When an undeclared identifier in a context that requires a type is followed by
'<', only look for type templates when typo-correcting, tweak the diagnostic
text to say that a template name (not a type name) was undeclared, and parse
the template arguments when recovering from the error.
llvm-svn: 302732
The heuristic that we use here is:
* the left-hand side must be a simple identifier or a class member access
* the right-hand side must be '<' followed by either a '>' or by a type-id that
cannot be an expression (in particular, not followed by '(' or '{')
* there is a '>' token matching the '<' token
The second condition guarantees the expression would otherwise be ill-formed.
If we're confident that the user intended the name before the '<' to be
interpreted as a template, diagnose the fact that we didn't interpret it
that way, rather than diagnosing that the template arguments are not valid
expressions.
llvm-svn: 302615
This improves our behavior in a few ways:
* We now guarantee that if a member is marked as being a member
specialization, there will actually be a member specialization declaration
somewhere on its redeclaration chain. This fixes a crash in modules builds
where we would try to check that there was a visible declaration of the
member specialization and be surprised to not find any declaration of it at
all.
* We don't set the source location of the in-class declaration of the member
specialization to the out-of-line declaration's location until we have
actually finished merging them. This fixes some very silly looking
diagnostics, where we'd point a "previous declaration is here" note at the
same declaration we're complaining about. Ideally we wouldn't mess with the
prior declaration's location at all, but too much code assumes that the
first declaration of an entity is a reasonable thing to use as an indication
of where it was declared, and that's not really true for a member
specialization unless we fake it like this.
llvm-svn: 302596
The code implements Richard Smith suggestion in comment 3 of the PR.
reviewer: Vassil Vassilev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31540
llvm-svn: 300443
This reverts an attempt to check that types match when matching a
dependently-typed non-type template parameter. (This comes up when matching the
parameters of a template template parameter against the parameters of a
template template argument.)
The matching rules here are murky at best. Our behavior after this revert is
definitely wrong for certain C++17 features (for 'auto' template parameter
types within the parameter list of a template template argument in particular),
but our behavior before this revert is wrong for some pre-existing testcases,
so reverting to our prior behavior seems like our best option.
llvm-svn: 300262
Printing typedefs or type aliases using clang_getTypeSpelling() is missing the
namespace they are defined in. This is in contrast to other types that always
yield the full typename including namespaces.
Patch by Michael Reiher!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29944
llvm-svn: 297465
compiler is run in a mode where the default C++ standard is newer than C++03.
The reason is because one of the warnings checked is only produced when the
compiler is using C++03 or lower.
This change fixes this problem as well as adds explicit run lines to run the
test in C++03 and C++11 modes.
llvm-svn: 296066
A 'decltype(auto)' parameter can match any other kind of non-type template
parameter, so should be usable in place of any other parameter in a template
template argument. The standard is sadly extremely unclear on how this is
supposed to work, but this seems like the obviously-correct result.
It's less clear whether an 'auto' parameter should be able to match
'decltype(auto)', since the former cannot be used if the latter turns out to be
used for a reference type, but if we disallow that then consistency suggests we
should also disallow 'auto' matching 'T' for the same reason, defeating
intended use cases of the feature.
llvm-svn: 295866
We need to look through the PackExpansionType in the parameter type when
deducing, and we need to consider the possibility of deducing arguments for
packs that are not lexically mentioned in the pattern (but are nonetheless
deducible) when figuring out which packs are covered by a pack deduction scope.
llvm-svn: 295790
template deduction guides for class template argument deduction.
Ensure that we have a local instantiation scope for tracking the instantiated
parameters. Additionally, unusually, we're substituting at depth 1 and leaving
depth 0 alone; make sure that we don't reduce template parameter depth by 2 for
inner parameters in the process. (This is probably also broken for alias
templates in the case where they're expanded within a dependent context, but
this patch doesn't fix that.)
llvm-svn: 295696
This appears to be the only template argument deduction context where we were
missing this check. Surprisingly, other implementations also appear to miss
the check in this case; it may turn out that important code is relying on
the widespread non-conformance here, in which case we'll need to reconsider.
llvm-svn: 295277
that has been explicitly specialized!
We assume in various places that we can tell the template specialization kind
of a class type by looking at the declaration produced by TagType::getDecl.
That was previously not quite true: for an explicit specialization, we could
have first seen a template-id denoting the specialization (with a use that does
not trigger an implicit instantiation of the defintiion) and then seen the
first explicit specialization declaration. TagType::getDecl would previously
return an arbitrary declaration when called on a not-yet-defined class; it
now consistently returns the most recent declaration in that case.
llvm-svn: 295118
This change adds a new type node, DeducedTemplateSpecializationType, to
represent a type template name that has been used as a type. This is modeled
around AutoType, and shares a common base class for representing a deduced
placeholder type.
