We introduce `polly_mallocManaged` and `polly_freeManaged` as
proxies for `cudaMallocManaged` / `cudaFree`. This is currently not
used by Polly. It is auxiliary code that is used in `COSMO`.
This is useful because `polly_mallocManaged` matches the signature of `malloc`,
while `cudaMallocManaged` does not. We introduce `polly_freeManaged` for
symmetry.
We use this in COSMO to use the unified memory feature of the newer
CUDA APIs (>= 6).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35991
llvm-svn: 309808
Summary:
When compiling for GPU, one can now choose to compile for OpenCL or CUDA,
with the corresponding polly-gpu-runtime flag (libopencl / libcudart). The
GPURuntime library (GPUJIT) has been extended with the OpenCL Runtime library
for that purpose, correctly choosing the corresponding library calls to the
option chosen when compiling (via different initialization calls).
Additionally, a specific GPU Target architecture can now be chosen with -polly-gpu-arch (only nvptx64 implemented thus far).
Reviewers: grosser, bollu, Meinersbur, etherzhhb, singam-sanjay
Reviewed By: grosser, Meinersbur
Subscribers: singam-sanjay, llvm-commits, pollydev, nemanjai, mgorny, yaxunl, Anastasia
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32431
llvm-svn: 302379
This reverts commit 17a84e414adb51ee375d14836d4c2a817b191933.
Patches should have been submitted in the order of:
1. D32852
2. D32854
3. D32431
I mistakenly pushed D32431(3) first. Reverting to push in the correct
order.
llvm-svn: 302217
Summary:
When compiling for GPU, one can now choose to compile for OpenCL or CUDA,
with the corresponding polly-gpu-runtime flag (libopencl / libcudart). The
GPURuntime library (GPUJIT) has been extended with the OpenCL Runtime library
for that purpose, correctly choosing the corresponding library calls to the
option chosen when compiling (via different initialization calls).
Additionally, a specific GPU Target architecture can now be chosen with -polly-gpu-arch (only nvptx64 implemented thus far).
Reviewers: grosser, bollu, Meinersbur, etherzhhb, singam-sanjay
Reviewed By: grosser, Meinersbur
Subscribers: singam-sanjay, llvm-commits, pollydev, nemanjai, mgorny, yaxunl, Anastasia
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32431
llvm-svn: 302215
generation.
This needs changes to GPURuntime to expose synchronization between host
and device.
1. Needs better function naming, I want a better name than
"getOrCreateManagedDeviceArray"
2. DeviceAllocations is used by both the managed memory and the
non-managed memory path. This exploits the fact that the two code paths
are never run together. I'm not sure if this is the best design decision
Reviewed by: PhilippSchaad
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32215
llvm-svn: 301640
Also factor out getArraySize() to avoid code dupliciation and reorder some
function arguments to indicate the direction into which data is transferred.
llvm-svn: 276636
At the beginning of each SCoP, we allocate device arrays for all arrays
used on the GPU and we free such arrays after the SCoP has been executed.
llvm-svn: 276635
This function is currently unused and won't be used in this form again. Instead
of freeing many unrelated items at the same time, we will instead explicitly
call free function from the host-IR we generate for each object we want to free.
These specific free functions will be added together with the corresponding
host-IR generation code.
llvm-svn: 276632
There is no need to expose the selected device at the moment. We also pass back
pointers as return values, as this simplifies the interface.
llvm-svn: 276623
This functionality won't be used in the current iteration. Drop it for now to
reduce the surface of the library. We can always add it back in when we need
it again.
llvm-svn: 276611
There is function is currently unused and will be replaced in the future by
functions that allow to allocate memory only on the host or only on the device.
llvm-svn: 274597
After this commit, polly is clang-format clean. This can be tested with
'ninja polly-check-format'. Updates to clang-format may change this, but the
differences will hopefully be both small and general improvements to the
formatting.
We currently have some not very nice formatting for a couple of items, DEBUG()
stmts for example. I believe the benefit of being clang-format clean outweights
the not perfect layout of this code.
llvm-svn: 177796
Siddharth Bhat