Summary:
There is no guarantee that the tls_init is executed on the static runtime
(/MT).
On windows 7, this unittest is failing.
On windows 10, I believe it's working because of the new CRT.
On ASAN side, it doesn't matter that the hook point is run or not.
It must be run only if there is other tls_initializer that are registered.
Reviewers: rnk, chrisha
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29838
llvm-svn: 295057
back into a vector
Previously the cost of the existing ExtractElement/ExtractValue
instructions was considered as a dead cost only if it was detected that
they have only one use. But these instructions may be considered
dead also if users of the instructions are also going to be vectorized,
like:
```
%x0 = extractelement <2 x float> %x, i32 0
%x1 = extractelement <2 x float> %x, i32 1
%x0x0 = fmul float %x0, %x0
%x1x1 = fmul float %x1, %x1
%add = fadd float %x0x0, %x1x1
```
This can be transformed to
```
%1 = fmul <2 x float> %x, %x
%2 = extractelement <2 x float> %1, i32 0
%3 = extractelement <2 x float> %1, i32 1
%add = fadd float %2, %3
```
because though `%x0` and `%x1` have 2 users each other, these users are
part of the vectorized tree and we can consider these `extractelement`
instructions as dead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29900
llvm-svn: 295056
Patch makes addends for addends of R_386_8, R_386_16 relocations
be sign extended.
The same we did earlier for PC ones,
currenly LLD fails to link linux kernel,
reporting relocation out of range because of this.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29714
llvm-svn: 295052
Summary:
Users might get confused easily when they see the check's message on
full template function speciliations.
Add a note to the output message, which mentions these kind of function
specializations are treated as regular functions.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29928
llvm-svn: 295048
Prevent memory objects of different address spaces to be part of
the same load/store groups when analysing interleaved accesses.
This is fixing pr31900.
Reviewers: HaoLiu, mssimpso, mkuper
Reviewed By: mssimpso, mkuper
Subscribers: llvm-commits, efriedma, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29717
llvm-svn: 295038
block or lambda.
This is a follow-up to r281682, which fixed a bug in computeBlockInfo
where the captured VarDecl's type, rather than the captured field type
of the enclosing lambda or block, was used to compute the layout of a
block.
This commit makes similar changes to enterBlockScope. This is necessary
to correctly determine whether a block capture requires cleanup.
rdar://problem/30388124
llvm-svn: 295034
Summary:
Function isCompatibleIVType is already used as a guard before the call to
SE.getMinusSCEV(OperExpr, PrevExpr);
in LSRInstance::ChainInstruction. getMinusSCEV requires the expressions
to be of the same type, so we now consider two pointers with different
address spaces to be incompatible, since it is possible that the pointers
in fact have different sizes.
Reviewers: qcolombet, eli.friedman
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: nhaehnle, Ka-Ka, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29885
llvm-svn: 295033
Launch policies provided a mechanism for running RPC handlers on a background
thread (unblocking the main RPC receiver thread). Async handlers generalize
this by passing the responder function (the function that sends the RPC return
value) as an argument to the handler. The handler can optionally do its work on
a background thread (the same way launch policies do), but can also (a) can
inspect the call arguments before deciding to run the work on a different
thread, or (b) can use the responder in a subsequent RPC call (e.g. in the
handler of a callAsync), allowing the handler to call back to the originator (or
to a 3rd party) without blocking the listener thread, and without launching a
new thread.
llvm-svn: 295030
It looks like the only use of AddDeallocation is to indirectly call the
destructors of objects. In one case I found
(TypeAliasTemplateDecl::Common), the destructor is a nop, so registering
it to run later seems pointless.
All of the other *::Common types have non-trivial dtors, so deleting the
useless AddDeallocation felt somewhat fragile. Happy to kill it + turn
the is_trivial_dtor check into a static_assert if people think that'd be
better.
llvm-svn: 295029
guide from a constructor.
The purpose of this change is to avoid triggering instantiation of the class
when substituting back into the deduction guide if it uses a typedef member.
We will still instantiate the class if the constructor (explicitly or
implicitly, directly or indirectly) uses the current instantiation in a way
that we can't canonicalize out, but that seems unavoidable.
llvm-svn: 295016
Extend our store promotion code to deal with unordered atomic accesses. Ordered atomics continue to be unhandled.
Most of the change is straight-forward, the only complicated bit is in the reasoning around mixing of atomic and non-atomic memory access. Rather than trying to reason about the complex semantics in these cases, I simply disallowed promotion when both atomic and non-atomic accesses are present. This is conservatively correct.
It seems really tempting to just promote all access to atomics, but the original accesses might have been conditional. Since we can't lower an arbitrary atomic type, it might not be safe to promote all access to atomic. Consider a loop like the following:
while(b) {
load i128 ...
if (can lower i128 atomic)
store atomic i128 ...
else
store i128
}
It could be there's no race on the location and thus the code is perfectly well defined even if we can't lower a i128 atomically.
It's not clear we need to be this conservative - arguably the program above is brocken since it can't be lowered unless the branch is folded - but I didn't want to have to fix any fallout which might result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D15592
llvm-svn: 295015
Previously we could not use it because std::once_flag's default
constructor was not constexpr. Today, all supported versions of VS
correctly mark it constexpr. I confirmed that MSVC 2015 does not emit
any problematic racy dynamic initialization code, so we should be safe
to use this now.
llvm-svn: 295013
Summary:
Adds a new cmake flag 'COMPILER_RT_ENABLE_LSAN_OSX', which enables lsan
compilation and is turned off by default. Patches to fix build errors
when this flag is enabled will be uploaded soon.
This is part of an effort to port LSan to OS X, but LSan on OS X does not
currently work or pass tests currently.
Reviewers: kubamracek, kcc, glider, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: kubamracek
Subscribers: danalbert, srhines, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29783
llvm-svn: 295012
They are a little bit of a special case in the mangling. They are always
mangled without taking into account their virtual-ness of the
destructor. They are also mangled to return void, unlike the actual
destructor.
This fixes PR31931.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29912
llvm-svn: 295010
Simon Pilgrim