Summary:
This patch removes IdentifierInfo from completion token after remembering
the identifier in the preprocessor.
Prior to this patch, completion token had the IdentifierInfo set to null when
completing at the start of identifier and to the II for completion prefix
when in the middle of identifier.
This patch unifies how code completion token is handled when it is insterted
before the identifier and in the middle of the identifier.
The actual IdentifierInfo can still be obtained from the Preprocessor.
Reviewers: bkramer, arphaman
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42241
llvm-svn: 323133
This fixes PR32732 by updating CurLexerKind to reflect available lexers.
We were hitting null pointer in Preprocessor::Lex because CurLexerKind
was CLK_Lexer but CurLexer was null. And we set it to null in
Preprocessor::HandleEndOfFile when exiting a file with code completion
point.
To reproduce the crash it is important for a comment to be inside a
class specifier. In this case in Parser::ParseClassSpecifier we improve
error recovery by pushing a semicolon token back into the preprocessor
and later on try to lex a token because we haven't reached the end of
file.
Also clang crashes only on code completion in included file, i.e. when
IncludeMacroStack is not empty. Though we reset CurLexer even if include
stack is empty. The difference is that during pushing back a semicolon
token, preprocessor calls EnterCachingLexMode which decides it is
already in caching mode because various lexers are null and
IncludeMacroStack is not empty. As the result, CurLexerKind remains
CLK_Lexer instead of updating to CLK_CachingLexer.
rdar://problem/34787685
Reviewers: akyrtzi, doug.gregor, arphaman
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: cfe-commits, kfunk, arphaman, nemanjai, kbarton
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41688
llvm-svn: 323008
Clang's completion output is non-deterministic, causing test failures
with turned on LLVM_REVERSE_ITERATION.
The workaround is to use CHECK-DAGs for now, will remove them when
PR35244 gets fixed.
llvm-svn: 317687
Summary:
Adjusted PrintingPolicy inside code completion to avoid printing some
redundant name qualifiers.
Before this change, typedefs that were written unqualified in source
code were printed with qualifiers in completion. For example, in the
following code
struct foo {
typedef int type;
type method();
};
completion item for `method` had return type of `foo::type`, even
though the original code used `type` without qualifiers.
After this change, the completion item has return type `type`, as
originally written in the source code.
Note that this change does not suppress qualifiers written by the
user. For example, in the following code
typedef int type;
struct foo {
typedef int type;
::type method(foo::type);
};
completion item for `method` has return type of `::type` and
parameter type of `foo::type`, as originally written in the source
code.
Reviewers: arphaman, bkramer, klimek
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: mgorny, eraman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38538
llvm-svn: 317677
Summary: The crash occured when FunctionDecl was parsed with an initializer.
Reviewers: bkramer, klimek, francisco.lopes
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37382
llvm-svn: 312788
Append optional chunks with their default values. For example:
before - "int i", after - "int i = 10"
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33644
llvm-svn: 308433
This commit is a follow up to r302797 which added support for dependent
completions after the '.' and '->' operators. This commit adds support for
dependent completions after the '::' operator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34173
llvm-svn: 305511
type is a TemplateSpecializationType or InjectedClassNameType
Fixes PR30847. Partially fixes PR20973 (first position only).
PR17614 is still not working, its expression has the dependent
builtin type. We'll have to teach the completion engine how to "resolve"
dependent expressions to fix it.
rdar://29818301
llvm-svn: 302797
If there is an unresolved member access AST node, and the base is
implicit, do not access/use it for generating candidate overloads for
code completion results.
Fixes PR31093.
llvm-svn: 298903
in macro argument pre-expansion mode when skipping a function body
This commit fixes a token caching problem that currently occurs when clang is
skipping a function body (e.g. when looking for a code completion token) and at
the same time caching the tokens for _Pragma when lexing it in macro argument
pre-expansion mode.
When _Pragma is being lexed in macro argument pre-expansion mode, it caches the
tokens so that it can avoid interpreting the pragma immediately (as the macro
argument may not be used in the macro body), and then either backtracks over or
commits these tokens. The problem is that, when we're backtracking/committing in
such a scenario, there's already a previous backtracking position stored in
BacktrackPositions (as we're skipping the function body), and this leads to a
situation where the cached tokens from the pragma (like '(' 'string_literal'
and ')') will remain in the cached tokens array incorrectly even after they're
consumed (in the case of backtracking) or just ignored (in the case when they're
committed). Furthermore, what makes it even worse, is that because of a previous
backtracking position, the logic that deals with when should we call
ExitCachingLexMode in CachingLex no longer works for us in this situation, and
more tokens in the macro argument get cached, to the point where the EOF token
that corresponds to the macro argument EOF is cached. This problem leads to all
sorts of issues in code completion mode, where incorrect errors get presented
and code completion completely fails to produce completion results.
rdar://28523863
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28772
llvm-svn: 296140
This commit adds context sensitive code completion support for the C++11
keywords that currently don't have completion results.
The following keywords are supported by this patch:
alignas
constexpr
static_assert
noexcept (as a function/method qualifier)
thread_local
The following special identifiers are also supported:
final (as a method qualifier or class qualifier)
override
rdar://29219185
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28286
llvm-svn: 295001
Use better heuristics to detect if a '{' might be the start of the constructor body
or not. Especially when there is a completion token.