We allow deduced class template types in a few more places than the standard
does: in conditions and for-range-declarators, and in new-type-ids. This is
consistent with GCC and with discussion on the core reflector. This patch
does not yet support deduced class template types being named in typename
specifiers.
llvm-svn: 293207
Under this defect resolution, the injected-class-name of a class or class
template cannot be used except in very limited circumstances (when declaring a
constructor, in a nested-name-specifier, in a base-specifier, or in an
elaborated-type-specifier). This is apparently done to make parsing easier, but
it's a pain for us since we don't know whether a template-id using the
injected-class-name is valid at the point when we annotate it (we don't yet
know whether the template-id will become part of an elaborated-type-specifier).
As a tentative resolution to a perceived language defect, mem-initializer-ids
are added to the list of exceptions here (they generally follow the same rules
as base-specifiers).
When the reference to the injected-class-name uses the 'typename' or 'template'
keywords, we permit it to be used to name a type or template as an extension;
other compilers also accept some cases in this area. There are also a couple of
corner cases with dependent template names that we do not yet diagnose, but
which will also get this treatment.
llvm-svn: 292518
The rules around typechecking deduced template arguments during partial
ordering are not clear, and while the prior behavior does not seem to be
correct (it doesn't follow the general model of partial ordering where each
template parameter is replaced by a non-dependent but unique value), the new
behavior is also not clearly right and breaks some existing idioms.
The new behavior is retained for dealing with non-type template parameters
with 'auto' types, as without it even the most basic uses of that feature
don't work. We can revisit this once CWG has come to an agreement on how
partial ordering with 'auto' non-type template parameters is supposed to
work.
llvm-svn: 292183
properly even when a non-type template parameter has a dependent type.
Previously, if a non-type template parameter was dependent, but not dependent
on an outer level of template parameter, we would not match the type of the
parameter. Under [temp.arg.template], we are supposed to check that the types
are equivalent, which means checking for syntactic equivalence in the dependent
case.
This also fixes some accepts-invalids when passing templates with auto-typed
non-type template parameters as template template arguments.
llvm-svn: 291512
Check for implicit conversion sequences for non-dependent function
template parameters between deduction and substitution. The idea is to accept
as many cases as possible, on the basis that substitution failure outside the
immediate context is much more common during substitution than during implicit
conversion sequence formation.
This re-commits r290808, reverted in r290811 and r291412, with a couple of
fixes for handling of explicitly-specified non-trailing template argument
packs.
llvm-svn: 291427
This issue clarifies how deduction proceeds past a non-trailing function
parameter pack. Essentially, the pack itself is skipped and consumes no
arguments (except for those implied by an explicitly-specified template
arguments), and nothing is deduced from it. As a small fix to the standard's
rule, we do not allow subsequent deduction to change the length of the function
parameter pack (by preventing extension of the explicitly-specified pack if
present, and otherwise deducing all contained packs to empty packs).
llvm-svn: 291425
Check for implicit conversion sequences for non-dependent function
template parameters between deduction and substitution. The idea is to accept
as many cases as possible, on the basis that substitution failure outside the
immediate context is much more common during substitution than during implicit
conversion sequence formation.
This re-commits r290808, reverted in r290811, with a fix for handling of
explicitly-specified template argument packs.
llvm-svn: 291410
deduction in partial ordering.
This prevents us from crashing due to attempting to instantiate the same class
template specialization definition multiple times. (Debug builds also appear to
sometimes hit the stack limit before hitting the instantiation depth limit in
this case.)
llvm-svn: 291407
This implements something like the current direction of DR1581: we use a narrow
syntactic check to determine the set of places where a constant expression
could be evaluated, and only instantiate a constexpr function or variable if
it's referenced in one of those contexts, or is odr-used.
