We would check the type information from the declaration found by lookup
but we would neglect checking compatibility with the most recent
declaration. This would make it possible for us to not correctly
diagnose inconsistencies with declarations which were made in a
different scope.
llvm-svn: 225934
In the following:
void f(int x) { extern int x; }
The second declaration of 'x' shouldn't be considered a redeclaration of
the parameter.
This is a different approach to r225780.
llvm-svn: 225875
In the following:
void f(int x) { extern int x; }
The second declaration of 'x' shouldn't be considered a redeclaration of
the parameter.
llvm-svn: 225780
Clang would treat the digits in an "11m" input constraint separately as
if it was handling constraint 1 twice instead of constraint 11.
llvm-svn: 225606
Input constraints like "0" and "[foo]" should be treated the same when
it comes to their corresponding output constraint.
This fixes PR21850.
llvm-svn: 225605
transform.
Also diagnose typos in the initializer of an invalid C++ declaration.
Both issues were hit using the same line of test code, depending on
whether the code was treated as C or C++.
Fixes PR22092.
llvm-svn: 225389
Add additional constraint checking for target specific behaviour for inline
assembly constraints. We would previously silently let all arguments through
for these constraints. In cases where the constraints were violated, we could
end up failing to select instructions and triggering assertions or worse,
silently ignoring instructions.
llvm-svn: 225244
Many places in Sema cannot handle isNull() types. This is fine, because in
most places the type building code recovers by falling back to IntTy. In
GetFullTypeForDeclarator(), this is done at the end of the getNumTypeObjects()
loop body. This function calls BuildQualifiedType() before this fallback is
done though, so it explicitly needs to check for isNull() types.
llvm-svn: 225124
The lit.cfg files only add .cpp to suffixes, so these tests used to never run,
oops. (Also tweak to of these tests in minor ways to make the actually pass.)
llvm-svn: 224718
The extension has the following syntax:
__builtin_call_with_static_chain(Call, Chain)
where Call must be a function call expression and Chain must be of pointer type
This extension performs a function call Call with a static chain pointer
Chain passed to the callee in a designated register. This is useful for
calling foreign language functions whose ABI uses static chain pointers
(e.g. to implement closures).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6332
llvm-svn: 224167
#undef a keyword is generally harmless but used often in configuration scripts.
Also added tests that I forgot to include to commit in r223114.
llvm-svn: 224100
Summary:
This change implements warnings if macro name is identical to a keyword or
reserved identifier. The warnings are different depending on the "danger"
of the operation. Defining macro that replaces a keyword is on by default.
Other cases produce warning that is off by default but can be turned on
using option -Wreserved-id-macro.
This change fixes PR11488.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: rnk, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6194
llvm-svn: 223114
This attribute serves as a hint to improve warnings about the ranges of
enumerators used as flag types. It currently has no working C++ implementation
due to different semantics for enums in C++. For more explanation, see the docs
and testcases.
Reviewed by Aaron Ballman.
llvm-svn: 222906
nonnull attribute when comparison is always true/false.
Original patch by Steven Wu. I have added extra code to prevent issuing of
warning when the nonnull parameter is modified prior to the comparison.
This addition prevents false positives in the most obvious cases.
There may still be false positive warnings in some cases (as one of my tests
indicates), but benefit far outweighs such cases. rdar://18712242
llvm-svn: 222264
Now we don't warn on this code:
void __stdcall f(void);
void __stdcall f();
My previous commit regressed this functionality because I didn't update
the relevant test case which used a definition.
llvm-svn: 221188
We already have a warning on the call sites of code like this:
void f() { }
void g() { f(1, 2, 3); }
t.c:2:21: warning: too many arguments in call to 'f'
We can limit ourselves to diagnosing unprototyped forward declarations
of f to cut down on noise.
llvm-svn: 221184
parameters with nonnull attribute when comparison is always
true/false. Patch causes false positive when parameter is
modified in the function.
llvm-svn: 221163
It turns out that MinGW never dllimports of exports inline functions.
This means that code compiled with Clang would fail to link with
MinGW-compiled libraries since we might try to import functions that
are not imported.
