Summary:
This commit renames GCRelocateOperands to GCRelocateInst and makes it an
intrinsic wrapper, similar to e.g. MemCpyInst. Also, all users of
GCRelocateOperands were changed to use the new intrinsic wrapper instead.
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames
Subscribers: reames, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15762
llvm-svn: 256811
This patch removes the isOperatorNewLike predicate since it was only being used to establish a non-null return value and we have attributes specifically for that purpose with generic handling. To keep approximate the same behaviour for existing frontends, I added the various operator new like (i.e. instances of operator new) to InferFunctionAttrs. It's not really clear to me why this isn't handled in Clang, but I didn't want to break existing code and any subtle assumptions it might have.
Once this patch is in, I'm going to start separating the isAllocLike family of predicates. These appear to be being used for a mixture of things which should be more clearly separated and documented. Today, they're being used to indicate (at least) aliasing facts, CSE-ability, and default values from an allocation site.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15820
llvm-svn: 256787
Amazingly, we just never triggered this without:
1) Moving code around for MetadataTracking so that a certain *different*
amount of inlining occurs in the per-TU compile step.
2) Then you LTO opt or clang with a bootstrap, and get inlining, loop
opts, and GVN line up everything *just* right.
I don't really know how we didn't hit this before. We really need to be
fuzz testing stuff, it shouldn't be hard to trigger. I'm working on
crafting a reduced nice test case, and will submit that when I have it,
but I want to get LTO build bots going again.
llvm-svn: 256735
It turns out that terminatepad gives little benefit over a cleanuppad
which calls the termination function. This is not sufficient to
implement fully generic filters but MSVC doesn't support them which
makes terminatepad a little over-designed.
Depends on D15478.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15479
llvm-svn: 255522
While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on
top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies:
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design
but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM
experts.
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot
be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes.
This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation.
- catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward.
It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other
funclets.
- The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of
control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully
analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal
nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when
they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a
representation which forbade them upfront.
Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following:
- Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control
flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable.
- Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model
the constraints of funclet oriented EH.
- Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume
the token produced by the funclet which contains them.
- Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred
implicitly using coloring information.
N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the
veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a
look to make sure the results are reasonable.
Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139
llvm-svn: 255422
Right now isTruePredicate is only ever called with Pred == ICMP_SLE or
ICMP_ULE, and the ICMP_SLT and ICMP_ULT cases are dead. This change
removes the untested dead code so that the function is not misleading.
llvm-svn: 252676
Summary:
This change teaches isImpliedCondition to prove things like
(A | 15) < L ==> (A | 14) < L
if the low 4 bits of A are known to be zero.
Depends on D14391
Reviewers: majnemer, reames, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14392
llvm-svn: 252673
This change would add functionality if isImpliedCondition worked on
vector types; but since it bail out on vector predicates this change is
an NFC.
llvm-svn: 252672
This is a cleaned up version of a patch by John Regehr with permission. Originally found via the souper tool.
If we add an odd number to x, then bitwise-and the result with x, we know that the low bit of the result must be zero. Either it was zero in x originally, or the add cleared it in the temporary value. As a result, one of the two values anded together must have the bit cleared.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14315
llvm-svn: 252629
Summary:
This change makes the `isImpliedCondition` interface similar to the rest
of the functions in ValueTracking (in that it takes a DataLayout,
AssumptionCache etc.). This is an NFC, intended to make a later diff
less noisy.
Depends on D14369
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14391
llvm-svn: 252333
Summary:
Currently `isImpliedCondition` will optimize "I +_nuw C < L ==> I < L"
only if C is positive. This is an unnecessary restriction -- the
implication holds even if `C` is negative.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14369
llvm-svn: 252332
Summary:
This change adds a framework for adding more smarts to
`isImpliedCondition` around inequalities. Informally,
`isImpliedCondition` will now try to prove "A < B ==> C < D" by proving
"C <= A && B <= D", since then it follows "C <= A < B <= D".
While this change is in principle NFC, I could not think of a way to not
handle cases like "i +_nsw 1 < L ==> i < L +_nsw 1" (that ValueTracking
did not handle before) while keeping the change understandable. I've
added tests for these cases.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14368
llvm-svn: 252331
Summary: This will allow a later patch to `JumpThreading` use this functionality.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13971
llvm-svn: 251488
Use `getUnsignedMax` directly instead of special casing a wrapped
ConstantRange.
The previous code would have been "buggy" (and this would have been a
semantic change) if LLVM allowed !range metadata to denote full
ranges. E.g. in
%val = load i1, i1* %ptr, !range !{i1 1, i1 1} ;; == full set
ValueTracking would conclude that the high bit (IOW the only bit) in
%val was zero.
