Currently checks alignment and killing stores on a power of 2 boundary as this is likely
to trim the size of the earlier store without breaking large vector stores into scalar ones.
Fixes <rdar://problem/10140300>
llvm-svn: 144239
Only currently done if the later store is writing to a power of 2 address or
has the same alignment as the earlier store as then its likely to not break up
large stores into smaller ones
Fixes <rdar://problem/10140300>
llvm-svn: 143630
We've been hitting asserts in this code due to the many supported
combintions of modes (iv-rewrite/no-iv-rewrite) and IV types. This
second rewrite of the code attempts to deal with these cases systematically.
llvm-svn: 143546
element types, even though the element extraction code does. It is surprising
that this bug has been here for so long. Fixes <rdar://problem/10318778>.
llvm-svn: 142740
Some code want to check that *any* call within a function has the 'returns
twice' attribute, not just that the current function has one.
llvm-svn: 142221
I rewrote the algorithm a while back so it doesn't require map lookup,
but neglected to change the data structure. This was caught by
llvm-gcc self host, not because there's anything special about
llvm-gcc, but because it is the only test for nondeterminism we
currently have. Unit tests don't work well for everything; we should
always try to have a nondeterminism stress test running.
Fixes PR11133: llvm-gcc self host .o mismatch after enable-iv-rewrite=false
llvm-svn: 142036
Someone more familiar with LSR should double-check that the extra cast is actually doing the right thing in the overflow cases; I'm not completely confident that's that case.
llvm-svn: 141916
would have never worked, since the element type of a vector type is never a
vector type. Also fix the conditional to be more direct in checking whether
EltTy is a vector type.
llvm-svn: 141713
IVs.
Indvars previously chose randomly between congruent IVs. Now it will
bias the decision toward IVs that SCEVExpander likes to create. This
was not done to fix any problem, it's just a welcome side effect of
factoring code.
llvm-svn: 141633
switch (n) {
case 27:
do_something(x);
...
}
the call do_something(x) will be replaced with do_something(27). In
gcc-as-one-big-file this results in the removal of about 500 lines of
bitcode (about 0.02%), so has about 1/10 of the effect of propagating
branch conditions.
llvm-svn: 141360
While I'm here, fix the related issue with strncmp, add some actual tests for strcmp and strncmp, and start using StringRef::compare for constant folding instead of using strcmp/strncmp so that the optimized IR isn't dependent on the host's implementation of strcmp.
llvm-svn: 141227
branch "br i1 %x, label %if_true, label %if_false" then it replaces
"%x" with "true" in places only reachable via the %if_true arm, and
with "false" in places only reachable via the %if_false arm. Except
that actually it doesn't: if value numbering shows that %y is equal
to %x then, yes, %y will be turned into true/false in this way, but
any occurrences of %x itself are not transformed. Fix this. What's
more, it's often the case that %x is an equality comparison such as
"%x = icmp eq %A, 0", in which case every occurrence of %A that is
only reachable via the %if_true arm can be replaced with 0. Implement
this and a few other variations on this theme. This reduces the number
of lines of LLVM IR in "GCC as one big file" by 0.2%. It has a bigger
impact on Ada code, typically reducing the number of lines of bitcode
by around 0.4% by removing repeated compiler generated checks. Passes
the LLVM nightly testsuite and the Ada ACATS testsuite.
llvm-svn: 141177
it's OK for the false/true destination to have multiple
predecessors as long as the extra ones are dominated by
the branch destination.
llvm-svn: 141176
This handles the case in which LSR rewrites an IV user that is a phi and
splits critical edges originating from a switch.
Fixes <rdar://problem/6453893> LSR is not splitting edges "nicely"
llvm-svn: 141059
We want heuristics to be based on accurate data, but more importantly
we don't want llvm to behave randomly. A benign trunc inserted by an
upstream pass should not cause a wild swings in optimization
level. See PR11034. It's a general problem with threshold-based
heuristics, but we can make it less bad.
llvm-svn: 140919
Rewriting the entire loop nest now requires -enable-lsr-nested.
See PR11035 for some performance data.
A few unit tests specifically test nested LSR, and are now under a flag.
llvm-svn: 140762
The minor bug heuristic was noticed by inspection. I added the
isLoser/isValid helpers because they will become more
important with subsequent checkins.
llvm-svn: 140580
No tests; these changes aren't really interesting in the sense that the logic is the same for volatile and atomic.
I believe this completes all of the changes necessary for the optimizer to handle loads and stores correctly. I'm going to try and come up with some additional testing, though.
llvm-svn: 139533
better.
Don't immediately give up when an add operation can't be trivially
sign/zero-extended within a loop. If it has NSW/NUW flags, generate a
new expression with sign extended (non-recurrent) operand. As before,
if SCEV says that all sign extends are loop invariant, then we can
widen the operation.
llvm-svn: 139453
This changes loop unrolling to use the same mechanism for trip count
computation as indvars. This is a stronger check that tends to unroll
more loops. A very common side-effect is that many single iteration
loops will be removed sooner. The real goal was simply to remove
dependence on canonical IVs.
x86 is break even.
ARM performance changes to expect (+ is good):
External/SPEC/CFP2000/183.equake/183.equake +13%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/fldry +21%
MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff +3%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Puzzle -14%
The Puzzle regression is actually an improvement in loop optimization
that defeats GVN: rdar://problem/10065079.
llvm-svn: 139009
The landingpad instruction is required in the landing pad block. Because we're
not deleting terminating instructions, the invoke may still jump to here (see
Transforms/SCCP/2004-11-16-DeadInvoke.ll). Remove all uses of the landingpad
instruction, but keep it around until code-gen can remove the basic block.
llvm-svn: 138890
PRE needs the landing pads to have their critical edges split. Doing this for a
landing pad is non-trivial. Abandon the attempt to perform PRE when we come
across a landing pad. (Reviewed by Owen!)
llvm-svn: 137876
making random bad assumptions about instructions which are not explicitly listed.
Includes fix for rdar://9956541, a version of "undef ^ undef should return
0 because it's easier than arguing with users".
llvm-svn: 137777
Pete Cooper