The CodeGenSchedModels::checkCompleteness routine in TableGen/
CodeGenSchedule.cpp is supposed to verify for each processor
model that is marked as "complete" that it actually defines a
scheduling class for each instruction.
However, this did not work correctly due to an incorrect
check whether a scheduling class has an itinerary.
Reviewer: atrick
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26156
llvm-svn: 285622
-debug-only=subtarget-emitter prints a lot of machine model diagnostics.
This prunes the output so that the "No machine model for XXX on processor YYY"
only appears when there is definitely no machine model for that opcode.
Previously it was printing that error even if the opcode was covered by
a more general scheduling class.
<rdar://problem/15919845> [TableGen][CodeGenSchedule] Debug output does not help spotting the missing scheduling classes
llvm-svn: 284452
Currently isComplete = 1 requires that every instruction must
be described, declared unsupported or marked as having no
scheduling information for a processor.
For some backends such as MIPS, this requirement entails
long regex lists of instructions that are unsupported.
This patch teaches Tablegen to skip over instructions that
are associated with unsupported feature when checking if the
scheduling model is complete.
Patch by: Daniel Sanders
Contributions by: Simon Dardis
Reviewers: MatzeB
Differential Reviewer: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20522
llvm-svn: 273551
TableGen checks at compiletime that for scheduling models with
"CompleteModel = 1" one of the following holds:
- Is marked with the hasNoSchedulingInfo flag
- The instruction is a subclass of Sched
- There are InstRW definitions in the scheduling model
Typical steps necessary to complete a model:
- Ensure all pseudo instructions that are expanded before machine
scheduling (usually everything handled with EmitYYY() functions in
XXXTargetLowering).
- If a CPU does not support some instructions mark the corresponding
resource unsupported: "WriteRes<WriteXXX, []> { let Unsupported = 1; }".
- Add missing scheduling information.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17747
llvm-svn: 262384
This introduces a new flag that indicates that a specific instruction
will never be present when the MachineScheduler runs and therefore needs
no scheduling information.
This is in preparation for an upcoming commit which checks completeness
of a scheduling model when tablegen runs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17728
llvm-svn: 262383
If the type isn't trivially moveable emplace can skip a potentially
expensive move. It also saves a couple of characters.
Call sites were found with the ASTMatcher + some semi-automated cleanup.
memberCallExpr(
argumentCountIs(1), callee(methodDecl(hasName("push_back"))),
on(hasType(recordDecl(has(namedDecl(hasName("emplace_back")))))),
hasArgument(0, bindTemporaryExpr(
hasType(recordDecl(hasNonTrivialDestructor())),
has(constructExpr()))),
unless(isInTemplateInstantiation()))
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 238602
This is to be consistent with StringSet and ultimately with the standard
library's associative container insert function.
This lead to updating SmallSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update SmallPtrSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update all the existing users of those functions...
llvm-svn: 222334
"ProcResource def is not included in the ProcResources".
Some of the machine model definitions were not added to the
processor's list used for diagnostics and error checking.
llvm-svn: 203749
This patch places class definitions in implementation files into anonymous
namespaces to prevent weak vtables. This eliminates the need of providing an
out-of-line definition to pin the vtable explicitly to the file.
llvm-svn: 195092
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file. The memory leaks in this version have been fixed. Thanks
Alexey for pointing them out.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 195064
This change is incorrect. If you delete virtual destructor of both a base class
and a subclass, then the following code:
Base *foo = new Child();
delete foo;
will not cause the destructor for members of Child class. As a result, I observe
plently of memory leaks. Notable examples I investigated are:
ObjectBuffer and ObjectBufferStream, AttributeImpl and StringSAttributeImpl.
llvm-svn: 194997
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 194865
The element passed to push_back is not copied before the vector reallocates.
The client needs to copy the element first before passing it to push_back.
No test case, will be tested by follow-up swift scheduler model change (it
segfaults without this change).
llvm-svn: 183459
This fixes some of the ridiculously complex code for optimizing the
machine model tables that are shared among all processors of a given
target. A9 and Swift both use the "special" feature that maps old
itinerary classes to new machine model defs. They map different
overlapping subsets of instructions, which wasn't handled correctly.
llvm-svn: 183302
A9 uses itinerary classes, Swift uses RW lists. This tripped some
verification when we're expanding variants. I had to refine the
verification a bit.
llvm-svn: 178357
Properly handle cases where a group of instructions have different
SchedRW lists with the same itinerary class.
This was supposed to work, but I left in an early break.
llvm-svn: 177317
We always supported a mixture of the old itinerary model and new
per-operand model, but it required a level of indirection to map
itinerary classes to SchedRW lists. This was done for ARM A9.
Now we want to define x86 SchedRW lists, with the goal of removing its
itinerary classes, but still support the itineraries in the mean
time. When I original developed the model, Atom did not have
itineraries, so there was no reason to expect this requirement.
llvm-svn: 177226
Don't require instructions to inherit Sched<...>. Sometimes it is more
convenient to say:
let SchedRW = ... in {
...
}
Which is now possible.
llvm-svn: 177199
This allows abitrary groups of processor resources. Using something in
a subset automatically counts againts the superset. Currently, this
only works if the superset is also a ProcResGroup as opposed to a
SuperUnit.
This allows SandyBridge to be expressed naturally, which will be
checked in shortly.
def SBPort01 : ProcResGroup<[SBPort0, SBPort1]>;
def SBPort15 : ProcResGroup<[SBPort1, SBPort5]>;
def SBPort23 : ProcResGroup<[SBPort2, SBPort3]>;
def SBPort015 : ProcResGroup<[SBPort0, SBPort1, SBPort5]>;
llvm-svn: 177112
Drive by fix. I noticed some missing logic that might bite future
users. This shouldn't affect the final output on currently modeled
targets.
llvm-svn: 174142
"../llvm-git/utils/TableGen/CodeGenSchedule.cpp", line 1594.12: 1540-0218 (S) The call does not match any parameter list for "operator+".
"../llvm-git/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h", line 130.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class _Iterator, class Func> llvm::operator+(mapped_iterator<_Iterator,Func>::difference_type, const mapped_iterator<_Iterator,Func> &)" is not a viable candidate.
Patch by Kai.
llvm-svn: 167311
Most places can use PrintFatalError as the unwinding mechanism was not
used for anything other than printing the error. The single exception
was CodeGenDAGPatterns.cpp, where intermediate errors during type
resolution were ignored to simplify incremental platform development.
This use is replaced by an error flag in TreePattern and bailout earlier
in various places if it is set.
llvm-svn: 166712
Eugene Zelenko