To fix this, make Clang never dllimport inline functions when targeting
MinGW.
llvm-svn: 221154
Wire it through everywhere we have support for fastcall, essentially.
This allows us to parse the MSVC "14" CTP headers, but we will
miscompile them because LLVM doesn't support __vectorcall yet.
Reviewed By: Aaron Ballman
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5808
llvm-svn: 220573
nonnull attribute when comparison is always
true/false. Patch by Steven Wu with few fixes and minor
refactoring and adding tests by me. rdar://18712242
llvm-svn: 220496
This is long-since overdue, and matches GCC 5.0. This should also be
backwards-compatible, because we already supported all of C11 as an extension
in C99 mode.
llvm-svn: 220244
When performing a type deduction from the return type, the FunctionDecl may be
attributed with a calling convention. In such a case, the retrieved type
location may be an AttributedTypeLoc. Performing a castAs<FunctionProtoTypeLoc>
on such a type loc would result in an assertion as they are not derived types.
Ensure that we correctly handle the attributed type location by looking through
it to the modified type loc.
Fixes an assertion triggered in C++14 mode.
llvm-svn: 219851
Summary: This fixes PR21155.
Test Plan: The patch includes a test.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5619
llvm-svn: 219322
Clang won't emit any prologues for such functions, so it would assert trying to
codegen the parameter references.
This patch makes Clang check the extended asm inputs and outputs for
references to function parameters.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5640
llvm-svn: 219272
Windows TLS relies on indexing through a tls_index in order to get at
the DLL's thread local variables. However, this index is not exported
along with the variable: it is assumed that all accesses to thread local
variables are inside the same module which created the variable in the
first place.
While there are several implementation techniques we could adopt to fix
this (notably, the Itanium ABI gets this for free), it is not worth the
heroics.
Instead, let's just ban this combination. We could revisit this in the
future if we need to.
This fixes PR21111.
llvm-svn: 219049
This test includes stdint.h, which might include system headers (and that might
not work, depending on the system configuration). Attempting to fix
llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-debian-fast.
llvm-svn: 218959
Adds a Clang-specific implementation of C11's stdatomic.h header. On systems,
such as FreeBSD, where a stdatomic.h header is already provided, we defer to
that header instead (using our __has_include_next technology). Otherwise, we
provide an implementation in terms of our __c11_atomic_* intrinsics (that were
created for this purpose).
C11 7.1.4p1 requires function declarations for atomic_thread_fence,
atomic_signal_fence, atomic_flag_test_and_set,
atomic_flag_test_and_set_explicit, and atomic_flag_clear, and requires that
they have external linkage. Accordingly, we provide these declarations, but if
a user elides the shadowing macros and uses them, then they must have a libc
(or similar) that actually provides definitions.
atomic_flag is implemented using _Bool as the underlying type. This is
consistent with the implementation provided by FreeBSD and also GCC 4.9 (at
least when __GCC_ATOMIC_TEST_AND_SET_TRUEVAL == 1).
Patch by Richard Smith (rebased and slightly edited by me -- Richard said I
should drive at this point).
llvm-svn: 218957
This adds support for the align_value attribute. This attribute is supported by
Intel's compiler (versions 14.0+), and several of my HPC users have requested
support in Clang. It specifies an alignment assumption on the values to which a
pointer points, and is used by numerical libraries to encourage efficient
generation of vector code.
Of course, we already have an aligned attribute that can specify enhanced
alignment for a type, so why is this additional attribute important? The
problem is that if you want to specify that an input array of T is, say,
64-byte aligned, you could try this:
typedef double aligned_double attribute((aligned(64)));
void foo(aligned_double *P) {
double x = P[0]; // This is fine.
double y = P[1]; // What alignment did those doubles have again?
}
the access here to P[1] causes problems. P was specified as a pointer to type
aligned_double, and any object of type aligned_double must be 64-byte aligned.
But if P[0] is 64-byte aligned, then P[1] cannot be, and this access causes
undefined behavior. Getting round this problem requires a lot of awkward
casting and hand-unrolling of loops, all of which is bad.
