Used for WebAssembly threads proposal. Add a flag --shared-memory
which sets the IS_SHARED bit in WasmLimits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54130
llvm-svn: 346248
Summary: llvm-readobj/readelf accepts both -s and -S as aliases for --sections. However with GNU readelf only -S means --section, and -s means --symbols. I would like to make llvm-readelf more compatible.
Reviewers: MaskRay, espindola
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54118
llvm-svn: 346164
This change allows for link-time merging of debugging information from
Microsoft precompiled types OBJs compiled with cl.exe /Z7 /Yc and /Yu.
This fixes llvm.org/PR34278
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45213
llvm-svn: 346154
Summary:
It is difficult to touch a file with a relative mtime across different OSes as POSIX touch -d is rigid. While we may construct relative timestamps with `date`, POSIX date is inadequate to do so as various OSes' date do not agree on a common format (OpenBSD uses `date -r seconds`, FreeBSD uses `date -v-2M` while GNU accepts `-d '-2 min'`)
Just use python os.utime()
Original description:
The case may randomly fail if we test it with command "
while llvm-lit tools/lld/test/ELF/lto/cache.ll; do true; done". It is because the llvmcache-foo file is younger than llvmcache-349F039B8EB076D412007D82778442BED3148C4E and llvmcache-A8107945C65C2B2BBEE8E61AA604C311D60D58D6. But due to timestamp precision reason their timestamp is the same. Given the same timestamp, the file prune policy is to remove bigger size file first, so mostly foo file is removed for its bigger size. And the files size is under threshold after deleting foo file. That's what test case expect.
However sometimes, the precision is enough to measure that timestamp of llvmcache-349F039B8EB076D412007D82778442BED3148C4E and llvmcache-A8107945C65C2B2BBEE8E61AA604C311D60D58D6 are smaller than foo, so llvmcache-349F039B8EB076D412007D82778442BED3148C4E and llvmcache-A8107945C65C2B2BBEE8E61AA604C311D60D58D6 are deleted first. Since the files size is still above the file size threshold after deleting the 2 files, the foo file is also deleted. And then the test case fails, because it expect only one file should be deleted instead of 3.
The fix is to change the timestamp of llvmcache-foo file to meet the thinLTO prune policy.
The same fix is applied to llvm code at https://reviews.llvm.org/D52452.
Patch by Luo Yuanke.
Reviewers: ruiu, craig.topper, smaslov, Jianping, espindola, LuoYuanke, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: sbc100, krytarowski, aheejin, llvm-commits, dexonsmith, steven_wu, arichardson, inglorion, emaste, bjope, rupprecht
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54039
llvm-svn: 346006
Summary:
The case may randomly fail if we test it with command "
while llvm-lit tools/lld/test/ELF/lto/cache.ll; do true; done". It is because the llvmcache-foo file is younger than llvmcache-349F039B8EB076D412007D82778442BED3148C4E and llvmcache-A8107945C65C2B2BBEE8E61AA604C311D60D58D6. But due to timestamp precision reason their timestamp is the same. Given the same timestamp, the file prune policy is to remove bigger size file first, so mostly foo file is removed for its bigger size. And the files size is under threshold after deleting foo file. That's what test case expect.
However sometimes, the precision is enough to measure that timestamp of llvmcache-349F039B8EB076D412007D82778442BED3148C4E and llvmcache-A8107945C65C2B2BBEE8E61AA604C311D60D58D6 are smaller than foo, so llvmcache-349F039B8EB076D412007D82778442BED3148C4E and llvmcache-A8107945C65C2B2BBEE8E61AA604C311D60D58D6 are deleted first. Since the files size is still above the file size threshold after deleting the 2 files, the foo file is also deleted. And then the test case fails, because it expect only one file should be deleted instead of 3.
The fix is to change the timestamp of llvmcache-foo file to meet the thinLTO prune policy.
The same fix is applied to llvm code at https://reviews.llvm.org/D52452.
Patch by Luo Yuanke.
Reviewers: ruiu, craig.topper, smaslov, Jianping, espindola, LuoYuanke
Subscribers: rupprecht, bjope, emaste, inglorion, arichardson, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53123
llvm-svn: 345977
Summary:
D52830 sets sh_link to .symtab in static link, which breaks executable stripped by GNU strip.
It may also be odd that .rela.plt (SHF_ALLOC) points to .symtab (non-SHF_ALLOC).
Change the logic on pcc's suggestion.
Before:
% clang -fuse-ld=lld -static -xc =(printf 'int main(){}') # or gcc
% strip a.out; ./a.out
unexpected reloc type in static binary[1] 61634 segmentation fault ./a.out
Reviewers: ruiu, grimar, emaste, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: pcc, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53993
llvm-svn: 345899
This patch should not introduce any behavior changes. It consists of
mostly one of two changes:
1. Replacing fall through comments with the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro
2. Inserting 'break' before falling through into a case block consisting
of only 'break'.
