destructors.
We previously tried to patch up the exception specification after
completing the class, which went wrong when the exception specification
was needed within the class body (in particular, by a friend
redeclaration of the destructor in a nested class). We now mark the
destructor as having a not-yet-computed exception specification
immediately after creating it.
This requires delaying various checks against the exception
specification (where we'd previously have just got the wrong exception
specification, and now find we have an exception specification that we
can't compute yet) when those checks fire while the class is being
defined.
This also exposed an issue that we were missing a CodeSynthesisContext
for computation of exception specifications (otherwise we'd fail to make
the module containing the definition of the class visible when computing
its members' exception specs). Adding that incidentally also gives us a
diagnostic quality improvement.
This has also exposed an pre-existing problem: making the exception
specification evaluation context a non-SFINAE context (as it should be)
results in a bootstrap failure; PR38850 filed for this.
llvm-svn: 341499
This change implements C++ DR1696, which makes initialization of a
reference member of a class from a temporary object ill-formed. The
standard wording here is imprecise, but we interpret it as meaning that
any time a mem-initializer would result in lifetime extension, the
program is ill-formed.
This reinstates r337226, reverted in r337255, with a fix for the
InitializedEntity alignment problem that was breaking ARM buildbots.
llvm-svn: 337329
This change breaks on ARM because pointers to clang::InitializedEntity are only
4 byte aligned and do not have 3 bits to store values. A possible solution
would be to change the fields in clang::InitializedEntity to enforce a bigger
alignment requirement.
The error message is
llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h:132:3: error: static_assert failed "PointerIntPair with integer size too large for pointer"
static_assert(IntBits <= PtrTraits::NumLowBitsAvailable,
include/llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h:73:13: note: in instantiation of template class 'llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *> >' requested here
Value = Info::updateInt(Info::updatePointer(0, PtrVal),
llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h:51:5: note: in instantiation of member function 'llvm::PointerIntPair<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, (anonymous namespace)::LifetimeKind, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *>, llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *> > >::setPointerAndInt' requested here
setPointerAndInt(PtrVal, IntVal);
^
llvm/tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp:6237:12: note: in instantiation of member function 'llvm::PointerIntPair<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, (anonymous namespace)::LifetimeKind, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *>, llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *> > >::PointerIntPair' requested here
return {Entity, LK_Extended};
Full log here:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-global-isel/builds/1330http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-full/builds/1394
llvm-svn: 337255
This change implements C++ DR1696, which makes initialization of a
reference member of a class from a temporary object ill-formed. The
standard wording here is imprecise, but we interpret it as meaning that
any time a mem-initializer would result in lifetime extension, the
program is ill-formed.
llvm-svn: 337226
C++14 [dcl.constexpr]p4 states that in the body of a constexpr
constructor,
> every non-variant non-static data member and base class sub-object
shall be initialized
However, [class.bit]p2 notes that
> Unnamed bit-fields are not members and cannot be initialized.
Therefore, we should make sure to filter them out of the check that
all fields are initialized.
Fixing this makes the constant evaluator a bit smarter, and
specifically allows constexpr constructors to avoid tripping
-Wglobal-constructors when the type contains unnamed bitfields.
Reviewed at https://reviews.llvm.org/D39035.
llvm-svn: 316408
constant expressions.
We permit array-to-pointer decay on such arrays, but disallow pointer
arithmetic (since we do not know whether it will have defined behavior).
This is based on r311970 and r301822 (the former by me and the latter by Robert
Haberlach). Between then and now, two things have changed: we have committee
feedback indicating that this is indeed the right direction, and the code
broken by this change has been fixed.
This is necessary in C++17 to continue accepting certain forms of non-type
template argument involving arrays of unknown bound.
llvm-svn: 316245
The standard is not clear on how these are supposed to be handled, so we
conservatively treat as non-constant any cases whose value is unknown or whose
evaluation might result in undefined behavior.
llvm-svn: 311970
The fix is that ExprEvaluatorBase::VisitInitListExpr should handle transparent exprs instead of exprs with one element. Fixing that uncovers one testcase failure because the AST for "constexpr _Complex float test2 = {1};" is wrong (the _Complex prvalue should not be const-qualified), and a number of test failures in test/OpenMP where the captured stmt contains an InitListExpr that is in syntactic form.
llvm-svn: 301891
This is necessary in order for the evaluation of an _Atomic initializer for
those types to have an associated object, which an initializer for class or
array type needs.
llvm-svn: 295886
Don't try to map an APSInt addend to an int64_t in pointer arithmetic before
bounds-checking it. This gives more consistent behavior (outside C++11, we
consistently use 2s complement semantics for both pointer and integer overflow
in constant expressions) and fixes some cases where in C++11 we would fail to
properly check for out-of-bounds pointer arithmetic (if the 2s complement
64-bit overflow landed us back in-bounds).