With the align_value attribute, we can accomplish what we'd like in a well
defined way:
typedef double *aligned_double_ptr attribute((align_value(64)));
void foo(aligned_double_ptr P) {
double x = P[0]; // This is fine.
double y = P[1]; // This is fine too.
}
This attribute does not create a new type (and so it not part of the type
system), and so will only "propagate" through templates, auto, etc. by
optimizer deduction after inlining. This seems consistent with Intel's
implementation (thanks to Alexey for confirming the various Intel-compiler
behaviors).
As a final note, I would have chosen to call this aligned_value, not
align_value, for better naming consistency with the aligned attribute, but I
think it would be more useful to users to adopt Intel's name.
llvm-svn: 218910
Prior to GCC 4.4, __sync_fetch_and_nand was implemented as:
{ tmp = *ptr; *ptr = ~tmp & value; return tmp; }
but this was changed in GCC 4.4 to be:
{ tmp = *ptr; *ptr = ~(tmp & value); return tmp; }
in response to this change, support for sync_fetch_and_nand (and
sync_nand_and_fetch) was removed in r99522 in order to avoid miscompiling code
depending on the old semantics. However, at this point:
1. Many years have passed, and the amount of code relying on the old
semantics is likely smaller.
2. Through the work of many contributors, all LLVM backends have been updated
such that "atomicrmw nand" provides the newer GCC 4.4+ semantics (this process
was complete July of 2014 (added to the release notes in r212635).
3. The lack of this intrinsic is now a needless impediment to porting codes
from GCC to Clang (I've now seen several examples of this).
It is true, however, that we still set GNUC_MINOR to 2 (corresponding to GCC
4.2). To compensate for this, and to address the original concern regarding
code relying on the old semantics, I've added a warning that specifically
details the fact that the semantics have changed and that we provide the newer
semantics.
Fixes PR8842.
llvm-svn: 218905
In addition to __builtin_assume_aligned, GCC also supports an assume_aligned
attribute which specifies the alignment (and optional offset) of a function's
return value. Here we implement support for the assume_aligned attribute by making
use of the @llvm.assume intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 218500
we were failing to find that bit-field when performing integer promotions. This
brings us closer to following the standard, and closer to GCC.
In C, this change is technically a regression: we get bit-field promotions
completely wrong in C, promoting cases that are categorically not bit-field
designators. This change makes us do so slightly more consistently, though.
llvm-svn: 218428
Fixes PR21027. The MIDL compiler produces code that does this.
If we wanted to improve the warning, I think we could do this:
void __stdcall f(); // Don't warn without -Wstrict-prototypes.
void g() {
f(); // Might warn, the user probably meant for f to take no args.
f(1, 2, 3); // Warn, we have no idea what args f takes.
f(1); // Error, this is insane, one of these calls is broken.
}
Reviewers: thakis
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5481
llvm-svn: 218394
Summary:
This fixes PR20023. In order to implement this scoping rule, we piggy
back on the existing LabelDecl machinery, by creating LabelDecl's that
will carry the "internal" name of the inline assembly label, which we
will rewrite the asm label to.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4589
llvm-svn: 218230
According to lore, we used to verifier-fail on:
void __thiscall f();
int main() { f(1); }
So that's fixed now. System headers use prototype-less __stdcall functions,
so make that a warning that's DefaultError -- then it fires on regular code
but is suppressed in system headers.
Since it's used in system headers, we have codegen tests for this; massage
them slightly so that they still compile.
llvm-svn: 218166
Previously, we would not mark structs containing anonymous structs as
invalid. Later, horrific things would occur when trying to determine
the size of the parent record.
Instead, require the struct to be a complete type when used as an
anonymous struct. Mark both the anonymous field for the struct and the
parent context as invalid (this is similar to what we do when a struct
contains a field with an incomplete type.)
This fixes PR11847.
llvm-svn: 218006
for __builtin___strlcpy_chk/__builtin___strlcat_chk.
Patch by Jacques Fortier with monir change by me and
addition of test. rdar://18259539
llvm-svn: 217700
Summary: This fixes PR20883.
Test Plan: The patch includes an automated test.
