The newline-eof fix was rendered as "insert '...'", this patch
special-case it.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117294
Not sure it's OK to suppress this in clang itself - if we're building a PCH
or module, maybe it matters?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116925
Often we run into situations where we want to ignore
warnings from system headers, but Clang will still
give warnings about the contents of a macro defined
in a system header used in user-code.
Introduce a ShowInSystemMacro option to be able to
specify which warnings we do want to keep raising
warnings for. The current behavior is kept in this patch
(i.e. warnings from system macros are enabled by default).
The decision as to whether this should be an opt-in or opt-out
feature can be made in a separate patch.
To put the feature to test, replace duplicated code for
Wshadow and Wold-style-cast with the SuppressInSystemMacro tag.
Also disable the warning for C++20 designators, fixing #52944.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116833
A function call `unresolved()` in C will generate an implicit declaration
of the missing function and warn `ext_implicit_function_decl` or so.
(Compared to in C++ where we get `err_undeclared_var_use`).
We want to try to resolve these names.
Unfortunately typo correction is disabled in sema for performance
reasons unless this warning is promoted to error.
(We need typo correction for include-fixer.)
It's not clear to me where a switch to force this correction on should
go, include-fixer is kind of a hack. So hack more by telling sema we're
promoting them to error.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/937
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115490
Clang doesn't offer these fixes I guess for a couple of reasons:
- where to insert includes is a formatting concern, and clang shouldn't
depend on clang-format
- the way clang prints diagnostics, we'd show a bunch of basically irrelevant
context of "this is where we'd want to insert the include"
Maybe it's possible to hack around 1, but 2 is still a concern.
Meanwhile, bolting this onto include-fixer gets the job done.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/355
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/937
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114667
It is not great to list diag ids by hand, but I don't see any other
solution unless diagnostics are annotated with these explicitly, which is a
bigger change in clang and I am not sure if would be worth it.
Diagnostics handled by this patch is by no means exhaustive, there might be
other checks that don't mention "unused"/"deprecated" in their names. But it
feels like this should be enough to catch common diagnostics and can be extended
over time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107040
Ignored diagnostics were only checked after level adjusters and assumed
it would stay the same for the rest. But it can also be modified by
FeatureModules.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103387
This is causing weird code patterns in various places and I can't see
any difference between None and empty change list. Neither in the current use
cases nor in the spec.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103449
These can be invoked at different stages while building an AST to let
FeatureModules implement features on top of it. The patch also
introduces a sawDiagnostic hook, which can mutate the final clangd::Diag
while reading a clang::Diagnostic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98499
We don't act as a language server for these files (e.g. don't get open/close
notifications for them), but just blindly publish diagnostics for them.
This works reasonably well in coc.nvim and vscode: they show up in the
workspace diagnostic list and when you open the file.
The only update after the file is reparsed, not as you type which is a bit
janky, but seems a lot better than nothing.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/614
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92704
The static_assert in "libcxx/include/memory" was the main offender here,
but then I figured I might as well `git grep -i instantat` and fix all
the instances I found. One was in user-facing HTML documentation;
the rest were in comments or tests.
This can happen when building implicit modules, as demonstrated in test.
The CompilerInstance uses the same StoredDiags, but different
SourceManager. This used to crash clangd when it tried to relocate the
diagnostic to the main file, which, according to SourceManager from the
diagnostic, is a fake <module-includes> file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85753
This reverts commit 658af94350.
Breaks tests on windows: http://45.33.8.238/win/17229/step_9.txt
I think this is uncovering a latent bug when a late-parsed preamble is
used with an eagerly-parsed file.
Summary:
Parsing std::make_unique is an exception to the usual non-parsing of function
bodies in the preamble. (A hook is added to PreambleCallbacks to allow this).
This allows us to diagnose make_unique<Foo>(wrong arg list), and opens the door
to providing signature help (by detecting where the arg list is forwarded to).
This function is trivial (checked libc++ and libstdc++) and doesn't result in
any extra templates being instantiated, so this should be cheap.
This uncovered a second issue (already visible with class templates)...
Errors produced by template instantiation have primary locations within the
template, with instantiation stack reported as notes.
For templates defined in headers, these end up reported at the #include
directive, which isn't terribly helpful as the header itself is probably fine.
