Commit Graph

836 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Richard Smith c5452ed941 Add optimization to sizeof...(X) handling: if none of parameter pack X's
corresponding arguments are unexpanded pack expansions, we can compute the
result without substituting them. This significantly improves the memory usage
and performance of make_integer_sequence implementations that do this kind of
thing:

  using result = integer_sequence<T, Ns ..., sizeof...(Ns) + Ns ...>;

... but note that such an implementation will still perform O(sizeof...(Ns)^2)
work while building the second pack expansion (we just have a somewhat lower
constant now).

In principle we could get this down to linear time by caching whether the
number of expansions of a pack is constant, or checking whether we're within an
alias template before scanning the pack for pack expansions (since that's the
only case in which we do substitutions within a dependent context at the
moment), but this patch doesn't attempt that.

llvm-svn: 284653
2016-10-19 22:18:42 +00:00
Reid Kleckner f33bfcb0e0 Factor out a diagnostic kind enum for use in two %select expressions
NFC

llvm-svn: 283131
2016-10-03 18:34:23 +00:00
Manman Ren e6be26c8d4 ObjectiveC generics: Add ObjCTypeParamType in the type system.
We also need to add ObjCTypeParamTypeLoc. ObjCTypeParamType supports the
representation of "T <protocol>" where T is a type parameter. Before this,
we use TypedefType to represent the type parameter for ObjC.

ObjCTypeParamType has "ObjCTypeParamDecl *OTPDecl" and it extends from
ObjCProtocolQualifiers. It is a non-canonical type and is canonicalized
to the underlying type with the protocol qualifiers.

rdar://24619481
rdar://25060179

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23079

llvm-svn: 281355
2016-09-13 17:25:08 +00:00
Bruno Cardoso Lopes 25f02cfc52 [SemaObjC] Do not RebuildObjCMessageExpr without valid method decl
Fix crash-on-invalid in ObjC Sema by avoiding to rebuild a message
expression to a 'super' class in case the method to call does not exist
(i.e. comes from another missing identifier).

In this case, the typo transform is invoked upon the message expression
in an attempt to solve a typo in a 'super' call parameters, but it
crashes since it assumes the method to call has a valid declaration.

rdar://problem/27305403

llvm-svn: 279481
2016-08-22 21:50:22 +00:00
Diana Picus 8b44bbc077 Revert "[OpenMP] Sema and parsing for 'teams distribute simd’ pragma"
This reverts commit r279003 as it breaks some of our buildbots (e.g.
clang-cmake-aarch64-quick, clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules).

The error is in OpenMP/teams_distribute_simd_ast_print.cpp:
clang: /home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-aarch64-quick/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h:527:
bool llvm::DenseMapBase<DerivedT, KeyT, ValueT, KeyInfoT, BucketT>::LookupBucketFor(const LookupKeyT&, const BucketT*&) const
[with LookupKeyT = clang::Stmt*; DerivedT = llvm::DenseMap<clang::Stmt*, long unsigned int>;
      KeyT = clang::Stmt*; ValueT = long unsigned int;
      KeyInfoT = llvm::DenseMapInfo<clang::Stmt*>;
      BucketT = llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<clang::Stmt*, long unsigned int>]:
Assertion `!KeyInfoT::isEqual(Val, EmptyKey) && !KeyInfoT::isEqual(Val, TombstoneKey) &&
"Empty/Tombstone value shouldn't be inserted into map!"' failed.

llvm-svn: 279045
2016-08-18 09:25:07 +00:00
Kelvin Li 0e3bde8216 [OpenMP] Sema and parsing for 'teams distribute simd’ pragma
This patch is to implement sema and parsing for 'teams distribute simd’ pragma.

This patch is originated by Carlo Bertolli.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23528

llvm-svn: 279003
2016-08-17 23:13:03 +00:00
Serge Pavlov d931b9f200 Pass information in a record instead of stack. NFC
Functions of Sema that work with building of nested name specifiers have too
many parameters (BuildCXXNestedNameSpecifier already expects 10 arguments).
With this change the information about identifier and its context is packed
into a structure, which is then passes to the semantic functions.

llvm-svn: 277976
2016-08-08 04:02:15 +00:00
Kelvin Li 0253287633 [OpenMP] Sema and parsing for 'teams distribute' pragma
This patch is to implement sema and parsing for 'teams distribute' pragma.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23189

llvm-svn: 277818
2016-08-05 14:37:37 +00:00
Kelvin Li 986330c190 [OpenMP] Sema and parsing for 'target simd' pragma
This patch is to implement sema and parsing for 'target simd' pragma.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22479

llvm-svn: 276203
2016-07-20 22:57:10 +00:00
Erik Pilkington 29099ded0c [ObjC] Implement @available in the Parser and AST
This patch adds a new AST node: ObjCAvailabilityCheckExpr, and teaches the
Parser and Sema to generate it. This node represents an availability check of
the form:

