We already correctly rejected:
typedef __attribute__((vector_size(16))) _BitInt(4) Ty;
but we would assert with:
typedef __attribute__((ext_vector_type(4))) _BitInt(4) Ty;
Now we issue the same error in both cases.
This completes the implementation of P1091R3 and P1381R1.
This patch allow the capture of structured bindings
both for C++20+ and C++17, with extension/compat warning.
In addition, capturing an anonymous union member,
a bitfield, or a structured binding thereof now has a
better diagnostic.
We only support structured bindings - as opposed to other kinds
of structured statements/blocks. We still emit an error for those.
In addition, support for structured bindings capture is entirely disabled in
OpenMP mode as this needs more investigation - a specific diagnostic indicate the feature is not yet supported there.
Note that the rest of P1091R3 (static/thread_local structured bindings) was already implemented.
at the request of @shafik, i can confirm the correct behavior of lldb wit this change.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52720
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122768
VisitCXXConstructExpr() will later do something similar, but for large
arrays, we should try to do it once an not for every element.
Fixes#56774
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130791
We didn't check that a destructor's name matches the directly enclosing class if the class was dependent.
I enabled the check we already had for non-dependent types, which seems to work. Added appropriate tests.
Fixes GitHub issue #56772
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130936
This reverts commit 0cc3c184c7.
The changes did not account for templated code where one instantiation
may trigger the diagnostic but other instantiations will not, as in:
```
template <int I, class T>
void foo(int x) {
bool b1 = (x & sizeof(T)) == 8;
bool b2 = (x & I) == 8;
bool b3 = (x & 4) == 8;
}
void run(int x) {
foo<4, int>(8);
}
```
I went over the output of the following mess of a command:
(ulimit -m 2000000; ulimit -v 2000000; git ls-files -z |
parallel --xargs -0 cat | aspell list --mode=none --ignore-case |
grep -E '^[A-Za-z][a-z]*$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n |
grep -vE '.{25}' | aspell pipe -W3 | grep : | cut -d' ' -f2 | less)
and proceeded to spend a few days looking at it to find probable typos
and fixed a few hundred of them in all of the llvm project (note, the
ones I found are not anywhere near all of them, but it seems like a
good start).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130827
This is a follow-up to D130058 to fix how we handle the Max value we obtain from
getValueRange(...) in IntExprEvaluator::VisitCastExpr(...) which in the case of
an enum that contains an enumerator with the max integer value will overflow by
one.
The fix is to decrement the value of Max and use slt and ult for comparison Vs
sle and ule.`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130811
C99 6.7.4p2 clarifies that a function specifier can only be used in the
declaration of a function. _Noreturn is a function specifier, so it is
a constraint violation to write it on a structure or union field, but
we missed that case.
Fixes#56800
DR2338 clarified that it was undefined behavior to set the value outside the
range of the enumerations values for an enum without a fixed underlying type.
We should diagnose this with a constant expression context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130058
The patch mainly focuses on the lack of warnings for
-Wtautological-compare. It works fine for positive numbers but doesn't
for negative numbers. This is because the warning explicitly checks for
an IntegerLiteral AST node, but -1 is represented by a UnaryOperator
with an IntegerLiteral sub-Expr.
For the below code we have warnings:
if (0 == (5 | x)) {}
but not for
if (0 == (-5 | x)) {}
This patch changes the analysis to not look at the AST node directly to
see if it is an IntegerLiteral, but instead attempts to evaluate the
expression to see if it is an integer constant expression. This handles
unary negation signs, but also handles all the other possible operators
as well.
Fixes#42918
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130510
DR2338 clarified that it was undefined behavior to set the value outside the
range of the enumerations values for an enum without a fixed underlying type.
We should diagnose this with a constant expression context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130058
Add the support for `atomic compare` and `atomic compare capture` in the
release note of clang.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129211
Without the "found declaration" it is later not possible to know where the operator declaration
was brought into the scope calling it.
The initial motivation for this fix came from #55095. However, this also has an influence on
`clang -ast-dump` which now prints a `UsingShadow` attribute for operators only visible through
`using` statements. Also, clangd now correctly references the `using` statement instead of the
operator directly.
Reviewed By: shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129973
Currently, the use of preferred_name would block implementing std
modules in libcxx. See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56490
for example.
