Targets are not necessarily inserted in the order they appear in source
code. For example we could traverse overload sets, or selectively insert
template patterns after all other decls.
So order the targets before printing to make sure tests are not dependent on
such implementation details. We can also do it in production, but that might be
wasteful as we haven't seen any complaints in the wild around these orderings
yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117549
This reverts commit cc56c66f27.
Fixed a bad assertion, the target of a UsingShadowDecl must not have
*local* qualifiers, but it can be a typedef whose underlying type is qualified.
Currently there's no way to find the UsingDecl that a typeloc found its
underlying type through. Compare to DeclRefExpr::getFoundDecl().
Design decisions:
- a sugar type, as there are many contexts this type of use may appear in
- UsingType is a leaf like TypedefType, the underlying type has no TypeLoc
- not unified with UnresolvedUsingType: a single name is appealing,
but being sometimes-sugar is often fiddly.
- not unified with TypedefType: the UsingShadowDecl is not a TypedefNameDecl or
even a TypeDecl, and users think of these differently.
- does not cover other rarer aliases like objc @compatibility_alias,
in order to be have a concrete API that's easy to understand.
- implicitly desugared by the hasDeclaration ASTMatcher, to avoid
breaking existing patterns and following the precedent of ElaboratedType.
Scope:
- This does not cover types associated with template names introduced by
using declarations. A future patch should introduce a sugar TemplateName
variant for this. (CTAD deduced types fall under this)
- There are enough AST matchers to fix the in-tree clang-tidy tests and
probably any other matchers, though more may be useful later.
Caveats:
- This changes a fairly common pattern in the AST people may depend on matching.
Previously, typeLoc(loc(recordType())) matched whether a struct was
referred to by its original scope or introduced via using-decl.
Now, the using-decl case is not matched, and needs a separate matcher.
This is similar to the case of typedefs but nevertheless both adds
complexity and breaks existing code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251
This implements the following changes:
* AutoType retains sugared deduced-as-type.
* Template argument deduction machinery analyses the sugared type all the way
down. It would previously lose the sugar on first recursion.
* Undeduced AutoType will be properly canonicalized, including the constraint
template arguments.
* Remove the decltype node created from the decltype(auto) deduction.
As a result, we start seeing sugared types in a lot more test cases,
including some which showed very unfriendly `type-parameter-*-*` types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith, #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216
This implements the following changes:
* AutoType retains sugared deduced-as-type.
* Template argument deduction machinery analyses the sugared type all the way
down. It would previously lose the sugar on first recursion.
* Undeduced AutoType will be properly canonicalized, including the constraint
template arguments.
* Remove the decltype node created from the decltype(auto) deduction.
As a result, we start seeing sugared types in a lot more test cases,
including some which showed very unfriendly `type-parameter-*-*` types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216
This implements the following changes:
* AutoType retains sugared deduced-as-type.
* Template argument deduction machinery analyses the sugared type all the way
down. It would previously lose the sugar on first recursion.
* Undeduced AutoType will be properly canonicalized, including the constraint
template arguments.
* Remove the decltype node created from the decltype(auto) deduction.
As a result, we start seeing sugared types in a lot more test cases,
including some which showed very unfriendly `type-parameter-*-*` types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216
Previously we would call getAsTemplate() when kind == TemplateExpansion,
which triggers an assertion. The call is now replaced with
getAsTemplateOrTemplatePattern(), which is exactly the same as
getAsTemplate(), except it allows calls when kind == TemplateExpansion.
No change in behavior for no-assert builds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111648
Even though they're implemented via typedefs, we typically
want to treat them like keywords.
We could add hover information / xrefs, but it's very unlikely
to provide any value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108556
This implements the 'using enum maybe-qualified-enum-tag ;' part of
1099. It introduces a new 'UsingEnumDecl', subclassed from
'BaseUsingDecl'. Much of the diff is the boilerplate needed to get the
new class set up.
There is one case where we accept ill-formed, but I believe this is
merely an extended case of an existing bug, so consider it
orthogonal. AFAICT in class-scope the c++20 rule is that no 2 using
decls can bring in the same target decl ([namespace.udecl]/8). But we
already accept:
struct A { enum { a }; };
struct B : A { using A::a; };
struct C : B { using A::a;
using B::a; }; // same enumerator
this patch permits mixtures of 'using enum Bob;' and 'using Bob::member;' in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102241
This is a pre-patch for adding using-enum support. It breaks out
the shadow decl handling of UsingDecl to a new intermediate base
class, BaseUsingDecl, altering the decl hierarchy to
def BaseUsing : DeclNode<Named, "", 1>;
def Using : DeclNode<BaseUsing>;
def UsingPack : DeclNode<Named>;
def UsingShadow : DeclNode<Named>;
def ConstructorUsingShadow : DeclNode<UsingShadow>;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101777
We now make up a TypeLoc for the class receiver to simplify visiting,
notably for indexing, availability, and clangd.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101645
Treat them just like we do for properties - as a `property` semantic
token although ideally we could differentiate the two.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101785
Class properties are always implicit short-hands for the getter/setter
class methods.
