This implementation doesn't warn on anything that GCC doesn't warn on with the
exception of templates specializations (GCC doesn't warn, Clang does). The
specific skipped cases (boolean, constant expressions, enums) are open for
debate/adjustment if anyone wants to demonstrate that GCC is being overly
conservative here. The only really obvious false positive I found was in the
Clang regression suite's MPI test - apparently MPI uses specific flag values in
pointer constants. (eg: #define FOO (void*)~0)
llvm-svn: 166039
While the check itself should count 0-based for the parameter index,
the diagnostic should be 1-based (first, second, third, not start at 0).
Fixes <rdar://problem/12249569>.
llvm-svn: 163375
the the code like this (due to x and &x being the same value but
different size):
void* x[] = { ptr1, ptr2, ptr3 };
CFArrayCreate(NULL, (const void **) &x, count, NULL);
llvm-svn: 149579
using CFArrayCreate & family.
Specifically, CFArrayCreate's input should be:
'A C array of the pointer-sized values to be in the new array.'
(radar://10717339)
llvm-svn: 149008
David Blaikie