Reviewers: hansw
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5256
llvm-svn: 217413
Temporarily comment out the test for really-large powers of two. This seems to
be host-sensitive for some reason... trying to fix the clang-i386-freebsd
builder.
llvm-svn: 217351
This makes use of the recently-added @llvm.assume intrinsic to implement a
__builtin_assume(bool) intrinsic (to provide additional information to the
optimizer). This hooks up __assume in MS-compatibility mode to mirror
__builtin_assume (the semantics have been intentionally kept compatible), and
implements GCC's __builtin_assume_aligned as assume((p - o) & mask == 0). LLVM
now contains special logic to deal with assumptions of this form.
llvm-svn: 217349
"protected scope" is very unhelpful here and actively confuses users. Instead,
simply state the nature of the problem in the diagnostic: we cannot jump from
here to there. The notes explain nicely why not.
llvm-svn: 217293
Naked functions don't have prologues or epilogues, so doing
codegen for anything other than inline assembly would be completely
hit or miss.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5183
llvm-svn: 217199
This shouldn't really be allowed, but it comes up in real code (see PR). As
long as the decl hasn't been used there's no technical difficulty in supporting
it, so downgrade the error to a warning.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5087
llvm-svn: 216619
the no-arguments case. Don't expand this to an __attribute__((nonnull(A, B,
C))) attribute, since that does the wrong thing for function templates and
varargs functions.
In passing, fix a grammar error in the diagnostic, a crash if
__attribute__((nonnull(N))) is applied to a varargs function,
a bug where the same null argument could be diagnosed multiple
times if there were multiple nonnull attributes referring to it,
and a bug where nonnull attributes would not be accumulated correctly
across redeclarations.
llvm-svn: 216520
feature is c11 about nested struct declarations must have
struct-declarator-list. Without this change, code
which was meant for c99 breaks. rdar://18125536
llvm-svn: 216469
variable that has regiser constraint "r" is not 64-bit.
General register operands are output using 64-bit "x" register names, regardless
of the size of the variable, unless the asm operand is prefixed with the "%w"
modifier. This surprises and confuses many users who aren't familiar with
aarch64 inline assembly rules.
With this commit, a note and fixit hint are printed which tell the users that
they need modifier "%w" in order to output a "w" register instead of an "x"
register.
<rdar://problem/12764785>
llvm-svn: 216260
Name might be empty again after we removed the '%' prefix
and Name[0] would assert.
Found on code like
register int foo asm("%" MACRO);
where MACRO was supposed to be defined in a header file that was not found.
llvm-svn: 215834
Clang used a custom implementation of lookup when handling designated
initializers. The custom code was not particularly optimized and relied
on standard lookup for typo-correction anyway.
This custom code has to go, it doesn't properly support MSVC-style
anonymous structs embedded inside other records; replace it with the
typo-correction path.
This has the side effect of speeding up semantic handling of the fields
for a designated initializer while simplifying the code at the same
time.
This fixes PR20573.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4839
llvm-svn: 215372
We had two bugs:
- We wouldn't properly warn when a struct/union/enum was mentioned
inside of a record definition if no declarator was provided. We
should have mentioned that this declaration declares nothing.
- We didn't properly support Microsoft's extension where certain
declspecs without declarators would act as anonymous structs/unions.
* We completely ignored the case where such a declspec could be a
union.
* We didn't properly handle the case where a record was defined inside
another record:
struct X {
int a;
struct Y {
int b;
};
};
llvm-svn: 215347
Embedded systems seem to have inherited Darwin's choise of "unsigned long" for
size_t (via a bunch of headers), so we should respect that.
rdar://problem/17872787
llvm-svn: 214854
Also, revert a couple of suppressions.
r214298, "Suppress clang/test/Sema/struct-packed-align.c for targeting LLP64."
r214301, "Suppress clang/test/Sema/struct-packed-align.c also on msvc for investigating."
llvm-svn: 214794
Summary:
Adding __int128 support explicitly for x86_64 because currently it's on
only when pointer size >= 64 which is not the case for x32.
