__attribute__((amdgpu_flat_work_group_size(<min>, <max>))) - request minimum and maximum flat work group size
__attribute__((amdgpu_waves_per_eu(<min>[, <max>]))) - request minimum and/or maximum waves per execution unit
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24513
llvm-svn: 282371
The backend can't encode all possible values of the argument and will fail isel. Checking in the frontend presents a friendlier experience to the user.
I started with builtins that can only take _MM_CUR_DIRECTION or _MM_NO_EXC. More builtins coming in the future.
llvm-svn: 282228
Summary:
The diagnostic did not handle ~ well. An expression such as ~0 is often used when 'all ones' is needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24232
llvm-svn: 282156
Summary:
Offset was doubled in size, but the assignment was missing. We just need
to reassign to the original variable in this case to fix it.
Reviewers: cfe-commits, echristo
Subscribers: meikeb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24648
llvm-svn: 281706
Summary:
The warning for a format string not being a string literal and therefore
being potentially insecure is overly strict for indices into string
literals. This fix checks if the index into the string literal is
precomputable. If that's the case it will check if the suffix of that
string literal is a valid format string string literal. It will still
issue the aforementioned warning for out of range indices into the
string literal.
Patch by Meike Baumgärtner (meikeb)
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: srhines, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24584
llvm-svn: 281686
r278501 inadvertently introduced a bug in which it disallowed shifting
scalar operands by vector operands when not compiling for OpenCL. This
commit fixes it.
Patch by Vladimir Yakovlev.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24467
llvm-svn: 281669
The underlying type for an enumeration in C is either char, signed int, or unsigned int. In the case the underlying type is chosen to be char (such as when passing -fshort-enums or using __attribute__((packed)) on the enum declaration), the enumeration can result in undefined behavior. However, when the underlying type is signed int or unsigned int (or long long as an extension), there is no undefined behavior because the types are compatible. This patch silences diagnostics for the latter while retaining the diagnostics for the former.
This patch addresses PR29140.
llvm-svn: 281632
Summary: This reverts r281527 because I messed up the attribution.
Reviewers: srhines
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24579
llvm-svn: 281530
Summary:
The warning for a format string not being a sting literal and therefore
being potentially insecure is overly strict for indecies into sting
literals. This fix checks if the index into the string literal is
precomputable. If thats the case it will check if the suffix of that
sting literal is a valid format string string literal. It will still
issue the aforementioned warning for out of range indecies into the
string literal.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: srhines, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23820
llvm-svn: 281527
CUDA target attributes are used for function overloading and must not be merged.
This fixes a bug where attributes were inherited during function template
specialization in CUDA and made it impossible for specialized function
to provide its own target attributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24522
llvm-svn: 281406
This mostly behaves cl.exe's behavior, even though clang-cl is stricter in some
corner cases and more lenient in others (see the included test).
To make the uuid declared previously here diagnostic work correctly, tweak
stripTypeAttributesOffDeclSpec() to keep attributes in the right order.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24469
llvm-svn: 281367
For ObjC type parameter, we used to have TypedefType that is canonicalized to
id or the bound type. We can't represent "T <protocol>" and thus will lose
the type information in the following example:
@interface MyMutableDictionary<KeyType, ObjectType> : NSObject
- (void)setObject:(ObjectType)obj forKeyedSubscript:(KeyType <NSCopying>)key;
@end
MyMutableDictionary<NSString *, NSString *> *stringsByString;
NSNumber *n1, *n2;
stringsByString[n1] = n2;
--> no warning on type mismatch of the key.
To fix the problem, we introduce a new type ObjCTypeParamType that supports
a list of protocol qualifiers.
We create ObjCTypeParamType for ObjCTypeParamDecl when we create
ObjCTypeParamDecl. We also substitute ObjCTypeParamType instead of TypedefType
on an ObjCTypeParamDecl.
rdar://24619481
rdar://25060179
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23080
llvm-svn: 281358
We also need to add ObjCTypeParamTypeLoc. ObjCTypeParamType supports the
representation of "T <protocol>" where T is a type parameter. Before this,
we use TypedefType to represent the type parameter for ObjC.
