Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).
Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor
Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
Depends on D65919
Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962
llvm-svn: 369041
Now that we're using widening legalization. We need to improve our extract_subvector cost model for these types. This patch begins by modeling these as a subvector extract followed by a permute. I've left FIXMEs in the code for future improvements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65892
llvm-svn: 369022
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
If the last step in an FP add reduction allows reassociation and doesn't care
about -0.0, then we are free to recognize that computation as a reduction
that may reorder the intermediate steps.
This is requested directly by PR42705:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42705
and solves PR42947 (if horizontal math instructions are actually faster than
the alternative):
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42947
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66236
llvm-svn: 368995
We already had the pattern for just the scalar to vector and bitcast,
but not the case where we wanted zeroes in the high half of the xmm.
llvm-svn: 368972
fp_to_sint is turned into X86cvttp2si during isel preprocessing.
The other redundant isel patterns were removed previously, but I
missed this one because its in the MMX td file.
llvm-svn: 368968
If the width is 256 bits, then we must have AVX so the else here
was unnecessary. Once that's removed then the >= 256 bit code is
identical to the 128 bit code with a different VT so combine them.
llvm-svn: 368956
Now that we legalize by widening, the element types here won't change. Previously these were modeled as the elements being widened and then the instruction might become an AND or SHL/ASHR pair. But now they'll become something like a ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG/SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG.
For AVX2, when the destination type is legal its clear the cost should be 1 since we have extend instructions that can produce 256 bit vectors from less than 128 bit vectors. I'm a little less sure about AVX1 costs, but I think the ones I changed were definitely too high, but they might still be too high.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66169
llvm-svn: 368858
If the target shuffle mask is from a wider type, attempt to scale the mask so that the extraction can attempt to peek through.
Fixes the regression mentioned in rL368662
Reapplying this as rL368308 had to be reverted as part of rL368660 to revert rL368276
llvm-svn: 368663
If we don't demand all elements, then attempt to combine to a simpler shuffle.
At the moment we can only do this if Depth == 0 as combineX86ShufflesRecursively uses Depth to track whether the shuffle has really changed or not - we'll need to change this before we can properly start merging combineX86ShufflesRecursively into SimplifyDemandedVectorElts.
The insertps-combine.ll regression is because XFormVExtractWithShuffleIntoLoad can't see through shuffles of different widths - this will be fixed in a follow-up commit.
Reapplying this as rL368307 had to be reverted as part of rL368660 to revert rL368276
llvm-svn: 368662
This introduced a false positive MemorySanitizer warning about use of
uninitialized memory in a vectorized crc function in Chromium. That suggests
maybe something is not right with this transformation. See
https://crbug.com/992853#c7 for a reproducer.
This also reverts the follow-up commits r368307 and r368308 which
depended on this.
> This patch attempts to peek through vectors based on the demanded bits/elt of a particular ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT node, allowing us to avoid dependencies on ops that have no impact on the extract.
>
> In particular this helps remove some unnecessary scalar->vector->scalar patterns.
>
> The wasm shift patterns are annoying - @tlively has indicated that the wasm vector shift codegen are to be refactored in the near-term and isn't considered a major issue.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65887
llvm-svn: 368660
Currently we can't keep any state in the selector object that we get from
subtarget. As a result we have to plumb through all our variables through
multiple functions. This change makes it non-const and adds a virtual init()
method to allow further state to be captured for each target.
AArch64 makes use of this in this patch to cache a call to hasFnAttribute()
which is expensive to call, and is used on each selection of G_BRCOND.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65984
llvm-svn: 368652
r367088 made it so that funclets store XMM registers into their local
frame instead of storing them to the parent frame. However, that change
forgot to update the parent frame pointer offset for catch blocks. This
change does that.
Fixes crashes when an exception is rethrown in a catch block that saves
XMMs, as described in https://crbug.com/992860.
llvm-svn: 368631
We need AVX512BW to be able to truncate an i16 vector. If we don't
have that we have to extend i16->i32, then trunc, i32->i8. But we
won't be able to remove the min/max if we do that. At least not
without more special handling.
llvm-svn: 368623
If we're after type legalize, we should make sure we won't create
a store with an illegal type when we separate the AVG pattern
from the truncating store.
I don't know of a way to fail for this today. Just noticed while
I was in the vicinity.
llvm-svn: 368608
Support -march=tigerlake for x86.
Compare with Icelake Client, It include 4 more new features ,they are
avx512vp2intersect, movdiri, movdir64b, shstk.