Test Plan: One of the tests using __int128 is updated
Reviewers: atanasyan, chandlerc
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rob.khasanov, zinovy.nis, dschuff
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4755
llvm-svn: 214710
Commit r213935 added additional validation of register constants/size for AArch64 and because these tests which contain Intel assembler the new validation caused these tests to fail when the default target is changed to an AArch64 target.
llvm-svn: 214706
Updating the diagnostics in the launch_bounds test since they have been improved in that case. Adding a test for nonnull since it has little test coverage, but has truly variadic arguments.
llvm-svn: 214407
Specifically the part where we removed a warning to be compatible with GCC, which has been widely regarded as a bad idea.
I'm not quite happy with how obtuse this warning is, especially in the fairly common case of a 32-bit integer literal, so I've got another patch awaiting review that adds a fixit to reduce confusion.
llvm-svn: 213935
Summary:
This patch extends the __asm parser to make it keep parsing input tokens
as inline assembly if a single-line __asm line is followed by another line
starting with __asm too. It also makes sure that we correctly keep
matching braces in such situations by separating the notions of how many
braces we are matching and whether we are in single-line asm block mode.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4598
llvm-svn: 213916
arm64_be doesn't really exist; it was useful for testing while AArch64 and
ARM64 were separate, but now the only real way to refer to the system is
aarch64_be.
llvm-svn: 213747
This fixes a couple of asserts when analyzing comparisons involving
C11 atomics that were uncovered by r205608 when we extended the
applicability of -Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare.
llvm-svn: 213573
C99 array parameters can have index-type CVR qualifiers, and the TypePrinter
should print them when present (and we were not for constant-sized arrays).
Otherwise, we'd drop the restrict in:
int foo(int a[restrict static 3]) { ... }
llvm-svn: 213445
ExtWarn/Warnings. Mostly the name of the warning was changed to match the
semantics, but in the PR20356 cases, the warning was about valid code, so the
diagnostic was changed from ExtWarn to Warning instead.
llvm-svn: 213443
In C99, an array parameter declarator might have the form: direct-declarator
'[' 'static' type-qual-list[opt] assign-expr ']'
and when the size of the array is a constant, don't omit the static keyword
when printing the type. Also, in the VLA case, put a space after the static
keyword (some assignment expression must follow it).
llvm-svn: 213424
Add an additional test to ensure that someone doesn't accidentally
change the definitions such that they can take a non-constant value.
llvm-svn: 213364
We were crashing on the relevant test case inputs. Also, refactor this
code a bit so we can report failure and slurp the pragma tokens without
returning a diagnostic id. This is more consistent with the rest of the
parser and sema code.
llvm-svn: 213337
This is a follow-up to an IRC conversation with Richard last night; __assume
does not evaluate its argument, and so the argument should not contribute to
whether (__assume(e), constant) can be used where a constant is required.
llvm-svn: 213267
In MS-compatibility mode, we support the __assume builtin. The __assume builtin
does not evaluate its arguments, and we should issue a warning if __assume is
provided with an argument with side effects (because these effects will be
discarded).
This is similar in spirit to the warnings issued by other compilers (Intel
Diagnostic 2261, MS Compiler Warning C4557).
llvm-svn: 213266
Memory barrier __builtin_arm_[dmb, dsb, isb] intrinsics are required to
implement their corresponding ACLE and MSVC intrinsics.
This patch ports ARM dmb, dsb, isb intrinsic to AArch64.
Requires LLVM r213247.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4521
llvm-svn: 213250
We've decided to make the core rewriter class and PP rewriters mandatory.
They're only a few hundred lines of code in total and not worth supporting as a
distinct build configuration, especially since doing so disables key compiler
features.
This reverts commit r213150.
Revert "clang/test: Introduce the feature "rewriter" for --enable-clang-rewriter."
This reverts commit r213148.
Revert "Move clang/test/Frontend/rewrite-*.c to clang/test/Frontend/Rewriter/"
This reverts commit r213146.
llvm-svn: 213159
gcc supports this behavior and it is pervasively used inside the Linux
kernel.
Note that both gcc and clang will reject code that attempts to do this
in a C++ language mode.
