This adds REQUIRES: shared_cxxabi to a bunch of tests that would fail if this
weak reference in sanitizer common was undefined. This is necessary in cases
where libc++abi.a is statically linked in. Because there is no strong reference
to __cxa_demangle in compiler-rt, then if libc++abi is linked in via a static
archive, then the linker will not extract the archive member that would define
that weak symbol. This causes a handful of tests to fail because this leads to
the symbolizer printing mangled symbols where tests expect them demangled.
Technically, this feature is WAI since sanitizer runtimes shouldn't fail if
this symbol isn't resolved, and linking statically means you wouldn't need to
link in all of libc++abi. As a workaround, we can simply make it a requirement
that these tests use shared libc++abis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109639
We hit some undefined symbol errors to 128-bit floating point functions when linking this test.
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __multf3
>>> referenced by strtof128_l.o:(round_and_return) in archive /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.a
>>> referenced by strtof128_l.o:(round_and_return) in archive /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.a
>>> referenced by strtof128_l.o:(round_and_return) in archive /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.a
>>> referenced 4 more times
>>> did you mean: __muldf3
>>> defined in: /usr/local/google/home/leonardchan/llvm-monorepo/llvm-build-1-master-fuchsia-toolchain/lib/clang/14.0.0/lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.builtins.a
Host libc expects these to be defined, and compiler-rt will only define these
for certain platforms (see definition for CRT_LDBL_128BIT). Since we likely
can't do anything about the host libc, we can at least restrict the test to
check that these functions are supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109709
[ubsan] warn inside the sigaction interceptor if static linking is suspected, and continue instead of crashing on null deref
Reviewed By: kostik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109081
As discussed, these tests are compiled with optimization to mimic real
sanitizer usage [1].
Let's mark relevant functions with `noinline` so we can continue to
check against the stack traces in the report.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D96198
This reverts commit 04af72c542.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96357
This test started failing after https://reviews.llvm.org/D95849
defaulted --allow-unused-prefixes to false.
Taking a look at the test, I didn't see an obvious need to add
OS-specific check lines for each supported value of %os.
rdar://74207657
The new pass manager was enabled by default [1].
The commit message states the following relevant differences:
* The inliner works slightly differently
* -O1 does some amount of inlining
These tests are affected because they specify `-O1` and then check the
reported stack trace.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D95380
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96198
On Solaris/x86, several hundred 32-bit tests `FAIL`, all in the same way:
env ASAN_OPTIONS=halt_on_error=false ./halt_on_error_suppress_equal_pcs.cpp.tmp
Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
They segfault during startup:
Thread 2 received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1 (LWP 1)]
0x080f21f0 in __sanitizer::internal_mmap(void*, unsigned long, int, int, int, unsigned long long) () at /vol/llvm/src/llvm-project/dist/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_solaris.cpp:65
65 int prot, int flags, int fd, OFF_T offset) {
1: x/i $pc
=> 0x80f21f0 <_ZN11__sanitizer13internal_mmapEPvmiiiy+16>: movaps 0x30(%esp),%xmm0
(gdb) p/x $esp
$3 = 0xfeffd488
The problem is that `movaps` expects 16-byte alignment, while 32-bit Solaris/x86
only guarantees 4-byte alignment following the i386 psABI.
This patch updates `X86Subtarget::initSubtargetFeatures` accordingly,
handles Solaris/x86 in the corresponding testcase, and allows for some
variation in address alignment in
`compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/TypeCheck/vptr.cpp`.
Tested on `amd64-pc-solaris2.11` and `x86_64-pc-linux-gnu`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87615
As reported in Bug 42535, `clang` doesn't inline atomic ops on 32-bit
Sparc, unlike `gcc` on Solaris. In a 1-stage build with `gcc`, only two
testcases are affected (currently `XFAIL`ed), while in a 2-stage build more
than 100 tests `FAIL` due to this issue.