It's not yet clear whether this is the right set of syntactic locations; we
currently consider all contexts within templates that would result in odr-uses
after instantiation, and contexts within list-initialization (narrowing
conversions take another victim...), as requiring instantiation. We could in
principle restrict the former cases more (only const integral / reference
variable initializers, and contexts in which a constant expression is required,
perhaps). However, this is sufficient to allow us to accept libstdc++ code,
which relies on GCC's behavior (which appears to be somewhat similar to this
approach).
llvm-svn: 291318
We were previously incorrectly using TDK_TooFewArguments to report a template
argument list that's too short, but it actually means that the number of
arguments in a top-level function call was insufficient. When diagnosing the
problem, SemaOverload would (rightly) assert that the failure kind didn't make
any sense.
llvm-svn: 291064
When a parameter pack has multiple corresponding arguments, and some subset of
them are overloaded functions, it's possible that some subset of the parameters
are non-deduced contexts. In such a case, keep deducing from the remainder of
the arguments, and resolve the incomplete pack against whatever other
deductions we've performed for the pack.
GCC, MSVC, and ICC give three different bad behaviors for this case; what we do
now (and what we did before) don't exactly match any of them, sadly :( I'm
getting a core issue opened to specify more precisely how this should be
handled.
llvm-svn: 290923
to be specified for a template template parameter whenever the parameter is at
least as specialized as the argument (when there's an obvious and correct
mapping from uses of the parameter to uses of the argument). For example, a
template with more parameters can be passed to a template template parameter
with fewer, if those trailing parameters have default arguments.
This is disabled by default, despite being a DR resolution, as it's fairly
broken in its current state: there are no partial ordering rules to cope with
template template parameters that have different parameter lists, meaning that
code that attempts to decompose template-ids based on arity can hit unavoidable
ambiguity issues.
The diagnostics produced on a non-matching argument are also pretty bad right
now, but I aim to improve them in a subsequent commit.
llvm-svn: 290792
to make reference to template parameters. This is only a partial
implementation; we retain the restriction that the argument must not be
type-dependent, since it's unclear how that would work given the existence of
other language rules requiring an exact type match in this context, even for
type-dependent cases (a question has been raised on the core reflector).
llvm-svn: 290647
specialized than the primary template. (Put another way, if we imagine there
were a partial specialization matching the primary template, we should never
select it if some other partial specialization also matches.)
llvm-svn: 290593
template parameters of reference type basically doesn't work, because we're
always deducing from an argument expression of non-reference type, so the type
of the deduced expression never matches. Instead, compare the type of an
expression naming the parameter to the type of the argument.
llvm-svn: 290586
dependent contexts when processing the template in C++11 and C++14, just like
we do in C++98 and C++1z. This allows us to diagnose invalid templates earlier.
llvm-svn: 290567
non-type template parameters.
During partial ordering, when checking the substituted deduced template
arguments match the original, check the types of non-type template arguments
match even if they're dependent. The only way we get dependent types here is if
they really represent types of the other template (which are supposed to be
modeled as being substituted for unique, non-dependent types).
In order to make this work for auto-typed non-type template arguments, we need
to be able to perform auto deduction even when the initializer and
(potentially) the auto type are dependent, support for which is the bulk of
this patch. (Note that this requires the ability to deduce only a single level
of a multi-level dependent type.)
llvm-svn: 290511
template arguments as written rather than the canonical template arguments,
so we print more user-friendly names for template parameters.
llvm-svn: 290483
fail the merge if the arguments have different types (except if one of them was
deduced from an array bound, in which case take the type from the other).
This is correct because (except in the array bound case) the type of the
template argument in each deduction must match the type of the parameter, so at
least one of the two deduced arguments must have a mismatched type.
This is necessary because we would otherwise lose the type information for the
discarded template argument in the merge, and fail to diagnose the mismatch.
In order to power this, we now properly retain the type of a deduced non-type
template argument deduced from a declaration, rather than giving it the type of
the template parameter; we'll convert it to the template parameter type when
checking the deduced arguments.
llvm-svn: 290399
argument even if the expression is value-dependent (we need to suppress the
final portion of the narrowing check, but the rest of the checking can still be
done eagerly).
This affects template template argument validity and partial ordering under
p0522r0.
llvm-svn: 290276
This change introduces UsingPackDecl as a marker for the set of UsingDecls
produced by pack expansion of a single (unresolved) using declaration. This is
not strictly necessary (we just need to be able to map from the original using
declaration to its expansions somehow), but it's useful to maintain the
invariant that each declaration reference instantiates to refer to one
declaration.
This is a re-commit of r290080 (reverted in r290092) with a fix for a
use-after-lifetime bug.
llvm-svn: 290203
This change introduces UsingPackDecl as a marker for the set of UsingDecls
produced by pack expansion of a single (unresolved) using declaration. This is
not strictly necessary (we just need to be able to map from the original using
declaration to its expansions somehow), but it's useful to maintain the
invariant that each declaration reference instantiates to refer to one
declaration.
llvm-svn: 290080
expressions in a function or class template.
