This affects CVTSD2SS, FMA, RCP28, RSQRT28, and SQRT scalar instructions
'b' here refers to 'sae' not broadcast. These aren't memory instructions.
llvm-svn: 320281
If the question mark is inside the parentheses it only applies to the single character proceeding it.
I had to make a few additional cleanups to fix some duplicate warnings that were exposed by fixing this.
llvm-svn: 320279
When the lowest bits of the operands to an integer multiply are known, the low bits of the result are deducible.
Code to deduce known-zero bottom bits already existed, but this change improves on that by deducing known-ones.
Patch by: Pedro Ferreira
Reviewers: craig.topper, sanjoy, efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34029
llvm-svn: 320269
We may need to widen the vector to make the shifts legal, but if we do that we need to make sure we shift left/right after accounting for the new size. If not we can't guarantee we are shifting in zeros.
The test cases affected actually show cases where we should move the shifts all together, but that's another problem.
llvm-svn: 320248
We were previously using kunpck with zero inputs unnecessarily. And we had cases where we would insert into a zero vector and then insert into larger zero vector incurring two sets of shifts.
llvm-svn: 320244
Summary:
This relaxes an assertion inside SelectionDAGBuilder which is overly
restrictive on targets which have no concept of alignment (such as AVR).
In these architectures, all types are aligned to 8-bits.
After this, LLVM will only assert that accesses are aligned on targets
which actually require alignment.
This patch follows from a discussion on llvm-dev a few months ago
http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/llvm-dev-Unaligned-atomic-load-store-td112815.html
Reviewers: bogner, nemanjai, joerg, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, cactus, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39946
llvm-svn: 320243
The outliner previously would never outline calls. Calls are pretty common in
files, so it makes sense to outline them. In fact, in the LLVM test suite, if
you count the number of instructions that the outliner misses when you outline
calls vs when you don't, it turns out that, on average, around 6% of the
instructions encountered are calls. So, if we outline calls, we can find more
candidates, and thus save some more space.
This commit adds that functionality and updates the mir test to reflect that.
llvm-svn: 320229
Summary:
Reuse the Linux new mapping as it is.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: joerg, eugenis, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41022
llvm-svn: 320219
Summary:
This is LLVM instrumentation for the new HWASan tool. It is basically
a stripped down copy of ASan at this point, w/o stack or global
support. Instrumenation adds a global constructor + runtime callbacks
for every load and store.
HWASan comes with its own IR attribute.
A brief design document can be found in
clang/docs/HardwareAssistedAddressSanitizerDesign.rst (submitted earlier).
Reviewers: kcc, pcc, alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, mehdi_amini, mgorny, javed.absar, eraman, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40932
llvm-svn: 320217
MachineSink attempts to place instructions near the basic blocks where
they are needed. Once an instruction has been sunk, its location
relative to other instructions no longer is consistent with the
original source code. In order to ensure correct stepping in the
debugger, the debug location for sunk instructions is either merged
with the insertion point or erased if the target successor block is
empty.
Originally submitted as r318679, revised to fix sanitizer failure and
improve testing.
Patch by Matthew Voss!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39933
llvm-svn: 320216
Both had a declaration of EmitXRayTable, but there is no method defined in either with that name. There is a emitXRayTable in the base class with a lower case 'e' and they both call that.
llvm-svn: 320213
Work towards the unification of MIR and debug output by refactoring the
interfaces.
Add support for operand subreg index as an immediate to debug printing
and use ::print in the MIRPrinter.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40965
llvm-svn: 320209
This reverts part of r300656, which caused a regression in
propagateMassToSuccessors by counting edges n^2 times, where n is the
number of edges from the source basic block to the same successor basic
block. The result was both incorrect and very slow to compute for large
values of n (e.g. switches with multiple cases that go to the same basic
block).
Patch by Andrew Scheidecker!
llvm-svn: 320208
The Debugify pass synthesizes debug info for IR. It's paired with a
CheckDebugify pass which determines how much of the original debug info
is preserved. These passes make it easier to create targeted tests for
debug info preservation.
Here is the Debugify algorithm:
NextLine = 1
for (Instruction &I : M)
attach DebugLoc(NextLine++) to I
NextVar = 1
for (Instruction &I : M)
if (canAttachDebugValue(I))
attach dbg.value(NextVar++) to I
The CheckDebugify pass expects contiguous ranges of DILocations and
DILocalVariables. If it fails to find all of the expected debug info, it
prints a specific error to stderr which can be FileChecked.
This was discussed on llvm-dev in the thread:
"Passes to add/validate synthetic debug info"
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40512
llvm-svn: 320202
Summary:
If a partially inlined function has debug info, we have to add debug
locations to the call instruction calling the outlined function.
We use the debug location of the first instruction in the outlined
function, as the introduced call transfers control to this statement and
there is no other equivalent line in the source code.
We also use the same debug location for the branch instruction added
to jump from artificial entry block for the outlined function, which just
jumps to the first actual basic block of the outlined function.
Reviewers: davide, aprantl, rriddle, dblaikie, danielcdh, wmi
Reviewed By: aprantl, rriddle, danielcdh
Subscribers: eraman, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40413
llvm-svn: 320199
Craig Topper