This fixes PR17998.
llvm-svn: 212631
Give scope a SEHTryScope bit, set that in ParseSEHTry(), and let Sema
walk the scope chain to find the SEHTry parent on __leave statements.
(They are rare enough that it seems better to do the walk instead of
giving Scope a SEHTryParent pointer -- this is similar to AtCatchScope.)
llvm-svn: 212422
ARMv8 adds (to both AArch32 and AArch64) acquiring and releasing
variants of the exclusive operations, in line with the C++11 memory
model.
This adds support for two new intrinsics to expose them to C & C++
developers directly: __builtin_arm_ldaex and __builtin_arm_stlex, in
direct analogy with the versions with no implicit barrier.
rdar://problem/15885451
llvm-svn: 212175
C++ [basic.start.main]p1: "It shall have a return type of type int"
ISO C is also clear about this, so only accept 'int' with qualifiers in GNUMode
C.
llvm-svn: 212171
Summary: This patch introduces ACLE header file, implementing extensions that can be directly mapped to existing Clang intrinsics. It implements for both AArch32 and AArch64.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, compnerd, rengolin
Reviewed By: compnerd, rengolin
Subscribers: rnk, echristo, compnerd, aemerson, mroth, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4296
llvm-svn: 211962
Types defined in function prototype are diagnosed earlier in C++ compilation.
They are put into declaration context where the prototype is introduced. Later on,
when FunctionDecl object is created, these types are moved into the function context.
This patch fixes PR19018 and PR18963.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4145
llvm-svn: 211718
The C++ language requires that the address of a function be the same
across all translation units. To make __declspec(dllimport) useful,
this means that a dllimported function must also obey this rule. MSVC
implements this by dynamically querying the import address table located
in the linked executable. This means that the address of such a
function in C++ is not constant (which violates other rules).
However, the C language has no notion of ODR nor does it permit dynamic
initialization whatsoever. This requires implementations to _not_
dynamically query the import address table and instead utilize a wrapper
function that will be synthesized by the linker which will eventually
query the import address table. The effect this has is, to say the
least, perplexing.
Consider the following C program:
__declspec(dllimport) void f(void);
typedef void (*fp)(void);
static const fp var = &f;
const fp fun() { return &f; }
int main() { return fun() == var; }
MSVC will statically initialize "var" with the address of the wrapper
function and "fun" returns the address of the actual imported function.
This means that "main" will return false!
Note that LLVM's optimizers are strong enough to figure out that "main"
should return true. However, this result is dependent on having
optimizations enabled!
N.B. This change also permits the usage of dllimport declarators inside
of template arguments; they are sufficiently constant for such a
purpose. Add tests to make sure we don't regress here.
llvm-svn: 211677
and is unrelated to the NEON intrinsics in arm_neon.h. On little
endian machines it works fine, however on big endian machines it
exhibits surprising behaviour:
uint32x2_t x = {42, 64};
return vget_lane_u32(x, 0); // Will return 64.
Because of this, explicitly call out that it is unsupported on big
endian machines.
This patch will emit the following warning in big-endian mode:
test.c:3:15: warning: vector initializers are a GNU extension and are not compatible with NEON intrinsics [-Wgnu]
int32x4_t x = {0, 1, 2, 3};
^
test.c:3:15: note: consider using vld1q_s32() to initialize a vector from memory, or vcombine_s32(vcreate_s32(), vcreate_s32()) to initialize from integer constants
1 warning generated.
llvm-svn: 211362
CL permits static redeclarations to follow extern declarations. The
storage specifier on the latter declaration has no effect.
This fixes PR20034.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4149
llvm-svn: 211238
There comes a time in the life of any amateur code generator when dumb string
concatenation just won't cut it any more. For NeonEmitter.cpp, that time has
come.
There were a bunch of magic type codes which meant different things depending on
the context. There were a bunch of special cases that really had no reason to be
there but the whole thing was so creaky that removing them would cause something
weird to fall over. There was a 1000 line switch statement for code generation
involving string concatenation, which actually did lexical scoping to an extent
(!!) with a bunch of semi-repeated cases.
