is dead" even though
it was actually "is simplified/replaced".
We explicitly check for dead values due to constant propagation in
`AAIsDeadValueImpl::areAllUsesAssumedDead` instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103858
Broke check-clang, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D102307#2869065
Ran `git revert -n ebbe149a6f08535ede848a531a601ae6591cfbc5..269416d41908bb670f67af689155d5ab8eea689a`
We should use AAValueSimplify for all value simplification, however
there was some leftover logic that predates AAValueSimplify in
AAReturnedValues. This remove the AAReturnedValues part and provides a
replacement by making AAValueSimplifyReturned strong enough to handle
all previously covered cases. Further, this improve
AAValueSimplifyCallSiteReturned to handle returned arguments.
AAReturnedValues is now much easier and the collected returned
values/instructions are now from the associated function only, making it
much more sane. We also do not have the brittle logic anymore that looks
for unresolved calls. Instead, we use AAValueSimplify to handle
recursion.
Useful code has been split into helper functions, e.g., an Attributor
interface to get a simplified value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103860
Not all attributes are able to handle the interprocedural step and
follow the uses into a call site. Let them be able to combine call site
uses instead. This might result in some unused values/arguments being
leftover but it removes problems where we misused "is dead" even though
it was actually "is simplified/replaced".
We explicitly check for dead values due to constant propagation in
`AAIsDeadValueImpl::areAllUsesAssumedDead` instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103858
We often need to deal with the value lattice that contains none and
undef as special values. A simple helper makes this much nicer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103857
When we do simplification via AAPotentialValues or AAValueConstantRange
we need to simplify the operands of an instruction we deconstruct first.
This does not only improve the result, see for example range.ll, but is
required as we allow outside AAs to provide simplification rules via
callbacks. If we do ignore the simplification rules and base other
simplifications on the IR instead we can create an inconsistent state.
Summary:
The current implementation of AANoFreeFloating will incorrectly list floating
point loads and stores as may-free. This prevents other attributor instances
like HeapToStack from pushing some allocations to the stack.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103975
We have seen various problems when the call graph was not updated or
the updated did not succeed because it involved functions outside the
SCC. This patch adds assertions and checks to avoid accidentally
changing something outside the SCC that would impact the call graph.
It also prevents us from reanalyzing functions outside the current
SCC which could cause problems on its own. Note that the transformations
we do might cause the CG to be "more precise" but the original one would
always be a super set of the most precise one. Since the call graph is
by nature an approximation, it is good enough to have a super set of all
call edges.
Since D86233 we have `mustprogress` which, in combination with
`readonly`, implies `willreturn`. The idea is that every side-effect
has to be modeled as a "write". Consequently, `readonly` means there
is no side-effect, and `mustprogress` guarantees that we cannot "loop"
forever without side-effect.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94125
The update_test_checks script can now check for global symbols and is able
to handle them properly when they differ across prefixes, e.g.,
attribute #0 might be different in different runs.
This patch simply updates all the Attributor tests with the new script.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97906
We don't need a bool and an enum to express the three options we
currently have. This makes the interface nicer and much easier to
use optional dependencies. Also avoids mistakes where the bool is
false and enum ignored.
This is a follow-up of D95238's LangRef update.
This patch updates `programUndefinedIfUndefOrPoison(V)` to return true if
`V` is used by any memory-accessing instruction.
Interestingly, this affected many tests in Attributors, mainly about adding noundefs.
The tests are updated using llvm/utils/update_test_checks.py. I checked that the diffs
are about updating noundefs.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96642
With the addition of the `willreturn` attribute, functions that may
not return (e.g. due to an infinite loop) are well defined, if they are
not marked as `willreturn`.
This patch updates `wouldInstructionBeTriviallyDead` to not consider
calls that may not return as dead.
This patch still provides an escape hatch for intrinsics, which are
still assumed as willreturn unconditionally. It will be removed once
all intrinsics definitions have been reviewed and updated.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94106
If we are looking at a call site argument it might be a load or call
which is in a different context than the call site argument. We cannot
simply use the call site argument range for the call or load.
Bug reported and reduced by Whitney Tsang <whitneyt@ca.ibm.com>.
Summary:
The module slice describes which functions we can analyze and transform
while working on an SCC as part of the Attributor-CGSCC pass. So far we
simply restricted it to the SCC.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86319
Even though `noundef` IR attribute might be attached to non-void type values, AANoUndef is mistakenly identified for pointer type values only.
This patch fixes that.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86737
Currently, although we handle `CallBase` case in updateImpl, we give up in initialize in the case.
That is problematic when we propagate a range from call site returned position to floating position.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86196
All these tests already explicitly test against both legacy PM and NPM.
$ sed -i 's/ -attributor / -attributor -enable-new-pm=0 /g' $(rg --path-separator // -l -- -passes=)
$ sed -i 's/ -attributor-cgscc / -attributor-cgscc -enable-new-pm=0 /g' $(rg --path-separator // -l -- -passes=)
Now all tests in Transforms/Attributor/ pass under NPM.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84813
Summary:
All tests are updated, except wrapper.ll since it is not working nicely
with newly created functions.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, uenoku, baziotis, homerdin
Subscribers: arphaman, jfb, kuter, bbn, okura, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84130
We should never give up on AAIsDead as it guards other AAs from
unreachable code (in which SSA properties are meaningless). We did
however use required dependences on some queries in AAIsDead which
caused us to invalidate AAIsDead if the queried AA got invalidated.
We now use optional dependences instead. The bug that exposed this is
added to the liveness.ll test and other test changes show the impact.
