This test has always failed on 32 bit armv8 bots:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/178/builds/42
Due to the output order of some symbols changing.
I don't think this is an Arm specific issue so disabling
on 32 bit while it's investigated.
While the original check's purpose is to identify potentially dangerous
functions based on the parameter types (as identifier names do not mean
anything when it comes to the language rules), unfortunately, such a plain
interface check rule can be incredibly noisy. While the previous
"filtering heuristic" is able to find many similar usages, there is an entire
class of parameters that should not be warned about very easily mixed by that
check: parameters that have a name and their name follows a pattern,
e.g. `text1, text2, text3, ...`.`
This patch implements a simple, but powerful rule, that allows us to detect
such cases and ensure that no warnings are emitted for parameter sequences that
follow a pattern, even if their types allow for them to be potentially mixed at a call site.
Given a threshold `k`, warnings about two parameters are filtered from the
result set if the names of the parameters are either prefixes or suffixes of
each other, with at most k letters difference on the non-common end.
(Assuming that the names themselves are at least `k` long.)
- The above `text1, text2` is an example of this. (Live finding from Xerces.)
- `LHS` and `RHS` are also fitting the bill here. (Live finding from... virtually any project.)
- So does `Qmat, Tmat, Rmat`. (Live finding from I think OpenCV.)
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D97297
There are several types of functions and various reasons why some
"swappable parameters" cannot be fixed with changing the parameters' types, etc.
The most common example might be int `min(int a, int b)`... no matter what you
do, the two parameters must remain the same type.
The **filtering heuristic** implemented in this patch deals with trying to find
such functions during the modelling and building of the swappable parameter
range.
If the parameter currently scrutinised matches either of the predicates below,
it will be regarded as **not swappable** even if the type of the parameter
matches.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D78652
Adds a relaxation option ModelImplicitConversions which will make the check
report for cases where parameters refer to types that are implicitly
convertible to one another.
Example:
struct IntBox { IntBox(int); operator int(); };
void foo(int i, double d, IntBox ib) {}
Implicit conversions are the last to model in the set of things that are
reasons for the possibility of a function being called the wrong way which is
not always immediately apparent when looking at the function (signature or
call).
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, martong
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D75041
Adds a relaxation option QualifiersMix which will make the check report for
cases where parameters refer to the same type if they only differ in qualifiers.
This makes cases, such as the following, not warned about by default, produce
a warning.
void* memcpy(void* dst, const void* src, unsigned size) {}
However, unless people meticulously const their local variables, unfortunately,
even such a function carry a potential swap:
T* obj = new T; // Not const!!!
void* buf = malloc(sizeof(T));
memcpy(obj, buf, sizeof(T));
// ^~~ ^~~ accidental swap here, even though the interface "specified" a const.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D96355
The base patch only deals with strict (canonical) type equality, which is
merely a subset of all the dangerous function interfaces that we intend to
find.
In addition, in the base patch, canonical type equivalence is not diagnosed in
a way that is immediately apparent to the user.
This patch extends the check with two features:
* Proper typedef diagnostics and explanations to the user.
* "Reference bind power" matching.
Case 2 is a necessary addition because in every case someone encounters a
function `f(T t, const T& tr)`, any expression that might be passed to either
can be passed to both. Thus, such adjacent parameter sequences should be
matched.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D95736
Finds function definitions where parameters of convertible types follow
each other directly, making call sites prone to calling the function
with swapped (or badly ordered) arguments.
Such constructs are usually the result of inefficient design and lack of
exploitation of strong type capabilities that are possible in the
language.
This check finds and flags **function definitions** and **not** call
sites!
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D69560
This adds another small fold for extract of a vdup, between a i32 and a
f32, converting to a BITCAST. This allows some extra folding to happen,
simplifying the resulting code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104857
The patch reuses the common code to print memory operand addresses as
instruction comments. This helps to align the comments and enables using
target-specific comment markers when `evaluateMemoryOperandAddress()` is
implemented for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104861
For now, the source variable locations are printed at about the same
space as the comments for disassembled code, which can make some ranges
for variables disappear if a line contains comments, for example:
┠─ bar = W1
0: add x0, x2, #2, lsl #12 // =8192┃
4: add z31.d, z31.d, #65280 // =0xff00
8: nop ┻
The patch shifts the report a bit to allow printing comments up to
approximately 16 characters without interferences.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104700
LLVM disassembler can generate comments for disassembled instructions.
