There is no real reason the index has to have the concept of an
exporting Module. We should be able to have one single unique
instance of the Index, and it should be read-only after creation
for the whole ThinLTO processing.
The linker plugin should be able to process multiple modules (in
parallel or in sequence) with the same index.
The only reason the ExportingModule was present seems to be to
implement hasExportedFunctions() that is used by the Module linker
to decide what to do with the current Module.
For now I replaced it with a query to the map of Modules path to
see if this module was declared in the Index and consider that if
it is the case then it is probably exporting function.
On the long term the Linker interface needs to evolve and this
call should not be needed anymore.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 254581
Add a shared helper routine to read the function index from a file
and create/return the function index object. Use it in llvm-link and
llvm-lto.
llvm-svn: 253903
The LLVMContext was only used for Diagnostic. Pass a DiagnosticHandler
instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14794
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 253540
This reverts commit r251837, due to a number of bot failures of the form:
/home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-fast/llvm.obj/tools/llvm-link/Release+Asserts/llvm-link.o:llvm-link.cpp:function
loadIndex(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::Module const*): error: undefined
reference to
'llvm::object::FunctionIndexObjectFile::create(llvm::MemoryBufferRef,
llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::Module const*, bool)'
/home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-fast/llvm.obj/tools/llvm-link/Release+Asserts/llvm-link.o:llvm-link.cpp:function
loadIndex(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::Module const*): error: undefined
reference to 'llvm::object::FunctionIndexObjectFile::takeIndex()'
I'm not sure why these are happening - I added Object to the requred
libraries in tools/llvm-link/LLVMBuild.txt and the LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS
in tools/llvm-link/CMakeLists.txt. Confirmed for my build that these
symbols come out of libLLVMObject.a. What am I missing?
llvm-svn: 251841
Summary:
Support for necessary linkage changes and symbol renaming during
ThinLTO function importing.
Also includes llvm-link support for manually importing functions
and associated llvm-link based tests.
Note that this does not include support for intelligently importing
metadata, which is currently imported duplicate times. That support will
be in the follow-on patch, and currently is ignored by the tests.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, joker.eph, davidxl
Subscribers: tobiasvk, tejohnson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13515
llvm-svn: 251837
Summary:
The bitcode format is described in this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B036uwnWM6RWdnBLakxmeDdOeXc/view
For more info on ThinLTO see:
https://sites.google.com/site/llvmthinlto
The first customer is ThinLTO, however the data structures are designed
and named more generally based on prior feedback. There are a few
comments regarding how certain interfaces are used by ThinLTO, and the
options added here to gold currently have ThinLTO-specific names as the
behavior they provoke is currently ThinLTO-specific.
This patch includes support for generating per-module function indexes,
the combined index file via the gold plugin, and several tests
(more are included with the associated clang patch D11908).
Reviewers: dexonsmith, davidxl, joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13107
llvm-svn: 249270
Mehdi Amini