Adds a new CMake option to disable the usage of incomplete headers.
These incomplete headers are not guaranteed to be ABI stable. This
option is intended to be used by vendors so they can avoid their users
from code that's not ready for production usage.
The option is enabled by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106763
Feedback requested in D106735 applied in Diff 3 seem to have
reverted in Diff 4. This patch fixes that up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106829
See LWG reflector thread of 2021-07-23 titled
'Question on ranges::advance and "past-the-sentinel iterators"'.
Test case heavily based on one graciously provided by Casey Carter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106735
This started as fixing a typo in a ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS directive
which turned out to uncover a few places where we warned about signedness
changes.
As a fly-by fix, this updates the various __advance overloads
for style consistency.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106372
`__function_like` wasn't being exported, so certain properties of the
`ranges` functions weren't being propagated in modules land.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105078
This is a spin-off from D79555 review, that with this patch will be able to use `__libcpp_copysign` instead of adhoc `__copysign_constexpr` helper.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106364
This replaces _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY with _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI. It's
not intended to do for other parts of libc++. This change makes it easy
to search and replace all occurrences of the patches in review.
We've been forgetting to add those to most of the <ranges> review.
To avoid forgetting in the future, I added an item in the pre-commit
checklist.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106287
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as `<__algorithm/find.h>` instead of
`<algorithm>`, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin
to rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
This is the first of four patches. Patch #2 will solve the problem for
pre-processor `#include`s; patches #3 and #4 will solve the problem for
`<__tree>` and `<__hash_table>` (since I've never touched the test cases
that are failing for these two, I want to split them out into their own
commits to be extra careful). Patch #5 will concern itself with
`<__threading_support>`, which intersects with libcxxabi (which I know
even less about).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105932
* <__algorithm/iter_swap.h>
* <__algorithm/swap_ranges.h>
* <__functional/is_transparent.h>
* <__memory/uses_allocator.h>
* <__ranges/drop_view.h>
* <__ranges/transform_view.h>
* <shared_mutex>
* <span>
Also updates header inclusions that were affected.
**NOTE:** This is a proper subset of D105932. Since the content has
already been LGTM'd, I intend to merge this patch without review,
pending green CI. I decided it would be better to move these changes
into their own commit since the former patch has undergone further
changes and will need yet another light review. In the event any of
that gets rolled back (for whatever reason), the changes in this patch
won't be affected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106040
It turns out that D105040 broke `std::rel_ops`; we actually do need
both a one-template-parameter and a two-template-parameter version of
all the comparison operators, because if we have only the heterogeneous
two-parameter version, then `x > x` is ambiguous:
template<class T, class U> int f(S<T>, S<U>) { return 1; }
template<class T> int f(T, T) { return 2; } // rel_ops
S<int> s; f(s,s); // ambiguous between #1 and #2
Adding the one-template-parameter version fixes the ambiguity:
template<class T, class U> int f(S<T>, S<U>) { return 1; }
template<class T> int f(T, T) { return 2; } // rel_ops
template<class T> int f(S<T>, S<T>) { return 3; }
S<int> s; f(s,s); // #3 beats both #1 and #2
We have the same problem with `reverse_iterator` as with `__wrap_iter`.
But so do libstdc++ and Microsoft, so we're not going to worry about it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105894
This will allow us to use variant in common_iterator. We do this by introducing a new `__light_array` type that variant uses instead of `std::array`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105597
The format library uses `std::monostate`, but not a `std::variant`.
Moving `std::monostate` to its own header allows the format library to
reduce the amount of included code.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105582
Summary:
If we are on c++03 mode for some reason, and __builtin_va_copy is
available, then use it instead of error out on not having va_copy
in 03 mode.
Reviewed by: ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100336
While we can debate on the value of passing by const value, there is no
arguing that it's confusing to do so in some circumstances, such as when
marking a pointer parameter as being const (did you mean a pointer-to-const?).
This commit fixes a few issues along those lines.
The __search helper function was once split into __functional for circular
dependency reasons, however this is not an issue anymore now that we have
finer grained headers.
With the STL containers, I didn't enable move operations in C++03 mode
because that would change the overload resolution for things that today
are copy operations. With iostreams, though, the copy operations aren't
present at all, and so I see no problem with enabling move operations
even in (Clang's greatly extended) C++03 mode.
Clang's C++03 mode does not support delegating constructors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104310
In typeinfo there is a reinterpret_cast between a uintptr_t and size_t. These are two integer types and therefore a reinterpret_cast is not right for this situation. It looks like it may have been copied and pasted from above in the file. An implicit cast works in it's place.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104814
zoecarver