I tried to refactor this three times in three different ways without
success. The only way forward was to rewrite the entire thing. Luckily the
testing coverage on this stuff is absolutely massive, both with regression tests
and the "emperor" random test case generator.
The main change is that previously, in arm_neon.td a bunch of "Operation"s were
defined with special names. NeonEmitter.cpp knew about these Operations and
would emit code based on a huge switch. Actually this doesn't make much sense -
the type information was held as strings, so type checking was impossible. Also
TableGen's DAG type actually suits this sort of code generation very well
(surprising that...)
So now every operation is defined in terms of TableGen DAGs. There are a bunch
of operators to use, including "op" (a generic unary or binary operator), "call"
(to call other intrinsics) and "shuffle" (take a guess...). One of the main
advantages of this apart from making it more obvious what is going on, is that
we have proper type inference. This has two obvious advantages:
1) TableGen can error on bad intrinsic definitions easier, instead of just
generating wrong code.
2) Calls to other intrinsics are typechecked too. So
we no longer need to work out whether the thing we call needs to be the Q-lane
version or the D-lane version - TableGen knows that itself!
Here's an example: before:
case OpAbdl: {
std::string abd = MangleName("vabd", typestr, ClassS) + "(__a, __b)";
if (typestr[0] != 'U') {
// vabd results are always unsigned and must be zero-extended.
std::string utype = "U" + typestr.str();
s += "(" + TypeString(proto[0], typestr) + ")";
abd = "(" + TypeString('d', utype) + ")" + abd;
s += Extend(utype, abd) + ";";
} else {
s += Extend(typestr, abd) + ";";
}
break;
}
after:
def OP_ABDL : Op<(cast "R", (call "vmovl", (cast $p0, "U",
(call "vabd", $p0, $p1))))>;
As an example of what happens if you do something wrong now, here's what happens
if you make $p0 unsigned before the call to "vabd" - that is, $p0 -> (cast "U",
$p0):
arm_neon.td:574:1: error: No compatible intrinsic found - looking up intrinsic 'vabd(uint8x8_t, int8x8_t)'
Available overloads:
- float64x2_t vabdq_v(float64x2_t, float64x2_t)
- float64x1_t vabd_v(float64x1_t, float64x1_t)
- float64_t vabdd_f64(float64_t, float64_t)
- float32_t vabds_f32(float32_t, float32_t)
... snip ...
This makes it seriously easy to work out what you've done wrong in fairly nasty
intrinsics.
As part of this I've massively beefed up the documentation in arm_neon.td too.
Things still to do / on the radar:
- Testcase generation. This was implemented in the previous version and not in
the new one, because
- Autogenerated tests are not being run. The testcase in test/ differs from
the autogenerated version.
- There were a whole slew of special cases in the testcase generation that just
felt (and looked) like hacks.
If someone really feels strongly about this, I can try and reimplement it too.
- Big endian. That's coming soon and should be a very small diff on top of this one.
llvm-svn: 211101
This patch adds support for pointer types in global named registers variables.
It'll be lowered as a pair of read/write_register and inttoptr/ptrtoint calls.
Also adds some early checks on types on SemaDecl to avoid the assert.
Tests changed accordingly. (PR19837)
llvm-svn: 210274
to the normal non-placement ::operator new and ::operator delete, but allow
optimizations like new-expressions and delete-expressions do.
llvm-svn: 210137
This allows us to be more careful when dealing with enums whose fixed
underlying type requires special handling in a format string, like
NSInteger.
A refinement of r163266 from a year and a half ago, which added the
special handling for NSInteger and friends in the first place.
<rdar://problem/16616623>
llvm-svn: 209966
A few (mostly CodeGen) parts of Clang were tightly coupled to the
AArch64 backend. Now that it's gone, they will not even compile.
I've also deduplicated RUN lines in many of the AArch64 tests. This
might improve "make check-all" time noticably: some of those NEON
tests were monsters.
llvm-svn: 209578
This patch implements global named registers in Clang, lowering to the just
created intrinsics in LLVM (@llvm.read/write_register). A new type of LValue
had to be created (Register), which just adds support to carry the metadata
node containing the name of the register. Two new methods to emit loads and
stores interoperate with another to emit the named metadata node.
