This patch is to fix 2 libcxx test cases, test cases assumed 'a' > 'A' which is not case in z/OS platform on ebcdic mode, modified test cases to compare between upper letters or lower letters, or digits so ordering will be true for all platform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104748
With the STL containers, I didn't enable move operations in C++03 mode
because that would change the overload resolution for things that today
are copy operations. With iostreams, though, the copy operations aren't
present at all, and so I see no problem with enabling move operations
even in (Clang's greatly extended) C++03 mode.
Clang's C++03 mode does not support delegating constructors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104310
In typeinfo there is a reinterpret_cast between a uintptr_t and size_t. These are two integer types and therefore a reinterpret_cast is not right for this situation. It looks like it may have been copied and pasted from above in the file. An implicit cast works in it's place.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104814
Moves:
* `std::move`, `std::forward`, `std::declval`, and `std::swap` into
`__utility/${FUNCTION_NAME}`.
* `std::swap_ranges` and `std::iter_swap` into
`__algorithm/${FUNCTION_NAME}`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103734
Under the as-if rule, we can directly implement the array overload for
`std::swap`. By removing this circular dependency where `swap` is
implemented in terms of `swap_ranges` and `swap_ranges` is defined in
terms of `swap`, we can split them into their own headers. This will:
* limit the surface area in which Hyrum's law can bite us;
* force users to include the correct headers;
* make finding the definitions trivial (`swap` is a utility;
`swap_ranges` is an algorithm).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104760
Since we now have modules-enabled CI, it is now redundant to have ad-hoc
tests that check arbitrary things about our modules support. Instead,
the whole test suite should pass with modules enabled, period.
This patch also removes the module cache path workaround: one would
expect that modules work properly without that workaround. If that
isn't the case and we do run into flaky test failures, we can re-enable
the workaround temporarily (but that would be very vexing and we should
fix Clang ASAP if that's the case).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104746
* `<type_traits>` depends on `std::forward`, so we replaced it with
`static_cast<T&&>`.
* `swap`'s return type is confusing, so it's been rearranged to improve
readabilitiy.
* indicates whether work has been started or completed
* consolidates content that was split for dependency reasons (iff
everything has been merged)
* makes things a lot more fine-grained
* turns sub-CSVs into lists
* puts links into description section and removes patch column
* adds links to c++draft on occasion
These changes heavily prioritise the the reader of the generated HTML
file, not the source.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103295
C++03 didn't support `explicit` conversion operators;
but Clang's C++03 mode does, as an extension, so we can use it.
This lets us make the conversion explicit in `std::function` (even in '03),
and remove some silly metaprogramming in `std::basic_ios`.
Drive-by improvements to the tests for these operators, in addition
to making sure all these tests also run in `c++03` mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104682
The current implementation of `std::forward_list::swap` uses
`propagate_on_container_move_assignment` for `noexcept` specification.
This patch changes it to use `propagate_on_container_swap`, as it should.
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR50224.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101899
This is a fairly mechanical change, it just moves each algorithm into
its own header. This is intended to be a NFC.
This commit re-applies 7ed7d4ccb8, which was reverted in 692d7166f7
because the Modules build got broken. The modules build has now been
fixed, so we're re-committing this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103583
Attribution note
----------------
I'm only committing this. This commit is a mix of D103583, D103330 and
D104171 authored by:
Co-authored-by: Christopher Di Bella <cjdb@google.com>
Co-authored-by: zoecarver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
P1518 does the following in C++23 but we'll just do it in C++17 as well:
- Stop requiring `Alloc` to be an allocator on some container-adaptor deduction guides
- Stop deducing from `Allocator` on some sequence container constructors
- Stop deducing from `Allocator` on some other container constructors (libc++ already did this)
The affected constructors are the "allocator-extended" versions of
constructors where the non-allocator arguments are already sufficient
to deduce the allocator type. For example,
std::pmr::vector<int> v1;
std::vector v2(v1, std::pmr::new_delete_resource());
std::stack s2(v1, std::pmr::new_delete_resource());
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97742
When we removed the allocator<void> specialization, the triviality of
std::allocator<void> changed because the primary template had a
non-trivial default constructor and the specialization didn't
(so std::allocator<void> went from trivial to non-trivial).
This commit fixes that oversight by giving a trivial constructor to
the primary template when instantiated on cv-void.
This was reported in https://llvm.org/PR50299.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104398
A few slipped through the cracks because D104175 and D104170 didn't
concern themselves with newer commits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104414
While the std::allocator<void> specialization was deprecated by
https://wg21.link/p0174#2.2, the *use* of std::allocator<void> by users
was not. The intent was that std::allocator<void> could still be used
in C++17 and C++20, but starting with C++20 (with the removal of the
specialization), std::allocator<void> would use the primary template.
That intent was called out in wg21.link/p0619r4#3.9.
As a result of this patch, _LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_MEMBERS
will also not control whether the explicit specialization is provided or
not. It shouldn't matter, since in C++20, one can simply use the primary
template.
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR50299
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104323
Also, fix the last issue that prevented GCC 11 from passing the test
suite. Thanks to everyone else who fixed issues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104315
This has been broken out of D104170 since it should be merged whether or
not we go ahead with the module map changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104175
https://eel.is/c++draft/atomics.types.operations#23 says: ... the value of failure is order except that a value of `memory_order::acq_rel` shall be replaced by the value `memory_order::acquire` and a value of `memory_order::release` shall be replaced by the value `memory_order::relaxed`.
This failure mapping is only handled for `_LIBCPP_HAS_GCC_ATOMIC_IMP`. We are seeing bad code generation for `compare_exchange_strong(cmp, 1, std::memory_order_acq_rel)` when using libc++ in place of libstdc++: https://godbolt.org/z/v3onrrq4G.
This was caught by tsan tests after D99434, `[TSAN] Honor failure memory orders in AtomicCAS`, but appears to be an issue in non-tsan code.
Reviewed By: ldionne, dvyukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103846
The runtimes build has assertions enabled, which is necessary to catch
some of the modules-related issues we've been seeing recently. This
patch enables testing with modules in the runtimes build so as to cover
those cases.
In the future, a better solution would be to systematically use versions
of Clang that have assertions enabled. However, the Clangs we release
currently don't have assertions enabled by default, which causes a
challenge for the CI (we could try to build our own Clang from ToT with
assertions in the CI, but that poses some problems).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104252
This started as an attempt to fix a GCC 11 warning of misplaced parentheses.
I then noticed that trying to fix the parentheses warning actually triggered
errors in the tests, showing that we were incorrectly assuming that the
implementation of ranges::advance was using operator+= or operator-=.
This commit fixes that issue and makes the tests easier to follow by
localizing the assertions it makes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103272
The synchronization library was marked as disabled on Apple platforms
up to now because we were not 100% sure that it was going to be ABI
stable. However, it's been some time since we shipped it in upstream
libc++ now and there's been no changes so far. This patch enables the
synchronization library on Apple platforms, and hence commits the ABI
stability as far as that vendor is concerned.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96790
Louis Dionne