MSVC 2013 ships, as part of its STL implementation, a class named
'_Atomic'. This is unfortunate because this keyword is in conflict with
the C11 keyword with the same name. Our solution was to disable this
keyword when targeting MSVC 2013 and reenable it for 2015.
However, this makes it impossible for clang's headers to make use of
_Atomic. This is problematic in the case of libc++ as it makes heavy
use of this keyword.
Let the keywordness of _Atomic float under certain circumstances:
the body of a class named _Atomic, or a class with a base specifier
named _Atomic, will not have the keyword variant of _Atomic for the
duration of the class body. This is sufficient to allow us to correctly
handle _Atomic in the STL while permitting us to use _Atomic as a
keyword everywhere else.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11233
llvm-svn: 242970
We disabled support for _Atomic because the STL had name conflicts,
they've been resolved in 2015. Similarly, reenable char16_t and
char32_t.
llvm-svn: 232611
"protected scope" is very unhelpful here and actively confuses users. Instead,
simply state the nature of the problem in the diagnostic: we cannot jump from
here to there. The notes explain nicely why not.
llvm-svn: 217293
Summary:
This is needed to allow MSVC's <atomic> header to properly parse.
It uses _Atomic as a class-id.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2948
llvm-svn: 202901
Summary:
This avoids false positives from -Wmicrosoft when name lookup would
normally succeed in standard C++. This triggered on a common CRTP
pattern in clang, where a derived class would have a private using decl
to pull in members of a dependent base:
class Verifier : InstVisitor<Verifier> {
private:
using InstVisitor<Verifier>::visit;
...
void anything() {
visit(); // warned here
}
};
Real access checks pass here because we're in the context of the
Verifier, but the -Wmicrosoft extension was just looking for the private
access specifier.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2679
llvm-svn: 201019
MSVC defines size_t without any explicit declarations. This change
allows us to be compatible with TUs that depend on this declaration
appearing from nowhere.
llvm-svn: 199190
It was previously enabled in both but should only have been part of the drop-in
quirks mode that is 'MicrosoftMode' given that it's only useful for
compatibility with the Microsoft headers/runtime.
llvm-svn: 198548
In Microsoft mode, we emit a warning instead of an error.
This fixes a couple of errors when parsing the MSVC 11 RC headers with clang.
llvm-svn: 160613
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
but trivially constructible and destructible variables in C++11 mode. Also
incidentally improve the precision of the wording for jump diagnostics in C++98
mode.
llvm-svn: 142619
This fixes a few errors when parsing MFC code with clang.
BTW clang trunk is now about 5 patches away to be able the parse the default wizard-generated MFC project.
llvm-svn: 140452
For example:
void f(float);
void f(int);
int main {
long a;
f(a);
}
Here, MSVC will call f(int) instead of generating a compile error as clang will do in standard mode.
This fixes a few errors when parsing MFC code with clang.
llvm-svn: 140007
David Majnemer