Bug report by @sdmitriev.
In a recent patch we introduced a problem with abstract attributes that
were assumed dead at some point. Since `Attributor::updateAA` was
introduced in 95e0d28b71, we did not
remember the dependence on the liveness AA when an abstract attribute
was assumed dead and therefore not updated.
Explicit reproducer added in liveness.ll.
---
Single run of the Attributor module and then CGSCC pass (oldPM)
for SPASS/clause.c (~10k LLVM-IR loc):
Before:
```
calls to allocation functions: 509242 (345483/s)
temporary memory allocations: 98666 (66937/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 18.60MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 103.29MB
total memory leaked: 269.10KB
```
After:
```
calls to allocation functions: 529332 (355494/s)
temporary memory allocations: 102107 (68574/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 19.40MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 102.79MB
total memory leaked: 269.10KB
```
Difference:
```
calls to allocation functions: 20090 (1339333/s)
temporary memory allocations: 3441 (229400/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 801.45KB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B
```
Before we eagerly put dependences into the QueryMap as soon as we
encountered them (via `Attributor::getAAFor<>` or
`Attributor::recordDependence`). Now we will wait to see if the
dependence is useful, that is if the target is not already in a fixpoint
state at the end of the update. If so, there is no need to record the
dependence at all.
Due to the abstraction via `Attributor::updateAA` we will now also treat
the very first update (during attribute creation) as we do subsequent
updates.
Finally this resolves the problematic usage of QueriedNonFixAA.
---
Single run of the Attributor module and then CGSCC pass (oldPM)
for SPASS/clause.c (~10k LLVM-IR loc):
Before:
```
calls to allocation functions: 554675 (389245/s)
temporary memory allocations: 101574 (71280/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 28.46MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 116.26MB
total memory leaked: 269.10KB
```
After:
```
calls to allocation functions: 512465 (345559/s)
temporary memory allocations: 98832 (66643/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 22.54MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 106.58MB
total memory leaked: 269.10KB
```
Difference:
```
calls to allocation functions: -42210 (-727758/s)
temporary memory allocations: -2742 (-47275/s)
peak heap memory consumption: -5.92MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B
```
If we have a dependence between an abstract attribute A to an abstract
attribute B such hat changes in A should trigger an update of B, we do
not need to keep the dependence around once the update was triggered. If
the dependence is still required the update will reinsert it into the
dependence map, if it is not we avoid triggering B in the future. This
replaces the "recompute interval" mechanism we used before to prune
stale dependences.
Number of required iterations is generally down, compile time for the
module pass (not really the CGSCC pass) is down quite a bit.
There is one test change which looks like an artifact in the undefined
behavior AA that needs to be looked at.
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
There was a TODO in genericValueTraversal to provide the context
instruction and due to the lack of it users that wanted one just used
something available. Unfortunately, using a fixed instruction is wrong
in the presence of PHIs so we need to update the context instruction
properly.
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76870
Use DL & ABI information for better alignment deduction, e.g., if a type
is accessed and the ABI specifies an alignment requirement for such an
access we can use it. This is based on a patch by @lebedev.ri and
inspired by getBaseAlign in Loads.cpp.
Depends on D76673.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76674
Currently ConstantRange::binaryAnd/binaryOr results are too pessimistic
for single element constant ranges.
If both operands are single element ranges, we can use APInt's AND and
OR implementations directly.
Note that some other binary operations on constant ranges can cover the
single element cases naturally, but for OR and AND this unfortunately is
not the case.
Reviewers: nikic, spatel, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76446
We usually will ask for liveness of an argument anyway so we ended up
lazily creating the attribute anyway. However, that is not always the
case and even if it is we should go the eager route here. Various tests
show how this can improve the outcome. One test exposed a problem with
type mismatches between argument and call site argument, a fix is
included. For liveness various more tests were added as well.
In addition to memory behavior attributes (readonly/writeonly) we now
derive memory location attributes (argmemonly/inaccessiblememonly/...).
The former is part of AAMemoryBehavior and the latter part of
AAMemoryLocation. While they are similar in nature it got messy when
they were put in a single AA. Location attributes for arguments and
floating values will follow later.
Note that both memory attributes kinds can derive readnone. If there are
no accesses AAMemoryBehavior will derive readnone. If there are accesses
but only to stack (=local) locations AAMemoryLocation will derive
readnone.
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73426
Due to the genericValueTraversal we might visit values for which we did
not create an AAValueConstantRange object, e.g., as they are behind a
PHI or select or call with `returned` argument. As a consequence we need
to validate the types as we are about to query AAValueConstantRange for
operands.
We used coarse-grained liveness before, thus we looked if the
instruction was executed, but we did not use fine-grained liveness,
hence if the instruction was needed or could be deleted even if the
surrounding ones are live. This patches introduces this level of
liveness checks together with other liveness queries, e.g., for uses.
For more control we enforce that all liveness queries go through the
Attributor.
Test have been adjusted to reflect the changes or augmented to prevent
deletion of the parts we want to check.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73313
The changeXXXAfterManifest functions are better suited to deal with
changes so we should prefer them. These functions also recursively
delete dead instructions which is why we see test changes.
Traversing PHI nodes is natural with the genericValueTraversal but also
a bit tricky. The problem is similar to the ones we have seen in AAAlign
and AADereferenceable, namely that we continue to increase the range in
each iteration. We use a pessimistic approach here to stop the
iterations. Nevertheless, optimistic information can now be propagated
through a PHI node.
Johannes Doerfert