During the review of D111166 I had a private discussion with @ldionne to
avoid the duplication of the C++2b issues in the Ranges and Format
status pages. The main reason for duplicating them is to make it easier to
find them. The title of the paper may not always make it clear to which
project the paper belongs.
This commit removes all LWG-issues from the Ranges and Format status page
and adds labels for these issue in the C++20/C++23 issues list.
A quick scan revealed there are some issues that are missing a label since
they weren't on the ranges issue list. These can be labelled in a separate
commit. In that commit I'll also look for issues for the spaceship operator
and chrono.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111458
Mark LWG3274 as complete. The feature test macro `__cpp_lib_span` was added in
`6d2599e4f776d0cd88438cb82a00c4fc25cc3f67`.
https://wg21.link/p1024 mentions marking `span:::empty()` with
`[[nodiscard]]` which is not done yet. So, do that and add tests.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111516
While looking at LWG-2988 and P0558 it seems the issues were already
implemented, but the synopsis wasn't updated. Some of the tests didn't
validate the `noexcept` status. A few tests were missing completely:
- `atomic_wait_explicit`
- `atomic_notify_one`
- `atomic_notify_all`
Mark P0558 as complete, didn't investigate which version of libc++ first
includes this. It seems the paper has been retroactively applied. I
couldn't find whether this is correct, but looking at cppreference it
seems intended.
Completes
- LWG-2988 Clause 32 cleanup missed one typename
- P0558 Resolving atomic<T> named base class inconsistencies
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103765
Implements the formatter for all fundamental integer types
(except `char`, `wchar_t`, and `bool`).
[format.formatter.spec]/2.3
For each charT, for each cv-unqualified arithmetic type ArithmeticT other
than char, wchar_t, char8_t, char16_t, or char32_t, a specialization
```
template<> struct formatter<ArithmeticT, charT>;
```
This removes the stub implemented in D96664.
As an extension it adds partial support for 128-bit integer types.
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
- P1652 Printf corner cases in std::format
Completes:
- LWG-3248 #b, #B, #o, #x, and #X presentation types misformat negative numbers
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, vitaut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103433
This implements the generic std.format.spec framework for all types.
The Unicode support will be added in a separate patch.
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Completes:
- LWG-3242 std::format: missing rules for arg-id in width and precision
- P1892 Extended locale-specific presentation specifiers for std::format
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, vitaut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103368
This implements the struct `__format_arg_store` and its dependencies:
* the class basic_format_arg,
* the class basic_format_args,
* the class basic_format_context,
* the function make_format_args,
* the function wmake_format_args,
* the function visit_format_arg,
* several Standard required typedefs.
The following parts will be implemented in a later patch:
* the child class `basic_format_arg::handle`,
* the function `basic_format_arg::basic_format_arg(const T* p)`.
The following extension has been implemented:
* the class basic_format_arg supports `__[u]int128_t` on platform where libc++ supports 128 bit integrals.
Implements parts of:
* P0645 Text Formatting
Completes:
* LWG3371 visit_format_arg and make_format_args are not hidden friends
* LWG3542 basic_format_arg mishandles basic_string_view with custom traits
Note https://mordante.github.io/blog/2021/06/05/format.html gives a bit more information about the goals and non-goals of this initial patch series.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, vitaut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103357
Feature test macro for `__cpp_lib_is_nothrow_convertible` was introduced in
466df1718e but the LWG issue was not marked as
`Complete` in the docs. Also, fix the formatting of `Complete` for
LWG 3348.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108964
Mark LWG3348 as complete. The `__cpp_lib_unwrap_ref` feature test macro
was placed in `<functional>` in 466df1718e
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108920
Konstantin Varlamov