LLVM Missing the following instructions: fadd\fdiv\fmul\fsub\fsubr\fdivr.
GAS and MS supporting this instruction and lowering them in to a faddp\fdivp\fmulp\fsubp\fsubrp\fdivrp instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14217
llvm-svn: 252908
Fixes PR18916. I don't think we need to implement support for either
hybrid syntax. Nobody should write Intel assembly with '%' prefixes on
their registers or AT&T assembly without them.
llvm-svn: 215031
Michael Zuckerman