The reason for this `gcc`/`clang` difference is that `gcc` on 32-bit
Solaris/SPARC defaults to `-mpcu=v9` where atomic ops are supported, unlike
with `clang`'s default of `-mcpu=v8`. This patch changes `clang` to use
`-mcpu=v9` on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC, too.
Doing so uncovered two bugs:
`clang -m32 -mcpu=v9` chokes with any Solaris system headers included:
/usr/include/sys/isa_defs.h:461:2: error: "Both _ILP32 and _LP64 are defined"
#error "Both _ILP32 and _LP64 are defined"
While `clang` currently defines `__sparcv9` in a 32-bit `-mcpu=v9`
compilation, neither `gcc` nor Studio `cc` do. In fact, the Studio 12.6
`cc(1)` man page clearly states:
These predefinitions are valid in all modes:
[...]
__sparcv8 (SPARC)
__sparcv9 (SPARC -m64)
At the same time, the patch defines `__GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_[1248]`
for a 32-bit Sparc compilation with any V9 cpu. I've also changed
`MaxAtomicInlineWidth` for V9, matching what `gcc` does and the Oracle
Developer Studio 12.6: C User's Guide documents (Ch. 3, Support for Atomic
Types, 3.1 Size and Alignment of Atomic C Types).
The two testcases that had been `XFAIL`ed for Bug 42535 are un-`XFAIL`ed
again.
Tested on `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11` and `amd64-pc-solaris2.11`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86621
It's not undefined behavior for an unsigned left shift to overflow (i.e. to
shift bits out), but it has been the source of bugs and exploits in certain
codebases in the past. As we do in other parts of UBSan, this patch adds a
dynamic checker which acts beyond UBSan and checks other sources of errors. The
option is enabled as part of -fsanitize=integer.
The flag is named: -fsanitize=unsigned-shift-base
This matches shift-base and shift-exponent flags.
<rdar://problem/46129047>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86000
Two tests `FAIL` on 32-bit sparc:
Profile-sparc :: Posix/instrprof-gcov-parallel.test
UBSan-Standalone-sparc :: TestCases/Float/cast-overflow.cpp
The failure mode is similar:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
__atomic_store_4 /var/tmp/instrprof-gcov-parallel-6afe8d.o
__atomic_load_4 /var/tmp/instrprof-gcov-parallel-6afe8d.o
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
__atomic_load_1 /var/tmp/cast-overflow-72a808.o
This is a known bug: `clang` doesn't inline atomics on 32-bit sparc, unlike
`gcc`.
The patch therefore `XFAIL`s the tests.
Tested on `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11` and `amd64-pc-solaris2.11`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85346
Two ubsan tests FAIL on Sparc:
UBSan-Standalone-sparc :: TestCases/TypeCheck/misaligned.cpp
UBSan-Standalone-sparcv9 :: TestCases/TypeCheck/misaligned.cpp
I've reported the details in Bug 47015, but it boils down to the fact that
the `s1` subtest actually incurs a fault on strict-alignment targets like
Sparc which UBSan doesn't expect.
This can be fixed like the `w1` subtest by compiling with
`-fno-sanitize-recover=alignment`.
Tested on `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`, `amd64-pc-solaris2.11`, and
`x86_64-pc-linux-gnu`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85433
These UBSan tests assert the absence of runtime errors via `count 0`,
which means "expect no output". This fails the test unnecessarily in
some environments (e.g., iOS simulator in our case). Alter the test to
be a bit more specific and "expect no error" instead of "expect no
output".
rdar://65503408
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85155
Check that the implicit cast from `id` used to construct the element
variable in an ObjC for-in statement is valid.
This check is included as part of a new `objc-cast` sanitizer, outside
of the main 'undefined' group, as (IIUC) the behavior it's checking for
is not technically UB.
The check can be extended to cover other kinds of invalid casts in ObjC.
