In other places in the code, we use lowercase spelling for things that
are not available in prior standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109435
Detected by evil-izing the widely used `MoveOnly` testing type.
I had to patch some tests that were themselves using its comma operator,
but I think that's a worthwhile cost in order to catch more places
in our headers that needed comma-proofing.
The trick here is that even `++ptr, SomeClass()` can find a comma operator
by ADL, if `ptr` is of type `Evil*`. (A comma between two operands
of non-class-or-enum type is always treated as the built-in
comma, without ADL. But if either operand is class-or-enum, then
ADL happens for _both_ operands' types.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109414
I just ran into a compiler error involving __bind_back and some overloads
that were being disabled with _EnableIf. I noticed that the error message
was quite bad and did not mention the reason for the overload being
excluded. Specifically, the error looked like this:
candidate template ignored: substitution failure [with _Args =
<ContiguousView>]: no member named '_EnableIfImpl' in 'std::_MetaBase<false>'
Instead, when using enable_if or enable_if_t, the compiler is clever and
can produce better diagnostics, like so:
candidate template ignored: requirement 'is_invocable_v<
std::__bind_back_op<1, std::integer_sequence<unsigned long, 0>>,
std::ranges::views::__transform::__fn &, std::tuple<PlusOne> &,
ContiguousView>' was not satisfied [with _Args = <ContiguousView>]
Basically, it tries to do a poor man's implementation of concepts, which
is already a lot better than simply complaining about substitution failure.
Hence, this commit uses enable_if_t instead of _EnableIf whenever
possible. That is both more straightforward than using the internal
helper, and also leads to better error messages in those cases.
I understand the motivation for _EnableIf's implementation was to improve
compile-time performance, however I believe striving to improve error
messages is even more important for our QOI, hence this patch. Furthermore,
it is unclear that _EnableIf actually improved compile-time performance
in any noticeable way (see discussion in the review for details).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108216
There were basically two bugs here:
When C++20 `to_address` is called on `int arr[10]`, then `const _Ptr&` becomes
a reference to a const array, and then we dispatch to `__to_address<const int(&)[10]>`,
which, oops, gives us a `const int*` result instead of an `int*` result.
Solution: We need to provide the two standard-specified overloads of
`std::to_address` in exactly the same way that we provide two overloads
of `__to_address`.
When `__to_address` is called on a pointer type, `__to_address(const _Ptr&)`
is disabled so we successfully avoid trying to instantiate pointer_traits of
that pointer type. But when it's called on an array type, it's not disabled
for array types, so we go ahead and instantiate pointer_traits<int[10]>,
which goes boom. Solution: We need to disable `__to_address(const _Ptr&)`
for both pointer and array types. Also disable it for function types,
so that they get the nice error message; and put a test on it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109331
Clang used to support [[nodebug]] everywhere except on typedefs. Since
we don't support such old Clangs anymore, we can get rid of _LIBCPP_NODEBUG_TYPE
in favour of always using _LIBCPP_NODEBUG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108996
All supported compilers have supported deduction guides in C++17 for a
while, so this isn't necessary anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108213
All supported compilers implement __builtin_addressof. Even MSVC implements
addressof as a simple call to __builtin_addressof, so it would work if we
were to port libc++ to that compiler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107905
Also, improve tests for std::destroy and std::destroy_n so that they
check for array support.
These changes are part of http://wg21.link/p0896 (the One Ranges proposal).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106916
Moves:
* `std::move`, `std::forward`, `std::declval`, and `std::swap` into
`__utility/${FUNCTION_NAME}`.
* `std::swap_ranges` and `std::iter_swap` into
`__algorithm/${FUNCTION_NAME}`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103734
C++03 didn't support `explicit` conversion operators;
but Clang's C++03 mode does, as an extension, so we can use it.
This lets us make the conversion explicit in `std::function` (even in '03),
and remove some silly metaprogramming in `std::basic_ios`.
Drive-by improvements to the tests for these operators, in addition
to making sure all these tests also run in `c++03` mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104682
This is a fairly mechanical change, it just moves each algorithm into
its own header. This is intended to be a NFC.