This patch makes the following changes:
- Create a DependentScopeDeclRefExpr for the default argument instead of
a CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr.
- Pass CombineWithOuterScope=true so that the outer scope in which the
enum is declared is searched for the instantiation of the enum.
This is the first part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23096. Fixes PR28795
rdar://problem/27535319
llvm-svn: 289914
Other compilers accept invalid code here that we reject, and we need a
better error message to try to convince users that the code is really
incorrect. Consider:
class Foo {
typedef MyIterHelper<Foo> iterator;
friend class iterator;
};
Previously our wording was "elaborated type refers to a typedef".
"elaborated type" isn't widely known terminology, so the new diagnostic
says "typedef 'iterator' cannot be referenced with class specifier".
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25216
llvm-svn: 289259
Output generated by option -ast-print looks like C/C++ code, and it
really is for plain C. For C++ the produced output was not valid C++
code, but the differences were small. With this change the output
is fixed and can be compiled. Tests are changed so that output produced
by -ast-print is compiled again with the same flags and both outputs are
compared.
Option -ast-print is extensively used in clang tests but it itself
was tested poorly, existing tests only checked that compiler did not
crash. There are unit tests in file DeclPrinterTest.cpp, but they test
only terse output mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26452
llvm-svn: 286439
This commit improves the "must have C++ linkage" error diagnostics that are
emitted for C++ declarations like templates and literal operators by adding an
additional note that points to the appropriate extern "C" linkage specifier.
rdar://19021120
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26189
llvm-svn: 285823
resolved the -> to a call to a specific operator-> function. The particular
test case added here is actually being mishandled: the implicit member access
should not be type-dependent (because it's accessing a non-type-dependent
member of the current instantiation), but calls to a type-dependent operator->
that is a member of the current instantiation would be liable to hit the same
codepath.
llvm-svn: 284999
corresponding arguments are unexpanded pack expansions, we can compute the
result without substituting them. This significantly improves the memory usage
and performance of make_integer_sequence implementations that do this kind of
thing:
using result = integer_sequence<T, Ns ..., sizeof...(Ns) + Ns ...>;
... but note that such an implementation will still perform O(sizeof...(Ns)^2)
work while building the second pack expansion (we just have a somewhat lower
constant now).
In principle we could get this down to linear time by caching whether the
number of expansions of a pack is constant, or checking whether we're within an
alias template before scanning the pack for pack expansions (since that's the
only case in which we do substitutions within a dependent context at the
moment), but this patch doesn't attempt that.
llvm-svn: 284653
not instantiate exception specifications of functions if they were only used in
unevaluated contexts (other than 'noexcept' expressions).
In C++17 onwards, this becomes essential since the exception specification is
now part of the function's type.
Note that this means that constructs like the following no longer work:
struct A {
static T f() noexcept(...);
decltype(f()) *p;
};
... because the decltype expression now needs the exception specification of
'f', which has not yet been parsed.
llvm-svn: 284549
declaration has a dependent type.
This fixes a bug where clang errors out on a valid code.
rdar://problem/28051467
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24110
llvm-svn: 280330
explicit specialization to a warning for C++98 mode (this is a defect report
resolution, so per our informal policy it should apply in C++98), and turn
the warning on by default for C++11 and later. In all cases where it fires, the
right thing to do is to remove the pointless explicit instantiation.
llvm-svn: 280308
within the instantiation of that same specialization. This could previously
happen for eagerly-instantiated function templates, variable templates,
exception specifications, default arguments, and a handful of other cases.
We still have an issue here for default template arguments that recursively
make use of themselves and likewise for substitution into the type of a
non-type template parameter, but in those cases we're producing a different
entity each time, so they should instead be caught by the instantiation depth
limit. However, currently we will typically run out of stack before we reach
it. :(
llvm-svn: 280190
per-frame stack usage enough to cause it to hit our stack limit. This is not
ideal; we should find a better way of dealing with this, such as increasing
our stack allocation when built with ASan.
llvm-svn: 279668
they're redeclarations. This is necessary in order for name lookup to correctly
find the most recent declaration of the name (which affects default template
argument lookup and cross-module merging, among other things).
llvm-svn: 275612
classes.
MSVC actively uses unqualified lookup in dependent bases, lookup at the
instantiation point (non-dependent names may be resolved on things
declared later) etc. and all this stuff is the main cause of
incompatibility between clang and MSVC.
Clang tries to emulate MSVC behavior but it may fail in many cases.
clang could store lexed tokens for member functions definitions within
ClassTemplateDecl for later parsing during template instantiation.
