We didn't add the artificial pass_object_size arguments to the
backreference map which bloated the size of manglings which involved
pass_object_size with duplicate types.
This lets us go from:
?qux@PassObjectSize@@YAHQAHW4__pass_object_size1@__clang@@0W4__pass_object_size1@3@@Z
to:
?qux@PassObjectSize@@YAHQAHW4__pass_object_size1@__clang@@01@Z
llvm-svn: 256622
MSVC doesn't implement a mangling for C99's _Complex so we must invent
our own.
For now, treating it like a class type called _Complex in the __clang
namespace.
This means that 'void f(__Complex int))'
will demangle as: 'void f(struct __clang::_Complex<int>)'
llvm-svn: 256583
MSVC doesn't implement a mangling for C11's _Atomic so we must invent
our own.
For now, treating it like a class type called _Atomic in the __clang
namespace.
This means that 'void f(__Atomic(int))'
will demangle as: 'void f(struct __clang::_Atomic<int>)'
llvm-svn: 256557
`pass_object_size` is our way of enabling `__builtin_object_size` to
produce high quality results without requiring inlining to happen
everywhere.
A link to the design doc for this attribute is available at the
Differential review link below.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13263
llvm-svn: 254554
A class without a name for linkage purposes gets a name along the lines
of <unnamed-type-foo> where foo is either the name of a declarator which
defined it (like a variable or field) or a
typedef-name (like a typedef or alias-declaration).
We handled the declarator case correctly but it would fall down during
template instantiation if the declarator didn't share the tag's type.
We failed to handle the typedef-name case at all.
Instead, keep track of the association between the two and keep it up to
date in the face of template instantiation.
llvm-svn: 246469
It turns out that there is a mangling for 'extern "C"', it's only used
by MSVC in /clr mode. Co-opt this mangling so that extern "C" functions
marked overloadable get demangled nicely.
llvm-svn: 237548
Wire it through everywhere we have support for fastcall, essentially.
This allows us to parse the MSVC "14" CTP headers, but we will
miscompile them because LLVM doesn't support __vectorcall yet.
Reviewed By: Aaron Ballman
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5808
llvm-svn: 220573
Extended qualifiers can appear in many places, refactor the code so it's
more reusable. Add tests in areas where we've increased compatibility.
llvm-svn: 201574
Pointer types in the MSVC ABI are a bit awkward, the width of the
pointer is considered a kind of CVR qualifier.
Restrict is handled similarly to const and volatile but is mangled after
the pointer width qualifier.
This fixes PR18880.
llvm-svn: 201569
This makes the C++ ABI depend entirely on the target: MS ABI for -win32 triples,
Itanium otherwise. It's no longer possible to do weird combinations.
To be able to run a test with a specific ABI without constraining it to a
specific triple, new substitutions are added to lit: %itanium_abi_triple and
%ms_abi_triple can be used to get the current target triple adjusted to the
desired ABI. For example, if the test suite is running with the i686-pc-win32
target, %itanium_abi_triple will expand to i686-pc-mingw32.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2545
llvm-svn: 199250
This reverts commit r197184.
Richard Smith brings up some good points, a proper implementation will
require us to mangle unnameable entities compatibly with MSVC.
llvm-svn: 197192
While testing our ability to mangle large constants (PR18175), I
incidentally discovered that we did not properly mangle enums correctly.
Previously, we would append the width of the enum in bytes after the
type-tag differentiator.
This would mean "enum : short" would be mangled as 'W2' while "enum :
char" would be mangled as 'W1'. Upon testing this with several versions
of MSVC, I found that this did not match their behavior: they always use
'W4'.
N.B. Quick testing uncovered that undname allows different numbers to
follow the 'W' in the following way:
'W0' -> "enum char"
'W1' -> "enum unsigned char"
'W2' -> "enum short"
'W3' -> "enum unsigned short"
'W4' -> "enum"
'W5' -> "enum unsigned int"
'W6' -> "enum long"
'W7' -> "enum unsigned long"
However this scheme appears abandoned, I cannot get MSVC to trigger it.
