The "casts away constness" check doesn't care at all how the different
layers of the source and destination type were formed: for example, if
the source is a pointer and the destination is a pointer-to-member, the
types are still decomposed and their pointee qualifications are still
checked.
This rule is bizarre and somewhat ridiculous, so as an extension we
accept code making use of such reinterpret_casts with a warning outside
of SFINAE contexts.
llvm-svn: 336738
such guides below explicit ones, and ensure that references to the class's
template parameters are not treated as forwarding references.
We make a few tweaks to the wording in the current standard:
1) The constructor parameter list is copied faithfully to the deduction guide,
without losing default arguments or a varargs ellipsis (which the standard
wording loses by omission).
2) If the class template declares no constructors, we add a T() -> T<...> guide
(which will only ever work if T has default arguments for all non-pack
template parameters).
3) If the class template declares nothing that looks like a copy or move
constructor, we add a T(T<...>) -> T<...> guide.
#2 and #3 follow from the "pretend we had a class type with these constructors"
philosophy for deduction guides.
llvm-svn: 295007
Summary:
[expr.cast.static] states:
> 3. A glvalue of type “cv1 T1” can be cast to type “rvalue reference to cv2 T2” if “cv2 T2” is reference-compatible
> with “cv1 T1”. The result refers to the object or the specified base class subobject thereof. If T2 is
> an inaccessible or ambiguous base class of T1, a program that necessitates such a cast is
> ill-formed.
>
> 4. Otherwise, an expression e can be explicitly converted to a type T using a static_cast of the form static_-
> cast<T>(e) if the declaration T t(e); is well-formed, for some invented temporary variable t. [...]
Currently when checking p3 Clang will diagnose `static_cast<T&&>(e)` as invalid if the argument is not reference compatible with `T`. However I believe the correct behavior is to also check p4 in those cases. For example:
```
double y = 42;
static_cast<int&&>(y); // this should be OK. 'int&& t(y)' is well formed
```
Note that we still don't check p4 for non-reference-compatible types which are reference-related since `T&& t(e);` should never be well formed in those cases.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26231
llvm-svn: 285872
mismatched dynamic exception specifications in expressions from an error to a
warning, since this is no longer ill-formed in C++1z.
Allow reference binding of a reference-to-non-noexcept function to a noexcept
function lvalue. As defect resolutions, also allow a conditional between
noexcept and non-noexcept function lvalues to produce a non-noexcept function
lvalue (rather than decaying to a function pointer), and allow function
template argument deduction to deduce a reference to non-noexcept function when
binding to a noexcept function type.
llvm-svn: 284905
function: it can't be 'void' and it can't be an initializer list. We give a
hard error for these rather than treating them as undefined behavior (we can
and probably should do the same for non-POD types in C++11, but as of this
change we don't).
Slightly rework the checking of variadic arguments in a function with a format
attribute to ensure that certain kinds of format string problem (non-literal
string, too many/too few arguments, ...) don't suppress this error.
llvm-svn: 187735
- References to ObjC bit-field ivars are bit-field lvalues;
fixes rdar://13794269, which got me started down this.
- Introduce Expr::refersToBitField, switch a couple users to
it where semantically important, and comment the difference
between this and the existing API.
- Discourage Expr::getBitField by making it a bit longer and
less general-sounding.
- Lock down on const_casts of bit-field gl-values until we
hear back from the committee as to whether they're allowed.
llvm-svn: 181252
through varargs. This only happens when we're in an unevaluated
context, where we don't want to trigger an error anyway. Fixes PR11131
/ <rdar://problem/10288375>.
llvm-svn: 141986
a scoped enumeration type to an integral or floating type,
properly. There was an over-eager assertion, and it was missing the
floating-point case.
Fixes PR9107/<rdar://problem/8937402>.
llvm-svn: 125825
Anastasia Stulova