This patch fixes three issues.
The first is that we didn't consider files which are explicitly
set to eolstyle CRLF in the repo, and there are a handful of
these.
Second is that dos2unix doesn't have a -q option in GnuWin32,
so this codepath wasn't working properly.
Finally with newer versions of Python (or newer versions of Git,
or some combination of the two) patches can't be applied when
we treat stdin as text, because Python silently undoes all the
work we did to convert the newlines to LF using dos2unix by
using universal_newlines=True and then converting them *back*
to CRLF. So we need to add a way to force stdin to be treated
as binary, and use it when LF-newlines are required.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51444
llvm-svn: 344095
Summary:
The predicate function is added in InlinePatternFragments, no need to
do it here. As a result, all uses of addPredicateFn are located in
InlinePatternFragments.
Test confirmed that there are no changes to generated files when
building all (non-experimental) targets.
Change-Id: I720e42e045ca596eb0aa339fb61adf6fe71034d5
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, RKSimon, craig.topper, hfinkel, uweigand
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51993
llvm-svn: 343977
There are a few leftovers in rL343163 which span two lines. This commit
changes these llvm::sort(C.begin(), C.end, ...) to llvm::sort(C, ...)
llvm-svn: 343426
If any prefixes have been specified on the RUN lines that do not end up
ever actually getting printed, raise an Error. This is either an
indication that the run lines just need cleaning up, or that something
is more fundamentally wrong with the test.
Also raise an Error if there are any blocks which cannot be checked
because they are not uniquely covered by a prefix.
Fixed up a couple of tests where the extra checking flagged up issues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48276
llvm-svn: 343332
Insert empty blocks to cause the positions of matching blocks to match
across lists where possible so that later stages of the algorithm can
actually identify them as being identical.
Regenerated all tests with this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52560
llvm-svn: 343331
Summary: This directory was missing from the lit package on pypi.org.
Reviewers: ddunbar
Subscribers: delcypher, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51670
llvm-svn: 343115
Summary:
By using the existing isCodeGenOnly bit in the tablegen defs, as
suggested by tlively in https://reviews.llvm.org/D51662
Tested: llvm-lit -v `find test -name WebAssembly`
Reviewers: tlively
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52373
llvm-svn: 342772
Summary:
This ensures we have the non-register version of the instruction.
The stack version of call_indirect now wants a type index argument,
so that has been added in the existing tests.
Tested:
llvm-lit -v `find test -name WebAssembly`
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51662
llvm-svn: 342753
Summary:
This reverts r329475 which applied to googlemock. This change makes the
googlemock implementation in LLVM dependent on LLVM unnecessarily.
Reviewers: echristo, mgrang
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52287
llvm-svn: 342612
The reason why build #25777 might have failed is because the SmallVector move
constructor is _not_ noexcept, and the stl implementation used by that buildbot
calls _VSTD::move_if_noexcept() (according to the backtrace).
OpcodeInfo has a default move constructor, and the copy constructor is deleted.
However, as far as I can see, SmallVector doesn't declare a noexcept move
constructor. So, what I believe it is happening here is that,
_VSTD::move_if_noexcept() returns an lvalue reference and not an rvalue
reference.
This eventually triggers a copy that fails to compile.
Hopefully, using a std::vector instead of SmallVector (as it was originally
suggested by Simon in the code review) should be enough to unbreak the buildbot.
llvm-svn: 342561
This patch adds the ability for processor models to describe dependency breaking
instructions.
Different processors may specify a different set of dependency-breaking
instructions.
That means, we cannot assume that all processors of the same target would use
the same rules to classify dependency breaking instructions.
The main goal of this patch is to provide the means to describe dependency
breaking instructions directly via tablegen, and have the following
TargetSubtargetInfo hooks redefined in overrides by tabegen'd
XXXGenSubtargetInfo classes (here, XXX is a Target name).
```
virtual bool isZeroIdiom(const MachineInstr *MI, APInt &Mask) const {
return false;
}
virtual bool isDependencyBreaking(const MachineInstr *MI, APInt &Mask) const {
return isZeroIdiom(MI);
}
```
An instruction MI is a dependency-breaking instruction if a call to method
isDependencyBreaking(MI) on the STI (TargetSubtargetInfo object) evaluates to
true. Similarly, an instruction MI is a special case of zero-idiom dependency
breaking instruction if a call to STI.isZeroIdiom(MI) returns true.
The extra APInt is used for those targets that may want to select which machine
operands have their dependency broken (see comments in code).
