Commit Graph

836 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
John McCall 8ccfcb51ee Refactor the representation of qualifiers to bring ExtQualType out of the
Type hierarchy.  Demote 'volatile' to extended-qualifier status.  Audit our
use of qualifiers and fix a few places that weren't dealing with qualifiers
quite right;  many more remain.

llvm-svn: 82705
2009-09-24 19:53:00 +00:00
Mike Stump 11289f4280 Remove tabs, and whitespace cleanups.
llvm-svn: 81346
2009-09-09 15:08:12 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 308047d3a5 Initial stab at implement dependent member references to member
templates, e.g.,
  
  x.template get<T>

We can now parse these, represent them within an UnresolvedMemberExpr
expression, then instantiate that expression node in simple cases.

This allows us to stumble through parsing LLVM's Casting.h.

llvm-svn: 81300
2009-09-09 00:23:06 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 5995a3e8fa BuildCXXConstructExpr now takes a MultiExprArg.
llvm-svn: 81160
2009-09-07 22:23:31 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 1b4ebfab2b Pass the ConstructLoc to BuildCXXConstructExpr.
llvm-svn: 81068
2009-09-05 07:40:38 +00:00
John McCall fcc33b074b Basic support for representing elaborated type specifiers
directly in the AST.  The current thinking is to create these
only in C++ mode for efficiency.  But for now, they're not being
created at all; patch to follow.

This will let us do things like verify that tags match during
template instantation, as well as signal that an elaborated type
specifier was used for clients that actually care.

Optimally, the TypeLoc hierarchy should be adjusted to carry tag
location information as well.

llvm-svn: 81057
2009-09-05 00:15:47 +00:00
Douglas Gregor ad8a336b40 Implement AST, semantics, and CodeGen for C++ pseudo-destructor
expressions, e.g.,

  p->~T()

when p is a pointer to a scalar type. 

We don't currently diagnose errors when pseudo-destructor expressions
are used in any way other than by forming a call.

llvm-svn: 81009
2009-09-04 17:36:40 +00:00
Douglas Gregor f816bd70ce Implement tree transformations for DeclarationNames. Among other
things, this means that we can properly cope with member access
expressions such as 

  t->operator T()

where T is a template parameter (or other dependent type).

llvm-svn: 80957
2009-09-03 22:13:48 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 2b6ca46c6b Improve template instantiation for member access expressions that
involve qualified names, e.g., x->Base::f. We now maintain enough
information in the AST to compare the results of the name lookup of
"Base" in the scope of the postfix-expression (determined at template
definition time) and in the type of the object expression.

llvm-svn: 80953
2009-09-03 21:38:09 +00:00
Douglas Gregor c26e0f626b Improved handling for dependent, qualified member access expressions, e.g.,
t->Base::f

where t has a dependent type. We save the nested-name-specifier in the
CXXUnresolvedMemberExpr then, during instantiation, substitute into
the nested-name-specifier with the (transformed) object type of t, so
that we get name lookup into the type of the object expression.

Note that we do not yet retain information about name lookup into the
lexical scope of the member access expression, so several regression
tests are still disabled.

llvm-svn: 80925
2009-09-03 16:14:30 +00:00
Douglas Gregor b7bfe79412 Rewrite of our handling of name lookup in C++ member access expressions, e.g.,
x->Base::f

We no longer try to "enter" the context of the type that "x" points
to. Instead, we drag that object type through the parser and pass it
into the Sema routines that need to know how to perform lookup within
member access expressions.

We now implement most of the crazy name lookup rules in C++
[basic.lookup.classref] for non-templated code, including performing
lookup both in the context of the type referred to by the member
access and in the scope of the member access itself and then detecting
ambiguities when the two lookups collide (p1 and p4; p3 and p7 are
still TODO). This change also corrects our handling of name lookup
within template arguments of template-ids inside the
nested-name-specifier (p6; we used to look into the scope of the
object expression for them) and fixes PR4703.

I have disabled some tests that involve member access expressions
where the object expression has dependent type, because we don't yet
have the ability to describe dependent nested-name-specifiers starting
with an identifier.

llvm-svn: 80843
2009-09-02 22:59:36 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 32e2c8472e Fix a crasher involving template instantiation of non-dependent
expressions making use of an overloaded operator. Thanks for the test
case, Anders!

llvm-svn: 80679
2009-09-01 16:58:52 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 5da848427a Don't assert when instantiating member references to fields in anonymous structs.
llvm-svn: 80657
2009-09-01 04:26:58 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 84f14dd674 Preliminary AST representation and semantic analysis for
explicitly-specified template argument lists in member reference
expressions, e.g.,

  x->f<int>()

llvm-svn: 80646
2009-09-01 00:37:14 +00:00
Douglas Gregor f405d7e6f1 Eliminate CXXAdornedMemberExpr entirely. Instead, optionally allocate
space within the MemberExpr for the nested-name-specifier and its
source range. We'll do the same thing with explicitly-specified
template arguments, assuming I don't flip-flop again.

llvm-svn: 80642
2009-08-31 23:41:50 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 96ee789d33 Rename CXXQualifiedMemberExpr -> CXXAdornedMemberExpr, since we will
also be adding explicit template arguments as an additional
"adornment". No functionality change.

llvm-svn: 80628
2009-08-31 21:41:48 +00:00
Douglas Gregor f14b46f9a8 Implement template instantiation for member operator access.
llvm-svn: 80609
2009-08-31 20:00:26 +00:00
Douglas Gregor c190523d7a When a member reference expression includes a qualifier on the member
name, e.g.,
  
  x->Base::f()

retain the qualifier (and its source range information) in a new
subclass of MemberExpr called CXXQualifiedMemberExpr. Provide
construction, transformation, profiling, printing, etc., for this new
expression type.

