Summary:
From https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40516
```
$ cat a.cpp
const NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName &NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName::myFunction() {
// do stuff
}
const NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName &NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName::operator++() {
// do stuff
}
$ ~/ll/build/opt/bin/clang-format -style=LLVM a.cpp
const NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName &
NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName::myFunction() {
// do stuff
}
const NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName &NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName::
operator++() {
// do stuff
}
```
What was happening is that the split penalty before `operator` was being set to
a smaller value by a prior if block. Moved checks around to fix this and added a
regression test.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57604
llvm-svn: 353033
Summary:
... from 8.
`VALIGNDZ128rmbik XMM0 XMM0 K1 XMM3 RDI i_0x1 i_0x0 i_0x1` instruction already has 9 components.
It does not matter much in terms of performance, but avoiding allocation seems to come with low cost here..
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57654
llvm-svn: 353022
Summary:
Up until the point i have looked in the source, i didn't even understood that
i can disable 'cluster' output. I have always silenced it via ` &> /dev/null`.
(And hoped it wasn't contributing much of the run time.)
While i expect that it has it's use-cases i never once needed it so far.
If i forget to silence it, console is completely flooded with that output.
How about not expecting users to opt-out of analyses,
but to explicitly specify the analyses that should be performed?
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57648
llvm-svn: 353021
Summary: this commit adds support to a new dependence type introduced in OpenMP
5.0. The LLVM OpenMP RTL already supports this feature, so we only need to
modify CLANG to take advantage of them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57576
llvm-svn: 353018
Currently, SCEV creates SCEVUnknown for every node of unreachable code. If we
have a huge amounts of such code, we will be littering SE with these nodes. We could
just state that they all are undef and save some memory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57567
Reviewed By: sanjoy
llvm-svn: 353017
We now print ST0 as 'st' when generating the clobber list for MS inline assembly in clang. This matches what the gcc reg name list expects.
Original commit message:
This fixes the test case in PR35982 by preventing MMX instructions that read MM0-7 from being moved below EMMS/FEMMS by the post RA scheduler.
Though as discussed in bugzilla, this is not a complete fix. There is still the possibility of reordering in IR or by the pre-RA scheduler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57298
llvm-svn: 353016
Looking into gcc and objdump behavior more this was overly aggressive. If the register is encoded in the instruction we should print %st(0), if its implicit we should print %st.
I'll be making a more directed change in a future patch.
llvm-svn: 353013
In llvm-nm, the symbol size was being computed only with --print-size option,
even though it was being printed in other cases, such as with --format=posix.
This patch simply removes the guard, so that the size is computed
independently of the later decision to print it or not.
Fixes PR39997.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57599
llvm-svn: 353011
The description of what the various Expr::Ignore* do has drifted from the
actual implementation.
Inspection reveals that IgnoreParenImpCasts() is not equivalent to doing
IgnoreParens() + IgnoreImpCasts() until reaching a fixed point, but
IgnoreParenCasts() is equivalent to doing IgnoreParens() + IgnoreCasts()
until reaching a fixed point. There is also a fair amount of duplication
in the various Expr::Ignore* functions which increase the chance of further
future inconsistencies. In preparation for the next patch which will factor
out the implementation of the various Expr::Ignore*, do the following cleanups:
Remove Stmt::IgnoreImplicit, in favor of Expr::IgnoreImplicit. IgnoreImplicit
is the only function among all of the Expr::Ignore* which is available in Stmt.
There are only a few users of Stmt::IgnoreImplicit. They can just use instead
Expr::IgnoreImplicit like they have to do for the other Ignore*.
Move Expr::IgnoreImpCasts() from Expr.h to Expr.cpp. This made no difference
in the run-time with my usual benchmark (-fsyntax-only on all of Boost).
While we are at it, make IgnoreParenNoopCasts take a const reference to the
ASTContext for const correctness.
Update the comments to match what the Expr::Ignore* are actually doing.
I am not sure that listing exactly what each Expr::Ignore* do is optimal,
but it certainly looks better than the current state which is in my opinion
between misleading and just plain wrong.