Patch by Xiang Zhang (xiangzhangllvm)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65840
llvm-svn: 368543
The test case that changed is probably better served through
allowing combineTruncatedArithmetic to create narrow vectors. It
also appears InstCombine would have simplified this test case
to remove the zext and trunc anyway.
llvm-svn: 368522
On SSE41+ targets we always lower vector shuffles to ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG, even if we don't need the extended bits.
This patch relaxes this so that we lower to ANY_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG if we can, meaning that shuffle combines have a better idea of what elements need to be kept zero. This helps the multiple reduction code as we can now combine away a lot more of the pack+extend codes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65741
llvm-svn: 368515
Summary:
This patch adds a special DAG combine for SSE1 to recognize the IR pattern InstCombine gives us for movmsk. This only does the recognition for a few cases where its obvious the input won't be scalarized resulting in building a vector just do to the movmsk. I've made it separate from our existing matching for movmsk since that's called in multiple places and I didn't spend time to see if the other callers would make sense here. Plus the restrictions and additional checks would complicate that.
This fixes the case from PR42870. Buts its probably still broken the presence of logic ops feeding the movmsk pattern which would further hide the v4f32 type.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, xbolva00
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65689
llvm-svn: 368506
Summary:
On windows if the frame size exceed 4096 bytes, compiler need to
generate a call to _alloca_probe. X86CallFrameOptimization pass
changes the reserved stack size and cause of stack probe function
not be inserted. This patch fix the issue by detecting the call
frame size, if the size exceed 4096 bytes, drop X86CallFrameOptimization.
Reviewers: craig.topper, wxiao3, annita.zhang, rnk, RKSimon
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65923
llvm-svn: 368503
Summary:
Targets often have instructions that can sign-extend certain cases faster
than the equivalent shift-left/arithmetic-shift-right. Such cases can be
identified by matching a shift-left/shift-right pair but there are some
issues with this in the context of combines. For example, suppose you can
sign-extend 8-bit up to 32-bit with a target extend instruction.
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24 # (I've inlined the G_CONSTANT for brevity)
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 24
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2:_(s32), i32 1
would reasonably combine to:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 25
which no longer matches the special case. If your shifts and extend are
equal cost, this would break even as a pair of shifts but if your shift is
more expensive than the extend then it's cheaper as:
%2:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG %0:_(s32), i32 8
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2:_(s32), i32 1
It's possible to match the shift-pair in ISel and emit an extend and ashr.
However, this is far from the only way to break this shift pair and make
it hard to match the extends. Another example is that with the right
known-zeros, this:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 24
%3:_(s32) = G_MUL %2:_(s32), i32 2
can become:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 23
All upstream targets have been configured to lower it to the current
G_SHL,G_ASHR pair but will likely want to make it legal in some cases to
handle their faster cases.
To follow-up: Provide a way to legalize based on the constant. At the
moment, I'm thinking that the best way to achieve this is to provide the
MI in LegalityQuery but that opens the door to breaking core principles
of the legalizer (legality is not context sensitive). That said, it's
worth noting that looking at other instructions and acting on that
information doesn't violate this principle in itself. It's only a
violation if, at the end of legalization, a pass that checks legality
without being able to see the context would say an instruction might not be
legal. That's a fairly subtle distinction so to give a concrete example,
saying %2 in:
%1 = G_CONSTANT 16
%2 = G_SEXT_INREG %0, %1
is legal is in violation of that principle if the legality of %2 depends
on %1 being constant and/or being 16. However, legalizing to either:
%2 = G_SEXT_INREG %0, 16
or:
%1 = G_CONSTANT 16
%2:_(s32) = G_SHL %0, %1
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2, %1
depending on whether %1 is constant and 16 does not violate that principle
since both outputs are genuinely legal.
Reviewers: bogner, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, aemerson, paquette, arsenm
Subscribers: sdardis, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61289
llvm-svn: 368487
As discussed on PR42825, if we are inverting the selection mask we can just swap the inputs and avoid the inversion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65522
llvm-svn: 368438
I've now needed to add an extra parameter to this call twice recently. Not only
is the signature getting extremely unwieldy, but just updating all of the
callsites and implementations is a pain. Putting the parameters in a struct
sidesteps both issues.
llvm-svn: 368408
The only way to generate these was through promoting legalization
of narrow vectors, but we widen those types now. So we shouldn't
produce these nodes.
llvm-svn: 368396
Craig Topper