Summary:
In the CHERI clang compiler __output and __input are keywords and therefore
we can't compile libc++ with our compiler.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, theraven
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39537
llvm-svn: 318144
Summary:
The constructors `vector(Iter, Iter, Alloc = Alloc{})` and `assign(Iter, Iter)` don't correctly perform EmplaceConstruction from the result of dereferencing the iterator. This results in them performing an additional and unneeded copy.
This patch addresses the issue by correctly using `emplace_back` in C++11 and newer.
There are also some bugs in our `insert` implementation, but those will be handled separately.
@mclow.lists We should probably merge this into 5.1, agreed?
Reviewers: mclow.lists, dlj, EricWF
Reviewed By: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38757
llvm-svn: 315994
This warning "structure was padded due to alignment specifier" says
that the compiler is going to do exactly what you asked it to do.
It's triggered by the tests for over-aligned dynamic memory allocation.
llvm-svn: 314257
test/std/containers/Emplaceable.h
test/std/containers/NotConstructible.h
test/support/counting_predicates.hpp
Replace unary_function/binary_function inheritance with typedefs.
test/std/depr/depr.function.objects/depr.base/binary_function.pass.cpp
test/std/depr/depr.function.objects/depr.base/unary_function.pass.cpp
test/std/utilities/function.objects/func.require/binary_function.pass.cpp
test/std/utilities/function.objects/func.require/unary_function.pass.cpp
Mark these tests as requiring 98/03/11/14 because 17 removed unary_function/binary_function.
test/std/thread/futures/futures.task/futures.task.members/ctor_func_alloc.pass.cpp
test/std/thread/futures/futures.task/futures.task.nonmembers/uses_allocator.pass.cpp
Mark these tests as requiring 11/14 because 17 removed packaged_task allocator support.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/func.wrap/func.wrap.func/derive_from.pass.cpp
This test doesn't need to be skipped in C++17 mode. Only the construction of
std::function from an allocator needs to be skipped in C++17 mode.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/refwrap/refwrap.access/conversion.pass.cpp
test/std/utilities/function.objects/refwrap/refwrap.assign/copy_assign.pass.cpp
test/std/utilities/function.objects/refwrap/refwrap.const/copy_ctor.pass.cpp
test/std/utilities/function.objects/refwrap/refwrap.const/type_ctor.pass.cpp
When testing these reference_wrapper features, unary_function inheritance is totally irrelevant.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/refwrap/weak_result.pass.cpp
Define and use my_unary_function/my_binary_function to test the weak result type machinery
(which is still present in C++17, although deprecated).
test/support/msvc_stdlib_force_include.hpp
Now we can test C++17 strictly, without enabling removed features.
Fixes D36503.
llvm-svn: 311705
locale.codecvt.byname/ctor_char.pass.cpp:
This test used to use "en_US" as a plain string instead of using platform_support.
Need to fix this because MS STL expects "en-US" instead.
platform_support.h:
These are the legacy Windows locale names. Should use IETF tags instead.
I've also added en_US, since a test was using that as a locale string as well.
msvc_stdlib_force_include.hpp:
Remove _MSVC_STL_VER. The libraries will directly define _MSVC_STL_VERSION in the future.
Fixes D29351.
llvm-svn: 305000
Also: Move constexpr / triviality extension tests into the std tree and make them conditional on _LIBCPP_VERSION / _MSVC_STL_VERSION.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32671
llvm-svn: 304847
This macro will instruct MSVC's STL to not warn about features that are deprecated in C++17,
as libcxx tests those features and uses them elsewhere.
llvm-svn: 304765
Was VSO#109062. This bug was filed *4 years ago*. I submitted a workaround to enable the scoped_allocator_adaptor tests to pass. Bug fixed a week and a half later. This was either a waste of my time, or I've discovered that libc++ has magical bugfix-inducing powers. My money's on the latter.
llvm-svn: 304730
This patch adds end-to-end/breathing tests for coroutines
into libc++. The tests aren't specifically to test libc++ requirements
but instead are intented to ensure coroutines are working fine in general.
Although libc++ isn't exactly the most correct place for these tests
to live, there is one major advantage. The libc++ test suite is also
used by MSVC and by adding the tests here it ensures they will be
run against all currently available coroutine implementations.
llvm-svn: 304101
VSO#391542 "Types can't be convertible to nullptr_t"
Also put internal bug numbers on the workarounds in test_workarounds.h for correlation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33290
llvm-svn: 303889
This change works around a couple of bugs:
1. EDG doesn't like explicit constexpr in a derived class. This program:
struct Base {};
struct Derived : Base {
constexpr Derived() = default;
};
triggers "error: defaulted default constructor cannot be constexpr."