The patch enables printing these comments for 'llvm-objdump -d'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104699
We can exploit branches by `undef` condition. Frankly, the LangRef says that
such branches are UB, so we can assume that all outgoing edges of such blocks
are dead.
However, from practical perspective, we know that this is not supported correctly
in some other places. So we are being conservative about it.
Branch by undef is treated in the following way:
- If it is a loop-exiting branch, we always assume it exits the loop;
- If not, we arbitrarily assume it takes `true` value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104689
Reviewed By: nikic
cli-wrapper-mpxtable.cpp was emitting warnings from printfs of
uint64_t on 32 bit arm build. This patch makes affected printfs
in cli-wrapper-mpxtable.cpp portable accross targets variants.
This test is again failing across multiple bots and passing on others
there is no reliable way to enable it for some of the bots while
disabling for the unsupported ones. Tagging it as unsupported across all
types of Arm 32 bit cores.
A combination of features ^ that lead to a mismatch of expectations
about how a subprogram definition DIE would be produced with/without a
declaration when taking full -g debug info and inlining it into a -gmlt
CU - specifically when using Split DWARF that doesn't support cross-CU
references, so we have to put the -g debug info into the -gmlt CU, which
gets confusing about which mode is respected.
This patch comes down on respecting the CU the debug info is emitted
into, rather than preserving the full debug info when it's emitted into
the gmlt CU.
We use (and (ctpop X), 1) to represent parity.
The generated code for i32 parity on RV64 has more instructions than
necessary which I hope to improve in a followup patch.
Also add missing test for i64 ctpop.
After D104475 / D104658, building the Linux kernel with ThinLTO is
broken:
ld.lld: error: Unknown attribute kind (73) (Producer: 'LLVM13.0.0git'
Reader: 'LLVM 13.0.0git')
getAttrFromCode() has never handled this attribute so it is written
during the ThinLTO phase but it cannot be handled during the linking
phase.
Add noprofile to getAttrFromCode() so that disassembly works properly.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104995
I thought this might help with another optimization I was
thinking about, but I don't think it will. So it just wastes
compile time calling computeKnownBits for no benefit.
This reverts commit 81b2f95971.
For the start shortening optimization, always use a i8 type for
the GEP, as it is a raw offset calculation.
Handling of non-i8* memset/memcpy arguments requires insertion
of casts. These cases were previously miscompiled, as the offset
calculation was performed on the wrong type.
Apparently, it is legal to use memcpy/memset with pointer types
other than i8*. Prior to 81fcdae68c
this case was silently miscompiled, as the i8 offset calculation
was performed on some other type. Now it would crash due to a
type mismatch. Fix this by inserting an explicit bitcast to i8*.
This is an extension of the handling for unary intrinsics and
follows the logic that we use for binary ops.
We don't canonicalize to min/max intrinsics yet, but this might
help unlock other folds seen in D98152.
This patch updates VPWidenPHI recipes for first-order recurrences to
also track the incoming value from the back-edge. Similar to D99294,
which did the same for reductions.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104197
libunwind uses unwind info to find the function address belonging
to the current instruction pointer. libunwind/src/CompactUnwinder.hpp's
step functions read functionStart for UNWIND_X86_64_MODE_STACK_IND
(and for nothing else), so these encodings need a dedicated entry
per function, so that the runtime can get the stacksize off the
`subq` instrunction in the function's prologue.
This matches ld64.
(CompactUnwinder.hpp from https://opensource.apple.com/source/libunwind/
also reads functionStart in a few more cases if `SUPPORT_OLD_BINARIES` is set,
but it defaults to 0, and ld64 seems to not worry about these additional
cases.)
Related upstream bug: https://crbug.com/1220175
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104978
llvm-dwarfdump was silent even when the format of DWARF was invalid
and/or llvm-dwarfdump did not understand/support some of the constructs.
This can be pretty confusing as llvm-dwarfdump is a tool for DWARF
producers+consumers development.
Review comments also by @dblaikie.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104271
Reduce code duplication: Move various helper functions, that are duplicated in TensorDialect, MemRefDialect, LinalgDialect, StandardDialect, into a new StaticValueUtils.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104687
Don't allow vectors to split into GPRs for 'r' and other scalar
constraints. Prevents assertion in getCopyToPartsVector.
Makes PR50907 give a better error instead of crashing.
David Spickett