[DebugInfo] Add debug locations to constant SD nodes
This adds debug location to constant nodes of Selection DAG and updates
all places that create constants to pass debug locations
(see PR13269).
Can't guarantee that all locations are correct, but in a lot of cases choice
is obvious, so most of them should be. At least all tests pass.
Tests for these changes do not cover everything, instead just check it for
SDNodes, ARM and AArch64 where it's easy to get incorrect locations on
constants.
This is not complete fix as FastISel contains workaround for wrong debug
locations, which drops locations from instructions on processing constants,
but there isn't currently a way to use debug locations from constants there
as llvm::Constant doesn't cache it (yet). Although this is a bit different
issue, not directly related to these changes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9084
llvm-svn: 235989
This adds debug location to constant nodes of Selection DAG and updates
all places that create constants to pass debug locations
(see PR13269).
Can't guarantee that all locations are correct, but in a lot of cases choice
is obvious, so most of them should be. At least all tests pass.
Tests for these changes do not cover everything, instead just check it for
SDNodes, ARM and AArch64 where it's easy to get incorrect locations on
constants.
This is not complete fix as FastISel contains workaround for wrong debug
locations, which drops locations from instructions on processing constants,
but there isn't currently a way to use debug locations from constants there
as llvm::Constant doesn't cache it (yet). Although this is a bit different
issue, not directly related to these changes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9084
llvm-svn: 235977
In theory this allows the compiler to skip materializing the array on
the stack. In practice clang often fails to do that, but that's a
different story. NFC.
llvm-svn: 231571
The new solution is to not use this lowering if there are any dynamic
allocas in the current function. We know up front if there are dynamic
allocas, but we don't know if we'll need to create stack temporaries
with large alignment during lowering. Conservatively assume that we will
need such temporaries.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5128
llvm-svn: 216775
shorter/easier and have the DAG use that to do the same lookup. This
can be used in the future for TargetMachine based caching lookups from
the MachineFunction easily.
Update the MIPS subtarget switching machinery to update this pointer
at the same time it runs.
llvm-svn: 214838
The argument list vector is never used after it has been passed to the
CallLoweringInfo and moving it to the CallLoweringInfo is cleaner and
pretty much as cheap as keeping a pointer to it.
llvm-svn: 212135
This is mostly a mechanical change changing all the call sites to the newer
chained-function construction pattern. This removes the horrible 15-parameter
constructor for the CallLoweringInfo in favour of setting properties of the call
via chained functions. No functional change beyond the removal of the old
constructors are intended.
llvm-svn: 209082
> For functions where esi is used as base pointer, we would previously fall ba
> from lowering memcpy with "rep movs" because that clobbers esi.
>
> With this patch, we just store esi in another physical register, and restore
> it afterwards. This adds a little bit of register preassure, but the more
> efficient memcpy should be worth it.
>
> Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2968
This didn't work. I was ending up with code like this:
lea edi,[esi+38h]
mov ecx,0Fh
mov edx,esi
mov esi,ebx
rep movs dword ptr es:[edi],dword ptr [esi]
lea ecx,[esi+74h] <-- Ooops, we're now using esi before restoring it from edx.
add ebx,3Ch
mov esi,edx
I guess if we want to do this we need stronger glue or something, or doing the expansion
much later.
llvm-svn: 204829
For functions where esi is used as base pointer, we would previously fall back
from lowering memcpy with "rep movs" because that clobbers esi.
With this patch, we just store esi in another physical register, and restore
it afterwards. This adds a little bit of register preassure, but the more
efficient memcpy should be worth it.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2968
llvm-svn: 204174
This happens when there is both stack realignment and a dynamic alloca in the
function. If we overwrite %esi (rep;movsl uses fixed registers) we'll lose the
base pointer and the next register spill will write into oblivion.
Fixes PR15249 and unbreaks firefox on i386/freebsd. Mozilla uses dynamic allocas
and freebsd a 4 byte stack alignment.
llvm-svn: 175057
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
getIntPtrType support for multiple address spaces via a pointer type,
and also introduced a crasher bug in the constant folder reported in
PR14233.
These commits also contained several problems that should really be
addressed before they are re-committed. I have avoided reverting various
cleanups to the DataLayout APIs that are reasonable to have moving
forward in order to reduce the amount of churn, and minimize the number
of commits that were reverted. I've also manually updated merge
conflicts and manually arranged for the getIntPtrType function to stay
in DataLayout and to be defined in a plausible way after this revert.
Thanks to Duncan for working through this exact strategy with me, and
Nick Lewycky for tracking down the really annoying crasher this
triggered. (Test case to follow in its own commit.)
After discussing with Duncan extensively, and based on a note from
Micah, I'm going to continue to back out some more of the more
problematic patches in this series in order to ensure we go into the
LLVM 3.2 branch with a reasonable story here. I'll send a note to
llvmdev explaining what's going on and why.
Summary of reverted revisions:
r166634: Fix a compiler warning with an unused variable.
r166607: Add some cleanup to the DataLayout changes requested by
Chandler.
r166596: Revert "Back out r166591, not sure why this made it through
since I cancelled the command. Bleh, sorry about this!
r166591: Delete a directory that wasn't supposed to be checked in yet.
r166578: Add in support for getIntPtrType to get the pointer type based
on the address space.
llvm-svn: 167221
to pass around a struct instead of a large set of individual values. This
cleans up the interface and allows more information to be added to the struct
for future targets without requiring changes to each and every target.
NV_CONTRIB
llvm-svn: 157479
the processor keeps a return addresses stack (RAS) which stores the address
and the instruction execution state of the instruction after a function-call
type branch instruction.
Calling a "noreturn" function with normal call instructions (e.g. bl) can
corrupt RAS and causes 100% return misprediction so LLVM should use a
unconditional branch instead. i.e.
mov lr, pc
b _foo
The "mov lr, pc" is issued in order to get proper backtrace.
rdar://8979299
llvm-svn: 151623
sequence of loads and stores was being generated to perform the
copy on the x86 targets if the parameter was less than 4 byte
aligned, causing llc to use up vast amounts of memory and time.
Use a "rep movs" form instead. PR7170.
llvm-svn: 118260
Move EmitTargetCodeForMemcpy, EmitTargetCodeForMemset, and
EmitTargetCodeForMemmove out of TargetLowering and into
SelectionDAGInfo to exercise this.
llvm-svn: 103481
Sergey Dmitrouk