No guarantees are being made and only non-allocatable global variable named
registers are being supported. Local named register support is unchanged.
llvm-svn: 209149
Now that llvm cannot represent alias cycles, we have to diagnose erros just
before trying to close the cycle. This degrades the errors a bit. The real
solution is what it was before: if we want to provide good errors for these
cases, we have to be able to find a clang level decl given a mangled name
and produce the error from Sema.
llvm-svn: 209008
We were emitting dynamic initializers for __thread variables if there
was no explicit initializer, as in this test case:
struct S { S(); };
__thread S s;
llvm-svn: 207675
glibc expects that stddef.h only defines a single thing if either of these
defines is set. For example, before this change, a C file containing
#include <stdlib.h>
int ptrdiff_t = 0;
would compile with gcc but not with clang. Now it compiles with clang too.
This also fixes PR12997, where older versions of the Linux headers would define
NULL incorrectly, and glibc would define __need_NULL and expect stddef.h to
redefine NULL with the correct definition.
llvm-svn: 207606
We never aka vector types because our attributed syntax for it is less
comprehensible than the typedefs. This leaves the user in the dark when
the typedef isn't named that well.
Example:
v2s v; v4f w;
w = v;
The naming in this cases isn't even that bad, but the error we give is
useless without looking up the actual typedefs.
t.c:6:5: error: assigning to 'v4f' from incompatible type 'v2s'
Now:
t.c:6:5: error: assigning to 'v4f' (vector of 4 'float' values) from
incompatible type 'v2s' (vector of 2 'int' values)
We do this for all diagnostics that print a vector type.
llvm-svn: 207267
through to the output even if the input comment comes from an untrusted source
Attribute filtering is currently based on a blacklist, which right now includes
all event handler attributes (they contain JavaScipt code). It should be
switched to a whitelist, but going over all of the HTML5 spec requires a
significant amount of time.
llvm-svn: 206882
This is a partial revert of 183015.
By not recognizing things like _setjmp we lose (returns_twice) attribute on
them, which leads to incorrect code generation.
Fixes PR16138.
llvm-svn: 206362
When instantiating an array that has an alignment attribute on it, we
were looking through the array type and only considering the element
type for the resulting alignment. We need to make sure we take the
array's requirements into account too.
llvm-svn: 206317
This patch adds support for the msvc pragmas section, bss_seg, code_seg,
const_seg and data_seg as well as support for __declspec(allocate()).
Additionally it corrects semantics and adds diagnostics for
__attribute__((section())) and the interaction between the attribute
and the msvc pragmas and declspec. In general conflicts should now be
well diganosed within and among these features.
In supporting the pragmas new machinery for uniform lexing for
msvc pragmas was introduced. The new machinery always lexes the
entire pragma and stores it on an annotation token. The parser
is responsible for parsing the pragma when the handling the
annotation token.
There is a known outstanding bug in this implementation in C mode.
Because these attributes and pragmas apply _only_ to definitions, we
process them at the time we detect a definition. Due to tentative
definitions in C, we end up processing the definition late. This means
that in C mode, everything that ends up in a BSS section will end up in
the _last_ BSS section rather than the one that was live at the time of
tentative definition, even if that turns out to be the point of actual
definition. This issue is not known to impact anything as of yet
because we are not aware of a clear use or use case for #pragma bss_seg
but should be fixed at some point.
Differential Revision=http://reviews.llvm.org/D3065#inline-16241
llvm-svn: 205810
which warns on compound conditionals that always evaluate to the same value.
For instance, (x > 5 && x < 3) will always be false since no value for x can
satisfy both conditions.
This patch also changes the CFG to use these tautological values for better
branch analysis. The test for -Wunreachable-code shows how this change catches
additional dead code.
Patch by Anders Rönnholm.
llvm-svn: 205665
better. This warning will now trigger on the following conditionals:
bool b;
int i;
if (b > 1) {} // always false
if (0 <= (i > 5)) {} // always true
if (-1 > b) {} // always false
Patch by Per Viberg.
llvm-svn: 205608
David Majnemer