Instead of detecting the string in 2 places. Just swap the string
to 'sse4.1' or 'sse4.2' at the top of the function.
Prep work for a patch to switch the rest of this function to a
table based system. And I don't want to include 'sse4a' in the
table.
Currently APValues are dumped as a single string. This becomes quickly
completely unreadable since APValue is a tree-like structure. Even a simple
example is not pretty:
struct S { int arr[4]; float f; };
constexpr S s = { .arr = {1,2}, .f = 3.1415f };
// Struct fields: Array: Int: 1, Int: 2, 2 x Int: 0, Float: 3.141500e+00
With this patch this becomes:
-Struct
|-field: Array size=4
| |-elements: Int 1, Int 2
| `-filler: 2 x Int 0
`-field: Float 3.141500e+00
Additionally APValues are currently only dumped as part of visiting a
ConstantExpr. This patch also dump the value of the initializer of constexpr
variable declarations:
constexpr int foo(int a, int b) { return a + b - 42; }
constexpr int a = 1, b = 2;
constexpr int c = foo(a, b) > 0 ? foo(a, b) : foo(b, a);
// VarDecl 0x62100008aec8 <col:3, col:57> col:17 c 'const int' constexpr cinit
// |-value: Int -39
// `-ConditionalOperator 0x62100008b4d0 <col:21, col:57> 'int'
// <snip>
Do the above by moving the dump functions to TextNodeDumper which already has
the machinery to display trees. The cases APValue::LValue, APValue::MemberPointer
and APValue::AddrLabelDiff are left as they were before (unimplemented).
We try to display multiple elements on the same line if they are considered to
be "simple". This is to avoid wasting large amounts of vertical space in an
example like:
constexpr int arr[8] = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7};
// VarDecl 0x62100008bb78 <col:3, col:42> col:17 arr 'int const[8]' constexpr cinit
// |-value: Array size=8
// | |-elements: Int 0, Int 1, Int 2, Int 3
// | `-elements: Int 4, Int 5, Int 6, Int 7
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83183
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
This covers both the existing memory functions as well as the new bulk memory proposal.
Added new test files since changes where also required in the inputs.
Also removes unused init/drop intrinsics rather than trying to make them work for 64-bit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82821
Mark these tests as only failing on PowerPC. Avoids unexpected passes on
other bots.
Fingers crossed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80952
Summary:
Some libraries use empty function to ignore unused variable warnings, which gets a new warning from `-Wuninitialized-const-reference`, discussed here https://reviews.llvm.org/D79895#2107604.
This patch should fix that.
Reviewers: hans, nick, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, riccibruno, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82425
We currently have strict floating point/constrained floating point enabled
for all targets. Constrained SDAG nodes get converted to the regular ones
before reaching the target layer. In theory this should be fine.
However, the changes are exposed to users through multiple clang options
already in use in the field, and the changes are _completely_ _untested_
on almost all of our targets. Bugs have already been found, like
"https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45274".
This patch disables constrained floating point options in clang everywhere
except X86 and SystemZ. A warning will be printed when this happens.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80952
* The getLine and getColumn functions need to update the position, or
they will return stale data for buffered streams. This fixes a bug in
the clang -analyzer-checker-option-help option, which was not wrapping
the help text correctly when stdout is not a TTY.
* If the stream contains multi-byte UTF-8 sequences, then the whole
sequence needs to be considered to be a single character. This has the
edge case that the buffer might fill up and be flushed part way
through a character.
* If the stream contains East Asian wide characters, these will be
rendered twice as wide as other characters, so we need to increase the
column count to match.
This doesn't attempt to handle everything unicode can do (combining
characters, right-to-left markers, ...), but hopefully covers most
things likely to be common in messages and source code we might want to
print.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76291
The error-bit was missing, and the unexpandedpack bit seemed to be
set incorrectly.
Reviewed By: sammccall, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83114
Hidden checkers (those marked with Hidden in Checkers.td) are meant for
development purposes only, and are only displayed under
-analyzer-checker-help-developer, so users shouldn't see reports from them.
I moved StdLibraryFunctionsArg checker to the unix package from apiModeling as
it violated this rule. I believe this change doesn't deserve a different
revision because it is in alpha, and the name is so bad anyways I don't
immediately care where it is, because we'll have to revisit it soon enough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81750
The thrilling conclusion to the barrage of patches I uploaded lately! This is a
big milestone towards the goal set out in http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-August/063070.html.
I hope to accompany this with a patch where the a coreModeling package is added,
from which package diagnostics aren't allowed either, is an implicit dependency
of all checkers, and the core package for the first time can be safely disabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78126
Summary:
This feature was only used in two places, but contributed a non-trivial
amount to the complexity of RecursiveASTVisitor, and was buggy (see my
recent patches where I was fixing the bugs that I noticed). I don't
think the convenience benefit of this feature is worth the complexity.