This commit re-applies 7ed7d4ccb8, which was reverted in 692d7166f7
because the Modules build got broken. The modules build has now been
fixed, so we're re-committing this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103583
Attribution note
----------------
I'm only committing this. This commit is a mix of D103583, D103330 and
D104171 authored by:
Co-authored-by: Christopher Di Bella <cjdb@google.com>
Co-authored-by: zoecarver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
When we removed the allocator<void> specialization, the triviality of
std::allocator<void> changed because the primary template had a
non-trivial default constructor and the specialization didn't
(so std::allocator<void> went from trivial to non-trivial).
This commit fixes that oversight by giving a trivial constructor to
the primary template when instantiated on cv-void.
This was reported in https://llvm.org/PR50299.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104398
While the std::allocator<void> specialization was deprecated by
https://wg21.link/p0174#2.2, the *use* of std::allocator<void> by users
was not. The intent was that std::allocator<void> could still be used
in C++17 and C++20, but starting with C++20 (with the removal of the
specialization), std::allocator<void> would use the primary template.
That intent was called out in wg21.link/p0619r4#3.9.
As a result of this patch, _LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_MEMBERS
will also not control whether the explicit specialization is provided or
not. It shouldn't matter, since in C++20, one can simply use the primary
template.
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR50299
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104323
This has been broken out of D104170 since it should be merged whether or
not we go ahead with the module map changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104175
This is a fairly mechanical change, it just moves each algorithm into its own header. This is a NFC.
Note: during this change, I burned down all the includes, so this follows "include only and exactly what you use."
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103583
Most of our private headers need to be treated as submodules so that
Clang modules can export things correctly. Previous commits that split
monolithic headers into smaller chunks were unaware of this requirement,
and so this is being addressed in one fell swoop. Moving forward, most
new headers will need to have their own submodule (anything that's
conditionally included is exempt from this rule, which means `__support`
headers aren't made into submodules).
This hasn't been marked NFC, since I'm not 100% sure that's the case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103551
Make sure we provide the correct It::difference_type member and update
the tests and synopses to be accurate.
Supersedes D102657 and D103101 (thanks to the original authors).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103273
C++17 deprecated std::iterator and removed it as a base class for all
iterator adaptors. We implement that change, but we still provide a way
to inherit from std::iterator in the few cases where doing otherwise
would be an ABI break.
Supersedes D101729 and the std::iterator base parts of D103101 and D102657.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103171
This also provides some of the scaffolding needed by D102992 and D101729, and mops up after D101730 etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103055
This commit alphabetizes all includes in libcxx. This is a NFC.
This can also serve as a pseudo "announcement" for how we should order these headers going forward (note: double underscores go before other headers).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102941
C++17 deprecates `std::raw_storage_iterator` and C++20 removes it.
Implements part of:
* P0174R2 'Deprecating Vestigial Library Parts in C++17'
* P0619R4 'Reviewing Deprecated Facilities of C++17 for C++20'
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101730
This is a rough reapplication of the change that fixed std::to_address
to avoid relying on element_type (da456167). It is somewhat different
because the fix to avoid breaking Clang (which caused it to be reverted
in 347f69c55) was a bit more involved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101638
This reverts commit da456167, which broke the Clang build. I'm able to
reproduce it but I want to give myself a bit more time to investigate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101638
This patch gets rid of technical debt around std::pointer_safety which,
I claim, is entirely unnecessary. I don't think anybody has used
std::pointer_safety in actual code because we do not implement the
underlying garbage collection support. In fact, P2186 even proposes
removing these facilities entirely from a future C++ version. As such,
I think it's entirely fine to get rid of complex workarounds whose goals
were to avoid breaking the ABI back in 2017.
I'm putting this up both to get reviews and to discuss this proposal for
a breaking change. I think we should be comfortable with making these
tiny breaks if we are confident they won't hurt anyone, which I'm fairly
confident is the case here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100410
This patch fixes LWG2874. It is based on the original patch by Zoe Carver
originally uploaded at D81417.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81417
This makes it clear that headers like <memory> which include auto_ptr
only do that when compiling under an older Standard, or when the removed
feature is explicitly requested.
Louis Dionne