The problem is pretty hard and it looks like we couldn't solve it in a
short time. So we sent this patch as a workaround to avoid blocking us
to modularize STL. This is intended to be fixed properly in the future.
Reviewed By: erichkeane, aaron.ballman, tahonermann
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130331
Before the patch we calculated the NRVO candidate looking at the
variable's whole enclosing scope. The research in [P2025] shows that
looking at the variable's potential scope is better and covers more
cases where NRVO would be safe and desirable.
Many thanks to @Izaron for the original implementation.
Reviewed By: ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119792
Since clang15 is going to be branched in July 26, and C++ modules still
lack an update on ReleaseNotes. Although it is not complete yet, I think
it would be better to add one since we've done many works for C++20
Modules in clang15.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129138
This partially reverts c7b3a91017. Having
libclang.so with a different SONAME than the other LLVM libraries was
causing a lot of confusion for users. Also, this change did not really
acheive it's purpose of allowing apps to use newer versions of
libclang.so without rebuilding, because a new version of libclang.so
requires a new version of libLLVM.so, which does not have a stable ABI.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129160
Currently in Sema::ActOnEnumBody(...) when calculating NumPositiveBits we miss
the case where there is only a single enumerator with value zero and the case of
an empty enum. In both cases we end up with zero positive bits when in fact we
need one bit to store the value zero.
This PR updates the calculation to account for these cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130301
and use fallback only for C.
It fixes the isssue with clang-cl:
```
#include <stdatomic.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#ifdef __cplusplus
#include <atomic>
using namespace std;
#endif
int main() {
atomic_bool b = true;
}
```
```
$ clang-cl /TC main.cpp
# works
```
```
$ clang-cl /TP /std:c++20 main.cpp
stdatomic.h(70,6): error: conflicting types for 'atomic_thread_fence'
void atomic_thread_fence(memory_order);
^
atomic(166,24): note: previous definition is here
extern "C" inline void atomic_thread_fence(const memory_order _Order) noexcept {
...
fatal error: too many errors emitted, stopping now [-ferror-limit=]
20 errors generated.
```
Many errors but
`<stdatomic.h>` has many macros to built-in functions.
```
#define atomic_thread_fence(order) __c11_atomic_thread_fence(order)
```
and MSVC `<atomic>` has real functions.
and the built-in functions are redefined.
Reviewed By: #libc, aaron.ballman, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130419
Support for functions wmemcpy, wcslen, wcsnlen is added to the checker.
Documentation and tests are updated and extended with the new functions.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130091
As per P2327R1,
|=, &= and ^= are no longer deprecated in all languages mode.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130421
The #warning directive is standard in C++2b and C2x,
this adjusts the pedantic and extensions warning accordingly.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130415
This implements
N2836 Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31.
The feature was already implemented for C++,
and the semantics are the same.
Unlike C++ there was, afaict, no decision to
backport the feature in older languages mode,
so C17 and earlier are not modified and the
code point tables for these language modes are conserved.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130416
Clang has traditionally allowed C programs to implicitly convert
integers to pointers and pointers to integers, despite it not being
valid to do so except under special circumstances (like converting the
integer 0, which is the null pointer constant, to a pointer). In C89,
this would result in undefined behavior per 3.3.4, and in C99 this rule
was strengthened to be a constraint violation instead. Constraint
violations are most often handled as an error.
This patch changes the warning to default to an error in all C modes
(it is already an error in C++). This gives us better security posture
by calling out potential programmer mistakes in code but still allows
users who need this behavior to use -Wno-error=int-conversion to retain
the warning behavior, or -Wno-int-conversion to silence the diagnostic
entirely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129881
This patch moves `Analysis/FlowSensitive/NoopAnalysis.h` from `clang/unittests/` to `clang/include/clang/`, so that we can use it for doing context-sensitive analysis.
Reviewed By: ymandel, gribozavr2, sgatev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130304
message expressions
For an Obj-C message expression `[o m]`, the adding matcher will match
the declaration of the method `m`. This commit overloads the existing
`callee` ASTMatcher, which originally was only for C/C++ nodes but
also applies to Obj-C messages now.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129398
EnumDecl's promotion type is set either to the parsed type or calculated type
after completing its definition. When it's bool type and has no definition,
its promotion type is bool which is not allowed by clang.