Fix the test 'test/CodeCompletion/ctor-initializer.cpp ' when clang defaults to c++11
The problem was is how we recover invalid code in the ctor-init part as we skip the
function body. In particular, we want to know if a '{' is the begining of the body.
In C++03, we always consider it as the beginng of the body. The problem was that in
C++11, it may be the start of an initializer, so we skip over it, causing further
parse errors later. (It is important that we are able to parse correctly the rest
of the class definition, to know what are the class member, for example)
This commit is improving the heuristics to decide if the '{' is starting a function
body. The rules are the following: If we are not in a template argument, and that the
previous tokens are not an identifier, or a >, then it is much more likely to be the
function body. We verify that further by checking the token after the matching '}'
The commit also fix the behavior when there is a code_completion token in the
ctor-initializers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21502
llvm-svn: 285883
This commit improves code completion for properties that are declared in
Objective-C protocols by making sure that properties show up in completions
when they are accessed through a qualified id.
rdar://24426041
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25436
llvm-svn: 284007
- In functions with try { } catch { }, only the try block would be
skipped, not the catch blocks
- The template functions would still be parsed.
- The initializers within a constructor would still be parsed.
- The inline functions within class would still be stored, only to be
discared later.
- Invalid code with try would assert (as in "int foo() try assert_here")
This attempt to do even less while skipping function bodies.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20821
llvm-svn: 272963
This commit fixes the IdentifierIterator to actually include identifiers
from a PCH or precompiled preamble when there is also a global module
index. This was causing code-completion (outside of C++) and
typo-correction to be missing global identifiers defined in the
PCH/preamble. Typo-correction has been broken since we first started
using the module index, whereas code-completion only started relying on
identifier iterator in r232793.
rdar://problem/25642879
llvm-svn: 268471
Currently we return no results when completing inside of the brackets in
a 'char foo[]' declaration. Let the generic expression completion code
handle it instead. We could get fancier here (e.g. filter non-constant
expressions in contexts where VLAs are not allowed), but it's a strict
improvement over the existing version.
llvm-svn: 261217
Otherwise the stale module cache data may cause the test to fail. These
two tests are new and are the only instances of c-index-test with
-fmodules that doesn't have an explicit module cache path.
llvm-svn: 242710
So, iterate over the list of macros mentioned in modules, and make sure those
are in the master table.
This isn't particularly efficient, but hopefully it's something that isn't
done too often.
PR23929 and rdar://problem/21480635
llvm-svn: 240571
Various tests had sprung up over the years which had --check-prefix=ABC on the
RUN line, but "CHECK-ABC:" later on. This happened to work before, but was
strictly incorrect. FileCheck is getting stricter soon though.
Patch by Ron Ofir.
llvm-svn: 188174
Summary: Passes all tests (+ the new one with code completion), but needs a thorough review in part related to modules.
Reviewers: doug.gregor
Reviewed By: alexfh
CC: cfe-commits, rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D41
llvm-svn: 164610
attached to a declaration in the completion string.
Since extracting comments isn't free, a new code completion option is
introduced.
A new code completion option that enables including brief comments
into CodeCompletionString should be a, err, code completion option.
But because ASTUnit caches global declarations during parsing before
even completion consumer is created, the option is duplicated as a
translation unit option (in both libclang and ASTUnit, like the option
to cache code completion results).
llvm-svn: 159539
Specifically, @[] and @{} didn't have a type associated with them; we now
use "NSArray *" and "NSDictionary *", respectively. @"" has the type
"NSString *". @(), unfortunately, has type "id", since it (currently) may
be either an NSNumber or an NSString.
Add a test for all the Objective-C at-expression completions.
<rdar://problem/11507708&11507668&11507711>
llvm-svn: 158533
includes a patch from Matthias Kleine with a regression testcase!
Adds a new iterator 'data_iterator' to OnDiskHashTable which doesn't try to
reconstruct the external_key from the internal_key, which is useful for traits
that don't store enough information to do that mapping in their key. Also
deletes the 'item_iterator' from OnDiskHashTable as dead code.
llvm-svn: 154784
Previously we would cut off the source file buffer at the code-completion
point; this impeded code-completion inside C++ inline methods and,
recently, with buffering ObjC methods.
Have the code-completion inserted into the source buffer so that it can
be buffered along with a method body. When we actually hit the code-completion
point the cut-off lexing or parsing.
Fixes rdar://10056932&8319466
llvm-svn: 139086
RTTI is disabled. Similarly, don't suggest throw or try as code
completion results when C++ exceptions are disabled. Fixes
<rdar://problem/9193560>.
llvm-svn: 129346
That bug concerned the well-formedness of code such as (&ovl)(a, b,
c). GCC rejects the code, while EDG accepts it. On further study of the
standard, I see no support for EDG's position: in particular, C++
[over.over] does not list this as a context where we can take the
address of an overloaded function, C++ [over.call.func] does not
reference the address-of operator at any point, and C++ [expr.call]
claims that the function argument in a call is either a function
lvalue or a pointer-to-function; (&ovl) is neither.
llvm-svn: 118620
declaration send or a variadic function call, collapse the ", ..."
into the parameter before it, so that we don't get a second
placeholder.
llvm-svn: 112579
Sam McCall