Note that by default, subtargets don't know about the existence of
dependency-breaking. In the absence of external information, those method calls
would always return false.
A new tablegen class named STIPredicate has been added by this patch to let
processor models classify instructions that have properties in common. The idea
is that, a MCInstrPredicate definition can be used to "generate" an instruction
equivalence class, with the idea that instructions of a same class all have a
property in common.
STIPredicate definitions are essentially a collection of instruction equivalence
classes.
Also, different processor models can specify a different variant of the same
STIPredicate with different rules (i.e. predicates) to classify instructions.
Tablegen backends (in this particular case, the SubtargetEmitter) will be able
to process STIPredicate definitions, and automatically generate functions in
XXXGenSubtargetInfo.
This patch introduces two special kind of STIPredicate classes named
IsZeroIdiomFunction and IsDepBreakingFunction in tablegen. It also adds a
definition for those in the BtVer2 scheduling model only.
This patch supersedes the one committed at r338372 (phabricator review: D49310).
The main advantages are:
- We can describe subtarget predicates via tablegen using STIPredicates.
- We can describe zero-idioms / dep-breaking instructions directly via
tablegen in the scheduling models.
In future, the STIPredicates framework can be used for solving other problems.
Examples of future developments are:
- Teach how to identify optimizable register-register moves
- Teach how to identify slow LEA instructions (each subtarget defining its own
concept of "slow" LEA).
- Teach how to identify instructions that have undocumented false dependencies
on the output registers on some processors only.
It is also (in my opinion) an elegant way to expose knowledge to both external
tools like llvm-mca, and codegen passes.
For example, machine schedulers in LLVM could reuse that information when
internally constructing the data dependency graph for a code region.
This new design feature is also an "opt-in" feature. Processor models don't have
to use the new STIPredicates. It has all been designed to be as unintrusive as
possible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52174
llvm-svn: 342555
This fixes building for Windows on ARM, with MinGW headers.
(Building for Windows on ARM with Windows SDK still is unsupported
by the benchmark library.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52262
llvm-svn: 342549
Further extension to D51035, this patch avoids all repeated predicates[] matching by caching as it collects the patterns that have multiple variants.
Saves around 25secs in debug builds of x86 -gen-dag-isel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51839
llvm-svn: 342467
The windows SDK headers don't have self-consistent casing anyway,
so we consistently use lowercase for these in other places, in order
to fix crosscompilation with mingw headers.
This applies an upstream commit:
5261307982
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52181
llvm-svn: 342450
Summary:
The multiprocess module uses pickling to transfer
information between processes and does not know how to pickle
the class created in the lit.cfg file and thus the example
fails.
Implement ManyTests in a separate file and import for the
example test passes
Patch by Nathan Lanza <nathan@lanza.io>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51328
llvm-svn: 342269
Summary: This is the only test that is still failing on Windows - or rather, it is expected to fail on the bots, but passes on the new bot that we're preparing causing a failure, so I'm going to disable it. Since the test has rarely, if ever, passed on the bots, this should have the same effect and it will unblock the creation of the new bot.
Reviewers: asmith, delcypher, zturner
Subscribers: stella.stamenova, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51871
llvm-svn: 341856
`MSVC` is true for clang-cl, but `"${CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_ID}" STREQUAL
"MSVC"` is false, so we would enable -Wall, which means -Weverything
with clang-cl, and we get tons of undesired warnings.
Use the simpler condition to fix things.
llvm-svn: 341717
- Refactor/rewrite most of the code. Also make sure it passes
pycodestyle/pyflakes now
- Add a new mode that performs bisection on the search space. This
should be faster in the common case where there is only a small number
of files or functions actually leading to failure.
The previous sequential behavior can still be accessed via `--seq`.
llvm-svn: 341679
This patch applies upstream commit:
f0901417c8
Tim Northover pointed out that benchmark build might be broken on 32-bit
macOS. This commit by Roman Lebedev (lebedev.ri) resolves the issue.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51677
llvm-svn: 341469
Summary:
The python executable may not exist on all systems so use sys.executable
instead.
Reviewers: ddunbar, stella.stamenova
Subscribers: delcypher, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51511
llvm-svn: 341244
Summary:
Now uses the StackBased bit from the tablegen defs to identify
stack instructions (and ignore register based or non-wasm instructions).
Also changed how we store operands, since we now have up to 16 of them
per instruction. To not cause static data bloat, these are compressed
into a tiny table.
+ a few other cleanups.