ObjCTypeParamType has "ObjCTypeParamDecl *OTPDecl" and it extends from
ObjCProtocolQualifiers. It is a non-canonical type and is canonicalized
to the underlying type with the protocol qualifiers.
rdar://24619481
rdar://25060179
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23079
llvm-svn: 281355
To construct the canonical type of ObjCTypeParamType, we need to apply
qualifiers on ObjCObjectPointerType. The updated applyObjCProtocolQualifiers
handles this case by merging the protocol lists, constructing a new
ObjCObjectType, then a new ObjCObjectPointerType.
rdar://24619481
rdar://25060179
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D24059
llvm-svn: 281353
In C mode, if we have a visible declaration but not a visible definition, a tag
defined in the declaration should be have a visible definition. In C++ we rely
on the ODR merging, whereas in C we cannot because each declaration of a
function gets its own set of declarations in its prototype scope.
Patch developed in collaboration with Richard Smith!
llvm-svn: 280984
r280553 introduced an issue where we'd emit ambiguity errors for code
like:
```
void foo(int *, int);
void foo(unsigned int *, unsigned int);
void callFoo() {
unsigned int i;
foo(&i, 0); // ambiguous: int->unsigned int is worse than int->int,
// but unsigned int*->unsigned int* is better than
// int*->int*.
}
```
This patch fixes this issue by changing how we handle ill-formed (but
valid) implicit conversions. Candidates with said conversions now always
rank worse than candidates without them, and two candidates are
considered to be equally bad if they both have these conversions for
the same argument.
Additionally, this fixes a case in C++11 where we'd complain about an
ambiguity in a case like:
```
void f(char *, int);
void f(const char *, unsigned);
void g() { f("abc", 0); }
```
...Since conversion to char* from a string literal is considered
ill-formed in C++11 (and deprecated in C++03), but we accept it as an
extension.
llvm-svn: 280847
Summary:
C++1z 6.4.1/p2:
If the if statement is of the form if constexpr, the value of the
condition shall be a contextually converted constant expression of type
bool [...]
C++1z 5.20/p4:
[...] A contextually converted constant expression of type bool is an
expression, contextually converted to bool (Clause4), where the
converted expression is a constant expression and the conversion
sequence contains only the conversions above. [...]
Contextually converting result of an expression `e` to a Boolean value
requires `bool t(e)` to be well-formed.
An explicit conversion function is only considered as a user-defined
conversion for direct-initialization, which is essentially what
//contextually converted to bool// requires.
Also, fixes PR28470.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24158
llvm-svn: 280838
copy-initialization. We previously got this wrong in a couple of ways:
- we only looked for copy / move constructors and constructor templates for
this copy, and thus would fail to copy in cases where doing so should use
some other constructor (but see core issue 670),
- we mishandled the special case for disabling user-defined conversions that
blocks infinite recursion through repeated application of a copy constructor
(applying it in slightly too many cases) -- though as far as I can tell,
this does not ever actually affect the result of overload resolution, and
- we misapplied the special-case rules for constructors taking a parameter
whose type is a (reference to) the same class type by incorrectly assuming
that only happens for copy/move constructors (it also happens for
constructors instantiated from templates and those inherited from base
classes).
These changes should only affect strange corner cases (for instance, where the
copy constructor exists but has a non-const-qualified parameter type), so for
the most part it only causes us to produce more 'candidate' notes, but see the
test changes for other cases whose behavior is affected.
llvm-svn: 280776
We have invariants we like to guarantee for the
`ImplicitConversionKind`s in a `StandardConversionSequence`. These
weren't being upheld in code that r280553 touched, so Richard suggested
that we should fix that. See D24113.