  @available(macos 10.10, *);

Which will eventually compile to a runtime check of the host's OS version. This
is the first patch of the feature I proposed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2016-July/049851.html

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22171

llvm-svn: 275654
2016-07-16 00:35:23 +00:00
Kelvin Li a579b9196c [OpenMP] Sema and parsing for 'target parallel for simd' pragma
This patch is to implement sema and parsing for 'target parallel for simd' pragma.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22096

llvm-svn: 275365
2016-07-14 02:54:56 +00:00
Richard Smith a547eb27fa P0305R0: Semantic analysis and code generation for C++17 init-statement for 'if' and 'switch':
if (stmt; condition) { ... }

Patch by Anton Bikineev! Some minor formatting and comment tweets by me.

llvm-svn: 275350
2016-07-14 00:11:03 +00:00
Carlo Bertolli 70594e9282 [OpenMP] Initial implementation of parse+sema for OpenMP clause 'is_device_ptr' of target
http://reviews.llvm.org/D22070

llvm-svn: 275282
2016-07-13 17:16:49 +00:00
Carlo Bertolli 2404b17192 [OpenMP] Initial implementation of parse+sema for clause use_device_ptr of 'target data'
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21904

This patch is similar to the implementation of 'private' clause: it adds a list of private pointers to be used within the target data region to store the device pointers returned by the runtime.
Please refer to the following document for a full description of what the runtime witll return in this case (page 10 and 11):
https://github.com/clang-omp/OffloadingDesign

I am happy to answer any question related to the runtime interface to help reviewing this patch.

llvm-svn: 275271
2016-07-13 15:37:16 +00:00
Kelvin Li 787f3fcc6b [OpenMP] Sema and parsing for 'distribute simd' pragma
Summary: This patch is an implementation of sema and parsing for the OpenMP composite pragma 'distribute simd'.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22007

llvm-svn: 274604
2016-07-06 04:45:38 +00:00
Erik Pilkington f1bd000f71 [Sema] Fix a bug where pack expansion was not expanded in type alias
The problem is that the parameter pack in a function type type alias is not
reexpanded after being transformed. Also remove an incorrect comment in a
similar function. Fixes PR26017.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21030

llvm-svn: 274566
2016-07-05 17:57:24 +00:00
Kelvin Li 4a39add05e [OpenMP] Sema and parse for 'distribute parallel for simd'
Summary: This patch is an implementation of sema and parsing for the OpenMP composite pragma 'distribute parallel for simd'.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21977

llvm-svn: 274530
2016-07-05 05:00:15 +00:00
Richard Smith c7a05a9f4d P0305R1: Parsing support for init-statements in 'if' and 'switch' statements.
No semantic analysis yet.

This is a pain to disambiguate correctly, because the parsing rules for the
declaration form of a condition and of an init-statement are quite different --
for a token sequence that looks like a declaration, we frequently need to
disambiguate all the way to the ')' or ';'.

We could do better here in some cases by stopping disambiguation once we've
decided whether we've got an expression or not (rather than keeping going until
we know whether it's an init-statement declaration or a condition declaration),
by unifying our parsing code for the two types of declaration and moving the
syntactic checks into Sema; if this has a measurable impact on parsing
performance, I'll look into that.

llvm-svn: 274169
2016-06-29 21:17:59 +00:00
Richard Smith 5179eb7821 P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991:
Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into
C++ last year as a DR against C++11.

Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited
base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to
constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for
using-declarations.

For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived
class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow
constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the
actual initialization, and have a new expression node,
CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such
a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect
forwarding of arguments.)

In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls,
variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting
constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code
into the caller of the inherited constructor.

Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some
corner cases. In particular:
 * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to
   construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B
   befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and
 * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default
   constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from
   a base class

llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-28 19:03:57 +00:00
Carlo Bertolli 9925f15661 Resubmission of http://reviews.llvm.org/D21564 after fixes.
[OpenMP] Initial implementation of parse and sema for composite pragma 'distribute parallel for'

This patch is an initial implementation for #distribute parallel for.
The main differences that affect other pragmas are:

The implementation of 'distribute parallel for' requires blocking of the associated loop, where blocks are "distributed" to different teams and iterations within each block are scheduled to parallel threads within each team. To implement blocking, sema creates two additional worksharing directive fields that are used to pass the team assigned block lower and upper bounds through the outlined function resulting from 'parallel'. In this way, scheduling for 'for' to threads can use those bounds.
As a consequence of blocking, the stride of 'distribute' is not 1 but it is equal to the blocking size. This is returned by the runtime and sema prepares a DistIncrExpr variable to hold that value.
As a consequence of blocking, the global upper bound (EnsureUpperBound) expression of the 'for' is not the original loop upper bound (e.g. in for(i = 0 ; i < N; i++) this is 'N') but it is the team-assigned block upper bound. Sema creates a new expression holding the calculation of the actual upper bound for 'for' as UB = min(UB, PrevUB), where UB is the loop upper bound, and PrevUB is the team-assigned block upper bound.

llvm-svn: 273884
2016-06-27 14:55:37 +00:00
Carlo Bertolli b8503d5399 Revert r273705
[OpenMP] Initial implementation of parse and sema for composite pragma 'distribute parallel for'

llvm-svn: 273709
2016-06-24 19:20:02 +00:00
Carlo Bertolli e77d6e0e4d [OpenMP] Initial implementation of parse and sema for composite pragma 'distribute parallel for'
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21564

This patch is an initial implementation for #distribute parallel for.
The main differences that affect other pragmas are:

The implementation of 'distribute parallel for' requires blocking of the associated loop, where blocks are "distributed" to different teams and iterations within each block are scheduled to parallel threads within each team. To implement blocking, sema creates two additional worksharing directive fields that are used to pass the team assigned block lower and upper bounds through the outlined function resulting from 'parallel'. In this way, scheduling for 'for' to threads can use those bounds.
As a consequence of blocking, the stride of 'distribute' is not 1 but it is equal to the blocking size. This is returned by the runtime and sema prepares a DistIncrExpr variable to hold that value.
As a consequence of blocking, the global upper bound (EnsureUpperBound) expression of the 'for' is not the original loop upper bound (e.g. in for(i = 0 ; i < N; i++) this is 'N') but it is the team-assigned block upper bound. Sema creates a new expression holding the calculation of the actual upper bound for 'for' as UB = min(UB, PrevUB), where UB is the loop upper bound, and PrevUB is the team-assigned block upper bound.

llvm-svn: 273705
2016-06-24 18:53:35 +00:00
David Majnemer 59f7792136 Use more ArrayRefs
No functional change is intended, just a small refactoring.

llvm-svn: 273647
2016-06-24 04:05:48 +00:00
Richard Smith b130fe7d31 Implement p0292r2 (constexpr if), a likely C++1z feature.
llvm-svn: 273602
2016-06-23 19:16:49 +00:00
Richard Smith 03a4aa3d00 Re-commit r273548, reverted in r273589, with a fix to not produce
-Wfor-loop-analysis warnings for a for-loop with a condition variable. In such
a case, the loop condition variable is modified on each iteration of the loop
by definition.

Original commit message:

Rearrange condition handling so that semantic checks on a condition variable
are performed before the other substatements of the construct are parsed,
rather than deferring them until the end. This allows better error recovery
from semantic errors in the condition, improves diagnostic order, and is a
prerequisite for C++17 constexpr if.

llvm-svn: 273600
2016-06-23 19:02:52 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne b77ebd749a Revert r273548, "Rearrange condition handling so that semantic checks on a condition variable"
as it caused a regression in -Wfor-loop-analysis.

llvm-svn: 273589
2016-06-23 18:11:15 +00:00
Richard Smith 19f877c3f2 Rearrange condition handling so that semantic checks on a condition variable
are performed before the other substatements of the construct are parsed,
rather than deferring them until the end. This allows better error recovery
from semantic errors in the condition, improves diagnostic order, and is a
prerequisite for C++17 constexpr if.

llvm-svn: 273548
2016-06-23 08:41:20 +00:00
David Majnemer f7e3609f77 Use ranges to concisely express iteration
No functional change is intended, this should just clean things up a
little.

llvm-svn: 273522
2016-06-23 00:15:04 +00:00
Alexey Bataev 61deb4dadc Revert accidential "[MSVC] Late parsing of in-class defined member functions in template"
This reverts commit 0253605771b8bd9d414aba74fe2742c730d6fd1a.

llvm-svn: 272776
2016-06-15 11:24:54 +00:00
Alexey Bataev 86e786bd17 [MSVC] Late parsing of in-class defined member functions in template
classes.

