Specifically, @[] and @{} didn't have a type associated with them; we now
use "NSArray *" and "NSDictionary *", respectively. @"" has the type
"NSString *". @(), unfortunately, has type "id", since it (currently) may
be either an NSNumber or an NSString.
Add a test for all the Objective-C at-expression completions.
<rdar://problem/11507708&11507668&11507711>
llvm-svn: 158533
Previously we would cut off the source file buffer at the code-completion
point; this impeded code-completion inside C++ inline methods and,
recently, with buffering ObjC methods.
Have the code-completion inserted into the source buffer so that it can
be buffered along with a method body. When we actually hit the code-completion
point the cut-off lexing or parsing.
Fixes rdar://10056932&8319466
llvm-svn: 139086
and does the Sema on their body after the entire
class/category @implementation is seen. This change allows messaging
of forward private methods, as well as, access to
synthesized ivars of properties with foward synthesize
declarations; among others. In effect, this patch removes
several restrictions placed on objective-c due to in-place
semantics processing of methods.
This is part of // rdar://8843851.
llvm-svn: 138865
Language-design credit goes to a lot of people, but I particularly want
to single out Blaine Garst and Patrick Beard for their contributions.
Compiler implementation credit goes to Argyrios, Doug, Fariborz, and myself,
in no particular order.
llvm-svn: 133103
type matches have a bigger impact. The impetus for this change was
that, when initializing an enumeration value, we want enumerators of
that enumeration type to have a higher priority than, e.g., unrelated
local variables.
llvm-svn: 116774
C++/C99/Objective-C, so that we properly include types. This fix
affects global caching of code-completion results; without caching,
the behavior was already correct.
llvm-svn: 116757
at the statement level or in Objective-C message receivers. Therefore,
just give types and declarations the same basic priority, and adjust
from there.
llvm-svn: 114374
- In Objective-C, we prefer BOOL to bool for historic reasons;
slightly penalize "bool".
- Treat Nil macro as a NULL pointer constant.
- Treat YES, NO, true, and false macros as constants.
- Treat the bool macro as a type.
llvm-svn: 114356
Douglas Gregor