The whole patch is NFC (if you count removing Stmt::IgnoreImplicit as NFC).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57266
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
llvm-svn: 353006
As discussed in D50222, this changes the vector types in tests required for that revision to ones legal for X86.
Patch by @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56372
llvm-svn: 353004
There is currently no way to distinguish implicit from explicit
CXXThisExpr in the AST dump output.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57649
Reviewed By: steveire
llvm-svn: 353003
There are 2 changes visible here:
1. There's no reason to limit this transform based on number
of condition registers. That diff allows PPC to produce
slightly better (dot-instructions should be generally good)
code.
Note: someone that cares about PPC codegen might want to
look closer at that output because it seems like we could
still improve this.
2. We (probably?) should not bother trying to form uaddo (or
other overflow ops) when there's no target support for such
an op. This goes beyond checking whether the op is expanded
because both PPC and AArch64 show better codegen for standard
types regardless of whether the op is legal/custom.
llvm-svn: 353001
Summary:
Enable tests that were previously disabled because they didn't work on
Windows.
Reviewers: morehouse
Reviewed By: morehouse
Subscribers: morehouse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57563
llvm-svn: 353000
This is the most important uaddo problem mentioned in PR31754:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31754
...but that was overcome in x86 codegen with D57637.
That patch also corrects the inc vs. add regressions seen with the previous attempt at this.
Still, we want to make this matcher complete, so we can potentially canonicalize the pattern
even if it's an 'add 1' operation.
Pattern matching, however, shouldn't assume that we have canonicalized IR, so we match 4
commuted variants of uaddo.
There's also a test with a crazy type to show that the existing CGP transform based on this
matcher is not limited by target legality checks.
I'm not sure if the Hexagon diff means the test is no longer testing what it intended to
test, but that should be solvable in a follow-up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57516
llvm-svn: 352998
Different Unix "errno" values are returned for the following scenarios:
$ echo test > /tmp/existingFile/impossibleDir/impossibleFile
"Not a directory"
$ echo test > /tmp/nonexistentDir/impossibleFile
"No such file or directory"
This fixes the regression introduced by r352971 / D57592.
llvm-svn: 352996
Summary:
This new traverser class allows clients to re-use the traversal logic
which was previously part of ASTDumper. This means that alternative
visit logic may be implemented, such as
* Dump to alternative data formats such as JSON
* Implement AST Matcher parent/child visitation matching AST dumps
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jfb, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57472
llvm-svn: 352989
This is not truly NFC because we are bailing out without
a TLI now. That should not be a real concern though because
there should be a TLI in any real-world scenario.
That seems better than passing around a pointer and then
checking it for null-ness all over the place.
The motivation is to fix what appears to be an unintended
restriction on the uaddo transform -
hasMultipleConditionRegisters() shouldn't be reason to limit
the transform.
llvm-svn: 352988
Summary:
The analysis result of DA caches pointers to AA, SCEV, and LI, but it
never checks for their invalidation. Fix that.
Reviewers: chandlerc, dmgreen, bogner
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56381
llvm-svn: 352986
Summary:
When calculating clobbers for MS style inline assembly we fail if the asm clobbers stack top because we print st(0) and try to pass it through the gcc register name check. This was found with when I attempted to make a emms/femms clobber all ST registers. If you use emms/femms in MS inline asm we would try to use st(0) as the clobber name but clang would think that wasn't a valid clobber name.
This also matches what objdump disassembly prints. It's also what is printed by gcc -S.
Reviewers: RKSimon, rnk, efriedma, spatel, andreadb, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: eraman, gbedwell, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57621
llvm-svn: 352985
Summary:
Add an additional combine to combineCarryThroughADD to reverse it back to the C flag to avoid regressions.
I believe this catches the cases that D57547 got.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57637
llvm-svn: 352984
Clang allows users to enable or disable various types of allocation
and deallocation regardless of the C++ dialect. When extended new/delete
overloads are enabled in older dialects, we need to treat them as if
they're usual.
Also, disabling one usual deallocation form shouldn't
disable any others. For example, disabling aligned allocation in C++2a
should have no effect on destroying delete.
llvm-svn: 352980
Max Kazantsev