Note that most changes to `strings` and `views.span` from the One Ranges
Proposal are no longer applicable:
- free `begin` and `end` functions taking `basic_string_view` and `span`
were removed by [P1870](http://wg21.link/p1870);
- `span::const_iterator` was removed by [LWG3320](https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#3320).
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118687
This started breaking in the CI because we bumped the Clang version
to 15, which requires adjusting the markup in the test suite.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118838
Per Discord discussion, we're normalizing on a simple `!defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)`
so that we can do a big search-and-replace for `!defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)`
back into `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17` when we're ready to abandon support for concept-syntax-less
compilers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118748
There is no reason for the parts of std::span that don't depend on ranges
to be disabled when ranges aren't provided. Also, to make sure the
"no-experimental-stuff" configuration is tested, add a CI job for it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118740
There is no practical difference between `_VSTD` and `std` so we should just remove `_VSTD`. This is the first step.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: jeroen.dobbelaere, wmaxey, EricWF, lebedev.ri, __simt__, dim, mgrang, sstefan1, wenlei, smeenai, libcxx-commits, #libc_vendors
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117811
In D117811 @Quuxplusone pointed out the friend declarations don't need
to be qualified. Removing the qualification should avoid needing to add
a GCC work-around when changing _VSTD to std.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, philnik, #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118719
With this patch there should be no more namespaces without closing comment
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118668
The old `__regex_word` aliased the mask for `xdigit`, causing stray
test failures.
The diff may look surprising, as if the previous faulty value had
been set specifically for Windows - but this is due to a restructuring
in 411c630bae. Prior to that, there
were OS specific settings for some OSes, and one fallback used for
the rest (which turns out to not work for Windows).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118188
In ancient Microsoft C runtimes, there might only have been
a nonstandard `_vsnprintf` instead of the standard `vsnprintf`, but
in modern versions (the only ones relevant for libc++), both
are available.
In MinGW configurations built with `__USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO=1` (as it
is built in CI), `vsnprintf` provides a more standards compliant
behaviour than what Microsoft's CRT provides, while `_vsnprintf` retains
the Microsoft C runtime specific quirks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118187
As discovered in D117817, `std::ranges::input_range<Holder<Incomplete>*[10]>`
hard-errored before this patch. That's because `input_range` requires
`iter_rvalue_reference_t`, which requires `iter_move`, which was
not ADL-proofed.
Add ADL-proofing tests to all the range refinements.
`output_range` and `common_range` shouldn't be affected,
and all the others subsume `input_range` anyway, but we might as
well be thorough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118213
This includes an experimental workaround for
LWG3664 "LWG3392 broke std::ranges::distance(a, a+3)",
but the workaround may be incomplete, I'm not sure.
This should be re-audited when LWG3664 is actually adopted,
to see if we need to change anything about our implementation.
See also https://github.com/microsoft/STL/pull/2500
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117940
Each "Nothing To Do" issue only changed nits in the English wording,
not anything to do with the code.
Each "Complete" issue was completed already, as far as I can tell.
I tried to err on the side of caution: I didn't mark a few issues
whose P/Rs were very invasive and would take time to verify, and I
didn't mark a lot of issues involving features we haven't even started
yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117960
The macro that opts out of `std::ranges::` functionality is called
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`, and is unrelated to this macro
which is specifically about _compiler_ support for the _syntax_.
The only non-mechanical diff here is in `<__config>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118507
I had a look at the changes since the last release and updated the
release notes with interesting changes.
It seems this time the release notes were already rather up to date :-)
If there are more interesting changes, please let me know and I'll
update the patch. I'd like to commit these changes latest next weekend
so they land before branching the 14.0 release.
I've added most active libc++ contributors. If I forgot anybody please add them.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, philnik, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117948
Remove copy and copy assignment rather than have them as private declarations.
They are superfluous given the move and move assignment.
As a drive-by, also specialize `std::hash` without reopening `namespace std`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118502
We previously had a few varied definitions of this floating around.
I had tried to make the one installed with LLVM handle all the cases, and then made the others use it, but this ran into issues with `HandleOutOfTreeLLVM` not working for compiler-rt, and also `CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS` not working right without `CMP0056` set to the new behavior.
My compromise solution is this:
- No not completely deduplicate: the runtime libs will instead use a version that still exists as part of the internal and not installed common shared CMake utilities. This avoids `HandleOutOfTreeLLVM` or a workaround for compiler-rt.
- Continue to use `CMAKE_REQUIRED_FLAGS`, which effects compilation and linking. Maybe this is unnecessary, but it's safer to leave that as a future change. Also means we can avoid `CMP0056` for now, to try out later, which is good incrementality too.
- Call it `llvm_check_compiler_linker_flag` since it, in fact is about both per its implementation (before and after this patch), so there is no name collision.
In the future, we might still enable CMP0056 and make compiler-rt work with HandleOutOfTreeLLVM, which case we delete `llvm_check_compiler_flag` and go back to the old way (as these are, in fact, linking related flags), but that I leave for someone else as future work.
The original issue was reported to me in https://reviews.llvm.org/D116521#3248117 as
D116521 made clang and LLVM use the common cmake utils.
Reviewed By: sebastian-ne, phosek, #libunwind, #libc, #libc_abi, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117537
These were omitted in all Windows configurations, but it turns out
that they work just fine in MinGW mode.
This allows converting a couple cases of "XFAIL: LIBCXX-WINDOWS-FIXME"
into "XFAIL: msvc" as the bug is specific to MSVC mode (clang-cl).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118192
The tests for these are just copy-pasted from the tests for std::{strong,weak,partial}_order,
and then I added an extra clause in each (test_2()) to test the stuff that's not just the same
as std::*_order.
This also includes the fix for https://wg21.link/LWG3465 (which falls naturally out of the
"you must write it three times" style, but I've added test cases for it also).
There is an action item here to go back and give good diagnostics for SFINAE failures
in these CPOs. I've filed this as https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53456 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111514
On targets that have limited atomic support, e.g. ones that define
ATOMIC_*_LOCK_FREE to '1' ("sometimes lock free"), we would end up
referencing yet-undefined __libcpp_{,un}signed_lock_free.
This commit adds a guard to prevent these references for such
targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118391
Mark de Wever