The AST for the fragment
```
@interface I
@end
template <typename>
void decode(I *p) {
for (I *k in p) {}
}
void decode(I *p) {
decode<int>(p);
}
```
differs heavily when templatized and non-templatized:
```
|-FunctionTemplateDecl 0x7fbfe0863940 <line:4:1, line:7:1> line:5:6 decode
| |-TemplateTypeParmDecl 0x7fbfe0863690 <line:4:11> col:11 typename depth 0 index 0
| |-FunctionDecl 0x7fbfe08638a0 <line:5:1, line:7:1> line:5:6 decode 'void (I *__strong)'
| | |-ParmVarDecl 0x7fbfe08637a0 <col:13, col:16> col:16 referenced p 'I *__strong'
| | `-CompoundStmt 0x7fbfe0863b88 <col:19, line:7:1>
| | `-ObjCForCollectionStmt 0x7fbfe0863b50 <line:6:3, col:20>
| | |-DeclStmt 0x7fbfe0863a50 <col:8, col:13>
| | | `-VarDecl 0x7fbfe08639f0 <col:8, col:11> col:11 k 'I *const __strong'
| | |-ImplicitCastExpr 0x7fbfe0863a90 <col:16> 'I *' <LValueToRValue>
| | | `-DeclRefExpr 0x7fbfe0863a68 <col:16> 'I *__strong' lvalue ParmVar 0x7fbfe08637a0 'p' 'I *__strong'
| | `-CompoundStmt 0x7fbfe0863b78 <col:19, col:20>
| `-FunctionDecl 0x7fbfe0863f80 <line:5:1, line:7:1> line:5:6 used decode 'void (I *__strong)'
| |-TemplateArgument type 'int'
| |-ParmVarDecl 0x7fbfe0863ef8 <col:13, col:16> col:16 used p 'I *__strong'
| `-CompoundStmt 0x7fbfe0890cf0 <col:19, line:7:1>
| `-ObjCForCollectionStmt 0x7fbfe0890cc8 <line:6:3, col:20>
| |-DeclStmt 0x7fbfe0890c70 <col:8, col:13>
| | `-VarDecl 0x7fbfe0890c00 <col:8, col:11> col:11 k 'I *__strong' callinit
| | `-ImplicitValueInitExpr 0x7fbfe0890c60 <<invalid sloc>> 'I *__strong'
| |-ImplicitCastExpr 0x7fbfe0890cb0 <col:16> 'I *' <LValueToRValue>
| | `-DeclRefExpr 0x7fbfe0890c88 <col:16> 'I *__strong' lvalue ParmVar 0x7fbfe0863ef8 'p' 'I *__strong'
| `-CompoundStmt 0x7fbfe0863b78 <col:19, col:20>
```
Note how in the instantiated version ImplicitValueInitExpr unexpectedly appears.
While objects are auto-initialized under ARC, it does not make sense to
have an initializer for a for-loop variable, and it makes even less
sense to have such a different AST for instantiated and non-instantiated
version.
Digging deeper, I have found that there are two separate Sema* files for
dealing with templates and for dealing with non-templatized code.
In a non-templatized version, an initialization was performed only for
variables which are not loop variables for an Objective-C loop and not
variables for a C++ for-in loop:
```
if (FRI && (Tok.is(tok::colon) || isTokIdentifier_in())) {
bool IsForRangeLoop = false;
if (TryConsumeToken(tok::colon, FRI->ColonLoc)) {
IsForRangeLoop = true;
if (Tok.is(tok::l_brace))
FRI->RangeExpr = ParseBraceInitializer();
else
FRI->RangeExpr = ParseExpression();
}
Decl *ThisDecl = Actions.ActOnDeclarator(getCurScope(), D);
if (IsForRangeLoop)
Actions.ActOnCXXForRangeDecl(ThisDecl);
Actions.FinalizeDeclaration(ThisDecl);
D.complete(ThisDecl);
return Actions.FinalizeDeclaratorGroup(getCurScope(), DS, ThisDecl);
}
SmallVector<Decl *, 8> DeclsInGroup;
Decl *FirstDecl = ParseDeclarationAfterDeclaratorAndAttributes(
D, ParsedTemplateInfo(), FRI);
```
However the code in SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl was inconsistent,
guarding only against C++ for-in loops.
rdar://38391075
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44989
llvm-svn: 328749
ObjC and ObjC++ pass non-trivial structs in a way that is incompatible
with each other. For example:
typedef struct {
id f0;
__weak id f1;
} S;
// this code is compiled in c++.
extern "C" {
void foo(S s);
}
void caller() {
// the caller passes the parameter indirectly and destructs it.
foo(S());
}
// this function is compiled in c.
// 'a' is passed directly and is destructed in the callee.
void foo(S a) {
}
This patch fixes the incompatibility by passing and returning structs
with __strong or weak fields using the C ABI in C++ mode. __strong and
__weak fields in a struct do not cause the struct to be destructed in
the caller and __strong fields do not cause the struct to be passed
indirectly.