Furthermore, it's incomplete: it doesn't handle "bool" or "long long".
llvm-svn: 196752
It wasn't possible for an anonymous type to show up inside of function arguments.
However, decltype (which MSVC added support for in 2010) makes this
possible. Further, backrefs to these anonymous types can now be formed.
This fixes PR18022.
N.B. We do not, and very likely _will not_, support MSVC's bug where
subsequent typedefs of anonymous types leak into the linkage name; this
is a gross violation of the ABI. A warning should be introduced to
inform our users of this particular shortcoming.
llvm-svn: 195669
Summary:
Operator new, new[], delete, and delete[] are all implicitly static when
declared inside a record. CXXMethodDecl already knows this, but we need
to account for that before we pick the calling convention for the
function type.
Fixes PR17371.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1761
llvm-svn: 192150
Summary:
When selecting a mangling for an anonymous tag type:
- We should first try it's typedef'd name.
- If that doesn't work, we should mangle in the name of the declarator
that specified it as a declaration specifier.
- If that doesn't work, fall back to a static mangling of
<unnamed-type>.
This should make our anonymous type mangling compatible.
This partially fixes PR16994; we would need to have an implementation of
scope numbering to get it right (a separate issue).
Reviewers: rnk, rsmith, rjmccall, cdavis5x
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1540
llvm-svn: 190892
Summary:
Functions named "main", "wmain", "WinMain", "wWinMain", and "DllMain"
are never mangled regardless of linkage, even when compiling for kernel
mode.
Depends on D1655
Reviewers: timurrrr, pcc, rnk, whunt
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1670
llvm-svn: 190675
Summary:
This is a first step to getting extern "C" working properly inside
clang. There are a number of quirks but mangling declarations inside
such a function are a good first step.
Reviewers: timurrrr, pcc, cdavis5x
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1655
llvm-svn: 190671
Summary:
There were several things going wrong:
- We mangled in useless qualifiers like "volatile void" return types.
- We didn't propagate 64-bit pointer markers sufficiently.
- We mangled qualifiers belonging to the pointee incorrectly.
This fixes PR16844 and PR16848.
Reviewers: rnk, whunt
Reviewed By: rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1353
llvm-svn: 188450
There were three things missing from the original implementation:
- We would omit the 'E' qualifier for members int 64-bit mode.
- We would not exmaine the qualifiers in 'IsMember' mode.
- We didn't generate the correct backref to the base class.
llvm-svn: 187753
Most of the complexity of this patch is figuring out which types get the
qualifier and which don't. If we implement __ptr32/64, then we should
check the qualifier instead of assuming all pointers are 64-bit.
This fixes PR13792.
Patch by Warren Hunt!
llvm-svn: 181825
This includes the following fixes:
- Implement 4 subtly different variants of qualifier mangling and use them
in what I believe are the right places.
- Fix handling of array types. Previously we were always decaying them,
which is wrong if the type appears as a template argument, pointee,
referent etc.
Fixes PR13182.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D709
llvm-svn: 180250
what I'm going to treat as basically universal properties of
array-cookie code. Implement MS array cookies on top of that.
Based on a patch by Timur Iskhodzhanov!
llvm-svn: 155886
mangler. Now member functions and pointers thereof have their calling
convention mangled as __thiscall if they have the default CC (even though,
they technically still have the __cdecl CC).
llvm-svn: 118598
ObjC pointers were easy enough (as far as the ABI is concerned, they're
just pointers to structs), but I had to invent a new mangling for block
pointers. This is particularly worrying with the Microsoft ABI, because
it is a vendor-specific ABI; extending it could come back to bite us
later when MS extends it on their own (and you know they will).
llvm-svn: 107572
Only actual functions get mangled correctly; I don't know how to fix it for
function pointers yet. Thanks to John McCall for the hint.
Also, mangle anonymous tag types. I don't have a suitable testcase yet; I have
a feeling that that's going to need support for static locals, and I haven't
figured out exactly how MSVC's scheme for mangling those works.
llvm-svn: 107561
David Majnemer