We were already using this warning with GCC, but its warning behaves
slightly differently. In this patch, the following differences are
relevant:
1. GCC recognizes comments that say "fall through" as annotations, clang
doesn't
2. GCC doesn't warn on "case N: foo(); default: break;", clang does
3. GCC doesn't warn when the case contains a switch, but falls through
the outer case.
I will enable the warning separately in a follow-up patch so that it can
be cleanly reverted if necessary.
Reviewers: alexfh, rsmith, lattner, rtrieu, EricWF, bollu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53950
llvm-svn: 345882
This is https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39493.
We crashed previously because did not handle /DISCARD/ properly
when -r was used. I think it is uncommon to use scripts with -r, though I see
nothing wrong to handle the /DISCARD/ so that we will not crash at least.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53864
llvm-svn: 345819
Summary:
There are really three different kinds of TLS layouts:
* A fixed TLS-to-TP offset. On architectures like PowerPC, MIPS, and
RISC-V, the thread pointer points to a fixed offset from the start
of the executable's TLS segment. The offset is 0x7000 for PowerPC
and MIPS, which allows a signed 16-bit offset to reach 0x1000 of
per-thread implementation data and 0xf000 of the application's TLS
segment. The size and layout of the TCB isn't relevant to the static
linker and might not be known.
* A fixed TCB size. This is the format documented as "variant 1" in
Ulrich Drepper's TLS spec. The thread pointer points to a 2-word TCB
followed by the executable's TLS segment. The first word is always
the DTV pointer. Used on ARM. The thread pointer must be aligned to
the TLS segment's alignment, possibly creating alignment padding.
* Variant 2. This format predates variant 1 and is also documented in
Drepper's TLS spec. It allocates the executable's TLS segment before
the thread pointer, apparently for backwards-compatibility. It's
used on x86 and SPARC.
Factor out an lld:🧝:getTlsTpOffset() function for use in a
follow-up patch for Android. The TcbSize/TlsTpOffset fields are only used
in getTlsTpOffset, so replace them with a switch on Config->EMachine.
Reviewers: espindola, ruiu, PkmX, jrtc27
Reviewed By: ruiu, PkmX, jrtc27
Subscribers: jyknight, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, javed.absar, arichardson, kristof.beyls, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, atanasyan, PkmX, jsji, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53905
llvm-svn: 345775
Summary: .rela.plt may only contain R_*_{,I}RELATIVE relocations and not need a symbol table link. bfd/gold fallbacks to sh_link=0 in this case. Without this patch, ld.lld --strip-all caused lld to dereference a null pointer.
Reviewers: ruiu, grimar, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53881
llvm-svn: 345648
Visual Studio has a bug where it converts the integer literal 2147483648
into an unsigned int instead of a long long (i.e. it follows C89 rules).
The bug has been reported as:
https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/content/problem/141813/-2147483648-c4146-error.html.
Because of this bug, we were getting a signed/unsigned comparison
warning in VS2015 from the old code (the subsequent unary negation had
no effect on the type).
Reviewed by: sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53821
llvm-svn: 345579
Summary: There are too many reasonable cases that would be considered unorderable.
Reviewers: ruiu, espindola, Bigcheese
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: grimar, emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53669
llvm-svn: 345322
Out::DebugInfo was used only by GdbIndex class to determine if
we need to create a .gdb_index section, but we can do the same
check without it.
Added a test that this patch doesn't change the existing behavior.
llvm-svn: 345058
Summary:
During upgrading of the FreeBSD source tree with lld 7.0.0, I noticed
that it started complaining about `crt1.o` having an "index past the
end of the symbol table".
Such a symbol table looks approximately like this, viewed with `readelf
-s` (note the `Ndx` field being messed up):
```
Symbol table '.symtab' contains 4 entries:
Num: Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx Name
0: 00000000 0 NOTYPE LOCAL DEFAULT UND
1: 00000000 0 SECTION LOCAL DEFAULT 1
2: 00000000 0 NOTYPE WEAK HIDDEN RSV[0xffff] __rel_iplt_end
3: 00000000 0 NOTYPE WEAK HIDDEN RSV[0xffff] __rel_iplt_start
```
At first, it seemed that recent ifunc relocation work had caused this:
<https://reviews.freebsd.org/rS339351>, but it turned out that it was
due to incorrect processing of the object files by lld, when using `-r`
(a.k.a. --relocatable).
Bisecting showed that rL324421 ("Convert a use of Config->Static") was
the commit where this new behavior began. Simply reverting it solved
the issue, and the `__rel_iplt` symbols had an index of `UND` again.
Looking at Rafael's commit message, I think he simply missed the
possibility of `--relocatable` being in effect, so I have added an
additional check for it.
I also added a simple regression test case.
Reviewers: grimar, ruiu, emaste, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: arichardson, krytarowski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53515
llvm-svn: 345002
emulation.s is testing multiple architectures, which means it needs all
the corresponding backends enabled, which might not be true for all
developers (for example, I don't have PPC or MIPS enabled). Rather than
marking the entire test as unsupported for such developers, split it up
per backend to get better testing granularity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53544
llvm-svn: 344986
Jordan Rupprecht