When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
Query AAValueSimplify on pointers in memory accessing instructions to take
advantage of the constant propagation (or any other value simplification) of such values.
It is possible that an instruction to be changed to unreachable is
in the same block with a terminator that can be constant-folded.
In this case, as of now, the instruction will be changed to
unreachable before the terminator is folded. But, then the
whole BB becomes invalidated and so when we go ahead to fold
the terminator, we trap.
Change the order of these two.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75780
We used coarse-grained liveness before, thus we looked if the
instruction was executed, but we did not use fine-grained liveness,
hence if the instruction was needed or could be deleted even if the
surrounding ones are live. This patches introduces this level of
liveness checks together with other liveness queries, e.g., for uses.
For more control we enforce that all liveness queries go through the
Attributor.
Test have been adjusted to reflect the changes or augmented to prevent
deletion of the parts we want to check.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73313
The changeXXXAfterManifest functions are better suited to deal with
changes so we should prefer them. These functions also recursively
delete dead instructions which is why we see test changes.
The change is performed as stated by the FIXME and the tests are
adjusted. All changes look fine to me and values can be inferred as
undef without it being an error.
When we replace instructions with unreachable we delete instructions. We
now avoid dangling pointers to those deleted instructions in the
`ToBeChangedToUnreachableInsts` set. Other modification collections
might need to be updated in the future as well.
A branch is considered UB if it depends on an undefined / uninitialized value.
At this point this handles simple UB branches in the form: `br i1 undef, ...`
We query `AAValueSimplify` to get a value for the branch condition, so the branch
can be more complicated than just: `br i1 undef, ...`.
Patch By: Stefanos Baziotis (@baziotis)
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1, uenoku
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71799
Summary:
Follow-up on: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71435
We basically use `checkForAllInstructions` to loop through all the instructions in a function that access memory through a pointer: load, store, atomicrmw, atomiccmpxchg
Note that we can now use the `getPointerOperand()` that gets us the pointer operand for an instruction that belongs to the aforementioned set.
Question: This function returns `nullptr` if the instruction is `volatile`. Why?
Guess: Because if it is volatile, we don't want to do any transformation to it.
Another subtle point is that I had to add AtomicRMW, AtomicCmpXchg to `initializeInformationCache()`. Following `checkAllInstructions()` path, that
seemed the most reasonable place to add it and correct the fact that these instructions were ignored (they were not in `OpcodeInstMap` etc.). Is that ok?
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71787
_Eventually_, this attribute will be assigned to a function if it
contains undefined behavior. As a first small step, I tried to make it
loop through the load instructions in a function (eventually, the plan
is to check if a load instructions causes undefined behavior, because
e.g. dereferences a null pointer - Also eventually, this won't happen in
initialize() but in updateImpl()).
Patch By: Stefanos Baziotis (@baziotis)
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71435
Johannes Doerfert