2. C1XX with /Za has no idea which constructor needs to be valid for copy elision.
The change also conditionally disables parts of the msvc_stdlib_force_include.hpp header that conflict with external configuration when _LIBCXX_IN_DEVCRT is defined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32778
llvm-svn: 302707
_HAS_CXX17 indicates whether MSVC's STL is in C++17 mode.
In MSVC there's a distinction between CRT headers like stdlib.h and STL headers
like cstdlib. Only the STL headers drag in yvals.h, our internal STL-wide header
that defines internal macros like _HAS_CXX17.
_HAS_CXX17 is an MSVC STL library macro, unconditionally defined. We centralize
everything on this, because we have to ask different questions to determine
whether C1XX, EDG, or Clang is in 14 or 17 mode, and we additionally permit
users to override the detection in one way (it's okay to ask for 17 from the
compiler, but only 14 from the libs, at least for the moment; only noexcept
in the type system will give us a headache).
As this header is for testing MSVC's STL, we can assume _HAS_CXX17 is defined.
Fixes D32726.
llvm-svn: 302104
This patch overhauls both specializations of unique_ptr while implementing
the following LWG issues:
* LWG 2801 - This issue constrains unique_ptr's constructors when the deleter type
is not default constructible. Additionally it adds SFINAE conditions
to unique_ptr<T[]>::unique_ptr(Up).
* LWG 2905 - This issue reworks the unique_ptr(pointer, /* see below */ deleter)
constructors so that they correctly SFINAE when the deleter argument cannot
be used to construct the stored deleter.
* LWG 2520 - This issue fixes initializing unique_ptr<T[]> from nullptr.
Libc++ had previously implemented this issue, but the suggested resolution
still broke initialization from NULL. This patch re-works the
unique_ptr<T[]>(Up, deleter) overloads so that they accept NULL as well
as nullptr.
llvm-svn: 300406
This patch almost entirely rewrites the unique_ptr tests. There are a couple
of reasons for this:
A) Most of the *.fail.cpp tests were either incorrect or could be better written
as a *.pass.cpp test that uses <type_traits> to check if certain operations
are valid (Ex. Using static_assert(!std::is_copy_constructible_v<T>) instead
of writing a failure test).
B) [unique.ptr.runtime] has very poor test coverage. Many of the constructors
and assignment operators have to tests at all. The special members that have
tests have very few test cases and are typically way out of date.
C) The tests for [unique.ptr.single] and [unique.ptr.runtime] are largely
duplicates of each other. This means common requirements have two different
sets of tests in two different test files. This makes the tests harder to
maintain than if there was a single copy.
To address (A) this patch changes almost all of the *.fail.cpp tests into
.pass.cpp tests using type traits; Allowing the *.fail.cpp tests to be removed.
The address (B) and (C) the tests for [unique.ptr.single] and [unique.ptr.runtime]
have been combined into a single directory, allowing both specializations to share
common tests. Tests specific to the single/runtime specializations are given the
suffix "*.single.pass.cpp" or "*.runtime.pass.cpp".
Finally the unique.ptr test have been moved into the correct directory according
to the standard. Specifically they have been removed from "utilities/memory" into
"utilities/smartptr".
PS. This patch also adds newly written tests for upcoming unique_ptr changes/fixes.
However since these tests don't currently pass they are guarded by the macro
TEST_WORKAROUND_UPCOMING_UNIQUE_PTR_CHANGES. This allows other STL's to validate
the tests before libc++ implements the changes. The relevant libc++ changes should
land in the next week.
llvm-svn: 300388
For reference deleter types the const qualifier on the return type
of get_deleter() should be ignored, and a non-const deleter should
be returned.
This patch fixes a bug where "const deleter_type&" is incorrectly
formed.
llvm-svn: 300121
Summary: This is my attempt to work around the C1XX bug described to me by @BillyONeal.
Reviewers: BillyONeal, STL_MSFT, CaseyCarter
Reviewed By: BillyONeal
Subscribers: cfe-commits, BillyONeal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31260
llvm-svn: 298554
Summary:
This patch fixes http://llvm.org/PR31938. The description below is copy/pasted from the bug:
The standard says:
template<class charT, class traits = char_traits<charT>,
class Allocator = allocator<charT>>
class basic_string {
using value_type = typename traits::char_type;
// ...
basic_string(const charT* s, const Allocator& a = Allocator());
};
libc++ actually chooses to declare the constructor as
basic_string(const value_type* s, const Allocator& a = Allocator());
The implicit deduction guides from class template argument deduction make what was previously an implementation detail visible:
std::basic_string s = "foo"; // error, can't deduce charT.
The constructor in question is in the libc++ DSO, but fortunately it looks like fixing this will not result in an ABI break.
@rsmith How does this look? I did more than just the constructors mentioned in the PR, but IDK how far to take it.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29863
llvm-svn: 295393
Billy Robert O'Neal III