I'm not entirely sure how to go about testing this, so no test case is
included. Suggestions welcome.
llvm-svn: 280562
This patch allows us to perform incompatible pointer conversions when
resolving overloads in C. So, the following code will no longer fail to
compile (though it will still emit warnings, assuming the user hasn't
opted out of them):
```
void foo(char *) __attribute__((overloadable));
void foo(int) __attribute__((overloadable));
void callFoo() {
unsigned char bar[128];
foo(bar); // selects the char* overload.
}
```
These conversions are ranked below all others, so:
A. Any other viable conversion will win out
B. If we had another incompatible pointer conversion in the example
above (e.g. `void foo(int *)`), we would complain about
an ambiguity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24113
llvm-svn: 280553
Summary:
This attribute specifies expectations about the initialization of static and
thread local variables. Specifically that the variable has a
[constant initializer](http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/constant_initialization)
according to the rules of [basic.start.static]. Failure to meet this expectation
will result in an error.
Static objects with constant initializers avoid hard-to-find bugs caused by
the indeterminate order of dynamic initialization. They can also be safely
used by other static constructors across translation units.
This attribute acts as a compile time assertion that the requirements
for constant initialization have been met. Since these requirements change
between dialects and have subtle pitfalls it's important to fail fast instead
of silently falling back on dynamic initialization.
```c++
// -std=c++14
#define SAFE_STATIC __attribute__((require_constant_initialization)) static
struct T {
constexpr T(int) {}
~T();
};
SAFE_STATIC T x = {42}; // OK.
SAFE_STATIC T y = 42; // error: variable does not have a constant initializer
// copy initialization is not a constant expression on a non-literal type.
```
This attribute can only be applied to objects with static or thread-local storage
duration.
Reviewers: majnemer, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23385
llvm-svn: 280525
Summary:
This attribute specifies expectations about the initialization of static and
thread local variables. Specifically that the variable has a
[constant initializer](http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/constant_initialization)
according to the rules of [basic.start.static]. Failure to meet this expectation
will result in an error.
Static objects with constant initializers avoid hard-to-find bugs caused by
the indeterminate order of dynamic initialization. They can also be safely
used by other static constructors across translation units.
This attribute acts as a compile time assertion that the requirements
for constant initialization have been met. Since these requirements change
between dialects and have subtle pitfalls it's important to fail fast instead
of silently falling back on dynamic initialization.
```c++
// -std=c++14
#define SAFE_STATIC __attribute__((require_constant_initialization)) static
struct T {
constexpr T(int) {}
~T();
};
SAFE_STATIC T x = {42}; // OK.
SAFE_STATIC T y = 42; // error: variable does not have a constant initializer
// copy initialization is not a constant expression on a non-literal type.
```
This attribute can only be applied to objects with static or thread-local storage
duration.
Reviewers: majnemer, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23385
llvm-svn: 280516
The class MismatchingNewDeleteDetector is in
lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp inside the anonymous namespace.
This diff reorders the fields and removes the excessive padding.
Test plan: make -j8 check-clang
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23898
llvm-svn: 280426
textually included, create an ImportDecl just as we would if we reached a
#include of any other modular header. This is necessary in order to correctly
determine the set of variables to initialize for an imported module.
This should hopefully make the modules selfhost buildbot green again.
llvm-svn: 280409
declaration has a dependent type.
This fixes a bug where clang errors out on a valid code.
rdar://problem/28051467
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24110
llvm-svn: 280330
explicit specialization to a warning for C++98 mode (this is a defect report
resolution, so per our informal policy it should apply in C++98), and turn
the warning on by default for C++11 and later. In all cases where it fires, the
right thing to do is to remove the pointless explicit instantiation.
llvm-svn: 280308
indirect virtual bases. We don't need to be able to invoke such an assignment
operator from the derived class, and we shouldn't delete the derived assignment
op if we can't do so.
llvm-svn: 280288
Richard Smith