We need to explicitly visit the interface decl `UIColor` in `UIColor.blueColor`,
otherwise we instead show the method decl even while hovering over
`UIColor` in the expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99975
- highlight references to protocols in class/protocol/extension decls
- support multi-token selector highlights in semantic + xref highlights
(method calls and declarations only)
- In `@interface I(C)`, I now references the interface and C the category
- highlight uses of interfaces as types
- added semantic highlightings of protocol names (as "interface") and
category names (as "namespace").
These are both standard kinds, maybe "extension" will be standardized...
- highlight `auto` as "class" when it resolves to an ObjC pointer
- don't highlight `self` as a variable even though the AST models it as one
Not fixed: uses of protocols in type names (needs some refactoring of
unrelated code first)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97617
The patch also does some cleanup on the interface of the entry
points from TargetFinder into the heuristic resolution code.
Since the heuristic resolver is created in a place where the
ASTContext is available, it can store the ASTContext and the
NameFactory hack can be removed.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92290
FindTarget on the virtual keyword or access specifier of a base specifier will now resolve to type of the base specifier.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95338
Combined with 'da98651 - Revert "DR2064:
decltype(E) is only a dependent', this change (5a391d3) caused verifier
errors when building Chromium. See https://crbug.com/1168494#c1 for a
reproducer.
Additionally it reverts changes that were dependent on this one, see
below.
> Following up on PR48517, fix handling of template arguments that refer
> to dependent declarations.
>
> Treat an id-expression that names a local variable in a templated
> function as being instantiation-dependent.
>
> This addresses a language defect whereby a reference to a dependent
> declaration can be formed without any construct being value-dependent.
> Fixing that through value-dependence turns out to be problematic, so
> instead this patch takes the approach (proposed on the core reflector)
> of allowing the use of pointers or references to (but not values of)
> dependent declarations inside value-dependent expressions, and instead
> treating template arguments as dependent if they evaluate to a constant
> involving such dependent declarations.
>
> This ends up affecting a bunch of OpenMP tests, due to OpenMP
> imprecisely handling instantiation-dependent constructs, bailing out
> early instead of processing dependent constructs to the extent possible
> when handling the template.
>
> Previously committed as 8c1f2d15b8, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted.
This reverts commit 5a391d38ac.
It also restores clang/test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp to its state before
da986511fb.
Revert "[c++20] P1907R1: Support for generalized non-type template arguments of scalar type."
> Previously committed as 9e08e51a20, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
> following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
>
> 7e84aa1b81 by Simon Pilgrim
> ed13d8c667 by me
> 95c7b6cadb by Sam McCall
> 430d5d8429 by Dave Zarzycki
This reverts commit 4b574008ae.
Revert "[msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay"
> [msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay
> applied to an array the same as the array itself.
>
> This follows MS ABI, and corrects a regression from the implementation
> of generalized non-type template parameters, where we "forgot" how to
> mangle this case.
This reverts commit 18e093faf7.
Previously committed as 9e08e51a20, and
reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
7e84aa1b81 by Simon Pilgrim
ed13d8c667 by me
95c7b6cadb by Sam McCall
430d5d8429 by Dave Zarzycki
SmallVector<T> with default size is now the recommended version (D92522).
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92788
The patch adjusts the existing `llvm::DenseMap<unsigned, T>` and
`llvm::DenseSet<unsigned>` objects that store source locations, so
that they use `SourceLocation` directly instead of `unsigned`.
This patch relies on the `DenseMapInfo` trait added in D89719.
It also replaces the construction of `SourceLocation` objects from
the constants -1 and -2 with calls to the trait's methods `getEmptyKey`
and `getTombstoneKey` where appropriate.
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69840
With this patch, we don't treat `using ns::X` as a first-class declaration like `using Z = ns::Y`, reference to X that goes through this using-decl is considered a direct reference (without the Underlying bit).
Fix the workaround in https://reviews.llvm.org/D87225 and https://reviews.llvm.org/D74054.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88472
The assertion is not true anymore after D82739, this patch just removes
it, and rename related functions.
And also fixes a missing cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84837
* Try to apply heuristic resolution recursively to the base
expression of a CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr.
* Try to apply heuristic resolution recursively to the callee
expression in a call expression.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/441
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82739
Summary:
Two helpers are introduced:
* Some of the logic previously in TargetFinder::Visit*() methods is
factored out into resolveDependentExprToDecls().
* Some of the logic in getMembersReferencedViaDependentName() is
factored out into resolveTypeToRecordDecl().
D82739 will build on this and use these functions in new ways.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83371
Summary:
This means they're renamable and textDocument/highlight works
This fell out of D78454
Reviewers: adamcz
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80170
Kadir Cetinkaya