Partially addresses: rdar://12903059, rdar://9542496
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71491
A few testcases are still using deprecated options.
warning: argument '-fsanitize-coverage=[func|bb|edge]' is deprecated,
use '-fsanitize-coverage=[func|bb|edge],[trace-pc-guard|trace-pc]'
instead [-Wdeprecated]
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79741
Hope this fixes:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android/builds/27977/steps/run%20lit%20tests%20%5Bi686%2Ffugu-userdebug%2FN2G48C%5D/logs/stdio
```
: 'RUN: at line 8'; UBSAN_OPTIONS=suppressions=/var/lib/buildbot/sanitizer-buildbot6/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android/build/compiler_rt_build_android_i686/test/ubsan/Standalone-i386/TestCases/Misc/Output/nullability.c.tmp.supp /var/lib/buildbot/sanitizer-buildbot6/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android/build/compiler_rt_build_android_i686/test/ubsan/Standalone-i386/TestCases/Misc/Output/nullability.c.tmp 2>&1 | count 0
--
Exit Code: 1
Command Output (stderr):
--
Expected 0 lines, got 2.
```
Not sure what this would be printing though, a sanitizer initialization message?
This patch defines `config.apple_platform_min_deployment_target_flag`
in the ASan, LibFuzzer, TSan, and UBSan lit test configs.
rdar://problem/59463146
EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL means something else for add_lit_testsuite as it does
for something like add_executable. Distinguish between the two by
renaming the variable and making it an argument to add_lit_testsuite.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74168
Summary:
Implicit Conversion Sanitizer is *almost* feature complete.
There aren't *that* much unsanitized things left,
two major ones are increment/decrement (this patch) and bit fields.
As it was discussed in
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39519 | PR39519 ]],
unlike `CompoundAssignOperator` (which is promoted internally),
or `BinaryOperator` (for which we always have promotion/demotion in AST)
or parts of `UnaryOperator` (we have promotion/demotion but only for
certain operations), for inc/dec, clang omits promotion/demotion
altogether, under as-if rule.
This is technically correct: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/zPgD
As it can be seen in `InstCombineCasts.cpp` `canEvaluateTruncated()`,
`add`/`sub`/`mul`/`and`/`or`/`xor` operators can all arbitrarily
be extended or truncated:
901cd3b3f6/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp (L1320-L1334)
But that has serious implications:
1. Since we no longer model implicit casts, do we pessimise
their AST representation and everything that uses it?
2. There is no demotion, so lossy demotion sanitizer does not trigger :]
Now, i'm not going to argue about the first problem here,
but the second one **needs** to be addressed. As it was stated
in the report, this is done intentionally, so changing
this in all modes would be considered a penalization/regression.
Which means, the sanitization-less codegen must not be altered.
It was also suggested to not change the sanitized codegen
to the one with demotion, but i quite strongly believe
that will not be the wise choice here:
1. One will need to re-engineer the check that the inc/dec was lossy
in terms of `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins
2. We will still need to compute the result we would lossily demote.
(i.e. the result of wide `add`ition/`sub`traction)
3. I suspect it would need to be done right here, in sanitization.
Which kinda defeats the point of
using `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins:
we'd have two `add`s with basically the same arguments,
one of which is used for check+error-less codepath and other one
for the error reporting. That seems worse than a single wide op+check.
4. OR, we would need to do that in the compiler-rt handler.
Which means we'll need a whole new handler.
But then what about the `CompoundAssignOperator`,
it would also be applicable for it.
So this also doesn't really seem like the right path to me.
5. At least X86 (but likely others) pessimizes all sub-`i32` operations
(due to partial register stalls), so even if we avoid promotion+demotion,
the computations will //likely// be performed in `i32` anyways.
So i'm not really seeing much benefit of
not doing the straight-forward thing.
While looking into this, i have noticed a few more LLVM middle-end
missed canonicalizations, and filed
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44100 | PR44100 ]],
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44102 | PR44102 ]].