Also, this patch fixes the microsoft ABI bug mentioned here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41039?id=128767#inline-364710
rdar://problem/38887866
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44908
llvm-svn: 328731
These instructions have been around for a long time, but we
haven't supported intrinsics for them. The "new" vesrions use
the CSx register for the start of the buffer instead of the K
field in the Mx register.
There is a related llvm patch.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 328725
We were assuming that vbtable indices were assigned in layout order in
our comparison, which is not the case. When a virtual method, such as
the destructor, appears in multiple vftables, the vftable that appears
first in object layout order is the one that points to the main
implementation of that method. The later vftables use thunks.
In this layout, we adjusted "this" in the main implementation by the
amount that is appropriate for 'B' instead of 'A', even though the main
implementation is found in D's vftable for A:
struct A {
virtual ~A() {}
};
struct B {
virtual ~B() {}
};
struct C : virtual B {};
struct D : virtual A, C {};
D's layout looks like:
0 D subobject (empty)
0 C base suboject
8 A base subobject
16 B base subobject
With this fix, we correctly adjust by -8 in D's deleting destructor
instead of -16.
Fixes PR36921.
llvm-svn: 328723
Summary:
The "previous definition is here" note is not helpful if there is no location information. The note will reference nothing in such a case. This patch first checks to see if there is location data, and if so the note diagnostic is emitted.
This fixes PR15409. The issue in the first comment seems to already be resolved. This patch addresses the second example.
Reviewers: bruno, rsmith
Reviewed By: bruno
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44901
llvm-svn: 328712
When the declare target variables are emitted for the device,
constructors|destructors for these variables must emitted and registered
by the runtime in the offloading sections.
llvm-svn: 328705
Summary:
This patch doing more check and verify the -march= string and will issue
an error if it's a invalid combination.
Reviewers: asb, apazos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44189
Patch by Kito Cheng.
llvm-svn: 328690
The diagnostic system for Clang can already handle many AST nodes. Instead
of converting them to strings first, just hand the AST node directly to
the diagnostic system and let it handle the output. Minor changes in some
diagnostic output.
llvm-svn: 328688
structs.
r326307 and r327870 made changes that allowed using non-trivial C
structs with fields qualified with __strong or __weak. This commit makes
the following C++ triviality type traits available to non-trivial C
structs:
__has_trivial_assign
__has_trivial_move_assign
__has_trivial_copy
__has_trivial_move_constructor
__has_trivial_constructor
__has_trivial_destructor
rdar://problem/33599681
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44913
llvm-svn: 328680
When SemaCoroutine looks for await_resume, it means it. No need for helpful: "Did you mean await_ready?" messages.
Fixes PR33477 and a couple of FIXMEs in test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp
llvm-svn: 328663
When we have a category implementation without a corresponding interface
(which is an error by itself), semantic checks for property accesses
will attempt to access a null interface declaration and then segfault.
Error out in such cases instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44916
llvm-svn: 328654
Extended the matched assignment operators when checking for bound changes in a body of the loop by using the freshly added isAssignmentOperator matcher.
This covers all the (current) possible assignments, tests added as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38921
llvm-svn: 328619
Summary:
Currently an invalid source range is generated for the member call expressions of `co_await`. The end location of the call expression is the `co_await` token loc, while the start is the location of the operand. This causes crashes when the source range is used to produce diagnostics.
This patch fixes the issues by using the expression location instead of the token location when building the member calls.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, rsmith, vsk, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: cfe-commits, modocache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44915
llvm-svn: 328606
Previously, anytime the result of the resume expression in
operator co_await was unused, a warning was generated. This
patch fixes the issue by only generating the unused result warning
if calling `await_resume()` would also generate a warning.
llvm-svn: 328602
Summary:
This fixes PR33561 and PR34185.
Don't store pending template instantiations for late-parsed templates in
the normal PendingInstantiations queue. Instead, use a separate list
that will only be parsed and instantiated at end of TU when late
template parsing actually works and doesn't infinite loop.
Reviewers: rsmith, thakis, hans
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44846
llvm-svn: 328567
Summary:
r318093 sets fma, fmaf, fmal as const for Gnu and MSVC. Android also
does not set errno for these functions. So mark these const for
Android.
Reviewers: spatel, efriedma, srhines, chh, enh
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44852
llvm-svn: 328552
If the link clause is used on the declare target directive, the object
should be linked on target or target data directives, not during the
codegen. Patch adds support for this clause.
llvm-svn: 328544
Declaring "_Pragma("clang optimize off")" before the body of a
function with a lambda leads to the lambda functions in the body
not being affected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43821
llvm-svn: 328494
Summary:
As the title says, this makes following code compile:
```
template<typename> struct Foo {};
Foo() -> Foo<void>;
Foo f; // ok
```
Thanks Nicolas Lesser for coining the fix.