Besides complexity, another issue with the current state of
RecursiveASTVisitor is the non-uniformity in how it handles different
AST nodes. All AST nodes follow a regular pattern, but operators are
special -- and this special behavior not documented. Correct usage of
RecursiveASTVisitor relies on shadowing member functions with specific
names and signatures. Near misses don't cause any compile-time errors,
incorrectly named or typed methods are just silently ignored. Therefore,
predictability of RecursiveASTVisitor API is quite important.
This change reduces the size of the `clang` binary by 38 KB (0.2%) in
release mode, and by 7 MB (0.3%) in debug mode. The `clang-tidy` binary
is reduced by 205 KB (0.3%) in release mode, and by 5 MB (0.4%) in debug
mode. I don't think these code size improvements are significant enough
to justify this change on its own (for me, the primary motivation is
reducing code complexity), but they I think are a nice side-effect.
Reviewers: rsmith, sammccall, ymandel, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith, sammccall, ymandel, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82921
Summary:
How does RecursiveASTVisitor call the WalkUp callback for expressions?
* In pre-order traversal mode, RecursiveASTVisitor calls the WalkUp
callback from the default implementation of Traverse callbacks.
* In post-order traversal mode when we don't have a DataRecursionQueue,
RecursiveASTVisitor also calls the WalkUp callback from the default
implementation of Traverse callbacks.
* However, in post-order traversal mode when we have a DataRecursionQueue,
RecursiveASTVisitor calls the WalkUp callback from PostVisitStmt.
As a result, when the user overrides the Traverse callback, in pre-order
traversal mode they never get the corresponding WalkUp callback. However
in the post-order traversal mode the WalkUp callback is invoked or not
depending on whether the data recursion optimization could be applied.
I had to adjust the implementation of TraverseCXXForRangeStmt in the
syntax tree builder to call the WalkUp method directly, as it was
relying on this behavior. There is an existing test for this
functionality and it prompted me to make this extra fix.
In addition, I had to fix the default implementation implementation of
RecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseSynOrSemInitListExpr to call WalkUpFrom in
the same manner as the implementation generated by the DEF_TRAVERSE_STMT
macro. Without this fix, the InitListExprIsPostOrderNoQueueVisitedTwice
test was failing because WalkUpFromInitListExpr was never called.
Reviewers: eduucaldas, ymandel
Reviewed By: eduucaldas, ymandel
Subscribers: gribozavr2, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82486
Since strong dependencies aren't user-facing (its hardly ever legal to disable
them), lets enforce that they are hidden. Modeling checkers that aren't
dependencies are of course not impacted, but there is only so much you can do
against developers shooting themselves in the foot :^)
I also made some changes to the test files, reversing the "test" package for,
well, testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81761
Summary:
Change stack alignment from 64 bits to 128 bits to follow ABI correctly.
And add a regression test for datalayout.
Reviewers: simoll, k-ishizaka
Reviewed By: simoll
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #ve, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83173
User can own a version of coroutine_handle::address() whose return type is not
void* by using template specialization for coroutine_handle<> for some
promise_type.
In this case, the codes may violate the capability with existing async C APIs
that accepted a void* data parameter which was then passed back to the
user-provided callback.
Patch by ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82442
We make assumptions about what projects and runtimes are enabled
when configuring our toolchain build, so we should enable those in
the cache file as well rather than relying on those being set
externally.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81514
Making -g[no-]column-info opt out reduces the length of a typical CC1 command line.
Additionally, in a non-debug compile, we won't see -dwarf-column-info.
Assume bundle can have more than one entry with the same name,
but at least AlignmentFromAssumptionsPass::extractAlignmentInfo() uses
getOperandBundle("align"), which internally assumes that it isn't the
case, and happily crashes otherwise.
Minimal reduced reproducer: run `opt -alignment-from-assumptions` on
target datalayout = "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
%0 = type { i64, %1*, i8*, i64, %2, i32, %3*, i8* }
%1 = type opaque
%2 = type { i8, i8, i16 }
%3 = type { i32, i32, i32, i32 }
; Function Attrs: nounwind
define i32 @f(%0* noalias nocapture readonly %arg, %0* noalias %arg1) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
bb:
call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "align"(%0* %arg, i64 8), "align"(%0* %arg1, i64 8) ]
ret i32 0
}
; Function Attrs: nounwind willreturn
declare void @llvm.assume(i1) #1
attributes #0 = { nounwind "reciprocal-estimates"="none" }
attributes #1 = { nounwind willreturn }
This is what we'd have with -mllvm -enable-knowledge-retention
This reverts commit c95ffadb24.
If you were around the analyzer for a while now, you must've seen a lot of
patches that awkwardly puts code from one library to the other:
* D75360 moves the constructors of CheckerManager, which lies in the Core
library, to the Frontend library. Most the patch itself was a struggle along
the library lines.
* D78126 had to be reverted because dependency information would be utilized
in the Core library, but the actual data lied in the frontend.