Since !range metadata does not allow empty or full ranges, this change
is just a minor stylistic improvement.
llvm-svn: 251380
Even though we may not know the value of the shifter operand, it's possible we know the shifter operand is non-zero. This can allow us to infer more known bits - for example:
%1 = load %p !range {1, 5}
%2 = shl %q, %1
We don't know %1, but we do know that it is nonzero so %2[0] is known zero, and importantly %2 is known non-zero.
Calling isKnownNonZero is nontrivially expensive so use an Optional to run it lazily and cache its result.
llvm-svn: 251294
The loop idiom creating a ConstantRange is repeated twice in the
codebase, time to give it a name and a home.
The loop is also repeated in `rangeMetadataExcludesValue`, but using
`getConstantRangeFromMetadata` there would not be an NFC -- the range
returned by `getConstantRangeFromMetadata` may contain a value that none
of the subranges did.
llvm-svn: 251180
First, the motivation: LLVM currently does not realize that:
((2072 >> (L == 0)) >> 7) & 1 == 0
where L is some arbitrary value. Whether you right-shift 2072 by 7 or by 8, the
lowest-order bit is always zero. There are obviously several ways to go about
fixing this, but the generic solution pursued in this patch is to teach
computeKnownBits something about shifts by a non-constant amount. Previously,
we would give up completely on these. Instead, in cases where we know something
about the low-order bits of the shift-amount operand, we can combine (and
together) the associated restrictions for all shift amounts consistent with
that knowledge. As a further generalization, I refactored all of the logic for
all three kinds of shifts to have this capability. This works well in the above
case, for example, because the dynamic shift amount can only be 0 or 1, and
thus we can say a lot about the known bits of the result.
This brings us to the second part of this change: Even when we know all of the
bits of a value via computeKnownBits, nothing used to constant-fold the result.
This introduces the necessary code into InstCombine and InstSimplify. I've
added it into both because:
1. InstCombine won't automatically pick up the associated logic in
InstSimplify (InstCombine uses InstSimplify, but not via the API that
passes in the original instruction).
2. Putting the logic in InstCombine allows the resulting simplifications to become
part of the iterative worklist
3. Putting the logic in InstSimplify allows the resulting simplifications to be
used by everywhere else that calls SimplifyInstruction (inlining, unrolling,
and many others).
And this requires a small change to our definition of an ephemeral value so
that we don't break the rest case from r246696 (where the icmp feeding the
@llvm.assume, is also feeding a br). Under the old definition, the icmp would
not be considered ephemeral (because it is used by the br), but this causes the
assume to remove itself (in addition to simplifying the branch structure), and
it seems more-useful to prevent that from happening.
llvm-svn: 251146
isKnownNonEqual(A, B) returns true if it can be determined that A != B.
At the moment it only knows two facts, that a non-wrapping add of nonzero to a value cannot be that value:
A + B != A [where B != 0, addition is nsw or nuw]
and that contradictory known bits imply two values are not equal.
This patch also hooks this up to InstSimplify; InstSimplify had a peephole for the first fact but not the second so this teaches InstSimplify a new trick too (alas no measured performance impact!)
llvm-svn: 251012
This is a cleaned up patch from the one written by John Regehr based on the findings of the Souper superoptimizer.
The basic idea here is that input bits that are known zero reduce the maximum count that the intrinsic could return. We know that the number of bits required to represent a particular count is at most log2(N)+1.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13253
llvm-svn: 250338
Remove implicit ilist iterator conversions from LLVMAnalysis.
I came across something really scary in `llvm::isKnownNotFullPoison()`
which relied on `Instruction::getNextNode()` being completely broken
(not surprising, but scary nevertheless). This function is documented
(and coded to) return `nullptr` when it gets to the sentinel, but with
an `ilist_half_node` as a sentinel, the sentinel check looks into some
other memory and we don't recognize we've hit the end.
Rooting out these scary cases is the reason I'm removing the implicit
conversions before doing anything else with `ilist`; I'm not at all
surprised that clients rely on badness.
I found another scary case -- this time, not relying on badness, just
bad (but I guess getting lucky so far) -- in
`ObjectSizeOffsetEvaluator::compute_()`. Here, we save out the
insertion point, do some things, and then restore it. Previously, we
let the iterator auto-convert to `Instruction*`, and then set it back
using the `Instruction*` version:
Instruction *PrevInsertPoint = Builder.GetInsertPoint();
/* Logic that may change insert point */
if (PrevInsertPoint)
Builder.SetInsertPoint(PrevInsertPoint);
The check for `PrevInsertPoint` doesn't protect correctly against bad
accesses. If the insertion point has been set to the end of a basic
block (i.e., `SetInsertPoint(SomeBB)`), then `GetInsertPoint()` returns
an iterator pointing at the list sentinel. The version of
`SetInsertPoint()` that's getting called will then call
`PrevInsertPoint->getParent()`, which explodes horribly. The only
reason this hasn't blown up is that it's fairly unlikely the builder is
adding to the end of the block; usually, we're adding instructions
somewhere before the terminator.
llvm-svn: 249925
This was requested in D13076: if we're going to canonicalize to fabs(), ValueTracking
should know that fabs() clears sign bits.