It will allow resolving many possible issues with lookup in dependent
base classes and removing many already existing MSVC-specific
hacks/workarounds from the clang code.
llvm-svn: 272774
The code had a typo it was doing:
Param->setUninstantiatedDefaultArg(Param->getUninstantiatedDefaultArg());
This is a no-op but may assert, we wanted to do:
Param->setUninstantiatedDefaultArg(OldParam->getUninstantiatedDefaultArg());
This fixes PR28082.
llvm-svn: 272425
Wilson.
An unqualified lookup for in base classes may cause stack overflow if
the base class is a specialization of current class.
Patch by Will Wilson.
llvm-svn: 271251
Also make explicit instantiation decls not apply to nested classes when
targeting MSVC. That dll attributes are not inherited by inner classes
might be the explanation for MSVC's behaviour here.
llvm-svn: 270897
Summary:
In dependent contexts where we know a type name is required, such as a
new expression, we can recover by forming a DependentNameType.
This generalizes our existing compatibility hack for default arguments
for template type parameters.
Works towards parsing atlctrlw.h, which is PR26748.
Reviewers: avt77, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20500
llvm-svn: 270615
This reversal is being done with r267453's author's (i.e. Richard Smith's) permission.
This fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27601
Also, per Richard's request the examples from the bug report have been added to our test suite.
llvm-svn: 270016
With this patch compiler emits warning if it tries to make implicit instantiation
of a template but cannot find the template definition. The warning can be suppressed
by explicit instantiation declaration or by command line options
-Wundefined-var-template and -Wundefined-func-template. The implementation follows
the discussion of http://reviews.llvm.org/D12326.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16396
llvm-svn: 266719
This is a fix for https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25561 which was a
crash on invalid. Change the handling of invalid decls to have a catch-all
case to prevent unexpecting decls from triggering an assertion.
llvm-svn: 265467
This feature works outside of templates by forming a DeclRefExpr to a
FieldDecl instead of a MemberExpr, which requires a base object in
addition to the FieldDecl.
Previously, while building up the template AST before instantiation, we
formed a CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr, which always instantiates to a
MemberExpr. Now, in unevaluated contexts we form a
DependentScopeDeclRefExpr, which is a more flexible node that can
instantiate to either a MemberExpr or a DeclRefExpr depending on lookup
results.
Fixes PR26893.
llvm-svn: 263279
In VisitNonTypeTemplateParamDecl, before SubstExpr with the default argument,
we should create a ConstantEvaluated ExpressionEvaluationContext. Without this,
it is possible to use a PotentiallyEvaluated ExpressionEvaluationContext; and
MaybeODRUseExprs will not be cleared when popping the context, causing
assertion failure.
This is similar to how we handle the context before SubstExpr with the
default argument, in SubstDefaultTemplateArgument.
Part of PR13986.
rdar://24480205
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17576
llvm-svn: 261803
Or, do not set Sema's CurContext to the template declaration's when substituting into default template arguments of said template declaration.
If we do push the template declaration context on to Sema, and the template declaration is at namespace scope, Sema can get confused and try and do odr analysis when substituting into default template arguments, even though the substitution could be occurring within a dependent context.
I'm not sure why this was being done, perhaps there was concern that if a default template argument referred to a previous template parameter, it might not be found during substitution - but all regression tests pass, and I can't craft a test that would cause it to fails (if some one does, please inform me, and i'll craft a different fix for the PR).
This patch removes a single line of code, but unfortunately adds more than it removes, because of the tests. Some day I still hope to commit a patch that removes far more lines than it adds, while leaving clang better for it ;)
Sorry that r253590 ("Change the expression evaluation context from Unevaluated to ConstantEvaluated while substituting into non-type template argument defaults") caused the PR!
llvm-svn: 258110
Covers significantly more code in the template template pack argument
test and fixes the resulting assert problem.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15743
llvm-svn: 257326
By storing the instantiated expression back in the ParmVarDecl,
we remove the last need for separately storing the sub-expression
of a CXXDefaultArgExpr. This makes PCH/Modules merging quite
simple: CXXDefaultArgExpr records are serialized as references
to the ParmVarDecl, and we ignore redundant attempts to overwrite
the instantiated expression.
This has some extremely marginal impact on user-facing semantics.
However, the major effect is that it avoids IRGen errors about
conflicting definitions due to lambdas in the argument being
instantiated multiple times while sharing the same mangling.
It should also slightly improve memory usage and module file size.
rdar://23810407
llvm-svn: 256983
Richard Smith