Reviewers: rsmith, lichray
Reviewed By: rsmith, lichray
Subscribers: lichray, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38216
llvm-svn: 328409
Launching a kernel from the host code does not generate code for the
kernel itself. This fixes an issue with clang erroneously reporting
an error for a HD->D call from within the kernel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44837
llvm-svn: 328362
Summary: Porting HWASan to Linux x86-64, the third of the three patches, clang part.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: cryptoad, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44745
llvm-svn: 328361
Need to override convertConstraint to recognise amdgpu specific register names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44533
llvm-svn: 328359
Add two additional implicit arguments for OpenCL for the AMDGPU target using the AMDHSA runtime to support device enqueue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44696
llvm-svn: 328350
- Remove use of the opencl and amdopencl environment member of the target triple for the AMDGPU target.
- Use a function attribute to communicate to the AMDGPU backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43735
llvm-svn: 328347
This make -ivfsoverlay behave more like other fatal errors (e.g. missing
-include file) by skipping the missing file instead of bailing out of
the whole compilation. This makes it possible for libclang to still
provide some functionallity as well as to correctly produce the fatal
error diagnostic (previously we lost the diagnostic in libclang since
there was no TU to tie it to).
rdar://33385423
llvm-svn: 328337
The issues was that we were setting hidden visibility if, when
processing a hidden class, we found out that we needed to emit a
reference to a vtable provided by the standard library.
Original message:
Set dso_local on vtables.
llvm-svn: 328288
Changes the analyzer to believe that methods annotated with _Nonnull
from system frameworks indeed return non null objects.
Local methods with such annotation are still distrusted.
rdar://24291919
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44341
llvm-svn: 328282
Putting back the code in commit r327189 that was reverted in r322737. The code is being committed in three stages and this one is the last stage: 1) r327455 fp16 feature flags, 2) r327836 pass half type or i16 based on FullFP16, and 3) the code here which the front-end fp16 vector intrinsic for ARM.
Differential revision https://reviews.llvm.org/D43650
llvm-svn: 328277
When a temporary is constructed with a proper construction context, it should
be safe to inline the destructor. We have added suppressions for some of the
common false positives caused by such inlining, so there should be - and from my
observations there indeed is - more benefit than harm from enabling destructor
inlining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44721
llvm-svn: 328258
CXXCtorInitializer-based constructors are also affected by the C++17 mandatory
copy elision, like variable constructors and return value constructors.
Extend r328248 to support those.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44763
llvm-svn: 328255
Function return values can be constructed directly in variables or passed
directly into return statements, without even an elidable copy in between.
This is how the C++17 mandatory copy elision AST behaves. The behavior we'll
have in such cases is the "old" behavior that we've had before we've
implemented destructor inlining and proper lifetime extension support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44755
llvm-svn: 328253
In C++17 copy elision is mandatory for variable and return value constructors
(as long as it doesn't involve type conversion) which results in AST that does
not contain elidable constructors in their usual places. In order to provide
construction contexts in this scenario we need to cover more AST patterns.
This patch makes the CFG prepared for these scenarios by:
- Fork VariableConstructionContext and ReturnedValueConstructionContext into
two different sub-classes (each) one of which indicates the C++17 case and
contains a reference to an extra CXXBindTemporaryExpr.
- Allow CFGCXXRecordTypedCall element to accept VariableConstructionContext and
ReturnedValueConstructionContext as its context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44597
llvm-svn: 328248
If a memory region (or an SVal that represents a pointer to that memory region)
is a (direct or indirect, not necessarily proper) sub-region of a SymbolicRegion
then it is said to have a symbolic base.
For now SVal::symbol_iterator explores the symbol within a symbolic region
only when the SVal represents a pointer to the symbolic region itself,
not to any of its sub-regions.
This behavior is not indended by any user of symbol_iterator; all users who
cared about such behavior were expecting the iterator to descend into the
symbolic base of an arbitrary region, find the parent symbol of the symbolic
base region, and iterate over that symbol. Lack of such behavior resulted in
bugs demonstarted by the test cases.
Hence the decision to change the API to behave more intuitively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44347
llvm-svn: 328247
The difference between CreateRuntimeFunction and CreateBuiltinFunction
is that CreateBuiltinFunction would not set dllimport or dso_local.
To keep the current semantics, just forward to CreateRuntimeFunction
with Local=true so it doesn't add dllimport.
llvm-svn: 328224
Summary: The workers also need to initialize the global stack. The call to the initialization function needs to happen after the kernel_init() function is called by the master. This ensures that the per-team data structures of the runtime have been initialized.
Reviewers: ABataev, grokos, carlo.bertolli, caomhin
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: jholewinski, guansong, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44749
llvm-svn: 328219
Now that LLVM has support for emitting calling conventions in DWARF (see
r328191) have clang emit them.
Patch by: Adrien Guinet
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42351
llvm-svn: 328196
George Karpenkov