The generated MS manglings differ between 32- and 64-bit, and the test only
expects the latter. See also the commit email thread.
> Thanks to Cameron DaCamara at Microsoft for letting us know what their
> chosen mangling is here!
llvm-svn: 345380
Adding the new enumerator forced a bunch more changes into this patch than I
would have liked. The -Wtautological-compare warning was extended to properly
check the new comparison operator, clang-format needed updating because it uses
precedence levels as weights for determining where to break lines (and several
operators increased their precedence levels with this change), thread-safety
analysis needed changes to build its own IL properly for the new operator.
All "real" semantic checking for this operator has been deferred to a future
patch. For now, we use the relational comparison rules and arbitrarily give
the builtin form of the operator a return type of 'void'.
llvm-svn: 320707
Hans Wennborg