In passing, also fix some cases where we'd perform possibly-overflowing
arithmetic on CharUnits (which have a signed underlying type) during constant
expression evaluation.
llvm-svn: 293595
This implements something like the current direction of DR1581: we use a narrow
syntactic check to determine the set of places where a constant expression
could be evaluated, and only instantiate a constexpr function or variable if
it's referenced in one of those contexts, or is odr-used.
It's not yet clear whether this is the right set of syntactic locations; we
currently consider all contexts within templates that would result in odr-uses
after instantiation, and contexts within list-initialization (narrowing
conversions take another victim...), as requiring instantiation. We could in
principle restrict the former cases more (only const integral / reference
variable initializers, and contexts in which a constant expression is required,
perhaps). However, this is sufficient to allow us to accept libstdc++ code,
which relies on GCC's behavior (which appears to be somewhat similar to this
approach).
llvm-svn: 291318
Most code paths would already bail out in this case, but certain paths,
particularly overload resolution and typo correction, would not. Carrying on
with an invalid declaration could in some cases result in crashes due to
downstream code relying on declaration invariants that are not necessarily
met for invalid declarations, and in other cases just resulted in undesirable
follow-on diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 291030
This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan
failures. msan was failing because we were calling
`isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us
to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of
said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in
`isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more
easily in the future.
Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :)
Original commit message:
This patch does three things:
- Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the
number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user
functions that act in a similar manner.
- Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables
is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in
test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly
unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in
person.
- Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at
D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when
combined with our new eagerness in the face of const.
llvm-svn: 290297
This commit fails MSan when running test/CodeGen/object-size.c in
a confusing way. After some discussion with George, it isn't really
clear what is going on here. We can make the MSan failure go away by
testing for the invalid bit, but *why* things are invalid isn't clear.
And yet, other code in the surrounding area is doing precisely this and
testing for invalid.
George is going to take a closer look at this to better understand the
nature of the failure and recommit it, for now backing it out to clean
up MSan builds.
llvm-svn: 290169
This patch does three things:
- Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the
number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user
functions that act in a similar manner.
- Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables
is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in
test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly
unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in
person.
- Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at
D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when
combined with our new eagerness in the face of const.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D14274
llvm-svn: 290149
copy constructors of classes with array members, instead using
ArrayInitLoopExpr to represent the initialization loop.
This exposed a bug in the static analyzer where it was unable to differentiate
between zero-initialized and unknown array values, which has also been fixed
here.
llvm-svn: 289618
mirror the description in the standard. Per DR1295, this means that binding a
const / rvalue reference to a bit-field no longer "binds directly", and per
P0135R1, this means that we materialize a temporary in reference binding
after adjusting cv-qualifiers and before performing a derived-to-base cast.
In C++11 onwards, this should have fixed the last case where we would
materialize a temporary of the wrong type (with a subobject adjustment inside
the MaterializeTemporaryExpr instead of outside), but we still have to deal
with that possibility in C++98, unless we want to start using xvalues to
represent materialized temporaries there too.
llvm-svn: 289250
latter case, a temporary array object is materialized, and can be
lifetime-extended by binding a reference to the member access. Likewise, in an
array-to-pointer decay, an rvalue array is materialized before being converted
into a pointer.
This caused IR generation to stop treating file-scope array compound literals
as having static storage duration in some cases in C++; that has been rectified
by modeling such a compound literal as an lvalue. This also improves clang's
compatibility with GCC for those cases.
llvm-svn: 288654
Only look for a variable's value in the constant expression evaluation activation frame, if the variable was indeed declared in that frame, otherwise it might be a constant expression and be usable within a nested local scope or emit an error.
void f(char c) {
struct X {
static constexpr char f() {
return c; // error gracefully here as opposed to crashing.
}
};
int I = X::f();
}
llvm-svn: 286748
This has two significant effects:
1) Direct relational comparisons between null pointer constants (0 and nullopt)
and pointers are now ill-formed. This was always the case for C, and it
appears that C++ only ever permitted by accident. For instance, cases like
nullptr < &a
are now rejected.
2) Comparisons and conditional operators between differently-cv-qualified
pointer types now work, and produce a composite type that both source
pointer types can convert to (when possible). For instance, comparison
between 'int **' and 'const int **' is now valid, and uses an intermediate
type of 'const int *const *'.
Clang previously supported #2 as an extension.
We do not accept the cases in #1 as an extension. I've tested a fair amount of
code to check that this doesn't break it, but if it turns out that someone is
relying on this, we can easily add it back as an extension.
This is a re-commit of r284800.
llvm-svn: 284890
This has two significant effects:
1) Direct relational comparisons between null pointer constants (0 and nullopt)
and pointers are now ill-formed. This was always the case for C, and it
appears that C++ only ever permitted by accident. For instance, cases like
nullptr < &a
are now rejected.