Tested:
- MCTest
- llvm-lit -v `find test -name WebAssembly`
Reviewers: dschuff, jgravelle-google, sunfish, tlively
Subscribers: sbc100, aheejin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51320
llvm-svn: 341081
Summary:
Add comments to help readers avoid having to read tablegen backends to
understand the code. Also remove unecessary breaks from the output.
Reviewers: dschuff, aheejin
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51371
llvm-svn: 340864
Summary:
Right now this test is failing on the builtbots on Windows but we have a very similar setup where the test passes. The test is meant to test that specifying a timeout works correctly by running an infnite loop and having it timeout - on the buildbot, the infinite loop doesn't actually execute. This change runs all of the tests in the set using an internal shell rather than an external shell. I expect this will make the test pass which means that either the way the external shell is invoked or the external shell setup on the buildbots is not correct. Regardless of whether the test passes with this change, we'll need to undo this change and have a real fix.
@gkistanova was able to get logs from the buildbot to rule out a number of theories as to why this test is failing, but they didn't have enough information to confirm exactly what the issue is. The purpose of this change is to narrow it down, but if someone has a local repro and can aid in debugging, that would make it much speedier (and less prone to making the bots fail).
Reviewers: gkistanova, asmith, zturner, modocache, rnk, delcypher
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: delcypher, llvm-commits, gkistanova
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51326
llvm-svn: 340840
CodeGenDAGPatterns::GenerateVariants is a costly function in many tblgen commands (33.87% of the total runtime of x86 -gen-dag-isel), and due to the O(N^2) nature of the function, there are a high number of repeated comparisons of the pattern's vector<Predicate>.
This initial patch at least avoids repeating these comparisons for every Variant in a pattern. I began investigating caching all the matches before entering the loop but hit issues with how best to store the data and how to update the cache as patterns were added.
Saves around 15secs in debug builds of x86 -gen-dag-isel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51035
llvm-svn: 340837
ompiling benchmark library (introduced in D50894) with the latest
bootstrapped Clang produces a lot of warnings, this issue was addressed
in the upstream patch I pushed earlier.
Upstream patch:
f85304e4e3
`README.LLVM` notes were updated to reflect the latest changes.
Reviewed by: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51342
llvm-svn: 340811
This patch pulls google/benchmark v1.4.1 into the LLVM tree so that any
project could use it for benchmark generation. A dummy benchmark is
added to `llvm/benchmarks/DummyYAML.cpp` to validate the correctness of
the build process.
The current version does not utilize LLVM LNT and LLVM CMake
infrastructure, but that might be sufficient for most users. Two
introduced CMake variables:
* `LLVM_INCLUDE_BENCHMARKS` (`ON` by default) generates benchmark
targets
* `LLVM_BUILD_BENCHMARKS` (`OFF` by default) adds generated
benchmark targets to the list of default LLVM targets (i.e. if `ON`
benchmarks will be built upon standard build invocation, e.g. `ninja` or
`make` with no specific targets)
List of modifications:
* `BENCHMARK_ENABLE_TESTING` is disabled
* `BENCHMARK_ENABLE_EXCEPTIONS` is disabled
* `BENCHMARK_ENABLE_INSTALL` is disabled
* `BENCHMARK_ENABLE_GTEST_TESTS` is disabled
* `BENCHMARK_DOWNLOAD_DEPENDENCIES` is disabled
Original discussion can be found here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-August/125023.html
Reviewed by: dberris, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, EricWF, lebedev.ri, srhines,
dschuff, mgorny, krytarowski, fedor.sergeev, mgrang, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50894
llvm-svn: 340809
Summary:
The new stackification backend generates the giant switch statement
used to translate instructions to their stackified forms. I did this
because it was more interesting than adding all the different vector
versions of the various SIMD instructions to the switch statment
manually.
Reviewers: aardappel, aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: mgorny, sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51318
llvm-svn: 340781
Summary:
So far, `isReturn` property is used to mean both a return instruction
from a functon and the end of an EH scope, a scope that starts with a EH
scope entry BB and ends with a catchret or a cleanupret instruction.
Because WinEH uses funclets, all EH-scope-ending instructions are also
real return instruction from a function. But for wasm, they only serve
as the end marker of an EH scope but not a return instruction that
exits a function. This mismatch caused incorrect prolog and epilog
generation in wasm EH scopes. This patch fixes this.
This patch is in the same vein with rL333045, which splits
`MachineBasicBlock::isEHFuncletEntry` into `isEHFuncletEntry` and
`isEHScopeEntry`.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50653
llvm-svn: 340325
Zachary Turner