Summary:
It is difficult to touch a file with a relative mtime across different OSes as POSIX touch -d is rigid. While we may construct relative timestamps with `date`, POSIX date is inadequate to do so as various OSes' date do not agree on a common format (OpenBSD uses `date -r seconds`, FreeBSD uses `date -v-2M` while GNU accepts `-d '-2 min'`)
Just use python os.utime()
Original description:
The case may randomly fail if we test it with command "
while llvm-lit tools/lld/test/ELF/lto/cache.ll; do true; done". It is because the llvmcache-foo file is younger than llvmcache-349F039B8EB076D412007D82778442BED3148C4E and llvmcache-A8107945C65C2B2BBEE8E61AA604C311D60D58D6. But due to timestamp precision reason their timestamp is the same. Given the same timestamp, the file prune policy is to remove bigger size file first, so mostly foo file is removed for its bigger size. And the files size is under threshold after deleting foo file. That's what test case expect.
However sometimes, the precision is enough to measure that timestamp of llvmcache-349F039B8EB076D412007D82778442BED3148C4E and llvmcache-A8107945C65C2B2BBEE8E61AA604C311D60D58D6 are smaller than foo, so llvmcache-349F039B8EB076D412007D82778442BED3148C4E and llvmcache-A8107945C65C2B2BBEE8E61AA604C311D60D58D6 are deleted first. Since the files size is still above the file size threshold after deleting the 2 files, the foo file is also deleted. And then the test case fails, because it expect only one file should be deleted instead of 3.
The fix is to change the timestamp of llvmcache-foo file to meet the thinLTO prune policy.
The same fix is applied to llvm code at https://reviews.llvm.org/D52452.
Patch by Luo Yuanke.
Reviewers: ruiu, craig.topper, smaslov, Jianping, espindola, LuoYuanke, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: sbc100, krytarowski, aheejin, llvm-commits, dexonsmith, steven_wu, arichardson, inglorion, emaste, bjope, rupprecht
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54039
llvm-svn: 346006
Summary:
The case may randomly fail if we test it with command "
while llvm-lit tools/lld/test/ELF/lto/cache.ll; do true; done". It is because the llvmcache-foo file is younger than llvmcache-349F039B8EB076D412007D82778442BED3148C4E and llvmcache-A8107945C65C2B2BBEE8E61AA604C311D60D58D6. But due to timestamp precision reason their timestamp is the same. Given the same timestamp, the file prune policy is to remove bigger size file first, so mostly foo file is removed for its bigger size. And the files size is under threshold after deleting foo file. That's what test case expect.
However sometimes, the precision is enough to measure that timestamp of llvmcache-349F039B8EB076D412007D82778442BED3148C4E and llvmcache-A8107945C65C2B2BBEE8E61AA604C311D60D58D6 are smaller than foo, so llvmcache-349F039B8EB076D412007D82778442BED3148C4E and llvmcache-A8107945C65C2B2BBEE8E61AA604C311D60D58D6 are deleted first. Since the files size is still above the file size threshold after deleting the 2 files, the foo file is also deleted. And then the test case fails, because it expect only one file should be deleted instead of 3.
The fix is to change the timestamp of llvmcache-foo file to meet the thinLTO prune policy.
The same fix is applied to llvm code at https://reviews.llvm.org/D52452.
Patch by Luo Yuanke.
Reviewers: ruiu, craig.topper, smaslov, Jianping, espindola, LuoYuanke
Subscribers: rupprecht, bjope, emaste, inglorion, arichardson, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53123
llvm-svn: 345977
Summary:
Before this change, pruning order was based on size. This changes it
to be based on time of last use instead, preferring to keep recently
used files and prune older ones.
Reviewers: pcc, rnk, espindola
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51062
llvm-svn: 340374
Summary:
The issue with the python path is that the path to python on Windows can contain spaces. To make the tests always work, the path to python needs to be surrounded by quotes.
This is a companion change to: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50206
Reviewers: asmith, zturner, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, sbc100, arichardson, aheejin, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50282
llvm-svn: 339075
Summary:
This fixes two failing tests on Windows with an installed version of python that has spaces in the path.
* elf/lto/cache.ll
* mach-o/dependency_info.yaml
Reviewers: zturner, llvm-commits, stella.stamenova
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43265
llvm-svn: 325650
The default limit is 1000000 but it can be configured with a cache
policy. The motivation is that some filesystems (notably ext4) have
a limit on the number of files that can be contained in a directory
(separate from the inode limit).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40327
llvm-svn: 318857
Commit r318397 fixed the cache pruning interval which broke this test
as it was assuming that the cache pruning was always being
performed. Explicitly set prune interval to 0s to ensure this.
llvm-svn: 318426
This is useful when an upper limit on the cache size needs to be
controlled independently of the amount of the amount of free space.
One use case is a machine with a large number of cache directories
(e.g. a buildbot slave hosting a large number of independent build
jobs). By imposing an upper size limit on each cache directory,
users can more easily estimate the server's capacity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34547
llvm-svn: 306126
This is a safeguard against data loss if the user specifies a directory
that is not a cache directory. Teach the existing cache pruning clients
to create files with appropriate names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31109
llvm-svn: 298271
It failed for me under windows,
touch reported invalid date format.
Seems related to 12h/24h format, though
I don't understant why 197001010200 does not work,
but 197001010300 works, I see no logic here.
Changed to 197001011200.
llvm-svn: 298064
This patch causes us to use pruneCache() to prune the ThinLTO cache after
completing LTO. A new flag --thinlto-cache-policy allows users to configure
the policy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31021
llvm-svn: 298036
This patch adds an option named --thinlto-cache-dir, which specifies the
path to a directory in which to cache native object files for ThinLTO
incremental builds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30509
llvm-svn: 296702
Michal Gorny