Fixes#56560.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130210
Based on the discussion at [1], this patch adds a Clang flag called
-fexperimental-library that controls whether experimental library
features are provided in libc++. In essence, it links against the
experimental static archive provided by libc++ and defines a feature
that can be picked up by libc++ to enable experimental features.
This ensures that users don't start depending on experimental
(and hence unstable) features unknowingly.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-a-compiler-flag-to-enable-experimental-unstable-language-and-library-features
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121141
Some code [0] consider that trailing arrays are flexible, whatever their size.
Support for these legacy code has been introduced in
f8f6324983 but it prevents evaluation of
__builtin_object_size and __builtin_dynamic_object_size in some legit cases.
Introduce -fstrict-flex-arrays=<n> to have stricter conformance when it is
desirable.
n = 0: current behavior, any trailing array member is a flexible array. The default.
n = 1: any trailing array member of undefined, 0 or 1 size is a flexible array member
n = 2: any trailing array member of undefined or 0 size is a flexible array member
This takes into account two specificities of clang: array bounds as macro id
disqualify FAM, as well as non standard layout.
Similar patch for gcc discuss here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101836
[0] https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/developers-handbook/sockets/#sockets-essential-functions
When an issue exists in the main file (caller) instead of an included file
(callee), using a `src` pattern applying to the included file may be
inappropriate if it's the caller's responsibility. Add `mainfile` prefix to check
the main filename.
For the example below, the issue may reside in a.c (foo should not be called
with a misaligned pointer or foo should switch to an unaligned load), but with
`src` we can only apply to the innocent callee a.h. With this patch we can use
the more appropriate `mainfile:a.c`.
```
//--- a.h
// internal linkage
static inline int load(int *x) { return *x; }
//--- a.c, -fsanitize=alignment
#include "a.h"
int foo(void *x) { return load(x); }
```
See the updated clang/docs/SanitizerSpecialCaseList.rst for a caveat due
to C++ vague linkage functions.
Reviewed By: #sanitizers, kstoimenov, vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129832
Summary: Introduce a new function 'clang_analyzer_value'. It emits a report that in turn prints a RangeSet or APSInt associated with SVal. If there is no associated value, prints "n/a".
AcceptedPublic
Currently CXXMethodDecl::isMoveAssignmentOperator() does not look though type
sugar and so if the parameter is a type alias it will not be able to detect
that the method is a move assignment operator. This PR fixes that and adds a set
of tests that covers that we correctly detect special member functions when
defaulting or deleting them.
This fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56456
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129591
Add two options, `-fprofile-function-groups=N` and `-fprofile-selected-function-group=i` used to partition functions into `N` groups and only instrument the functions in group `i`. Similar options were added to xray in https://reviews.llvm.org/D87953 and the goal is the same; to reduce instrumented size overhead by spreading the overhead across multiple builds. Raw profiles from different groups can be added like normal using the `llvm-profdata merge` command.
Reviewed By: ianlevesque
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129594
WG21 approved delimited escape sequences and named escape
sequences.
Adjust the extension warnings accordingly, and update
the release notes.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129664
clang-format's documentation documented the more general clang-format-diff.py
script. Add documentation for the less general but arguably easier-to-use
git integration as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129563
CStringChecker is using getByteLength to get the length of a string
literal. For targets where a "char" is 8-bits, getByteLength() and
getLength() will be equal for a C string, but for targets where a "char"
is 16-bits getByteLength() returns the size in octets.
This is verified in our downstream target, but we have no way to add a
test case for this case since there is no target supporting 16-bit
"char" upstream. Since this cannot have a test case, I'm asserted this
change is "correct by construction", and visually inspected to be
correct by way of the following example where this was found.
The case that shows this fails using a target with 16-bit chars is here.
getByteLength() for the string literal returns 4, which fails when
checked against "char x[4]". With the change, the string literal is
evaluated to a size of 2 which is a correct number of "char"'s for a
16-bit target.
```
void strcpy_no_overflow_2(char *y) {
char x[4];
strcpy(x, "12"); // with getByteLength(), returns 4 using 16-bit chars
}
```
This change exposed that embedded nulls within the string are not
handled. This is documented as a FIXME for a future fix.
```
void strcpy_no_overflow_3(char *y) {
char x[3];
strcpy(x, "12\0");
}
```
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129269
Phoebe Wang