Those are not specific to inc/dec, we also have them for
`CompoundAssignOperator`, and it can happen for normal arithmetics, too.
But if we take some other path in the patch, it will not be applicable
here, and we will have most likely played ourselves.
TLDR: front-end should emit canonical, easy-to-optimize yet
un-optimized code. It is middle-end's job to make it optimal.
I'm really hoping reviewers agree with my personal assessment
of the path this patch should take..
This originally landed in 9872ea4ed1
but got immediately reverted in cbfa237892
because the assertion was faulty. That fault ended up being caused
by the enum - while there will be promotion, both types are unsigned,
with same width. So we still don't need to sanitize non-signed cases.
So far. Maybe the assert will tell us this isn't so.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44054 | PR44054 ]].
Refs. https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/940
Reviewers: rjmccall, erichkeane, rsmith, vsk
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, aaron.ballman, t.p.northover, efriedma, regehr
Tags: #llvm, #clang, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70539
The asssertion that was added does not hold,
breaks on test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/analyze.c
Will reduce the testcase and revisit.
This reverts commit 9872ea4ed1, 870f3542d3.
Summary:
Implicit Conversion Sanitizer is *almost* feature complete.
There aren't *that* much unsanitized things left,
two major ones are increment/decrement (this patch) and bit fields.
As it was discussed in
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39519 | PR39519 ]],
unlike `CompoundAssignOperator` (which is promoted internally),
or `BinaryOperator` (for which we always have promotion/demotion in AST)
or parts of `UnaryOperator` (we have promotion/demotion but only for
certain operations), for inc/dec, clang omits promotion/demotion
altogether, under as-if rule.
This is technically correct: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/zPgD
As it can be seen in `InstCombineCasts.cpp` `canEvaluateTruncated()`,
`add`/`sub`/`mul`/`and`/`or`/`xor` operators can all arbitrarily
be extended or truncated:
901cd3b3f6/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp (L1320-L1334)
But that has serious implications:
1. Since we no longer model implicit casts, do we pessimise
their AST representation and everything that uses it?
2. There is no demotion, so lossy demotion sanitizer does not trigger :]
Now, i'm not going to argue about the first problem here,
but the second one **needs** to be addressed. As it was stated
in the report, this is done intentionally, so changing
this in all modes would be considered a penalization/regression.
Which means, the sanitization-less codegen must not be altered.
It was also suggested to not change the sanitized codegen
to the one with demotion, but i quite strongly believe
that will not be the wise choice here:
1. One will need to re-engineer the check that the inc/dec was lossy
in terms of `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins
2. We will still need to compute the result we would lossily demote.
(i.e. the result of wide `add`ition/`sub`traction)
3. I suspect it would need to be done right here, in sanitization.
Which kinda defeats the point of
using `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins:
we'd have two `add`s with basically the same arguments,
one of which is used for check+error-less codepath and other one
for the error reporting. That seems worse than a single wide op+check.
4. OR, we would need to do that in the compiler-rt handler.
Which means we'll need a whole new handler.
But then what about the `CompoundAssignOperator`,
it would also be applicable for it.
So this also doesn't really seem like the right path to me.
5. At least X86 (but likely others) pessimizes all sub-`i32` operations
(due to partial register stalls), so even if we avoid promotion+demotion,
the computations will //likely// be performed in `i32` anyways.
So i'm not really seeing much benefit of
not doing the straight-forward thing.
While looking into this, i have noticed a few more LLVM middle-end
missed canonicalizations, and filed
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44100 | PR44100 ]],
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44102 | PR44102 ]].
Those are not specific to inc/dec, we also have them for
`CompoundAssignOperator`, and it can happen for normal arithmetics, too.
But if we take some other path in the patch, it will not be applicable
here, and we will have most likely played ourselves.
TLDR: front-end should emit canonical, easy-to-optimize yet
un-optimized code. It is middle-end's job to make it optimal.
