only from a function definition (that does not have a prototype) are
only used to determine the compatible with other declarations of that
same function. In particular, when referencing the function we pretend
as if it does not have a prototype. Implement this behavior, which
fixes PR3626.
llvm-svn: 65460
external declarations to also support external variable
declarations. Unified the code for these two cases into two new
subroutines.
Note that we fail to diagnose cases like the one Neil pointed
out, where a visible non-external declaration hides an external
declaration by the same name. That will require some reshuffling of
name lookup.
llvm-svn: 65385
that declaration to global scope so that it can be found from other
scopes. This allows us to diagnose redeclaration errors for external
declarations across scopes. We also warn when name lookup finds such
an out-of-scope declaration. This is part of <rdar://problem/6127293>;
we'll also need to do the same thing for variables.
llvm-svn: 65373
- When we are declaring a function in local scope, we can merge with
a visible declaration from an outer scope if that declaration
refers to an entity with linkage. This behavior now works in C++
and properly ignores entities without linkage.
- Diagnose the use of "static" on a function declaration in local
scope.
- Diagnose the declaration of a static function after a non-static
declaration of the same function.
- Propagate the storage specifier to a function declaration from a
prior declaration (PR3425)
- Don't name-mangle "main"
llvm-svn: 65360
assertion when the ivars and method list was reset into the existing
interface. To fix this, mark decls as invalid when they are redefined,
and don't insert ivars/methods into invalid decls.
llvm-svn: 65340
helper isConstantInitializer) to check whether an initializer is
constant. This passes tests, but it's possible that it'll cause
regressions with real-world code.
Future work:
1. The diagnostics obtained this way are lower quality at the moment;
some work both here and in Evaluate is needed for accurate diagnostics.
2. We probably need some extra code when we're in -pedantic mode so we
can strictly enforce the rules in C99 6.6p7.
3. Dead code cleanup (this should wait until after 2, because we might
want to re-use some of the code).
llvm-svn: 65265
required to actually be an error for correctness. The attached testcase
now gives an error instead of mysteriously crashing.
Now, it's possible we actually want to support the given usage, but I
haven't looked at the relevant code closely.
llvm-svn: 65253
This prevents emitting diagnostics which are almost certainly useless.
(Note that the test is checking that we emit only one diagnostic.)
llvm-svn: 65101
information about types. We often print diagnostics where we say
"foo_t" is bad, but the user doesn't know how foo_t is declared
(because it is a typedef). Fix this by expanding sugar when present
in a diagnostic (and not one of a few special cases, like vectors).
Before:
t.m:5:2: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('typeof(P)' and 'typeof(F)')
MAX(P, F);
^~~~~~~~~
t.m:1:78: note: instantiated from:
#define MAX(A,B) ({ __typeof__(A) __a = (A); __typeof__(B) __b = (B); __a < __b ? __b : __a; })
^
After:
t.m:5:2: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('typeof(P)' (aka 'struct mystruct') and 'typeof(F)' (aka 'float'))
MAX(P, F);
^~~~~~~~~
t.m:1:78: note: instantiated from:
#define MAX(A,B) ({ __typeof__(A) __a = (A); __typeof__(B) __b = (B); __a < __b ? __b : __a; })
^
llvm-svn: 65081
(as GCC does), except when we've performed overload resolution and
found an unavailable function: in this case, we actually error.
Merge the checking of unavailable functions with the checking for
deprecated functions. This unifies a bit of code, and makes sure that
we're checking for unavailable functions in the right places. Also,
this check can cause an error. We may, eventually, want an option to
make "unavailable" warnings into errors.
Implement much of the logic needed for C++0x deleted functions, which
are effectively the same as "unavailable" functions (but always cause
an error when referenced). However, we don't have the syntax to
specify deleted functions yet :)
llvm-svn: 64955
and escaped newlines don't throw off the offset computation.
On this testcase:
printf("abc\
def"
"%*d", (unsigned) 1, 1);
Before:
t.m:5:5: warning: field width should have type 'int', but argument has type 'unsigned int'
def"
^
after:
t.m:6:12: warning: field width should have type 'int', but argument has type 'unsigned int'
"%*d", (unsigned) 1, 1);
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
llvm-svn: 64930
any named parameters, e.g., this is accepted in C:
void f(...) __attribute__((overloadable));
although this would be rejected:
void f(...);
To do this, moved the checking of the "ellipsis without any named
arguments" condition from the parser into Sema (where it belongs anyway).
llvm-svn: 64902
to do in this area, since there are other places that reference
FunctionDecls.
Don't allow "overloadable" functions (in C) to be declared without a
prototype.
llvm-svn: 64897
functions, so if we're declaring a static we should implicitly declare
a library function by the same name (e.g., malloc, strdup). Fixes PR3592.
llvm-svn: 64736
- If a declaration is an invalid redeclaration of an existing name,
complain about the invalid redeclaration then avoid adding it to
the AST (we can still parse the definition or initializer, if any).
- If the declaration is invalid but there is no prior declaration
with that name, introduce the invalid declaration into the AST
(for later error recovery).
- If the declaration is an invalid redeclaration of a builtin that
starts with __builtin_, we produce an error and drop the
redeclaration. If it is an invalid redeclaration of a library
builtin (e.g., malloc, printf), warn (don't error!) and drop the
redeclaration.
If a user attempts to define a builtin, produce an error and (if it's
a library builtin like malloc) suggest -ffreestanding.
This addresses <rdar://problem/6097585> and PR2892. However, PR3588 is
still going to cause some problems when builtins are redeclared
without a prototype.
llvm-svn: 64639
Douglas Gregor