When a virtual function is called via a qualified name, don't emit a
virtual call. Instead, call that function directly. Mike, could you
add a CodeGen test for this, too?

llvm-svn: 80167
2009-08-26 22:36:53 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 7e112b0d79 Source location information for ? and : in a ConditionalOperator, from Enea Zaffanella
llvm-svn: 80097
2009-08-26 14:37:04 +00:00
Douglas Gregor e861bac059 Improve support for out-of-line definitions of nested templates and
their members, including member class template, member function
templates, and member classes and functions of member templates.

To actually parse the nested-name-specifiers that qualify the name of
an out-of-line definition of a member template, e.g.,

  template<typename X> template<typename Y>
  X Outer<X>::Inner1<Y>::foo(Y) {
    return X();
  }

we need to look for the template names (e.g., "Inner1") as a member of
the current instantiation (Outer<X>), even before we have entered the
scope of the current instantiation. Since we can't do this in general
(i.e., we should not be looking into all dependent
nested-name-specifiers as if they were the current instantiation), we
rely on the parser to tell us when it is parsing a declaration
specifier sequence, and, therefore, when we should consider the
current scope specifier to be a current instantiation.

Printing of complicated, dependent nested-name-specifiers may be
somewhat broken by this commit; I'll add tests for this issue and fix
the problem (if it still exists) in a subsequent commit.

llvm-svn: 80044
2009-08-25 22:51:20 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 6eb55575da BuildCXXConstructExpr now returns an OwningExprResult.
llvm-svn: 79975
2009-08-25 05:12:04 +00:00
Chris Lattner dca19591f2 fix a GCC type punning warning.
llvm-svn: 79895
2009-08-24 05:19:01 +00:00
Fariborz Jahanian 9a84665921 Using "ObjCImplicitSetterGetterRefExpr" instead of "ObjCImplctSetterGetterRefExpr".
A field rename and more comments.

llvm-svn: 79537
2009-08-20 17:02:02 +00:00
Douglas Gregor ebe1010b0f Refactor the instantiation of statements into a generic tree
transformation.

llvm-svn: 79519
2009-08-20 07:17:43 +00:00
Argyrios Kyrtzidis e918926d31 Introduce LocInfoType which is a Sema-specific implementation detail.
This is a Type subclass that can hold a DeclaratorInfo* when we have type source info coming
out of a declarator that we want to preserve. This is used only at the "border" of Parser/Sema for
passing/getting QualTypes, it does not participate in the type system semantics in any way.

llvm-svn: 79394
2009-08-19 01:28:17 +00:00
Fariborz Jahanian 88cc2340de Renamed ObjCKVCRefExpr to ObjCImplctSetterGetterRefExpr.
Removed an unnecessary loop to get to setters incoming
argument. Added DoxyGen comments. Still more work
to do in this area (WIP).

llvm-svn: 79365
2009-08-18 20:50:23 +00:00
Anders Carlsson f86a8d1030 BuildCXXConstructExpr doesn't need to take an ASTContext.
llvm-svn: 79149
2009-08-15 23:41:35 +00:00
Anders Carlsson e827123f08 Make the CXXDefaultArgExpr constructor protected and add a static Create function.
llvm-svn: 79013
2009-08-14 18:30:22 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 2168a9f25f Fix DISABLE_SMART_POINTERS build
llvm-svn: 78674
2009-08-11 15:56:57 +00:00
Douglas Gregor a16548e301 Refactor the template-instantiation logic for expressions into a
generic tree transformation (also used for recanonicalization) and a
small amount of template-instantiation-specific logic.

llvm-svn: 78645
2009-08-11 05:31:07 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 766b0bbe61 Minor refactoring to introduce a new transformation function,
TransformStmt, into the tree transformer.

llvm-svn: 78347
2009-08-06 22:17:10 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 15acfb9f50 When we encounter a dependent type that was parsed before we know that
we were going to enter into the scope of a class template or class
template partial specialization, rebuild that type so that it can
refer to members of the current instantiation, as in code like

  template<typename T>
  struct X {
    typedef T* pointer;
    pointer data();
  };

  template<typename T>
  typename X<T>::pointer X<T>::data() { ... }

Without rebuilding the return type of this out-of-line definition, the
canonical return type of the out-of-line definition (a TypenameType)
will not match the canonical return type of the declaration (the
canonical type of T*).

llvm-svn: 78316
2009-08-06 16:20:37 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 71dc50915a Implement transformation of template names within the generic tree
transform, then use the result for template instantiation. The generic
transformation fixes a few issues:

  - It copes better with template template parameters and member
  templates (when they're implemented). 
  - The logic used to replace template template parameters with their
  arguments is now centralized in TransformDecl, so that it will apply
  for other declaration-instantiation steps.
  - The error-recovery strategy is normalized now, so that any error
  results in a NULL TemplateName.

llvm-svn: 78292
2009-08-06 06:41:21 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 1135c35c7c Implement transformation of nested-name-specifiers within the general
tree transformation. Template instantiation uses this general
transformation rather than implementing its own transformation.

llvm-svn: 78286
2009-08-06 05:28:30 +00:00
Douglas Gregor e922c77ddd Move the template instantiation logic for template arguments into the
general tree transformation. Also, implement template instantiation
for parameter packs.

In addition, introduce logic to enter the appropriate context for
subexpressions that are not potentially evaluated.

llvm-svn: 78114
2009-08-04 22:27:00 +00:00
Douglas Gregor d6ff33294a Refactor template instantiation for types into a generic tree
transformation template (TreeTransform) that handles the
transformation and reconstruction of AST nodes. Template instantiation
for types is a (relatively small) customization of the generic tree
transformation.

llvm-svn: 78071
2009-08-04 16:50:30 +00:00