I'm really hoping reviewers agree with my personal assessment
of the path this patch should take..
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44054 | PR44054 ]].
Reviewers: rjmccall, erichkeane, rsmith, vsk
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, aaron.ballman, t.p.northover, efriedma, regehr
Tags: #llvm, #clang, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70539
Summary:
Right now all hwasan tests on Android are silently disabled because they
require "has_lld" and standalone compiler-rt can not (and AFAIK was
never able to) set it.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: dberris, mgorny, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69405
Summary:
Quote from http://eel.is/c++draft/expr.add#4:
```
4 When an expression J that has integral type is added to or subtracted
from an expression P of pointer type, the result has the type of P.
(4.1) If P evaluates to a null pointer value and J evaluates to 0,
the result is a null pointer value.
(4.2) Otherwise, if P points to an array element i of an array object x with n
elements ([dcl.array]), the expressions P + J and J + P
(where J has the value j) point to the (possibly-hypothetical) array
element i+j of x if 0≤i+j≤n and the expression P - J points to the
(possibly-hypothetical) array element i−j of x if 0≤i−j≤n.
(4.3) Otherwise, the behavior is undefined.
```
Therefore, as per the standard, applying non-zero offset to `nullptr`
(or making non-`nullptr` a `nullptr`, by subtracting pointer's integral value
from the pointer itself) is undefined behavior. (*if* `nullptr` is not defined,
i.e. e.g. `-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks` was *not* specified.)
To make things more fun, in C (6.5.6p8), applying *any* offset to null pointer
is undefined, although Clang front-end pessimizes the code by not lowering
that info, so this UB is "harmless".
Since rL369789 (D66608 `[InstCombine] icmp eq/ne (gep inbounds P, Idx..), null -> icmp eq/ne P, null`)
LLVM middle-end uses those guarantees for transformations.
If the source contains such UB's, said code may now be miscompiled.
Such miscompilations were already observed:
* https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190826/687838.html
* https://github.com/google/filament/pull/1566
Surprisingly, UBSan does not catch those issues
... until now. This diff teaches UBSan about these UB's.
`getelementpointer inbounds` is a pretty frequent instruction,
so this does have a measurable impact on performance;
I've addressed most of the obvious missing folds (and thus decreased the performance impact by ~5%),
and then re-performed some performance measurements using my [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed ]] benchmark:
(all measurements done with LLVM ToT, the sanitizer never fired.)
* no sanitization vs. existing check: average `+21.62%` slowdown
* existing check vs. check after this patch: average `22.04%` slowdown
* no sanitization vs. this patch: average `48.42%` slowdown
Reviewers: vsk, filcab, rsmith, aaron.ballman, vitalybuka, rjmccall, #sanitizers
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, nickdesaulniers, nikic, ychen, dtzWill, xbolva00, dberris, arphaman, rupprecht, reames, regehr, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67122
llvm-svn: 374293
The main problem here is that `-*-version_min=` was not being passed to
the compiler when building test cases. This can cause problems when
testing on devices running older OSs because Clang would previously
assume the minimum deployment target is the the latest OS in the SDK
which could be much newer than what the device is running.
Previously the generated value looked like this:
`-arch arm64 -isysroot
<path_to_xcode>/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneOS.platform/Developer/SDKs/iPhoneOS12.1.sdk`
With this change it now looks like:
`-arch arm64 -stdlib=libc++ -miphoneos-version-min=8.0 -isysroot
<path_to_xcode>/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneOS.platform/Developer/SDKs/iPhoneOS12.1.sdk`
This mirrors the setting of config.target_cflags on macOS.
This change is made for ASan, LibFuzzer, TSan, and UBSan.
To implement this a new `get_test_cflags_for_apple_platform()` function
has been added that when given an Apple platform name and architecture
returns a string containing the C compiler flags to use when building
tests. This also calls a new helper function `is_valid_apple_platform()`
that validates Apple platform names.