2) Comparisons and conditional operators between differently-cv-qualified
pointer types now work, and produce a composite type that both source
pointer types can convert to (when possible). For instance, comparison
between 'int **' and 'const int **' is now valid, and uses an intermediate
type of 'const int *const *'.
Clang previously supported #2 as an extension.
We do not accept the cases in #1 as an extension. I've tested a fair amount of
code to check that this doesn't break it, but if it turns out that someone is
relying on this, we can easily add it back as an extension.
llvm-svn: 284800
Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into
C++ last year as a DR against C++11.
Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited
base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to
constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for
using-declarations.
For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived
class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow
constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the
actual initialization, and have a new expression node,
CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such
a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect
forwarding of arguments.)
In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls,
variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting
constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code
into the caller of the inherited constructor.
Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some
corner cases. In particular:
* if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to
construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B
befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and
* if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default
constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from
a base class
llvm-svn: 274049
const' variable. That variable might be defined as 'constexpr', so we cannot
prove that a use of it could never be a constant expression.
llvm-svn: 270774
Fix a crash while parsing this code:
struct X {
friend constexpr int foo(X*) { return 12; }
static constexpr int j = foo(static_cast<X*>(nullptr));
};
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16973
llvm-svn: 260675
side-effect, so that we don't allow speculative evaluation of such expressions
during code generation.
This caused a diagnostic quality regression, so fix constant expression
diagnostics to prefer either the first "can't be constant folded" diagnostic or
the first "not a constant expression" diagnostic depending on the kind of
evaluation we're doing. This was always the intent, but didn't quite work
correctly before.
This results in certain initializers that used to be constant initializers to
no longer be; in particular, things like:
float f = 1e100;
are no longer accepted in C. This seems appropriate, as such constructs would
lead to code being executed if sanitizers are enabled.
llvm-svn: 254574
someone thought all the bits would be value bits in this case.
Also fix the wording of the warning -- it claimed that the width of 'bool' is
8, which is not correct; the width is 1 bit, whereas the size is 8 bits in our
implementation.
llvm-svn: 248435
r235046 turned "extern __declspec(selectany) int a;" from a declaration into
a definition to fix PR23242 (required for compatibility with mc.exe output).
However, this broke parsing Windows headers: A d3d11 headers contain something
like
struct SomeStruct {};
extern const __declspec(selectany) SomeStruct some_struct;
This is now a definition, and const objects either need an explicit default
ctor or an initializer so this errors out with
d3d11.h(1065,48) :
error: default initialization of an object of const type
'const CD3D11_DEFAULT' without a user-provided default constructor
(cl.exe just doesn't implement this rule, independent of selectany.)
To work around this, weaken this error into a warning for selectany decls
in microsoft mode, and recover with zero-initialization.
Doing this is a bit hairy since it adds a fixit on an error emitted
by InitializationSequence – this means it needs to build a correct AST, which
in turn means InitializationSequence::Failed() cannot return true when this
fixit is applied. As a workaround, the patch adds a fixit member to
InitializationSequence, and InitializationSequence::Perform() prints the
diagnostic if the fixit member is set right after its call to Diagnose.
That function is usually called when InitializationSequences are used –
InitListChecker::PerformEmptyInit() doesn't call it, but the InitListChecker
case never performs default-initialization, so this is technically OK.
This is the alternative, original fix for PR20208 that got reviewed in the
thread "[patch] Improve diagnostic on default-initializing const variables
(PR20208)". This change basically reverts r213725, adds the original fix for
PR20208, and makes the error a warning in Microsoft mode.
llvm-svn: 235166
We have a diagnostic describing that constexpr changed in C++14 when
compiling in C++11 mode. While doing this, it examines the previous
declaration and assumes that it is a function. However it is possible,
in the context of error recovery, for this to not be the case.
llvm-svn: 225518
clang lets programmers be pretty cavalier when it comes to void return
statements in functions which have non-void return types. However, we
cannot be so forgiving in constexpr functions: evaluation will go off
the rails very quickly.
Instead, keep the return statement in the AST but mark the function as
invalid. Doing so gives us nice diagnostics while making constexpr
evaluation halt.
This fixes PR21859.
llvm-svn: 224189
Comparing the address of an object with an incomplete type might return
true with a 'distinct' object if the former has a size of zero.
However, such an object should compare unequal with null.
llvm-svn: 224040
Specifically, when we have this situation:
struct A {
template <typename T> struct B {
int m1 = sizeof(A);
};
B<int> m2;
};
We can't parse m1's initializer eagerly because we need A to be
complete. Therefore we wait until the end of A's class scope to parse
it. However, we can trigger instantiation of B before the end of A,
which will attempt to instantiate the field decls eagerly, and it would
build a bad field decl instantiation that said it had an initializer but
actually lacked one.
Fixed by deferring instantiation of default member initializers until
they are needed during constructor analysis. This addresses a long
standing FIXME in the code.
Fixes PR19195.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5690
llvm-svn: 222192
Richard Smith