Summary:
This patch makes modernize-use-emplace remove unnecessary make_ calls from push_back calls and turn them into emplace_back -- the same way make_pair calls are handled.
Custom make_ calls can be removed for custom tuple-like types -- two new options that control that are `TupleTypes` and `TupleMakeFunctions`. By default, the check removes calls to `std::make_pair` and `std::make_tuple`.
Eq.
```
std::vector<std::tuple<int, char, bool>> v;
v.push_back(std::make_tuple(1, 'A', true)); // --> v.emplace_back(1, 'A', true);
```
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, Prazek, hokein
Reviewed By: Prazek
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, JonasToth, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32690
llvm-svn: 303145
Summary:
This patch makes modernize-use-emplace remove unnecessary make_ calls from push_back calls and turn them into emplace_back -- the same way make_pair calls are handled.
Custom make_ calls can be removed for custom tuple-like types -- two new options that control that are `TupleTypes` and `TupleMakeFunctions`. By default, the check removes calls to `std::make_pair` and `std::make_tuple`.
Eq.
```
std::vector<std::tuple<int, char, bool>> v;
v.push_back(std::make_tuple(1, 'A', true)); // --> v.emplace_back(1, 'A', true);
```
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, Prazek, hokein
Reviewed By: Prazek
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, JonasToth, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32690
llvm-svn: 303139
Summary:
C++14 added a couple of user-defined literals in the standard library. E.g.
std::chrono_literals and std::literals::chrono_literals . Using them
requires a using directive so do not warn in google-build-using-namespace
if namespace name starts with "std::" and ends with "literals".
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Patch by Martin Ejdestig!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33010
llvm-svn: 303085
Summary:
The statement **getArg** tries to get the first one without checking, which may cause segmentation fault.
Reviewers: chh, bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: cfe-commits, xazax.hun
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33103
llvm-svn: 303001
This check flags postfix operator++/-- declarations,
where the return type is not a const object.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32743
llvm-svn: 302637
The patch makes the check treat binary conditional operator (`x ?: y`), `while`
and regular `for` loops as conditional statements for the purpose of
AllowConditional*Cast options.
llvm-svn: 302431
Summary:
And also enable it by default to be consistent with e.g.
modernize-use-using.
This helps e.g. when running this check on cppunit client code where the
macro is provided by the system, so there is no easy way to modify it.
Reviewers: alexfh, malcolm.parsons
Reviewed By: malcolm.parsons
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32945
llvm-svn: 302429
modernize-use-equals-delete is extremely noisy in code using
DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN-style macros and there's no easy way to automatically
fix the warning when macros are in play.
llvm-svn: 302425
Summary:
This patch fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 | PR32896 ]].
The problem was that modernize-use-emplace incorrectly removed changed push_back into emplace_back, removing explicit constructor call with initializer list parameter, resulting in compiler error after applying fixits.
modernize-use-emplace used to check if matched constructor had InitListExpr, but didn't check against CXXStdInitializerListExpr.
Eg.
```
std::vector<std::vector<int>> v;
v.push_back(std::vector<int>({1})); // --> v.emplace_back({1});
```
Reviewers: Prazek, alexfh, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: Prazek, alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32767
llvm-svn: 302281
Summary:
When there is a push_back with a call to make_pair, turn it into emplace_back and remove the unnecessary make_pair call.
Eg.
```
std::vector<std::pair<int, int>> v;
v.push_back(std::make_pair(1, 2)); // --> v.emplace_back(1, 2);
```
make_pair doesn't get removed when explicit template parameters are provided, because of potential problems with type conversions.
Reviewers: Prazek, aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: Prazek, alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, JonasToth, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32395
llvm-svn: 301651
Summary:
The goal of this change is to fix the following suboptimal replacements currently suggested by clang-tidy:
```
// with MemberPrefix == "_"
int __foo; // accepted without complaint
```
```
// with MemberPrefix == "m_"
int _foo;
^~~~~~
m__foo
```
I fixed this by
- updating `matchesStyle()` to reject names which have a leading underscore after a prefix has already been stripped, or a trailing underscore if a suffix has already been stripped;
- updating `fixupWithStyle()` to strip leading & trailing underscores before adding the user-defined prefix and suffix.
The replacements are now:
```
// MemberPrefix == "_"
int __foo;
^~~~~~
_foo
```
```
// MemberPrefix == "m_"
int _foo;
^~~~~
m_foo
```
Future improvements might elect to add .clang-tidy flags to improve what is being stripped. For instance, stripping `m_` could allow `m_foo` to be automatically replaced with `_foo`.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Patch by Jacob Bandes-Storch!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32333
llvm-svn: 301431
This check will find occurrences of ``std::random_shuffle`` and replace it with ``std::shuffle``. In C++17 ``std::random_shuffle`` will no longer be available and thus we need to replace it.
Example of case that it fixes
```
std::vector<int> v;
// First example
std::random_shuffle(vec.begin(), vec.end());
```
Reviewers: hokein, aaron.ballman, alexfh, malcolm.parsons, mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30158
llvm-svn: 301167
Summary:
The "performance-inefficient-vector-operation" check finds vector oprations in
for-loop statements which may cause multiple memory reallocations.
This is the first version, only detects typical for-loop:
```
std::vector<int> v;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
v.push_back(i);
}
// or
for (int i = 0; i < v2.size(); ++i) {
v.push_back(v2[i]);
}
```
We can extend it to handle more cases like for-range loop in the future.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: zaks.anna, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, cfe-commits, djasper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31757
llvm-svn: 300534
- removed unnessacary namespaces
- added option to print warning in macros
- no fix for typedef with array
- removed "void" word from functions with 0 parameters
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29262
llvm-svn: 299340
Catch trivially true statements of the form a != 1 || a != 3. Statements like
these are likely errors. They are particularly easy to miss when handling enums:
enum State {
RUNNING,
STOPPED,
STARTING,
ENDING
}
...
if (state != RUNNING || state != STARTING)
...
Patch by Blaise Watson!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29858
llvm-svn: 298607
This commit renames all of the safety functionality to be hicpp, adds an appropriate LICENSE.TXT, and updates the documentation accordingly.
llvm-svn: 298229
Summary:
There is no need for triggering warning when noexcept specifier in move constructor or move-assignment operator is neither evaluated nor uninstantiated.
This fixes bug reported here: bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24712
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JonasToth, JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Marek Jenda!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31049
llvm-svn: 298101
Summary:
I've added a test case that (without the fix) triggers the assertion,
which happens when a move happens in an implicitly called conversion
operator.
This patch also fixes nondeterministic behavior in the source code
location reported for the move when the move is constained in an init list;
this was causing buildbot failures in the previous attempt to submit
this patch (see D30569 and rL297004).
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30650
llvm-svn: 297272
Haojian Wu