This is the third attempt at landing the patch.
The first attempt (r359305) had to be reverted (r359327) due to a buildbot
failure. The problem was that calling `get_test_cflags_for_apple_platform()`
can trigger a CMake error if the provided architecture is not supported by the
current CMake configuration. Previously, this could be triggered by passing
`-DCOMPILER_RT_ENABLE_IOS=OFF` to CMake. The root cause is that we were
generating test configurations for a list of architectures without checking if
the relevant Sanitizer actually supported that architecture. We now intersect
the list of architectures for an Apple platform with
`<SANITIZER>_SUPPORTED_ARCH` (where `<SANITIZER>` is a Sanitizer name) to
iterate through the correct list of architectures.
The second attempt (r363633) had to be reverted (r363779) due to a build
failure. The failed build was using a modified Apple toolchain where the iOS
simulator SDK was missing. This exposed a bug in the existing UBSan test
generation code where it was assumed that `COMPILER_RT_ENABLE_IOS` implied that
the toolchain supported both iOS and the iOS simulator. This is not true. This
has been fixed by using the list `SANITIZER_COMMON_SUPPORTED_OS` for the list
of supported Apple platforms for UBSan. For consistency with the other
Sanitizers we also now intersect the list of architectures with
UBSAN_SUPPORTED_ARCH.
rdar://problem/50124489
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61242
llvm-svn: 373405
Summary:
This option is true by default in sanitizer common. The default
false value was added a while ago without any reasoning in
524e934112
so, presumably it's safe to remove for consistency.
Reviewers: hctim, samsonov, morehouse, kcc, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: hctim, samsonov, vitalybuka
Subscribers: delcypher, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, kcc
Tags: #llvm, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67193
llvm-svn: 371442
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D58620 for discussion, and for the commands
I ran. In addition I also ran
for f in $(svn diff | diffstat | grep .cc | cut -f 2 -d ' '); do rg $f . ; done
and manually updated references to renamed files found by that.
llvm-svn: 367452
i.e., recent 5745eccef54ddd3caca278d1d292a88b2281528b:
* Bump the function_type_mismatch handler version, as its signature has changed.
* The function_type_mismatch handler can return successfully now, so
SanitizerKind::Function must be AlwaysRecoverable (like for
SanitizerKind::Vptr).
* But the minimal runtime would still unconditionally treat a call to the
function_type_mismatch handler as failure, so disallow -fsanitize=function in
combination with -fsanitize-minimal-runtime (like it was already done for
-fsanitize=vptr).
* Add tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61479
llvm-svn: 366186
This patch enables compiler-rt on SPARC targets. Most of the changes are straightforward:
- Add 32 and 64-bit sparc to compiler-rt
- lib/builtins/fp_lib.h needed to check if the int128_t and uint128_t types exist (which they don't on sparc)
There's one issue of note: many asan tests fail to compile on Solaris/SPARC:
fatal error: error in backend: Function "_ZN7testing8internal16BoolFromGTestEnvEPKcb": over-aligned dynamic alloca not supported.
Therefore, while asan is still built, both asan and ubsan-with-asan testing is disabled. The
goal is to check if asan keeps compiling on Solaris/SPARC. This serves asan in gcc,
which doesn't have the problem above and works just fine.
With this patch, sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11 test results are pretty good:
Failing Tests (9):
Builtins-sparc-sunos :: divtc3_test.c
Builtins-sparcv9-sunos :: compiler_rt_logbl_test.c
Builtins-sparcv9-sunos :: divtc3_test.c
[...]
UBSan-Standalone-sparc :: TestCases/TypeCheck/misaligned.cpp
UBSan-Standalone-sparcv9 :: TestCases/TypeCheck/misaligned.cpp
The builtin failures are due to Bugs 42493 and 42496. The tree contained a few additonal
patches either currently in review or about to be submitted.
Tested on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40943
llvm-svn: 365880
Leonard Chan