When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
If we have a replacement for a value, via AAValueSimplify, the original
value will lose all its uses. Thus, as long as a value is simplified we
can skip the uses in checkForAllUses, given that these uses are
transitive uses for the simplified version and will therefore affect the
simplified version as necessary.
Since this allowed us to remove calls without side-effects and a known
return value, we need to make sure not to eliminate `musttail` calls.
Those we keep around, or later remove the entire `musttail` call chain.
The changeXXXAfterManifest functions are better suited to deal with
changes so we should prefer them. These functions also recursively
delete dead instructions which is why we see test changes.
Summary:
This patch introduces `AAValueConstantRange`, which answers a possible range for integer value in a specific program point.
One of the motivations is propagating existing `range` metadata. (I think we need to change the situation that `range` metadata cannot be put to Argument).
The state is a tuple of `ConstantRange` and it is initialized to (known, assumed) = ([-∞, +∞], empty).
Currently, AAValueConstantRange is created in `getAssumedConstant` method when `AAValueSimplify` returns `nullptr`(worst state).
Supported
- BinaryOperator(add, sub, ...)
- CmpInst(icmp eq, ...)
- !range metadata
`AAValueConstantRange` is not intended to extend to polyhedral range value analysis.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: phosek, davezarzycki, baziotis, hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71620
This patch introduces `AAValueConstantRange`, which answers a possible range for integer value in a specific program point.
One of the motivations is propagating existing `range` metadata. (I think we need to change the situation that `range` metadata cannot be put to Argument).
The state is a tuple of `ConstantRange` and it is initialized to (known, assumed) = ([-∞, +∞], empty).
Currently, AAValueConstantRange is created when AAValueSimplify cannot
simplify the value.
Supported
- BinaryOperator(add, sub, ...)
- CmpInst(icmp eq, ...)
- !range metadata
`AAValueConstantRange` is not intended to extend to polyhedral range value analysis.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71620
A branch is considered UB if it depends on an undefined / uninitialized value.
At this point this handles simple UB branches in the form: `br i1 undef, ...`
We query `AAValueSimplify` to get a value for the branch condition, so the branch
can be more complicated than just: `br i1 undef, ...`.
Patch By: Stefanos Baziotis (@baziotis)
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1, uenoku
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71799
The Attributor can, to some degree, do what IPConstantProp does. We can
consequently use the corner cases already collected and tested for in
the IPConstantProp tests to improve Attributor test coverage.
This exposed various bugs fixed in previous Attributor patches.
Not all functionality of IPConstantProp is available in AAValueSimplify
and AAIsDead so some tests show that we cannot perform the expected
constant propagation.
Reviewers: fhahn, efriedma, mssimpso, davide
Subscribers: bollu, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69748
Johannes Doerfert