This patch reports them at the instantiation site (the first location in the
instantiation stack that's in the main file). This in turn required a bit of
refactoring in Diagnostics so we can delay relocating the diagnostic until all
notes are available.
https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/412
Reviewers: hokein, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81351
Summary:
This would avoid adding too much noise when there is a "-Wall" in the
compile command.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79923
Summary: This seems like a pretty safe case, and common enough to be useful.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78338
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
LSP requires diagnostics to lay inside main file. In clangd we keep
diagnostics in three different cases:
- already in main file
- adjusted to a header included in main file
- has a note covering some range in main file
In the last case, we were not adjusting the diagnostics range to be in main
file, therefore these diagnostics ended up pointing some arbitrary locations.
This patch fixes that issue by adjusting the range of diagnostics to be the
first note inside main file when converting to LSP.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72458
Summary:
Instead, emit a diagnostic and return an empty ASM node, as we do if the target
is missing.
Filter this diagnostic out in clangd, where it's not meaningful.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/222
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71189
Summary:
Diagnostic locations were broken when it was result of a macro
expansion. This patch fixes it by using expansion location instead of location
inside macro body.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/201.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70494
Summary:
Those errors are exposed at the first character of a file,
for a lack of a better place.
Previously, all errors were stored inside the AST and report
accordingly. However, errors in command-line argument parsing could
result in failure to produce the AST, so we need an alternative ways to
report those errors.
We take the following approach in this patch:
- buildCompilerInvocation() now requires an explicit DiagnosticConsumer.
- TUScheduler and TestTU now collect the diagnostics produced when
parsing command line arguments.
If pasing of the AST failed, diagnostics are reported via a new
ParsingCallbacks::onFailedAST method.
If parsing of the AST succeeded, any errors produced during
command-line parsing are stored alongside the AST inside the
ParsedAST instance and reported as previously by calling the
ParsingCallbacks::onMainAST method;
- The client code that uses ClangdServer's DiagnosticConsumer
does not need to change, it will receive new diagnostics in the
onDiagnosticsReady() callback
Errors produced when parsing command-line arguments are collected using
the same StoreDiags class that is used to collect all other errors. They
are recognized by their location being invalid. IIUC, the location is
invalid as there is no source manager at this point, it is created at a
later stage.
Although technically we might also get diagnostics that mention the
command-line arguments FileID with after the source manager was created
(and they have valid source locations), we choose to not handle those
and they are dropped as not coming from the main file. AFAICT, those
diagnostics should always be notes, therefore it's safe to drop them
without loosing too much information.
Reviewers: kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: nridge, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits, gribozavr
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66759
llvm-svn: 370177
Summary: This would fix that we show weird diagnostics on random lines of the main file.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66074
llvm-svn: 368549
Summary:
This fixes a case where we show diagnostics on arbitrary lines, in an
internal codebase.
Open for ideas on unittesting this.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64863
llvm-svn: 367303
Summary:
Clang-tidy checks may emit duplicated messages (clang-tidy tool
deduplicate them in its custom diagnostic consumer), and we may show
multiple duplicated diagnostics in the UI, which is really bad.
This patch makes clangd do the deduplication, and revert the change
rL363889.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64127
llvm-svn: 365204
Summary:
We strip the "[clang-tidy-check]" suffix from the clang-tidy diagnostics, we
should be consistent with the message in FixIt (strip the suffix as well).
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63926
llvm-svn: 364731
Summary:
- Fixed diagnostics where zero width inserted ranges were being used instead of the whole token
- Added unit tests
Patch by @SureYeaah !
Reviewers: sammccall, kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63222
llvm-svn: 363253
Summary: A temporary workaround until we figure out a better way to present fixes.
Reviewers: kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62372
llvm-svn: 361625
Summary: We already have the structure internally, we just need to expose it.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60267
llvm-svn: 358675
Summary:
- for warnings, use the flag the warning is controlled by (-Wfoo)
- for errors, keep using the internal name (there's nothing better) but
drop the err_ prefix
This comes at the cost of uniformity, it's no longer totally obvious
exactly what the code field contains. But the -Wname flags are so much
more useful to end-users than the internal warn_foo that this seems worth it.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60822
llvm-svn: 358611
Haojian Wu