MSVC actively uses unqualified lookup in dependent bases, lookup at the
instantiation point (non-dependent names may be resolved on things
declared later) etc. and all this stuff is the main cause of
incompatibility between clang and MSVC.

Clang tries to emulate MSVC behavior but it may fail in many cases.
clang could store lexed tokens for member functions definitions within
ClassTemplateDecl for later parsing during template instantiation.

It will allow resolving many possible issues with lookup in dependent
base classes and removing many already existing MSVC-specific
hacks/workarounds from the clang code.

llvm-svn: 272774
2016-06-15 11:19:39 +00:00
Richard Smith c83bf82ad8 Remove CXXConstructExpr::getFoundDecl(); it turned out to not be useful.
llvm-svn: 272357
2016-06-10 00:58:19 +00:00
Samuel Antao ec172c6da0 [OpenMP] Parsing and sema support for the from clause
Summary:
The patch contains the parsing and sema support for the `from` clause. 

Patch based on the original post by Kelvin Li.

Reviewers: hfinkel, carlo.bertolli, kkwli0, arpith-jacob, ABataev

Subscribers: caomhin, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18488

llvm-svn: 270882
2016-05-26 17:49:04 +00:00
Samuel Antao 661c0904e1 [OpenMP] Parsing and sema support for the to clause
Summary:
The patch contains the parsing and sema support for the `to` clause. 

Patch based on the original post by Kelvin Li.

Reviewers: carlo.bertolli, hfinkel, kkwli0, arpith-jacob, ABataev

Subscribers: caomhin, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18597

llvm-svn: 270880
2016-05-26 17:39:58 +00:00
Samuel Antao 686c70c3dc [OpenMP] Parsing and sema support for target update directive
Summary:
This patch is to add parsing and sema support for `target update` directive. Support for the `to` and `from` clauses will be added by a different patch.  This patch also adds support for other clauses that are already implemented upstream and apply to `target update`, e.g. `device` and `if`.

This patch is based on the original post by Kelvin Li.

Reviewers: hfinkel, carlo.bertolli, kkwli0, arpith-jacob, ABataev

Subscribers: caomhin, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15944

llvm-svn: 270878
2016-05-26 17:30:50 +00:00
Richard Smith c2bebe9aca Preserve the FoundDecl when performing overload resolution for constructors.
This is in preparation for C++ P0136R1, which switches the model for inheriting
constructors over from synthesizing a constructor to finding base class
constructors (via using shadow decls) when looking for derived class
constructors.

llvm-svn: 269231
2016-05-11 20:37:46 +00:00
Faisal Vali a734ab9808 [Cxx1z-constexpr-lambda-P0170R1] Support parsing of constexpr specifier (and its inference) on lambda expressions
Support the constexpr specifier on lambda expressions - and support its inference from the lambda call operator's body.

i.e.
  auto L = [] () constexpr { return 5; };
  static_assert(L() == 5); // OK
  auto Implicit = [] (auto a) { return a; };
  static_assert(Implicit(5) == 5); 

We do not support evaluation of lambda's within constant expressions just yet.

Implementation Strategy:
  - teach ParseLambdaExpressionAfterIntroducer to expect a constexpr specifier and mark the invented function call operator's declarator's decl-specifier with it; Have it emit fixits for multiple decl-specifiers (mutable or constexpr) in this location.
  - for cases where constexpr is not explicitly specified, have buildLambdaExpr check whether the invented function call operator satisfies the requirements of a constexpr function, by calling CheckConstexprFunctionDecl/Body.

Much obliged to Richard Smith for his patience and his care, in ensuring the code is clang-worthy.

llvm-svn: 264513
2016-03-26 16:11:37 +00:00
Faisal Vali dc6b596ebb [Cxx1z] Implement Lambda Capture of *this by Value as [=,*this] (P0018R3)
Implement lambda capture of *this by copy.
For e.g.:
struct A {

  int d = 10;
  auto foo() { return [*this] (auto a) mutable { d+=a; return d; }; }

};

auto L = A{}.foo(); // A{}'s lifetime is gone.

// Below is still ok, because *this was captured by value.
assert(L(10) == 20);
assert(L(100) == 120);

If the capture was implicit, or [this] (i.e. *this was captured by reference), this code would be otherwise undefined.