In this patch (as in D13076), we're not handling vectors yet even though computeKnownBits'
fabs() case itself should be vector-ready via the splat in this patch.
Fixing this will require follow-on patches to correct other logic that uses 'getScalarType'.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13222
llvm-svn: 249701
This is a cleaned up patch from the one written by John Regehr based on the findings of the Souper superoptimizer.
When writing tests, I was surprised to find that instsimplify apparently doesn't know how to collapse bit test sequences based purely on known bits. This required me to split my tests across both instsimplify and instcombine.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13250
llvm-svn: 249453
On some of our benchmarks this change shows about 50% compile time improvement without any noticeable performance difference.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13248
llvm-svn: 248801
If a PHI starts at a non-negative constant, monotonically increases
(only adds of a constant are supported at the moment) and that add
does not wrap, then the PHI is known never to be zero.
llvm-svn: 248796
If the shifter operand is a constant, and all of the bits shifted out
are known to be zero, then if X is known non-zero at least one
non-zero bit must remain.
llvm-svn: 248508
Turns out that not every basic block is guaranteed to have a node within the DominatorTree. This is really hard to trigger, but the test case from the PR managed to do so. There's active discussion continuing about what documentation and/or invariants needed cleaned up.
llvm-svn: 248216
Summary: This patch replaces isKnownNonNull() with isKnownNonNullAt() when checking nullness of passing arguments at callsite. In this way it can handle cases where the argument does not have nonnull attribute but has a dominating null check from the CFG. It also adds assertions in isKnownNonNull() and isKnownNonNullFromDominatingCondition() to make sure the value checked is pointer type (as defined in LLVM document). These assertions might trip failures in things which are not covered under llvm/test, but fixes should be pretty obvious.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12779
llvm-svn: 247587
Summary:
Add a `cleanupendpad` instruction, used to mark exceptional exits out of
cleanups (for languages/targets that can abort a cleanup with another
exception). The `cleanupendpad` instruction is similar to the `catchendpad`
instruction in that it is an EH pad which is the target of unwind edges in
the handler and which itself has an unwind edge to the next EH action.
The `cleanupendpad` instruction, similar to `cleanupret` has a `cleanuppad`
argument indicating which cleanup it exits. The unwind successors of a
`cleanuppad`'s `cleanupendpad`s must agree with each other and with its
`cleanupret`s.
Update WinEHPrepare (and docs/tests) to accomodate `cleanupendpad`.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12433
llvm-svn: 246751
We only looked through casts when one operand was a constant. We can also look through casts when both operands are non-constant, but both are in fact the same cast type. For example:
%1 = icmp ult i8 %a, %b
%2 = zext i8 %a to i32
%3 = zext i8 %b to i32
%4 = select i1 %1, i32 %2, i32 %3
llvm-svn: 246678
This reverts isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute's use of ReadNone until we
split ReadNone into two pieces: one attribute which reasons about how
the function reasons about memory and another attribute which determines
how it may be speculated, CSE'd, trap, etc.
llvm-svn: 246331
A readnone tailcall may still have a chain of computation which follows
it that would invalidate a tailcall lowering. Don't skip the analysis
in such cases.
This fixes PR24613.
llvm-svn: 246304
Any call which is side effect free is trivially OK to speculate. We
already had similar logic in EarlyCSE and GVN but we were missing it
from isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute.
This fixes PR24601.
llvm-svn: 246232
Globals in address spaces other than one may have 0 as a valid address,
so we should not assume that they can be null.
Reviewed by Philip Reames.
llvm-svn: 246137
Summary:
Refactor, NFC
Extracts computeOverflowForSignedAdd and isKnownNonNegative from NaryReassociate to ValueTracking in case
others need it.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11313
llvm-svn: 245591
The select pattern recognition in ValueTracking (as used by InstCombine
and SelectionDAGBuilder) only knew about integer patterns. This teaches
it about minimum and maximum operations.
matchSelectPattern() has been extended to return a struct containing the
existing Flavor and a new enum defining the pattern's behavior when
given one NaN operand.
C minnum() is defined to return the non-NaN operand in this case, but
the idiomatic C "a < b ? a : b" would return the NaN operand.
ARM and AArch64 at least have different instructions for these different cases.
llvm-svn: 244580
Manuel Jacob