D78126#inline-751477 touches on this issue as well.
This stems from the often mentioned problem: the Frontend library depends on
Core and Checkers, Checkers depends on Core. The checker registry functions
(`registerMallocChecker`, etc) lie in the Checkers library in order to keep each
checker its own module. What this implies is that checker registration cannot
take place in the Core, but the Core might still want to use the data that
results from it (which checker/package is enabled, dependencies, etc).
D54436 was the patch that initiated this. Back in the days when CheckerRegistry
was super dumb and buggy, it implemented a non-documented solution to this
problem by keeping the data in the Core, and leaving the logic in the Frontend.
At the time when the patch landed, the merger to the Frontend made sense,
because the data hadn't been utilized anywhere, and the whole workaround without
any documentation made little sense to me.
So, lets put the data back where it belongs, in the Core library. This patch
introduces `CheckerRegistryData`, and turns `CheckerRegistry` into a short lived
wrapper around this data that implements the logic of checker registration. The
data is tied to CheckerManager because it is required to parse it.
Side note: I can't help but cringe at the fact how ridiculously awkward the
library lines are. I feel like I'm thinking too much inside the box, but I guess
this is just the price of keeping the checkers so modularized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82585
Summary:
D80831 changed part of the prefix usage for AIX.
But there are other places getting prefix from DataLayout.
This patch intends to make prefix usage consistent on AIX.
Reviewed by: hubert.reinterpretcast, daltenty
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81270
In general there is no way to get to the ASTContext from most AST nodes
(Decls are one of the exception). This will be a problem when implementing
the rest of APValue::dump since we need the ASTContext to dump some kinds of
APValues.
The ASTContext* in ASTDumper and TextNodeDumper is not always non-null.
This is because we still want to be able to use the various dump() functions
in a debugger.
No functional changes intended.
Reverted in fcf4d5e449 since a few dump()
functions in lldb where missed.
This patch upstreams support for the Arm-v8 Cortex-A77
processor for AArch64 and ARM.
In detail:
- Adding cortex-a77 as a cpu option for aarch64 and arm targets in clang
- Cortex-A77 CPU name and ProcessorModel in llvm
details of the CPU can be found here:
https://www.arm.com/products/silicon-ip-cpu/cortex-a/cortex-a77
and a similar submission to GCC can be found here:
e0664b7a63
The following people contributed to this patch:
- Luke Geeson
- Mikhail Maltsev
Reviewers: t.p.northover, dmgreen, ostannard, SjoerdMeijer
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: dmgreen, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, danielkiss, cfe-commits,
llvm-commits, miyuki
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82887
This reverts commit 8bf4c40af8.
This reverts commit 7b0be962d6.
This reverts commit 94454442c3.
Some compilers on some buildbots didn't accept the specialization of
is_same_method_impl in a non-namespace scope.
Summary:
How does RecursiveASTVisitor call the WalkUp callback for expressions?
* In pre-order traversal mode, RecursiveASTVisitor calls the WalkUp
callback from the default implementation of Traverse callbacks.
* In post-order traversal mode when we don't have a DataRecursionQueue,
RecursiveASTVisitor also calls the WalkUp callback from the default
implementation of Traverse callbacks.
* However, in post-order traversal mode when we have a DataRecursionQueue,
RecursiveASTVisitor calls the WalkUp callback from PostVisitStmt.
As a result, when the user overrides the Traverse callback, in pre-order
traversal mode they never get the corresponding WalkUp callback. However
in the post-order traversal mode the WalkUp callback is invoked or not
depending on whether the data recursion optimization could be applied.
I had to adjust the implementation of TraverseCXXForRangeStmt in the
syntax tree builder to call the WalkUp method directly, as it was
relying on this behavior. There is an existing test for this
functionality and it prompted me to make this extra fix.
In addition, I had to fix the default implementation implementation of
RecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseSynOrSemInitListExpr to call WalkUpFrom in
the same manner as the implementation generated by the DEF_TRAVERSE_STMT
macro. Without this fix, the InitListExprIsPostOrderNoQueueVisitedTwice
test was failing because WalkUpFromInitListExpr was never called.
Reviewers: eduucaldas, ymandel
Reviewed By: eduucaldas, ymandel
Subscribers: gribozavr2, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82486
Summary:
RecursiveASTVisitor has special code for handling operator AST nodes,
specifically, unary, binary, and compound assignment operators. In this
change I'm adding tests for operator AST nodes that follow the existing
pattern of tests for the CallExpr node (an AST node that triggers the
common code path).
Reviewers: ymandel, eduucaldas
Reviewed By: ymandel, eduucaldas
Subscribers: gribozavr2, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82875
in general, value dependent is a subset of instnatiation dependent. This
would allows us to produce diagnostics for the align expression (which
is instantiation dependent but not value dependent).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83074
Xiang1 Zhang