Implementation Strategy:
  - amend the parser to accept *this in the lambda introducer
  - add a new king of capture LCK_StarThis
  - teach Sema::CheckCXXThisCapture to handle by copy captures of the
    enclosing object (i.e. *this)
  - when CheckCXXThisCapture does capture by copy, the corresponding 
    initializer expression for the closure's data member 
    direct-initializes it thus making a copy of '*this'.
  - in codegen, when assigning to CXXThisValue, if *this was captured by 
    copy, make sure it points to the corresponding field member, and
    not, unlike when captured by reference, what the field member points
    to.
  - mark feature as implemented in svn

Much gratitude to Richard Smith for his carefully illuminating reviews!   

llvm-svn: 263921
2016-03-21 09:25:37 +00:00
Richard Smith 01694c340d P0184R0: Allow types of 'begin' and 'end' expressions in range-based for loops to differ.
llvm-svn: 263895
2016-03-20 10:33:40 +00:00
Alexey Bataev a839dddf92 [OPENMP 4.0] Use 'declare reduction' constructs in 'reduction' clauses.
OpenMP 4.0 allows to define custom reduction operations using '#pragma
omp declare reduction' construct. Patch allows to use this custom
defined reduction operations in 'reduction' clauses.

llvm-svn: 263701
2016-03-17 10:19:46 +00:00
John McCall c8e321d4bc Fix the template instantiation of ExtParameterInfos; tests to follow.
llvm-svn: 262289
2016-03-01 02:09:25 +00:00
Akira Hatanaka be8f522ef3 [Sema] Remove assert in TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformObjCObjectType.
The assert isn't correct since TypeLoc::ObjCObjectTypeLoc doesn't
indicate whether the type is a dependent type. The function returns
false for a type like "<SomeProtocol>" which is a synonym for
"id<SomeProtocol>".

rdar://problem/23838912

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17355

llvm-svn: 261829
2016-02-25 07:08:33 +00:00
Arpith Chacko Jacob 05bebb578a [OpenMP] Parsing + sema for target parallel for directive.
Summary:
This patch adds parsing + sema for the target parallel for directive along with testcases.

Reviewers: ABataev

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16759

llvm-svn: 259654
2016-02-03 15:46:42 +00:00
Arpith Chacko Jacob e955b3d3fe [OpenMP] Parsing + sema for target parallel directive.
Summary:
This patch adds parsing + sema for the target parallel directive and its clauses along with testcases.

Reviewers: ABataev

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16553

Rebased to current trunk and updated test cases.

llvm-svn: 258832
2016-01-26 18:48:41 +00:00
Arpith Chacko Jacob 3cf89040b0 [OpenMP] Parsing + sema for defaultmap clause.
Summary:
This patch adds parsing + sema for the defaultmap clause associated with the target directive (among others).

Reviewers: ABataev

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16527

llvm-svn: 258817
2016-01-26 16:37:23 +00:00
Samuel Antao 23abd726e6 [OpenMP] Detect implicit map type to report unspecified map type for target enter/exit data directives.
Support for the following OpenMP 4.5 restriction on 'target enter data' and 'target exit data':

  - A map-type must be specified in all map clauses.

I have to save 'IsMapTypeImplicit' when parsing a map clause to support this constraint and for more informative error messages. This helps me support the following case:

  #pragma omp target enter data map(r) // expected-error {{map type must be specified for '#pragma omp target enter data'}}

and distinguish it from:

  #pragma omp target enter data map(tofrom: r) // expected-error {{map type 'tofrom' is not allowed for '#pragma omp target enter data'}}

Patch by Arpith Jacob. Thanks!

llvm-svn: 258179
2016-01-19 20:40:49 +00:00
Samuel Antao 7259076032 [OpenMP] Parsing + sema for "target exit data" directive.
Patch by Arpith Jacob. Thanks!

llvm-svn: 258177
2016-01-19 20:04:50 +00:00
Samuel Antao df67fc468e [OpenMP] Parsing + sema for "target enter data" directive.
Patch by Arpith Jacob. Thanks!

llvm-svn: 258165
2016-01-19 19:15:56 +00:00
Carlo Bertolli b4adf55e0f Add OpenMP dist_schedule clause to distribute directive and related regression tests.
llvm-svn: 257917
2016-01-15 18:50:31 +00:00
Manuel Klimek 4c67fa747b Fix assert hit when tree-transforming template template parameter packs.
Covers significantly more code in the template template pack argument
test and fixes the resulting assert problem.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15743

llvm-svn: 257326
2016-01-11 11:39:00 +00:00
Xiuli Pan 9c14e28211 [OpenCL] Pipe type support
Summary:
Support for OpenCL 2.0 pipe type.
This is a bug-fix version for bader's patch reviews.llvm.org/D14441


Reviewers: pekka.jaaskelainen, Anastasia

Subscribers: bader, Anastasia, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15603

llvm-svn: 257254
2016-01-09 12:53:17 +00:00